Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

City Academy Norwich

Inspected 22 Sept 2011 · published 13 Oct 2011 · URN 135904

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Sept 2011

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alan Alder

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    City Academy Norwich

  • URN verified

    135904

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 5% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentvery wellpositivemake good progresseffectiveimprovedeffectively
Criticisminadequateweaknessesnot alwaysunacceptablefailedconcernspersistently absentnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2319w+29
  • Leadership305w+75
  • What needs to improve220w−59

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
2,838
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Age group 11–19 Inspection date(s) 21–22 September 2011 Inspection number 381957 City Academy Norwich Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 135904 Local Authority N/A Inspection number 381957 Inspection dates 21–22 September 2011 Reporting inspector Alan Alder HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Academy School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–19 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 695 Of which, number on roll in the sixth form 35 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Dick Palmer Headteacher David Brunton Date of previous school inspection N/A School address Earlham Road Norwich NR4 7NU Telephone number 01603 452628 Fax number 01603 507215 Email address principal@cityacademynorwich.org achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and two additional inspectors. The number of lessons observed was 35 and the number of teachers seen was 33. Meetings were held with groups of students, representatives of the governing body and trustees, as well as with members of staff. Inspectors observed the academy’s work, and looked at a wide range of documents including those relating to self-evaluation, policies, students’ performance data and the safeguarding of students. Questionnaires were received from 83 parents and carers, and inspectors also gathered data from those submitted by students and staff.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the academy’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 The progress currently being made by students in the sixth form.  How regularly students are attending.  The quality of the academy’s self-evaluation?

p.3

Information about the school

The academy opened in September 2009, occupying the buildings of the predecessor school. Most of the academy’s senior leadership team had previously worked in other schools. A new building is being constructed and the academy expects it to be ready for occupation later in the school year.

p.3

Information about the school

The academy has a much-higher-than-average proportion of students who are known to be eligible for free school meals, and this is also the case for students who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. The proportion of students from minority ethnic heritages or who speak English as an additional language is well- below the national average.

p.3

Information about the school

The academy’s specialisms are English and digital technology. Its roll is increasing; the academy is becoming more popular with parents.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

This is a good academy. Its improvement has been rapid. Students’ achievement is improving well and is good. Behaviour is good, classrooms are settled and learning is good. Students’ attendance is now satisfactory, and has shown rapid improvement in the last two years. The very small sixth form, however, is inadequate because students last year did not make sufficient progress.

p.4

Main findings

The governing body and the academy’s leaders have a clear mission, to create an institution in which students make rapid progress in both their work and their personal development. This mission, a very highly motivated leadership team and staff body and imaginative strategic planning with highly challenging targets, together have enabled the academy to make considerable progress as an institution and students to make good progress as learners.

p.4

Main findings

Much thought is put into improving the academy’s work. The improvement of teaching is a major focus. The strategies to improve teaching are proving to be very effective. The quality of teaching is now good, with an increasing proportion of lessons which are outstanding. The progress being made by students is closely monitored and a range of effective strategies is in place to bring about improvement where it is not sufficient. Frequent reviews of provision have identified areas for development, and these too have been improved. For example, the progress of students who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is improving well as a result of the changes made. The academy’s capacity to improve is good.

p.4

Main findings

There are regular reviews of the effectiveness of subject departments. However, evaluations tend to focus on provision rather than its impact on learning. This can lead to an assumption that because an action is taken, an improvement in learning will occur. This is not always the case, so some minor areas which may require further work are not always quickly identified.

p.4

Main findings

The curriculum has been radically redesigned. It now allows considerable flexibility, and so caters well for the wide range of interests and aspirations of students. A key feature is the mixed-age classes in Years 9 and 10. These classes are organised not on age, but on prior attainment and potential. Whilst it is too early for any firm conclusions to be drawn about their effectiveness, they were well-taught and good learning was taking place in them by all groups. A positive indicator is the much improved attendance of Year 9 students since the launch of this initiative.

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

The care, guidance and support provided by the academy has contributed significantly to recent improvements in achievement, attendance and behaviour. All three aspects of the academy’s work have shown marked improvement. Students benefit from increasingly well-focused tracking of their progress. The support given to students whose circumstances make them vulnerable, through the academy’s own pastoral care systems and through links with local partners, has helped them progress well. Where students have special educational needs and/or disabilities these needs are identified promptly to enable support to be targeted effectively. Well-considered arrangements for students’ transition from primary school to the academy develop the students’ confidence and help them settle in quickly.

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

The very small number of students in Year 12 last year made inadequate progress, and the sixth form is therefore judged to be inadequate. In the observations made during the inspection, however, the quality of learning was mostly satisfactory in lessons with nothing that was inadequate. Provision is therefore now satisfactory, though students are too passive in lessons.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve sixth form students’ attainment and progress by ensuring that they are more actively involved in their learning and are less passive in lessons.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Take steps to further improve student’s attendance rates so they are, within one year, at least as high as the national average.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that evaluations focus upon the impact of actions on students’ learning, personal development and well-being.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Students’ learning and progress are good, as revealed both by the provisional examination results at GCSE, or equivalent, for 2011 and by their current progress in lessons. The proportion of students who gained five or more higher grades, including English and mathematics at GCSE showed a good increase in the last year, exceeding the very challenging targets. The results are now securely above the minimum expected nationally, although they remain significantly-lower-than-average. All groups of students are making good progress Some, including those who are judged to be gifted or talented are making outstanding progress. Data shows that rates of progress for the most recent Year 11 have accelerated as they have moved through the school. In lessons currently, there remains no difference in the progress made by different groups.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Students’ behaviour is good. Classrooms are settled and students behave sensibly at all times. Inspectors saw several examples of students offering help to others. They work productively, both independently and in groups.

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

The academy’s leaders and staff are determined to provide a good academic education, but also a good preparation for future life. Students have a good understanding of the attitudes and attributes that are required in the workplace and all gain work experience. The result is that the proportion of students who leave the academy to enter work or some form of training is above average. They are also encouraged to understand how to lead a healthy lifestyle and the success of this is evident in, for example, the high proportion that takes part in sports events outside the timetabled curriculum. Their very positive attitudes towards the academy were revealed both in discussions with inspectors and in their responses to the inspection questionnaire. This is also reflected in the considerable contribution they make to the academy, and indeed to the wider community.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes

p.6

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

contribute to their future economic well-being

Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Teaching is of good quality. The academy’s good policies on teaching influence most lessons. Questioning, for example, is used well to check students’ understanding and successful steps are taken to improve this where a problem is identified. In very many lessons there are opportunities for students of different ability to tackle work which is most appropriate for them. Most lessons involve a good range of activities and this promotes students’ interest. This is further enhanced by some good use of the academy’s information and communications (ICT) equipment. Some practical lessons in Key Stage 4 are very long and teachers maintain students’ interest and the pace of working, using the time well. Teaching assistants have a marked impact on

p.6

How effective is the provision?

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

learning; they are very clear about what support is needed by different students. Their intervention is well-judged so that students are helped to learn: the work is not done for them. A very small minority of lessons were inadequate. This was sometimes because the challenge provided by the content of the lesson, or the manner in which it was being taught, did not take sufficiently into account the abilities of the students concerned.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

The curriculum is outstanding. All students follow programmes in English and mathematics that are closely matched to their strengths and weaknesses and this helps them to make good progress. The curriculum at Key Stage 4 provides a good choice of options, including a good range of vocational subjects at two local colleges. Students are motivated by being able to take some GCSE courses in one year. The academy provides an excellent range of opportunities in ICT, in line with its specialism, and students benefit well from the outstanding resources available. There are excellent extra-curricular activities available. These are well-attended and are a source of great enjoyment to students.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Students are cared for well. An overwhelming majority of students who responded to the inspection questionnaire said that they are helped to prepare for the future well and most said that adults explain to them how to improve their work and that teachers are interested in their views. Much has been done, to good effect, to improve attendance. The proportion of students who are persistently absent has fallen rapidly and is now in line with national averages. Partnerships with outside agencies are made very good use of to help students who require specialist support.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The rapid development of the academy is based upon a very clear and strong commitment to improving the education and well-being of the students. The governing body is powerful, well informed and challenges the academy’s leaders very well. A lot of well-judged, and at times bold, steps have been taken in pursuit of improvement. The radically reorganised curriculum is an example. There is frequent monitoring of the work of the academy and evaluations are generally very helpful in enabling senior leaders to decide what needs to be improved and how. Initiatives to raise teaching quality are very well led and have resulted in very good improvement. Monitoring of the sixth form has been less effective. Although academy leaders and the governing body were alerted to issues relating to students progress, this did not

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

lead to an effective or rapid enough response. The situation in the sixth form nevertheless is now improving and is currently satisfactory.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Academy leaders have analysed in detail how well different groups benefit from provision. So, for example, data on attendance and the uptake of extra-curricular activities as well as the academic progress by the different groups is regularly reviewed to ensure that all are benefiting sufficiently. It is such an analysis that has led to some changes in the provision for students who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, to good effect. Safeguarding procedures are effective and the academy complies with legal requirements.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Community cohesion is outstanding. The academy’s leaders know the local context of its learners very well. The academy is very active in the local community and its international links have, for example, led to the presence of some students from Spain in classes during the inspection.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

driving improvement

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Sixth form

A significant number of students failed to make sufficient progress in 2011 and the proportion who have progressed from Year 12 to Year 13 is very small. However, the quality of provision is now satisfactory. Teachers plan their lessons well, but the small teaching groups make it difficult for students to learn from, and respond to, the work and ideas of others. The curriculum at present offers exclusively academic subjects at AS or A levels and there are currently few opportunities for students to participate in extra-curricular activities. The academy’s leaders have responded robustly to the identified weaknesses in provision, day-to-day management has been strengthened, target setting and monitoring procedures are now more

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

comprehensive and tutors now ensure that students are appropriately qualified for the courses they wish to follow.

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form

Taking into account: Outcomes for students in the sixth form The quality of provision in the sixth form Leadership and management of the sixth form

p.9

Views of parents and carers

The proportion of parents and carers who responded to the Ofsted questionnaire was slightly lower than the national average. Those that did respond were highly complimentary about the academy. The responses to all the questions are more positive than average and some much more so. Inspection evidence endorses their views.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at City Academy Norwich to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 83 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 730 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 36 43 42 51 3 4 1 1 The school keeps my child safe 31 37 50 60 1 1 0 0 The school informs me about my child’s progress 27 33 49 59 3 4 0 0 My child is making enough progress at this school 30 36 45 54 2 2 0 0 The teaching is good at this school 33 40 47 57 2 2 0 0 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 25 30 52 63 2 2 0 0 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 19 23 55 66 6 7 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 27 33 49 59 3 4 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child’s particular needs 26 31 53 64 1 1 0 0 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 31 37 44 53 7 8 0 0 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 19 23 49 59 5 6 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 28 34 51 61 3 4 0 0 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 35 42 45 54 2 2 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9 Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5 All schools 10 44 39 6

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.  The school’s capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of City Academy Norwich, Norwich, NR4 7NU

Your academy is successfully helping you to learn well and to develop well as young people. It has improved rapidly since it opened two years ago and is now good. Teaching is good at the academy, and support teachers have a good understanding of how to give help to those of you who need it.

p.13

Inspection of City Academy Norwich, Norwich, NR4 7NU

You play an important part in this success. Your behaviour is good, both in class and in and around the buildings. You work hard in lessons and have good, mature relationships with the adults in the academy. Inspectors were impressed by how well you work together in small groups. The academy has been good in involving you in its improvement. Many of you have responded to surveys about, for example, how well you are taught, which have helped to bring about improvement. Behaviour has improved well and your attendance, which was low, is now average.

p.13

Inspection of City Academy Norwich, Norwich, NR4 7NU

The Principal and the other leaders, who are very well supported and challenged by the governing body, have made many changes to help you learn better. As a result, for example, the curriculum is outstanding and gives you many opportunities. You also have many opportunities to work with others in other year groups and in the local and international community.

p.13

Inspection of City Academy Norwich, Norwich, NR4 7NU

Students in Year 12 last year did not make the progress they should have. Teaching in the sixth form, although it is satisfactory, leads students to learn too passively and needs to be more engaging. Inspectors have given this as an area for the academy to improve. Another area for improvement is to help to improve your attendance so that it is at least as high as the national average. Finally, we have asked academy’s leaders to make sure they check on how well the changes they have made are helping you learn and develop. You can help by doing all you can to ensure that attendance continues to improve and that you contribute as much as you can to every lesson.

p.13

from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy

of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion