Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Churchfields Primary School

Inspected 4 Oct 2011 · published 31 Oct 2011 · URN 101589

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Oct 2011

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Churchfields Primary School

  • URN verified

    101589

Page 4 of 15
Page 4 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivelypositivestrongstronglyenjoymake good progressimproved
Criticisminadequateweaknessesconcernsunacceptablenot yetlownot consistentlyinconsistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2065w+28
  • Leadership1406w+28
  • What needs to improve145w+79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
15
Words of findings
3,610
longer than usual (typical 2796)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 3
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%Leadership 31%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 3–4 October 2011 Inspection number 376595 Churchfields Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 101589 Local Authority Bromley Inspection number 376595 Inspection dates 3–4 October 2011 Reporting inspector Jon Carter

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 318 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Sara Jeffrey Headteacher Tom Hyndley Date of previous school inspection 20–21 January 2009 School address Churchfields Road Beckenham BR3 4QY Telephone number 020 8650 5247 Fax number 020 8663 3383 Email address admin@churchfields.bromley.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. They observed 16 lessons taught by 11 teachers and held meetings with school leaders and managers, representatives from the governing body and two groups of pupils. Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at assessment information, the school’s analysis of pupils’ progress, curriculum plans, minutes of governing body meetings, records of the school leaders’ lesson monitoring and many other documents. They analysed responses from the 165 questionnaires received from parents and carers, as well as those from 108 pupils and 30 staff.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 How effectively leaders and managers at all levels are identifying and addressing weaknesses in teaching and the curriculum in order to drive improvement and raise attainment in literacy, particularly in writing.  How effectively the school works to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence.  How effectively the Early Years Foundation Stage uses assessment information to provide well-targeted activities to build children’s abilities in language for communication and thinking, and promote their physical development.

p.3

Information about the school

Churchfields is a primary school of slightly larger than average size. The largest ethnic group in the school is made up of pupils from White British backgrounds. The school has a higher than average percentage of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds. A lower than average proportion of pupils speak English as an additional language, a small minority of whom are at a very early stage of learning English. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is slightly higher than average. The school has a higher than average proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. This is partly due to there being two classes provided specifically for pupils with severe and complex needs. Pupils’ special educational needs are mainly autistic spectrum disorders and moderate learning difficulties. The Early Years Foundation Stage is made up of a Nursery class and two Reception classes. The school holds Healthy School status and Artsmark Silver

p.3

Information about the school

There is a children’s centre on the same site as the school and the school buildings are used for an after-school club run by a private provider. These are subject to separate inspection arrangements and were not included as part of this inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Main findings

Churchfields is a satisfactory school. Pupils make satisfactory progress in their learning and show good development in their personal skills. They enjoy coming to school and taking part in lessons. Parents and carers are particularly pleased about how well staff look after pupils’ well-being. One parent, whose views echoed those of many, wrote, ‘The staff are friendly, helpful and go out of their way to make school a fun and happy place to be.’

p.4

Main findings

School leaders have successfully brought the school through a period of significant change to staffing. Pupils’ progress during this time has not been as rapid as seen previously. Consequently, attainment is low. Leaders and managers at all levels have an accurate understanding of where the school has strengths and the areas that need further development because self-evaluation processes are satisfactory. Restructuring of subject leadership throughout the school has ensured that a sharper focus on learning is beginning to improve lessons. While pupils make satisfactory progress overall, an increasing proportion of learning is good or better. This is ensuring that progress is improving securely and quickly, particularly in writing in Key Stage 1. The success of the actions taken by the restructured leadership team in a short period of time demonstrates that the school has satisfactory capacity to improve.

p.4

Main findings

The quality of teaching is satisfactory overall. In a minority of lessons, where teaching is good, pupils make good progress because clear objectives are set for learning. In these lessons, pupils engage well with learning activities which are suitably challenging and well paced. As a result, their learning moves on swiftly. However, these levels of pace and challenge are not consistently established in all lessons. The quality of written feedback is also inconsistent across the school. Where good practice is seen, pupils have opportunities to put their teachers’ suggestions into effect and their learning progresses well. Where these opportunities are not routinely provided, pupils’ understanding develops less rapidly because some errors and misconceptions remain.

p.4

Main findings

Leaders and managers have a sound understanding of where teaching is best around the school because their observations are regular and accurate and they identify areas for development. However, subsequent observations do not make rigorous use of this information to help gauge how well the quality of teaching is improving. Teachers are beginning to benefit from opportunities to observe their colleagues. This is helping to spread good practice but is not yet sufficiently widespread to have Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

had significant impact on improving the quality of teaching, learning and progress.

p.5

Main findings

Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attainment and improve the quality and consistency of pupils’ progress in lessons by ensuring that:  lesson planning sets suitably high expectations of achievement for all pupils by establishing clear learning goals that challenge pupils, based upon recent and accurate assessment of what they know and can do  the pace of learning is accelerated during lessons.  Improve the quality of teaching by:  sharing good practice more widely across the school through increased opportunities for teachers to observe each other’s work  ensuring that lesson observations by senior and middle leaders are strongly focused on specific areas for development.  Improve the consistency with which high quality written feedback helps pupils to make rapid progress by ensuring that:  pupils are given regular opportunities to respond to teachers’ written feedback  teachers follow up these opportunities by evaluating pupils’ progress in

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils enter the school with levels of development that are generally below age- related expectations, particularly in communication, language and literacy skills. Overall, pupils make satisfactory progress although, by the end of Year 6, attainment is low, particularly in writing. Accelerated progress for pupils has recently been established through changes to whole-school programmes. These have given pupils more opportunities for writing as well as better focused support for those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Consequently, the attainment of an increasing number of pupils is improving quickly in writing, particularly for those in Key Stage 1.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

In lessons, pupils make at least satisfactory progress. They particularly enjoy working together while learning. For example, a group of more able pupils in Years 3 and 4 enthusiastically discussed how the structure of a poem affects its meaning. In the best lessons, pupils respond enthusiastically to the challenges set for them. Pupils’ literacy skills develop with increasing pace, from very limited starting points, through both the teaching of discrete skills and the use of those skills in other subjects. For example, older pupils with severe and complex needs developed their speaking skills and extended their vocabulary while sharing a story with their teacher. Progress in Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

numeracy and information and communication technology (ICT) is satisfactory, as shown, for example, by the confident use of word processing software by Year 6 pupils. This familiarity supports their satisfactory development of skills which contribute to their future economic well-being. Pupils’ behaviour is almost always good in classrooms and around the school. However, where learning activities are not well matched to pupils’ needs, behaviour in lessons is only satisfactory.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language make progress at similar rates to their peers because they are effectively supported in the classroom. Overall, boys do less well than girls, although girls do less well when compared with their peers nationally than boys.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils make a particularly strong contribution to their school community. Their enthusiastic participation in schemes such as the ‘mini-mentors’ helps them to develop good social and moral skills while playing their part in creating a safe and friendly learning environment. Pupils are confident that they are kept safe in school. Their good adoption of healthy lifestyles through participation in physical activity and understanding of healthy eating is recognised by the award of Healthy School status. The majority of pupils respond well to the school’s strategies for managing absence. Pupils’ attendance continues to improve and is now broadly average overall. The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent from school is also falling rapidly.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress The extent to which pupils feel safe 2 Pupils’ behaviour 2 The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 2 The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1 The extent of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Teaching is satisfactory, and improving due to the professional commitment of staff to continuously update their subject knowledge and understanding of different teaching methods. Consequently, activities that are planned to address the literacy needs of individual pupils are becoming more successful as they are better matched to how pupils learn best. Relationships between adults and pupils are positive and staff ensure that learning environments are bright and exciting. Satisfactory use is made of ICT to engage and motivate pupils. Lessons are planned satisfactorily so that pupils’ learning is structured and takes account of the range of abilities, although expectations of what pupils can achieve are not always high enough. This is particularly the case in the provision for pupils with severe and complex needs. Where learning and progress are good in a minority of lessons, assessment of what pupils know and can do is both thorough and accurate. This detailed information is

p.7

How effective is the provision?

used well to ensure that planning takes good account of what pupils know and can do. Consequently, pupils are motivated to learn and progress because the work they do is suitably challenging. Teaching assistants are deployed effectively to ensure that the pace of learning is at least satisfactory.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Pupils benefit from a satisfactory curriculum which is broad, balanced and makes particularly good use of local partnerships. For example, adult volunteers support pupils’ reading effectively and pupils in Year 6 gain inspiration for their writing activities from a visiting theatre company supporting their study of Macbeth. These are beginning to contribute to pupils’ improved literacy skills, especially in writing. Provision made for pupils with severe and complex needs ensures that they receive satisfactory opportunities to develop their social and communication skills through collaborative working with their peers. Links between subjects, particularly to incorporate meaningful use of ICT, are established but not yet wide ranging or comprehensive.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Pupils are well cared for and given good guidance which has positive effects on their personal development. Arrangements to ensure that pupils settle in quickly to school and are well prepared for moving on to secondary school are good. Pupils who are particularly vulnerable, for example due to health needs, are provided with individually tailored support to ensure the transition proceeds smoothly. Relationships with parents are strengthened through the good support provided by staff, especially that provided by the school’s Family Worker. This has been an important factor in securing improved attendance. The school has good systems for identifying and working with the most persistent absentees and for rewarding high attendance. The well-attended breakfast club also encourages pupils to be in school on time. However, pupils who fall slightly below average rates of attendance are not routinely given realistic but challenging targets that encourage improvement.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The quality of teaching 3 Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 2

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The drive for continued improvement over the past 12 months has been adversely affected by a significant turnover of staff at all levels in the school. Nevertheless, the headteacher has ensured that the staff team is well focused on what the school needs to do to improve. Leaders and managers at all levels communicate a consistent message about the way forward for the school. As a result, staff feel invigorated by their enthusiasm and there is a shared ethos of change for the better. While the impact of some changes, such as those made to improve writing in Key Stage 1, can be seen in pupils’ better progress, other changes are too recent to have yet had a measureable effect. The governing body provide satisfactory support and challenge to the leadership team and visit the school regularly to gain an appreciation of its strengths and weaknesses.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

Arrangements for ensuring that pupils are adequately safeguarded are good. Staff are trained regularly and recruitment procedures are robust. The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion is satisfactory. School leaders have an accurate understanding of pupils’ backgrounds. They ensure that pupils have suitable opportunities to enhance their understanding of the diversity of different heritages within the school. However, school leaders recognise that links with children in different areas of the UK and globally are less well developed and appropriate plans are in place to redress this balance.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The promotion of equality of opportunity is satisfactory in all aspects of the school’s work, and it takes suitable steps to tackle discrimination. The progress of the most vulnerable groups of pupils is monitored. No groups of pupils perform significantly differently to their peers. Pupils have positive attitudes towards their peers and the school operates harmoniously on a day-to-day basis.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met The effectiveness of the school’s engagement with parents and carers 2 Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 2 The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 2 The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 3 The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Children get off to a good start in the Early Years Foundation Stage. A good range of purposeful and engaging activities are provided which ensure that all areas of learning are covered comprehensively. Links between activities in the classroom and the outdoor environment are strong. As a result, children experience continuity in their learning. In the nursery, children are settled into the routines established for them and show good levels of independence. They make choices and take responsibility for clearing up after themselves. Children in the Reception classes make good progress in their literacy skills because teachers effectively help them to develop good awareness of the sounds letters make. Good opportunities to talk with adults, who question the children skilfully, is enabling them to develop better skills in language for communication and thinking. This area remains a key priority for the

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

staff of the Early Years Foundation Stage, as progress still lags behind other skills such as reading and writing. Children’s physical development is well provided for, although some summer-born boys still make less progress than their peers.

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Leaders and managers make good use of assessment information to inform their development planning. For example, a more relevant range of writing opportunities has been provided for boys in the outdoor area in response to early identification of potential under-achievement. Consequently, both boys and girls make improved progress in writing and a greater proportion than average meet national expectations for their age. Transition arrangements are strong and parents are increasingly engaged as partners in their children’s learning.

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Views of parents and carers

A higher than average proportion of parents and carers returned questionnaires. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Views of parents and carers

Most responses were positive and appreciative of the work of school staff and leaders. They were particularly impressed with the care shown to their children, especially in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Inspectors found the care, guidance and support provided by the school to be good. Parents and carers also recognised the recent staffing changes as having a positive effect on their children’s learning.

p.10

Views of parents and carers

A few raised concerns about the information provided by the school about their children’s progress and how they could support this better, as well as the extent to which the school takes account of their suggestions and concerns. Inspectors found that communication with parents and carers is well established and provides suitable information to parents and carers using a variety of media. The headteacher has plans to survey parents’ and carers’ opinions more specifically about communication in order to find out how best to address their concerns.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Churchfields Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 165 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 318 pupils registered at the school.

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 109 66 52 32 4 2 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 96 58 67 41 0 0 0 0 The school informs me about my child’s progress 57 35 84 51 16 10 3 2 My child is making enough progress at this school 62 38 84 51 10 6 3 2 The teaching is good at this school 81 49 74 45 5 3 0 0 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 75 45 73 44 16 10 0 0 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 71 43 91 55 2 1 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 55 33 80 48 8 5 1 1

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school meets my child’s particular needs 70 42 77 47 12 7 1 1 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 53 32 86 52 14 8 3 2 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 52 32 85 52 15 9 1 1

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school is led and managed effectively 67 41 80 48 10 6 2 1 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 91 55 63 38 9 5 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspectio n outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.  The school’s capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.13

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.14

Inspection of Churchfields Primary School, Bromley BR3 4QY

Thank you for giving us a warm welcome when we visited your school recently. We enjoyed speaking with you and watching you enjoy your lessons.

p.14

Inspection of Churchfields Primary School, Bromley BR3 4QY

I am writing to tell you that Churchfields is a satisfactory school. You make satisfactory progress in your lessons and you develop good personal skills. Your behaviour is good and you told us that you feel safe while you are in school. We were impressed by how well you take part in activities that help other people in your school community. We can see that teachers are making changes that are helping you to get better at some of the subjects you find most difficult. The younger pupils are already making better progress in their writing, for example.

p.14

Inspection of Churchfields Primary School, Bromley BR3 4QY

To help your school get even better, we have asked the headteacher to focus on three main things. We have asked him to improve:

p.14

Inspection of Churchfields Primary School, Bromley BR3 4QY

 your progress in lessons so that you achieve more  how well the teachers deliver their lessons by getting them to share the things they do well with each other  how teachers get you to use and respond to their marking of your written work so you make quicker progress.

p.14

Inspection of Churchfields Primary School, Bromley BR3 4QY

You can all help by showing your teachers how you have used their feedback to improve other pieces of work that you do.

p.14

Inspection of Churchfields Primary School, Bromley BR3 4QY

Jon Carter Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion