Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Walton on the Naze Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 Nov 2011
- Name on report verified
Walton on the Naze Primary School
- URN verified
115300
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.12
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.12
- The teacher’s high expectations, along with her skilled questioning, extended their learning very effectively. p.5
- Relationships with parents and carers are strong and this means that they are confident they can leave their children at school, in the knowledge that they will be safe and happy. p.9
- Strong partnerships with parents, carers and the community, along with good levels of care and support for pupils, contribute to its warm and positive family ethos. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school meets my child’s particular needs 90 63 51 35 1 1 0 0 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 79 55 60 42 2 1 0 0 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 84 58 55 38 0 0 0 0 p.11
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.12
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.12
- Questioning is not always effective in extending pupils’ thinking and helping them to take the next steps in their learning. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve children’s progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage by: ensuring that adults engage with children more effectively during independent activities to extend their learning using the information gained from tracking children’s progress to plan activities which challenge them at levels, appropriate to their needs and abilities. p.5
- Strengthen leadership and management by ensuring that school improvement plans focus directly on raising pupils’ achievement and contain clear and measureable success criteria, monitoring procedures and interim benchmarks by which to judge progress towards intended outcomes. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 15
- Words of findings
- 3,506
- about usual (typical 3042)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 16–17 November 2011 Inspection number 379056 Walton on the Naze Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique Reference Number 115300 Local Authority Essex Inspection number 379056 Inspection dates 16–17 November 2011 Reporting inspector Mary Summers
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 225 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jonathan Geldard Headteacher Anne Myatt Date of previous school inspection 24 November 2008 School address Standley Road Walton on the Naze CO14 8PT Telephone number 01255 675657 Fax number 01255 851695 Email address head@walton.essex.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. They visited 14 lessons which were taught by a total of ten teachers. They observed the school’s work, and looked at documents associated with safeguarding procedures and self- evaluation. They examined data and information about pupils’ progress and looked at samples of their work. They also scrutinised improvement plans as well as planning for lessons and the curriculum. Minutes from meetings held by the governing body and monitoring and evaluation reports written by senior leaders as well as the local authority were also examined. Inspectors took account of the views of pupils and of 22 members of staff who had completed questionnaires, as well as the content of 144 questionnaires that had been completed and returned by parents and carers.
p.3
Introduction
The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.
p.3
Introduction
How good is boys’ achievement throughout the school? Is pupils’ progress in mathematics at Key Stage 2 rapid enough? How well does the school meet the needs of more-able pupils? How effective are school leaders in improving the quality of teaching and learning?
p.3
Information about the school
The large majority of pupils who attend this average-sized primary school come from the immediate area, although a few travel from further afield. Almost all pupils are from White British families. The proportion known to be eligible for free school meals is above average. The proportion identified with special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average; many of these have moderate learning difficulties. The school has won a number of national awards in recent years, including Healthy Schools status and the Activemark. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Main findings
Walton on the Naze Primary School gives its pupils a satisfactory education. Strong partnerships with parents, carers and the community, along with good levels of care and support for pupils, contribute to its warm and positive family ethos.
p.4
Main findings
Pupils are known well as individuals and are nurtured carefully throughout their time at school. They grow into enthusiastic young learners who respect one another’s opinions. Pupils’ good behaviour has a positive impact on their learning. They enjoy coming to school, as their active participation in lessons shows. Attendance has improved significantly and is now average. Pupils have a good understanding about how to keep healthy and safe. Parents and carers value all the support that the school offers. One, echoing the views of many, wrote, ‘There isn’t a group of people that I would trust more with my child.’
p.4
Main findings
Achievement is satisfactory in both key stages. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities also achieve satisfactorily. Progress in mathematics, while satisfactory, has been slower than in reading and writing, but the school has implemented a range of initiatives which are beginning to have a positive impact. Progress in both English and mathematics accelerates in Years 5 and 6 because of better teaching. In Years 1 to 4, lessons do not always challenge pupils enough, especially those who are more able. Sometimes learning is hindered by the slow pace of lessons, which results in pupils losing concentration. Although teachers’ questioning is often good in Years 5 and 6 and encourages pupils to develop their thinking and understanding, it is less effective in Years 1 to 4. Opportunities are missed to involve and motivate pupils more effectively by setting them clear short- term targets.
p.4
Main findings
Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make satisfactory progress. They enjoy coming to school and quickly develop good relationships with adults and other children. Progress is tracked appropriately, but the information is not used well enough to plan activities that meet the pupils’ individual needs and abilities closely. Adults do not challenge pupils enough to extend their learning during independent activities.
p.4
Main findings
School leaders have an accurate overview of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, gained through regular observations of lessons and tracking of pupils’ progress. There is a satisfactory drive for improvement and the impact of this can be seen in pupils’ increased progress in mathematics this year. Teaching is improving as a result Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Main findings
of some useful training on ‘active learning’, which has helped teachers plan more practical activities for pupils during lessons. Improvement plans however, lack a clear focus on improving the achievement of specific groups of pupils and do not contain clear and measureable success criteria and milestones along the way to help leaders judge how well they are doing. The school has a satisfactory capacity for sustained improvement.
p.5
Main findings
Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Increase pupils’ progress, especially in Years 1 to 4 by: using assessment information more effectively to plan activities that challenge pupils at different levels, particularly more-able pupils ensuring that lessons move at a fast enough rate, so that pupils do not lose their interest and concentration providing pupils with clear, short-term targets for improvement improving the use of questions to explore pupils’ thinking and extend their understanding.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve children’s progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage by: ensuring that adults engage with children more effectively during independent activities to extend their learning using the information gained from tracking children’s progress to plan activities which challenge them at levels, appropriate to their needs and abilities.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Strengthen leadership and management by ensuring that school improvement plans focus directly on raising pupils’ achievement and contain clear and measureable success criteria, monitoring procedures and interim benchmarks by which to judge progress towards intended outcomes.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Children’s skills levels vary considerably when they start in the Reception Year, but are usually in line with those expected for their age. By the time they leave at the end of Year 6, their attainment is average. Progress in Years 5 and 6 is good because lessons are often challenging, practical and interesting. In one mathematics lesson, for example, the teacher used her recent experience and photographs of a visit to Ghana to challenge pupils to design enclosures to accommodate different animals. Pupils were well motivated and worked well together to calculate the perimeters of different shapes. The teacher’s high expectations, along with her skilled questioning, extended their learning very effectively. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Boys are making better progress than in past years because of a curriculum review which has ensured that topics and resources motivate and interest them more successfully. Boys, as well as girls in Year 4 class, for example, showed great enthusiasm when writing a paragraph about the Roman army. They understood the teacher’s clear success criteria about using dynamic openings for sentences and used their previous research as the basis for their writing.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are identified and supported quickly. Their progress is satisfactory and often good in the older classes, because then additional support is directed more closely.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Pupils support and encourage each other at work and at play. They reflect maturely, for example, considering the impact of flooding in Asia, writing moving poems to express their feelings. They take on a range of different responsibilities in the school, for example, as librarians and school councillors, and regularly participate in community events, such as the Remembrance Day parade. They have a good knowledge of cultures and communities outside their own experience.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress The extent to which pupils feel safe 2 Pupils’ behaviour 2 The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 2 The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1 The extent of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2
p.6
How effective is the provision?
Teachers, usually, make it clear to pupils at the start of lessons exactly what they will be learning and this helps the pupils to focus on the task in hand. They use
p.6
How effective is the provision?
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
How effective is the provision?
interactive whiteboards to illustrate different teaching points and encourage pupils to discuss their work in pairs and small groups. In a good lesson in a Year 5 and 6 class, for example, pupils examined a range of illustrations and paragraphs to help them understand the features and structure of an explanation text. They worked very well in groups to put these in order, challenging each other to explain the reasons for their choices. Effective questioning by the teacher encouraged them to think carefully about their decisions and also helped her to check their progress and address any misconceptions.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
Teaching is less consistent in Years 1 to 4; sometimes, more-able pupils find the work too easy and make limited progress. Questioning is not always effective in extending pupils’ thinking and helping them to take the next steps in their learning. Occasionally, pupils spend too much time listening passively to teachers, rather than being actively engaged in learning.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
The good curriculum supports pupils’ personal development well. The current arrangement for teaching Year 5 and 6 pupils in mixed-age groups for mathematics is having a positive impact on their achievement. A recent review has made the curriculum more interesting and relevant to pupils, especially boys, who talk enthusiastically about their work on the Romans or their research into Australian culture. The new curriculum is helping pupils to develop their literacy, numeracy and computer skills well in different subjects. Year 5 and 6 pupils, for example, wrote clear instructions about how to play a didgeridoo and how to make a boomerang. Effective partnerships with local organisations provide useful opportunities for pupils to extend their academic, creative and sporting skills. Pupils appreciate the wide variety of clubs on offer, such as Wii-fit, tri-golf, German and choir. A good range of local visits enables pupils to develop their historical and geographical knowledge of
p.7
How effective is the provision?
Pupils are cared for well in school. Learning mentors provide a valuable service, helping pupils to attend school regularly and maintain good behaviour. Good links with the local secondary school mean that transition arrangements are well established, so that pupils transfer confidently at the end of Year 6. The school is quick to identify pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and provide appropriate emotional or academic support. Those pupils’ individual learning plans are satisfactory, but, sometimes, targets for improvement provide insufficient challenge for them. There are satisfactory systems in place to encourage regular attendance and the school continues to work with parents and carers of pupils whose attendance causes concern. The breakfast club offers good levels of care to children, providing a warm, happy atmosphere, where children enjoy a good start to the school day.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
These are the grades for the quality of provision The quality of teaching Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
How effective is the provision?
The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 2
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
The leadership team is giving a satisfactory steer to the school’s work and there is a clear focus on securing improvement. Senior leaders implemented a number of initiatives successfully, which are contributing well to improvements in pupils’ attainment in mathematics and in teaching generally. They monitor teaching effectively through observing lessons, examining lesson plans and pupils’ work. However, school improvement plans lack explicit guidance to ensure that everyone understands their roles and responsibilities in evaluating the school’s performance and driving improvement.
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
Parents and carers develop good levels of trust in the staff because of the strong partnerships that exist between them and the school. The headteacher enjoys very good support from parents and carers. Regular consultation evenings provide good opportunities for parents and carers to find out about their children’s progress and these are supplemented by extremely informative annual progress reports. The reports provide very clear individual targets for pupils, but opportunities are missed to follow up on these in subsequent lessons and involve pupils more closely in their own learning and development. Good partnerships with a wide range of schools and other agencies have provided effective opportunities for pupils to engage in competitions, projects and visits to support their academic and personal development. Recent, effective support from the local authority has been very helpful in helping the school improve the way it tracks and analyses pupils' progress.
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
Governance is satisfactory. The governing body is supportive and has a reasonable understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. It is presently reviewing its systems to ensure that it gains a more thorough understanding of the school’s work.
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
Safeguarding procedures are good. There are very well-organised arrangements to ensure that pupils are safe at school. Policies and procedures are robust and reviewed regularly and management systems are clearly defined. Staff promote equality of opportunity satisfactorily. Senior staff are now able to track the progress of different groups of pupils to identify underachievement. Instances of racist behaviour are rare and procedures are in place to ensure that any which arise are tackled promptly. The school promotes community cohesion well. There is a strong feeling of community within the school and locality and links with communities overseas, for example a school in Ghana, are developing well.
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
These are the grades for leadership and management
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and 3 Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
driving improvement Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met The effectiveness of the school’s engagement with parents and carers 2 The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 2 The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 2 The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 2 The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money
p.9
Early Years Foundation Stage
Children settle in quickly to the Reception Year and begin to develop their confidence and independence. The atmosphere in the Early Years Foundation Stage is warm and inviting and children come into school happily each morning, ready to engage in all the activities provided for them. Relationships with parents and carers are strong and this means that they are confident they can leave their children at school, in the knowledge that they will be safe and happy. There are effective systems in place to ensure that they transfer easily from pre-school playgroups.
p.9
Early Years Foundation Stage
Children enjoy a satisfactory range of activities that are directed by adults and some that they choose for themselves. Activities led by adults are mostly effective, enabling children to develop their phonic knowedge and number awareness well. They are less successful in encouraging children to develop their creativity and imagination, as, often, they are over-directed by adults. Adults check children’s progress regularly, but do not use the information well enough to ensure that activities challenge children of different abilities. Consequently, some children, especially the more-able, do not make as much progress as they should. Children like choosing activities for themselves, but their learning is hindered by the fact that adults do not interact with them sufficiently, to challenge their thinking and extend their language.
p.9
Early Years Foundation Stage
These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.9
Views of parents and carers
The proportion of parental questionnaires returned was higher than average. Those who responded are extremely positive about the school’s work. All say that they are happy with their children’s experience at school and that the school takes account of their suggestions and concerns. Virtually all agree that their children are kept safe, that their children’s needs are met effectively and they are kept well informed about their progress. Many parents and carers wrote that they valued particularly the way that school staff respond very quickly to any concerns raised. These positive views were endorsed by inspection findings.
p.10
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Walton on the Naze Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 144 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 225 pupils registered at the school.
p.11
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 97 67 45 31 1 1 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 108 75 33 23 1 1 0 0 The school informs me about my child’s progress 94 65 48 33 1 1 0 0 My child is making enough progress at this school 95 66 44 31 3 2 0 0 The teaching is good at this school 104 72 39 27 0 0 0 0 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 92 64 46 32 5 3 0 0 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 82 57 58 40 2 1 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 82 57 55 38 0 0 0 0
p.11
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
The school meets my child’s particular needs 90 63 51 35 1 1 0 0 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 79 55 60 42 2 1 0 0 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 84 58 55 38 0 0 0 0
p.11
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
The school is led and managed effectively 109 76 33 23 0 0 1 1 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 117 81 27 19 0 0 0 0
p.11
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.12
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9
p.12
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5
p.12
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.
p.13
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.13
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.13
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.13
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.13
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be. The school’s capacity for sustained improvement. Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils. The quality of teaching. The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
p.13
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.13
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.14
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
Inspection of Walton on the Naze Primary School , Walton on the Naze ,
p.14
CO14 8PT
Thank you so much for welcoming us recently to your school and giving us your opinions about the school. Your views in the questionnaire and everything else that we saw helped us to get to know your school and how well it works. You go to a satisfactory school. Here are some of the things we liked best.
p.14
CO14 8PT
You work hard in class and behave well. You understand how to keep safe, healthy and fit. You are keen to learn about different countries and cultures. The adults look after you well and arrange a wide range of activities to make learning exciting. The school works very well with your parents to make sure you are all focused on learning.
p.14
CO14 8PT
There are a few things that could be even better. We have asked teachers to set work at the right levels, not too easy and not too hard, so you can all make faster progress. We have asked them to set you individual targets for improvement. We think that the lessons in some classes could move more quickly, so that you don’t lose your concentration. We have asked the teachers to make sure they ask you questions that make you think hard. We think that the adults in the Reception class could spend more time talking with children, encouraging them to think more carefully about what they are learning. We have asked them to use the information they get from checking children’s progress to plan activities that will help them improve. Finally, we have asked the headteacher and governing body to write more detailed plans to ensure that things improve more quickly. You can all play your part in helping your school become better by making sure you work hard, behave well
p.14
CO14 8PT
and attend school every day unless you are ill.
p.14
CO14 8PT
Mary Summers Lead inspector (on bhehalf of the inspection team) procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.14
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion