Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Southfield Junior School

Inspected 11 Nov 2011 · published 2 Dec 2011 · URN 137460

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Nov 2011

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Southfield Junior School

  • URN verified

    137460

Page 1 of 13
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivemake good progresseffectivelyoutstandingeffectivesuccessfulstrengthsexcellent
Criticisminadequateconcernsnot yetunacceptableweaknessesconcernnot effectivelylow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1669w+67
  • Leadership321w+39
  • What needs to improve739w+32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
13
Words of findings
2,722
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%Leadership 9%What needs to improve 21%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Age group 7–11 Inspection date(s) 10–11 November 2011 Inspection number 386090 Southfield Junior School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 137460 Local Authority N/A Inspection number 386090 Inspection dates 10–11 November 2011 Reporting inspector David Carrington

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Academy Convertor Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 227 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Norman Edwards Headteacher Nicola Anderton Date of previous school inspection No previous inspection School address Shrivenham Road Highworth Swindon SN6 7BZ Telephone number 01793 762210 Fax number 01793 762210 Email address head@southfield-jun.swindon.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. They observed 10 lessons led by eight teachers. Meetings were held with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, senior leaders and members of the governing body. The inspectors observed the school’s work, and looked at school planning, assessment data, pupils’ work, the school’s checks on the quality of teaching and a number of policy documents. The team received 91 questionnaires from parents and carers and also evaluated those from pupils and the school staff.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 How far key leaders and the governing body have set highly challenging targets for achievement and the success so far in meeting them.  How effectively the system of assessment and the use of its resulting data support pupils in increasing their achievement.  Whether partnerships with other groups internationally are effective enough to foster good cultural development.

p.3

Information about the school

This is an average size junior school. There are few pupils from minority ethnic groups or who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is average. The most common of these needs is some form of learning difficulty. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is well below average. The school has Eco Schools and Healthy Schools status.

p.3

Information about the school

The school has not previously been inspected since changing its status in September 2011 to an academy. At the same time, a new headteacher and deputy headteacher took up post. The senior leadership team is also new, as are a number of members of staff.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Southfield Junior is a good school. The new leadership team has made a very successful start by preserving the strengths of its predecessor and in promptly making changes to boost pupils’ achievement. The governing body has a very accurate perception of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and, crucially during this period of significant change, is probing in its analysis of the school’s performance. The updated priorities for school improvement focus squarely on the essential next steps for the school. Pupils enjoy coming to school, work hard, make good progress and are proud of their achievements.

p.4

Main findings

Attainment is above average and is rising. The work in books across all four years is well presented, spelt accurately and shows good productivity. Some writing is of excellent quality. Mathematically, the focus is as much on the ability to solve problems and make investigations as it is on arithmetical skill. The pupils do well in these aspects of the subject. The more-able pupils are, like the other pupils, set demanding targets. Those with special educational needs and/or disabilities enjoy their learning and are enthused to make good progress. These good achievements stem from well-taught lessons, high expectations of work and behaviour, and effective use of resources, particularly teaching and non-teaching staff, and time.

p.4

Main findings

Pupils respond well in lessons, and their good behaviour extends to other activities in the school day. They have good alertness to healthy lifestyles and feel safe and secure in school. They have very good opportunities to contribute to the local community, although their links with people of different backgrounds further afield, especially overseas, are not as marked. Thus, the promotion of community cohesion is satisfactory rather than good.

p.4

Main findings

The curriculum is well planned, broad and relevant. School leaders are working to extend its focus on creativity, make it more exciting, develop more out-of-school activities and strengthen links between subjects. The school provides good care, guidance and support for pupils, particularly those with barriers to learning.

p.4

Main findings

All staff and members of the governing body are ambitious for the school’s future as an academy. The headteacher and deputy headteacher have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and areas in need of development, and provide a strong drive for improvement. They have good understanding of the views of parents and carers, who in the main are well engaged in the education of their children and appreciative of the school’s work. The careful auditing of the views of

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

others is a significant factor in the realistic improvement priorities at present. There is good capacity to improve in the future.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve pupils’ attainment and progress by developing the curriculum so it consistently  increases pupils’ creativity in learning  promotes pupils’ great enthusiasm and excitement about learning  provides a well-balanced programme of out-of-school activities  includes stronger links between subjects.  Improve the effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion by strengthening the opportunities for pupils to communicate with people of different cultures, beliefs and traditions, especially overseas.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The above average attainment of pupils is evident from not only the data tracking their progress but equally in lessons and pupils’ books. Key groups of pupils who may from time to time in the past have progressed less effectively have been the focus of successful improvement work. Thus, the girls are achieving as well as boys. While in some classes girls tend to be quieter than the boys, they nonetheless work just as well and reach similar attainment levels. The same holds for the very few pupils from Indian family backgrounds. There are currently some highly achieving pupils among them. Pupils who speak English as an additional language also make good progress. In some cases, their achievement in mathematics exceeds that in English, but they are keen to learn new language skills and develop the necessary fluency well.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Achievement in writing has been a recent improvement priority in order to raise attainment. The school has had considerable success in meeting this priority. Among the sometimes impressive writing in books, a Year 3 pupil recounting a day in school wrote: ‘I was working in my literacy book on a story about a disaster, meanwhile my friend next to me whispered in my ear ‘You’re a bad writer, you have spelt ‘writer’ wrong.’.’

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Pupils are well prepared for the next stage in their education because they achieve well. They are also enterprising. Through their own research and presentation skills, Year 5 have been able to convince local government not to close the nearby recreation ground. The Eco Schools award is upheld by pupils’ great concern for the environment. They understand the need to use resources responsibly, to recycle where possible and to take care of the local area.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The quality of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Pupils’ good achievements in music contribute well to their cultural understanding. Singing is a particular talent, as shown when the pupils recorded their latest Christmas compact disc. Pupils’ multicultural awareness is not yet as well developed. The

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

programme of visits to different places of worship such as the Gurdwalla helps broaden their empathy with other groups but such links are not yet frequent enough. Despite this, the pupils help each other to do well in school. The ‘buddy’ system is viewed warmly by the pupils as a way of supporting each other when difficulties occur.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes

p.6

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

contribute to their future economic well-being

Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1

p.6

How effective is the provision?

School staff are working effectively to ensure that the tradition of above average attainment in its predecessor school is being maintained. In fact, the emphasis is on even higher attainment and the acceleration of progress. The results so far are positive. Pupils have a thirst for learning and, because behaviour is settled in class, the conditions for good achievement are in place. The quality of teaching is good. On occasion, teachers talk for too long, which reduces pupils’ concentration and interest. When the pupils have the time and opportunity to work at practical or investigational tasks, their interest redoubles. Many lessons include such opportunities and pupils then maturely manage their own learning, work well in partnership with other pupils and complete their tasks in good time.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The use of assessment to support learning is good. The progress of pupils is tracked carefully to ensure they meet their challenging academic targets. Classrooms display clearly the targets for achievement, lessons are used well to review learning and identify the next steps. Much of the marking of books includes helpful comments on what has been achieved and what must come next, although this is not consistent in

p.6

How effective is the provision?

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

The contrast in effectiveness between teacher-dominated and pupil-focused learning has been identified as a reason why the curriculum deserves improvement. The emphasis on pupil-centred learning is a key criteria of the curriculum to be introduced in spring 2012. Parents’ and carers’ comments about homework, out-of- school activities, particularly sports, and excitement in learning have also been taken into account in planning the new approach. Parents and carers are well involved in measures to ensure good care, guidance and support for their children. Outside agencies are similarly included, providing effective support to ensure pupils attend regularly and are able to take a full part in lessons and other school events.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

Although it is early in the term of office for the headteacher and deputy headteacher, they have made a successful start. They quickly identified their own priorities for improvement, based on accurate assessment of pupils’ achievement, thorough tracking of progress and good procedures to check the effectiveness of the school’s work. Already a number of improvement initiatives are proving positive. The ‘Going for Gold’ approach to the achievement of challenging academic targets is prominently displayed in every classroom. It is used as the basis for curriculum and individual lesson planning, which is resulting in provision that is focused more on best achievement by all pupils. The approach is not yet written as a key element of the school improvement plan, although the governing body is alert to the need for this.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The governing body has good expertise and experience to challenge constructively school leaders about how well the school is improving. Its business is conducted efficiently, ensuring, for example, that the school is responsive to demands about the safeguarding of pupils. Because the governing body ensures the school abides by the most recent guidance, keeps training and documentation up to date and that all adults in school are watchful, safeguarding is good. The governing body also pursues the promotion of community cohesion appropriately. At present, the focus on life, culture, faith and tradition in different societies overseas is not comprehensive. In answer, school leaders have firm, recorded improvement priorities for the development of direct links between the pupils and those in a school in The Gambia.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

Pupils are provided with good equality of opportunity, whether academically or

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

socially. They do well in school. There is no tolerance of any form of discrimination, bullying or prejudice. The pupils are testament to this in their attitudes, helpfulness and behaviour towards others.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

driving improvement

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Views of parents and carers

About one third of parents and carers responded to the questionnaire, which is towards the upper end of an average return. Generally, they show positive views of the school, whether recorded in the ticks on the questionnaire or their comments. A very small minority of parents and carers were concerned about the progress their children were making and a few did not agree that the school took account of their views. There were some written comments showing concerns about the effectiveness of homework, especially the usefulness of the ‘learning logs’ and their children’s excitement in learning. Inspection evidence indicates that both senior leaders and the governing body are aware of these issues and have appropriate plans for improvement.

p.8

Views of parents and carers

In contrast to the concerns, there were at least as many parents and carers who wrote positively about the school. They noted the approachability of staff, including the new headteacher, in listening to and responding to their views. Several commented on the improvements introduced this term by the new headteacher. Additionally, parents and carers of the youngest pupils in school are clear in their praise for the school’s efforts to welcome and settle them into good learning. These positive thoughts tally with the evidence from inspection.

p.8

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Southfield Junior School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 91 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 227 pupils registered at the school.

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 60 66 29 32 0 0 1 1 The school keeps my child safe 60 66 31 34 0 0 0 0 The school informs me about my child’s progress 37 41 41 45 12 13 0 0 My child is making enough progress at this school 34 37 48 53 6 7 2 2 The teaching is good at this school 38 42 48 53 3 3 1 1 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 28 31 51 56 10 11 1 1 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 29 32 59 65 2 2 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 31 34 52 57 0 0 1 1 The school meets my child’s particular needs 38 42 42 46 7 8 1 1 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 30 33 46 51 8 9 1 1 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 26 29 43 47 11 12 0 0 The school is led and managed effectively 43 47 33 36 4 4 1 1

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 50 55 30 33 3 3 2 2

p.9

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.9

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.10

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9

p.10

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5

p.10

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.  The school’s capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.11

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.12

Inspection of Southfield Junior School, Highworth SN6 7BZ

Thank you for the warm welcome you gave us when we visited your school recently. You were helpful and shared your ideas about the school willingly. We have written a report to show how well the school is doing. In it, you will read about a number of strengths. The main ones are:  Southfield Junior is a good school.  You do well in your work and make good progress.  You are well behaved, take good care of each other and enjoy school.  You are well taught.  You feel safe in school because you are well looked after.  Your new headteacher and deputy headteacher have made a good start to improving the school further.  All the adults in school want to help you do even better.

p.12

Inspection of Southfield Junior School, Highworth SN6 7BZ

To help the school improve your education, we have identified two things for your teachers to work on now.  Make your curriculum more exciting so you always learn new things in an interesting way.  Give you more chances to find out about the beliefs, culture and lives of children in other countries.

p.12

Inspection of Southfield Junior School, Highworth SN6 7BZ

We know you will help make these improvements. All of you can start by making a list of what makes the best lesson. Share it with your parents, carers and teachers.

p.12

from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy

of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion