Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Bentinck Primary and Nursery School

Inspected 27 Sept 2011 · published 13 Oct 2011 · URN 122407

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Sept 2011

  • Name on report verified

    Bentinck Primary and Nursery School

  • URN verified

    122407

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingvery effectivepositivestrongexcellenteffectivelyimprovedgood progress
Criticisminadequateconcernsnot yetnot alwaysunacceptableweaknessespoorlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2313w+59
  • Leadership240w+51
  • What needs to improve322w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
2,864
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%Leadership 6%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 26–27 September 2011 Inspection number 380464 Bentinck Primary and Nursery School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 122407 Local Authority Nottingham Inspection number 380464 Inspection dates 26–27 September 2011 Reporting inspector Geof Timms

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 269 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Pete Wilson Headteacher Jane Nunez Date of previous school inspection 29 April 2009 School address Alfreton Road Nottingham NG7 4AA Telephone number 0115 915 1567 Fax number 0115 915 `1568 Email address headteacher@bentinck.nottingham.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. They observed 17 lessons taught by nine teachers. Meetings were held with groups of pupils, staff and a member of the governing body. Discussions were also held with some parents. Inspectors observed the school’s work, and looked at a range of pupils’ work, policies, planning documents and assessment data. Responses to 119 questionnaires from parents and carers were analysed.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 Inspectors looked into how the school raised standards at the end of Year 6.  They looked at what the school has done to help pupils attain more highly in mathematics.  They investigated what the school is doing to develop its cross-curricular planning.  They investigated whether the leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage has had a positive impact on the provision and outcomes.

p.3

Information about the school

This is a larger than average-sized primary school. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is well above average. Most pupils come from a wide range of minority ethnic backgrounds, the largest grouping of which is Pakistani. The majority of pupils speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average. The school has achieved national Healthy School status.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Bentinck has rapidly improved over the past two years to become a good school. Great strides have been made in raising pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics. From a period when attainment was consistently below average, it has risen to well above average levels by the end of Year 6. This represents at least good progress in the basic skills from children’s often very low starting points when they join the school. The improvements made and the high standards now achieved show that the school has a good capacity to both maintain and to improve further in the future.

p.4

Main findings

The teaching throughout the school is consistently of good quality. The relationships between staff and pupils are strong and this is having a positive impact on pupils’ learning. They are happy at school and, because of this, their behaviour is good overall and often excellent in lessons. In addition, their attendance has improved to its current average level. The school keeps pupils safe effectively, an aspect recognised by the parents, and pupils adopt healthy lifestyles. The good teaching and pupils’ positive attitudes have been a major factor in their much improved attainment in reading, writing and mathematics. In addition, good basic computer skills are taught well throughout the school. The rapid rise in pupils’ attainment has been the result of a strong focus on basic skills in these subjects. Work to raise attainment in mathematics has had a positive impact from the early years throughout

p.4

Main findings

the school. However, the school has recognised the need to extend and enrich the curriculum so that it provides more breadth and so that pupils have better opportunities to use their skills in other subjects and in more creative ways.

p.4

Main findings

The school has improved its use of data and tracks pupils closely. Work has been done to identify underachieving groups and to address any weaknesses. Because of this there are few evident differences in the progress of different groups of pupils. The school draws up very detailed plans on an individual basis for the interventions staff make to help all pupils make progress. This is very successful in promoting good progress for those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. A major strength of the school is the work done with pupils whose challenging circumstances may make them vulnerable. The support they receive socially and emotionally has a clear and positive impact on their learning. The progress of pupils who speak English as an additional language is as good as that of their peers. In particular, the high number of pupils who are at an early stage in speaking English are very well

p.4

Main findings

supported and they often make excellent progress. The progress in some aspects of the learning of the very youngest children is also often outstanding.

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

The leadership and management of the school are effective and improvements made have been the result of strong team work between the senior leadership team and the staff. The Chair of the Governing Body provides good support to the school but the governing body has not sought parents’ and carers’ views about the school and does not systematically monitor and evaluate its day-to-day running. Training has supported teachers’ skills and outside advice and support has been very effective in helping to challenge the school to raise pupils’ attainment.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Broaden and enrich the curriculum so that pupils have more opportunities to use their skills creatively and in different subjects.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Sharpen the work of the governing body by more regularly seeking the views of parents and carers, staff and pupils about the school, and by developing systematic monitoring and evaluation of the day-to-day work of the school.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The above-average standards observed in lessons reflect the recent rapid rise seen in results at the end of Year 6. The school is working hard to improve pupils’ writing skills. This work is correctly based on giving them good opportunities to read and talk so that their language and vocabulary are extended. The school is aware that it does not yet provide sufficient opportunities to write in other subjects. A few good projects and ideas, such as the creative writing around the ‘alien egg’ theme show that pupils are capable of some imaginative work. In mathematics, the teaching has been very focused on specific skills and levels, and the better grouping of pupils at a similar stage in their learning. More regular use of skills in practical and problem- solving activities is raising attainment. For example, in an outstanding Year 6 lesson, pupils followed a clear system to help them accurately solve complex word problems.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Pupils are adamant that they feel safe and that any concerns they raise are dealt with very effectively by adults. They are clear about how to keep themselves safe when using modern technology. The school has a very effective system to record behaviour and analysis of this shows that the number of incidents of poor behaviour has declined over the last three years. The school provides a wide variety of very effective activities to promote healthy eating, including work done with some families to promote healthy meals. Although the school’s work to develop pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural knowledge and understanding is good overall, with much good work on understanding different cultures, assemblies are not always used sufficiently to provide opportunities for spiritual reflection.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

contribute to their future economic well-being

Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The good teaching has a very positive impact on pupils’ learning through the strong relationships built up and through good planning and a good match of work to pupils’ prior attainment. The teaching of basic skills is particularly strong. Teaching assistants play a very important part in lessons, especially when supporting those who speak English as an additional language and are at an early stage of learning English, and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The marking of pupils’ work is useful and clear targets are set for them. They say themselves that they are given ‘hard work and hard targets’ to prepare them for secondary school. However, they also say they are sometimes unsure of how well they are doing and the school is aware that more could be done to provide them with this information.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The curriculum remains satisfactory because the school’s successful drive to improve basic skills in reading, writing and mathematics has focused attention on these subjects. However, the school is aware of the need to broaden and enrich the curriculum further by providing more opportunities for pupils to make links between subjects and to use the skills they have learned, especially in writing and information and communication technology, across all subjects. The curriculum is well-adjusted to provide for those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Care, guidance and support are good because there are very effective systems to track pupils whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. Their needs are quickly identified and actions are taken by named individuals to ensure that these pupils are effectively supported. The school has successfully negotiated with parents, carers and external agencies, to ensure that religious or cultural misunderstandings do not inhibit pupils’ inclusion into the full life of the school, such as on educational

p.6

How effective is the provision?

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

visits. The school’s breakfast club provides some pupils with a calm and positive start to the day.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The leadership and management are good. The headteacher and senior staff have worked hard since the last inspection to raise pupils’ attainment, improve behaviour and develop teachers’ skills further. They monitor the teaching and learning well and have an accurate view of teachers’ skills and the quality of their lessons. The use of data has improved through training and the available assessment information is now used more smartly and regularly to track individual pupils’ progress. The work to promote community cohesion is currently satisfactory because the school has yet to complete its work on extending its international links. The governing body is very supportive of the school and representative of the wider community but does not yet have a systematic way of evaluating the school’s work. In addition, not all staff, parents and carers are fully aware of the work of the governing body. The school

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

promotes equality of opportunity and tackles all forms of discrimination well. It ensures safeguarding arrangements are robust and keep pupils safe from harm. Safeguarding practice is better than that typically found because the care through counselling for those whose circumstances are more challenging is often outstanding. The school has good very detailed records of the checks carried out on adults who work with the pupils. Because of the success the school has had in raising attainment and improving provision it now offers good value for money.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.7

driving improvement

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

Children learn effectively and make good progress overall throughout the Nursery and Reception classes. There is often outstanding progress in aspects such as reading and number recognition. However, progress in writing is not as strong and remains an area for improvement. The good overall progress is the result of good planning that takes account of children’s often very low starting points. Teachers and other adults encourage children’s independence. The assessment of learning is good and is used well in planning children’s next steps. There are good opportunities for a wide range of adult-led and child-initiated activities. This includes the excellent use of the outdoor area by the Nursery, although constraints of the building mean access to this area is harder for Reception children. Children clearly settle quickly into school and they get along together well. Welfare aspects of the provision are strong and

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

children have good attitudes to personal hygiene and healthy living.

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

The Early Years Foundation Stage is well led and managed and this has led to the evident improvements in provision and progress since the last inspection. The use of assessment information is improving but does not yet fully show trends in progress through the year. The adults work hard to celebrate the uniqueness of each child, especially when supporting those who speak English as an additional language and at an early stage of learning English.

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

Views of parents and carers

Of the good proportion of parents and carers who responded to the questionnaire, the large majority are happy with the school’s work and say their children enjoy school. This is supported by the evidence found in the inspection. A minority say the school does not always take their suggestions and concerns into account and therefore does not provide well for their child’s individual needs. Inspectors explored these areas and found that the school’s engagement with parents and carers is good

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

and has a positive impact on children’s learning. It is especially strong for the children whose circumstances make them most vulnerable, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Bentinck Primary and Nursery School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 119 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 269 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 76 64 37 31 1 1 2 2 The school keeps my child safe 79 66 33 28 0 0 2 2 The school informs me about my child’s progress 69 58 41 34 5 4 2 2 My child is making enough progress at this school 59 50 47 39 2 2 5 4 The teaching is good at this school 70 59 43 36 1 1 2 2 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 58 49 51 43 6 5 2 2 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 54 45 58 49 5 4 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 46 39 57 48 3 3 2 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child’s particular needs 48 40 52 44 5 4 6 5 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 56 47 48 40 3 3 5 4 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 47 39 54 45 7 6 2 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 55 46 49 41 3 3 2 2 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 71 60 40 34 1 1 2 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.  The school’s capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of Bentinck Primary and Nursery School, Nottingham, NG7 4AA

I am writing to thank you for the way you welcomed us to your school recently. We really enjoyed our visit and talking with many of you about your school. You are very positive about school and think that your behaviour is ‘kind of good,’ as one of you said. We think your behaviour is good as well and it is helping you to learn new things and teachers to make your lessons more interesting.

p.13

Inspection of Bentinck Primary and Nursery School, Nottingham, NG7 4AA

We found that yours is a good school. Teaching is good, you make good progress and you reach high standards in reading, writing and mathematics by the time you leave the school. We have asked your teachers to improve the ways you can use these skills in different subjects and in creative ways. You also have good computer skills and produce some interesting art and design work.

p.13

Inspection of Bentinck Primary and Nursery School, Nottingham, NG7 4AA

You make a good contribution to the school in the way you help each other and enjoy taking on a wide range of jobs and responsibilities. You can talk knowledgeably about how to stay healthy and safe. Most of you now attend school regularly but some of you are still out of school too often to help your learning. To make the best progress, you need to go to school every day.

p.13

Inspection of Bentinck Primary and Nursery School, Nottingham, NG7 4AA

Your parents and carers, some of the staff and some of you are unsure about the role of the governing body. We have asked the governors to spend more time observing the work of the school and finding out from your parents and you what is working well and what, if anything, could be better.

p.13

Inspection of Bentinck Primary and Nursery School, Nottingham, NG7 4AA

Thank you again for your help during the inspection. Enjoy your time at Bentinck and keep working hard.

p.13

from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy

of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion