Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
The Meads Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Oct 2011
- Inspectorssingle source
Philip Mann
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Name on report verified
The Meads Primary School
- URN verified
109558
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.11
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.11
- Combined with the excellent promotion of community cohesion, they provide solid foundations for pupils’ achievement and ensure good value for money. p.4
- For instance, in an outstanding science lesson in Year 4, pupils in pairs used a netbook computer with enthusiasm to research information about friction. p.6
- This provided excellent opportunities for the development of their literacy and interpersonal skills while undertaking scientific enquiry. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school meets my child’s particular needs 52 34 87 57 6 4 2 1 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 43 28 92 60 8 5 2 1 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 39 25 88 58 16 10 3 2 p.10
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.11
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.11
- However, standards in writing are not as high because of gaps in the pupils’ knowledge of Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Further raise standards in reading and writing by: implementing an effective strategy for the teaching of phonics within the school encouraging the pupils to write in a neat cursive style at the earliest opportunity. p.5
- Ensure that all teaching is consistently good or better throughout the school by: increasing the pace of learning in lessons making sure that teachers use technology and resources effectively to support their teaching and engage pupils in the review of their learning. p.5
- Enable middle managers to play a full part in school self-evaluation and improvement. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 14
- Words of findings
- 3,530
- about usual (typical 2920)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 18–19 October 2011 Inspection number 377942 The Meads Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique Reference Number 109558 Local Authority Luton Inspection number 377942 Inspection dates 18–19 October 2011 Reporting inspector Philip Mann HMI
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 436 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Cindy Williams Headteacher Richard Jenkins Date of previous school inspection 10 December 2008 School address Sawtry Close Luton LU3 2UE Telephone number 01582 490905 Fax number 01582 591343 Email address meads.primary.admin@luton.gov.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial tea cher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and three additional inspectors. They observed 18 teachers teaching 23 lessons. Several shorter observations of teaching and learning in Key Stages 1 and 2 were undertaken. Meetings were held with parents and carers, groups of pupils, governors, staff and the headteacher, deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher. Inspectors observed the school’s work, and looked at the school’s documentation related to safeguarding, improvement plans, records of pupils’ progress, the monitoring of teaching and pupils’ work. Inspectors analysed 153 questionnaires from parents and carers.
p.3
Introduction
The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.
p.3
Introduction
How effectively is the school raising standards in writing? Are teachers providing more able pupils with sufficient levels of challenge to ensure that they achieve well in lessons? How effectively are teachers using marking to inform pupils about what they need to do next to improve? How effective has school leadership been in addressing inconsistencies in teaching and learning across the school? How effectively are school leaders using self-evaluation and monitoring to eliminate gaps in achievement to improve outcomes further and especially that of girls?
p.3
Information about the school
The school is above average in size and serves the northern side of Luton and other areas of central Luton from which pupils travel to school by bus. It is rapidly growing as a result of a major building programme. Just over half the pupils are White British and almost half come from minority ethnic backgrounds. The number of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above average and increasing. The proportion of pupils identified as having special educational needs and/or disabilities is broadly average. More pupils join or leave the school during the year than in most schools because of mobility in the local population. The school continues to hold Healthy Schools status.
p.3
Information about the school
A new headteacher is in post following a period of uncertainty regarding school leadership after the previous inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Main findings
This is a good school that has benefited from well-focused and determined leadership through a period of significant change. The headteacher has instilled a sense of purpose among the staff and teamwork is a strength. Together with the staff he has established a very positive climate for learning based on a well understood set of core values. These are shared very effectively during assemblies and through everything the school does. Combined with the excellent promotion of community cohesion, they provide solid foundations for pupils’ achievement and ensure good value for money. Many parents and carers agree with the views of inspectors. Comments such as, ‘The school has come on leaps and bounds in the last 18 months due to the new headteacher’ reflect the views of many about the quality of school leadership following a period of uncertainty after the last inspection.
p.4
Main findings
Pupils are keen to come to Meads Primary School and the vast majority of pupils demonstrate very positive attitudes towards learning. Many teachers work hard to make learning enjoyable and worthwhile and pupils respond well to this. Behaviour is good throughout the school. Relationships between pupils and adults and among pupils themselves are extremely positive. This is because core values such as tolerance, listening to the views of others and the celebration of diversity are covered comprehensively within the school’s outstanding provision for the pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils appreciate the good levels of care, guidance and support provided for them. Those pupils who have difficulty in behaving well respond positively to carefully-targeted adult support.
p.4
Main findings
Inspectors observed good or better teaching in over half of the lessons seen and characteristics of good provision were noted in several other visits into the classrooms. Good levels of consistency in planning, display and the establishment of a positive climate for learning exist in all the classrooms. These factors contribute effectively to positive learning experiences for pupils. However, in those lessons judged satisfactory, teachers place too much emphasis on talking at length to the pupils rather than using technology to engage the pupils more actively in their learning. This weaker teaching is being addressed effectively by the headteacher and senior leaders. The school has recognised that a more structured approach to the teaching of phonics is needed to facilitate better outcomes for pupils in literacy. Achievement in numeracy is good. The quality of marking is good and an improvement on the findings of the last inspection. Teachers’ comments are detailed
p.4
Main findings
and used well to set further challenges for all pupils in their literacy and numeracy books before they go onto their next task. Pupils say that they find the teachers’ Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Main findings
comments very useful and many enter into little written conversations with their teacher about their work. This contributes effectively to the very positive climate for learning found around the school.
p.5
Main findings
Governance is good. Governors are very supportive of the school and demonstrate a good understanding of its strengths and areas for development. Access to good data now provides them with good opportunities to monitor the school’s performance and ask challenging questions of school leaders about possible areas for improvement. Safeguarding procedures are robust. Strong partnerships have been established with a number of other key partners and organisations to enhance the overall quality of provision and make effective use of limited resources. Self-evaluation is accurate because school leaders regularly monitor the quality of provision and use it to inform planning for school improvement. An improving trend in pupils’ standards as a result of these actions is now clearly evident and shows capacity for sustained improvement is good. However, middle managers and those with subject responsibilities are yet to play a significant role in this drive for improvement.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Further raise standards in reading and writing by: implementing an effective strategy for the teaching of phonics within the school encouraging the pupils to write in a neat cursive style at the earliest opportunity.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that all teaching is consistently good or better throughout the school by: increasing the pace of learning in lessons making sure that teachers use technology and resources effectively to support their teaching and engage pupils in the review of their learning.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Enable middle managers to play a full part in school self-evaluation and improvement.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Achievement is good. From below average starting points in language and communication, pupils reach standards that are average and rising at the end of Key Stage 2 in English and mathematics. Levels of pupil mobility are high and a growing number of pupils who are at the early stages of speaking English are joining the school in all year groups. This makes it harder for the school to achieve higher standards by the end of Key Stage 2. However, closer inspection of accurate data related to the performance of the Year 6 pupils who started in Year 3 and took the 2011 national tests, confirms above average attainment in mathematics, where a quarter of pupils attained the higher Level 5. This pattern of improvement is reflected in the predicted outcomes for the current Year 6 pupils. However, standards in writing are not as high because of gaps in the pupils’ knowledge of Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
letter sounds and the application of this in their reading and spelling of unfamiliar words. Furthermore, the pupils’ writing and presentation in their books is untidy and many do not write in a consistent, cursive style. This limits the ability of older pupils to write quickly and at length.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Positive outcomes related to the quality of the pupils’ learning experiences are becoming increasingly more evident in lessons. For instance, in an outstanding science lesson in Year 4, pupils in pairs used a netbook computer with enthusiasm to research information about friction. This provided excellent opportunities for the development of their literacy and interpersonal skills while undertaking scientific enquiry. Such high quality learning is not evident in all lessons in other year groups. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language make good progress because of the teachers’ ability to match work to prior attainment. Good levels of challenge are provided for more able pupils in many lessons. Those from minority ethnic groups achieve well because overall provision meets their needs well and diversity is celebrated fully.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Pupils demonstrate a clear sense of enjoyment in being at school because their teachers plan many interesting things for them to do in lessons such as being a Roman soldier as part of a historical enactment in the playground. One pupil in Year 6 stated that, ‘I wake up and can’t wait to get into school and learn something new! This week we are learning how to paint in art.’ Girls respond well to teachers’ questions and their achievement is good. Behaviour is good in lessons, around the school and in the playground. Pupils say that when the few incidents of bullying do occur they are confident that they are dealt with by senior staff effectively. Pupils are very respectful of each other; they are polite and conduct themselves well. Pupils know how to keep themselves healthy and safe because these important topics are covered well. For instance, they demonstrate a very good understanding of issues related to road safety because of close links with the local community support officer
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
and cycling safety courses. The school council provides good opportunities for the pupils to have a voice in the future development of the school.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress The extent to which pupils feel safe 2 Pupils’ behaviour 2 The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 2
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 2 The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1 The extent of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1
p.7
How effective is the provision?
Teaching and learning are good. The vast majority of teachers make clear to pupils what they are going to learn next and what is expected of them at the end of the lesson. Teachers in the good or better lessons use digital visualisers, interactive whiteboards and questions well to review the progress of the pupils’ learning during the lessons and facilitate good pace to their teaching. These strengths in teaching are not often evident in the lessons graded satisfactory. In these lessons, teachers talk too much and make very little use of technology to support teaching. Pupils’ progress in these lessons is slower as a result. Procedures for the assessment of pupils’ progress are good. Data are used effectively to identify gaps in achievement and ensure work is carefully matched to pupils’ ability.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
A vibrant and exciting curriculum supports the pupils’ learning well. A good focus is placed on the teaching of literacy and numeracy. The range of pupils’ writing experiences is good. This is an improvement on the findings of the previous inspection. However, there is no structured approach to the teaching of phonics across the school. This limits the rate at which pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities and the growing number who speak English as an additional language, can achieve in literacy. The teaching of French and a wide range of extra-curricular activities outside lessons, however, provide good levels of enrichment.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
The care, guidance and support for pupils are good. The benefits of good attendance are promoted well. Detailed policies and procedures are in place to ensure that pupils remain safe and protected at school and especially when using the internet for research in lessons. Effective marking provides pupils with good levels of guidance in their literacy and numeracy books. As a result, they can talk confidently about what they need to do next to improve. The most vulnerable pupils and those who are looked after are provided with sensitive and effective support to ensure that they achieve well.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
These are the grades for the quality of provision The quality of teaching Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where 2 Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
How effective is the provision?
relevant, through partnerships The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 2
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
The headteacher and senior leaders demonstrate the necessary drive and ambition to develop the school and raise standards further. The school expansion has been managed very well. A very positive climate for learning has been quickly established through the sharing of common values by pupils and staff alike. Teamwork is a strength and staff share a common purpose. The monitoring of teaching and learning is rigorous and systematic. Weaker teaching is tackled robustly by the headteacher and senior staff, and detailed support plans effectively facilitate improvement in teaching competencies. As a result, there are greater levels of consistency in teaching quality in both year groups and across the key stages. Parents, carers and pupils comment positively about these improvements.
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
Challenging targets are set, based on accurate self-evaluation, informed by regular and focused monitoring by the headteacher and governing body. The correct priorities for further development are highlighted within a comprehensive plan for school improvement. The involvement of subject leaders in this process is less well developed. The promotion of equality and diversity is good and data are used well to identify any gaps in achievement and tackle any discrimination. This is resulting in an improving trend in pupils’ outcomes overall but standards in writing still lag behind those in mathematics. The promotion of community cohesion is excellent. The school has established strong links with other local schools, representatives from different faith groups and the local community. Links are being established with schools in Bangladesh and Nepal. Older pupils will be visiting France with another Luton school
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
Safeguarding procedures are applied effectively to ensure that all staff and volunteers working with the pupils are properly vetted. Governors take seriously their responsibilities for the oversight of risk assessment and health and safety.
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
These are the grades for leadership and management The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met The effectiveness of the school’s engagement with parents and carers 2 The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 2 The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and 2 Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
tackles discrimination The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 2 The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 1 The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money
p.9
Early Years Foundation Stage
Children make good progress in their learning from their starting points. They settle in well to school routines because of well organised induction arrangements and good adult care and support. As a result, children feel safe and enjoy their learning. The staff provide an exciting range of activities inside and out. Activities outside mirror those planned for indoors and children demonstrate enjoyment in their learning and play. This is an improvement on the previous inspection. Behaviour is good. The children co-operate well with each other in sharing toys on the carpet or books in the reading areas. Detailed safeguarding policies and procedures ensure that children are protected and well supported. There are effective partnerships with parents, carers, other agencies and providers of childcare. Leadership and management are good and clearly focused on driving forward improvements in provision to raise the achievement of the children. Self-evaluation is effective at
p.9
Early Years Foundation Stage
identifying strengths and areas for further development. Resources are generally well deployed to improve outcomes for all children.
p.9
Early Years Foundation Stage
These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage
p.9
Views of parents and carers
Many parents and carers feel that the school is being led and managed well and inspection evidence corroborates this. Some parents and carers expressed concern about the quality of communication between school and home. Inspectors looked at this closely and found that the school is making every effort to include parents and carers in their children’s learning and in what is going on at school. Many parents and carers felt that the school is a harmonious community where their children want to be. Inspectors found strong evidence to support this view.
p.9
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at The Meads Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 153 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 436 pupils registered at the school.
p.10
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 84 55 64 42 2 1 2 1 The school keeps my child safe 76 50 72 47 2 1 1 1 The school informs me about my child’s progress 44 29 93 61 11 7 1 1 My child is making enough progress at this school 44 29 93 61 10 7 0 0 The teaching is good at this school 52 34 96 63 2 1 0 0 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 50 33 89 58 10 7 1 1 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 51 33 94 61 3 2 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 53 35 86 56 7 5 0 0
p.10
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
The school meets my child’s particular needs 52 34 87 57 6 4 2 1 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 43 28 92 60 8 5 2 1 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 39 25 88 58 16 10 3 2
p.10
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
The school is led and managed effectively 51 33 92 60 3 2 0 0 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 68 44 80 52 3 2 0 0
p.10
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be. The school’s capacity for sustained improvement. Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils. The quality of teaching. The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.12
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.13
Inspection of The Meads Primary School, Luton, LU3 2UE
I would like to thank you all on behalf of the inspection team for making us all feel so welcome. We really enjoyed visiting your school and were very impressed with your attitudes towards learning, good behaviour and how much you enjoy being at school. Your school has improved in many ways since it was last inspected. It is now a good school with some things that make it stand out above others. In particular, we were very impressed in the way your headteacher has led the school through a period of change to ensure it becomes one happy community where the views and backgrounds of everyone are respected and valued.
p.13
Inspection of The Meads Primary School, Luton, LU3 2UE
The teachers are working hard to make sure that lessons are interesting for you and learning is fun. In many lessons this is the case. In some classes, the lessons are not as good as the best in the school. This is because sometimes these lessons are too slow and the teachers are not using technology and computers enough to help you in your learning. This is something that I have asked them to work at for the future. Many of you are doing well in your numeracy lessons but not as well in literacy. This is because some of you are not sure how to use the sounds of letters to read words that are unfamiliar to you. In future, the staff are going to work together to make sure that all of you know these important sounds to improve your spelling, reading and handwriting. The staff provide good levels of help and support. Many of you told us how much help you get from the teachers’ careful marking. The support staff
p.13
Inspection of The Meads Primary School, Luton, LU3 2UE
work alongside many of you in lessons or outside the classrooms to provide you with the help that you need to succeed.
p.13
Inspection of The Meads Primary School, Luton, LU3 2UE
All of the staff and governors are keen to improve the school further. Much has been achieved but teachers with special responsibilities are going to play an even bigger part in further improving the work of the school. You can all play your part by always behaving well, working as hard as you can and trying to write as neatly as possible.
p.13
Inspection of The Meads Primary School, Luton, LU3 2UE
Philip Mann Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.13
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion