Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Giffard Park Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Sept 2011
- Name on report verified
Giffard Park Primary School
- URN verified
110381
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.11
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.11
- In a broadly average return, the vast majority parents and carers are positive about the school and are particularly pleased with the teachers and the way their children are kept safe and happy. p.9
- Parents’ and carers’ positive views of the school are evident in comments such as, ‘Everyone connected with the school is professional’ and ‘The school is supportive and welcoming.’ p.4
- The school is led and managed effectively 79 61 43 33 2 2 0 0 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 90 70 35 27 2 2 0 0 p.10
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A few parents and carers expressed concerns over the way unacceptable behaviour is dealt with and the way the school responds to their suggestions or concerns. p.9
- The school meets my child’s particular needs 67 52 50 39 4 3 1 1 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 59 46 48 37 7 5 1 1 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 55 43 50 39 6 5 1 1 p.10
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.11
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.11
- Progress across the school is uneven between classes and subjects because teachers, particularly in Years 3 and 4, do not always plan work that meets the pupils’ diverse needs or involve them fully in whole class discussions. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Increase the proportion of good or better teaching, especially in Years 3 and 4, by: ensuring that work always matches pupils’ differing needs involving all pupils in whole class discussions giving pupils sufficient opportunity to work independently. p.5
- Accelerate progress in mathematics by: ensuring teachers’ marking identifies pupils’ next steps in learning expanding opportunities for pupils to develop and apply their numeracy across the curriculum. p.5
- Ensure that leaders at all levels understand what constitutes good progress and check provision rigorously to ensure that challenging, measurable targets are achieved. p.5
- Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning p.7
- Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms p.8
- Children make good progress in the Reception classes and enter Year 1 with broadly average attainment. p.8
- A wide range of activities is made available indoors and outside and children enjoy working with each other and members of staff. p.8
- Role-play activities are used well to develop basic skills, especially literacy. p.8
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 14
- Words of findings
- 2,739
- about usual (typical 3042)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 19–20 September 2011 Inspection number 378092 Giffard Park Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique Reference Number 110381 Local Authority Milton Keynes Inspection number 378092 Inspection dates 19–20 September 2011 Reporting inspector Alison Cartlidge
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 362 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Lisa Peel Headteacher Glenn Booth Date of previous school inspection 24–25 March 2009 School address Broadway Avenue Giffard Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK14 5PY Telephone number 01908 617868 Fax number 01908 211423 Email address giffardparkc@milton-keynes.gov.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. The inspection team observed 22 lessons taught by 15 teachers. Meetings were held with members of the governing body, staff, parents and carers, and pupils. The inspection team observed the school’s work and looked at pupils’ books, information on pupils’ progress, safeguarding policies and other documents. Questionnaires from 129 parents and carers, 22 members of staff and 85 pupils were scrutinised.
p.3
Introduction
The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.
p.3
Introduction
The way provision is increasing the progress of pupils, especially in mathematics. How teaching and assessment need to develop to become consistently good or better. The impact of leaders at all levels, including the governing body, in evaluating and improving provision and pupils’ progress, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. How provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage enables children to gain independence and to learn quickly.
p.3
Information about the school
This is a larger-than-average sized primary school with a high number of pupils joining the school at different times. It has expanded rapidly since the time of the last inspection and there have been several new members of staff in the last two years. Most pupils are of White British heritage, with a few coming from other backgrounds. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is broadly average. The school has an above-average proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, although these pupils are not evenly distributed across year groups. There is a resource base for 15 pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. At the time of the last inspection it took pupils with moderate learning difficulties but now takes pupils with complex learning difficulties. These pupils come to the base from across Milton Keynes. The school has received
p.3
Information about the school
several awards including Healthy School Status and the International School Award. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage are taught in two Reception classes.
p.3
Information about the school
The pre-school and after-school club that meet at the school are run by external providers and were not part of this inspection.
p.3
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Main findings
This popular and happy school provides its pupils with a satisfactory education. Parents’ and carers’ positive views of the school are evident in comments such as, ‘Everyone connected with the school is professional’ and ‘The school is supportive and welcoming.’
p.4
Main findings
Children make a good start to their education in the Early Years Foundation Stage. They gain independence and learn quickly because members of staff provide clear routines for them to follow and involve them well in planning their own work. Between Years 1 and 6, pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, make at least satisfactory progress, leading to broadly average attainment by the end of Year 6. Provision for pupils with complex learning difficulties is good enabling them to make good progress towards their specific targets.
p.4
Main findings
Progress across the school is uneven between classes and subjects because teachers, particularly in Years 3 and 4, do not always plan work that meets the pupils’ diverse needs or involve them fully in whole class discussions. Teachers write constructive comments to help pupils to improve their writing. This good practice is less consistent in mathematics. In addition, there are too few opportunities for pupils to extend and apply their numeracy skills across the curriculum. Consequently, pupils do better in English than in mathematics. Pupils are good at taking responsibility and contributing to the community. For example, they demonstrate their considerate behaviour when supporting each other as buddies at playtimes. Pupils appreciate the good care they receive from members of staff. As one pupil said, ‘The teachers always try to make you a better person.’
p.4
Main findings
Leaders at all levels have a realistic understanding of what needs to be done to improve the school. Pupils’ progress is being tracked more rigorously than in the past so that support can be targeted more precisely and teachers are responsive towards advice on how they can improve. There are satisfactory procedures for self- evaluation which support the leaders’ planning for improvement. Leaders, including the governing body, have developed a wealth of information about provision and pupils’ progress. However, this information is not always fully evaluated in order to identify good progress and help to set measurable and challenging targets. Nevertheless, since the last inspection, the school has been successful in increasing the pupils’ progress in writing and has extended opportunities for pupils to develop their writing and information and communication technology (ICT) skills in other
p.4
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
subjects. These improvements demonstrate satisfactory leadership and a satisfactory capacity to improve further.
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Increase the proportion of good or better teaching, especially in Years 3 and 4, by: ensuring that work always matches pupils’ differing needs involving all pupils in whole class discussions giving pupils sufficient opportunity to work independently.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Accelerate progress in mathematics by: ensuring teachers’ marking identifies pupils’ next steps in learning expanding opportunities for pupils to develop and apply their numeracy across the curriculum.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that leaders at all levels understand what constitutes good progress and check provision rigorously to ensure that challenging, measurable targets are achieved.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Attainment on entry to the school varies considerably from year to year. Most recent data shows that most children entered the reception year working at levels typical for their age in personal development and speaking, but the majority were working below these levels in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils in Years 1 to 6, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, do best in speaking and writing because these skills are promoted well in most classes. For example, in a good literacy lesson in Year 6, pupils enjoyed explaining what their talk partner found difficult when writing about being a different character. Pupils do less well in mathematics because they are not always clear about what they need to learn next, and their ability to apply what they have learnt is underdeveloped.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Pupils’ achievement is at least satisfactory, although progress varies between classes. Progress in Years 3 and 4 is slower because work is not always well matched to pupils’ particular needs. For example, in one lesson, pupils with a wide range of abilities completed subtraction sums that were of a similar level of difficulty and consequently not all pupils were challenged. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make satisfactory progress, but in some lessons they are given insufficient guidance on how to carry out the tasks set and valuable time is lost. Pupils with complex learning difficulties are given work that matches their specific needs leading to them making good progress.
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Pupils’ sound literacy and numeracy skills, along with their good personal development, prepare them satisfactorily for the next stage of education and later life. Rates of attendance are above average, reflecting pupils’ enthusiasm for school. Pupils say that they feel safe at school and are listened to when they have a worry. They have a good understanding about staying safe, including e-safety. Pupils raise funds for charities and develop good spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness. They respect and appreciate diversity, singing the school song about equal opportunities with sincerity. The school deserves Healthy School Status because pupils are keen to take part in the various sporting activities, including ‘walk to school’ week, and enjoy healthy snacks and lunches.
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes
p.6
Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress
p.6
contribute to their future economic well-being
Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1
p.6
How effective is the provision?
Teachers use praise well to help manage behaviour successfully. They have a secure knowledge of the subjects they teach and use ICT well to support learning. Teachers are good at involving pupils in assessing their learning in writing, but in mathematics they do not consistently provide pupils with enough guidance on what they need to learn next. Teaching is not consistently good, especially in Years 3 and 4. Work is not always adapted well enough to meet pupils’ differing needs and sometimes teachers talk for too long and do not give pupils enough time to apply what they have learnt.
p.6
How effective is the provision?
The satisfactory curriculum has good additional activities such as educational visits and opportunities to work outside, and is expanding links between subjects. For
p.6
How effective is the provision?
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
example, literacy and ICT are used well to support learning in topic work and have increased the motivation of pupils. There are missed opportunities for pupils to develop numeracy at the right level in all subjects.
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Members of staff know the pupils well and keep track of their progress. Close links with parents and good support for new pupils and those who have personal problems enable them to take a full part in what the school has to offer. Pupils with complex learning difficulties are supported well academically and socially. They are integrated into school life in a way that is appropriate for their specific needs.
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for the quality of provision
p.7
The quality of teaching
Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
Leaders embed ambition and drive improvement satisfactorily because there is a shared understanding of what needs to be done to improve the school so that it can become good in the future. They promote equal opportunities and tackle discrimination satisfactorily. All pupils are included well socially, and the school is working satisfactorily with external agencies to eliminate unevenness in learning and progress between year groups and subjects. The changes in staffing have been managed smoothly and leaders are responding positively to the continuing changes in the school’s size and intake.
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The school’s good safeguarding arrangements are robust and ensure that pupils feel and stay safe. Training is up to date and safer recruitment procedures are followed carefully. Risk assessments are diligently completed.
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The governing body meets statutory requirements and is knowledgeable about the school. It is starting to have an impact on improving provision and pupils’ progress. The school provides good opportunities for pupils to be involved in the local and global community, demonstrating why the school has the International Award. For example, there are good links with schools in contrasting localities.
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
These are the grades for leadership and management
p.7
driving improvement
Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.8
Early Years Foundation Stage
Children make good progress in the Reception classes and enter Year 1 with broadly average attainment. A wide range of activities is made available indoors and outside and children enjoy working with each other and members of staff. Role-play activities are used well to develop basic skills, especially literacy. For example, in the ‘baby clinic’, members of staff demonstrated how to write prescriptions and discussed with children how they should care for the ‘babies’.
p.8
Early Years Foundation Stage
Children settle into school swiftly because members of staff work closely with parents and carers and establish good relationships with the children. Clear routines help children to become confident, happy and keen to learn. Children enjoy talking about what they are doing, learn quickly and behave sensibly. For example, in the morning a member of staff supported groups of children as they learnt to play a counting game and by the afternoon they were able to take turns and play independently. Sensitive support is provided for children’s social and emotional needs. There are good arrangements for assessing learning and ‘learning journeys’ are shared with parents and carers. Children’s ideas are used well to help plan a relevant and interesting curriculum. Leaders have good plans for improvement, including ensuring that there are more boy-friendly writing activities outside to help improve their progress.
p.8
Early Years Foundation Stage
These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage
p.8
Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage
Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.9
Views of parents and carers
In a broadly average return, the vast majority parents and carers are positive about the school and are particularly pleased with the teachers and the way their children are kept safe and happy. The inspection team found teachers to be welcoming and, consequently, pupils are keen to come to school. A few parents and carers expressed concerns over the way unacceptable behaviour is dealt with and the way the school responds to their suggestions or concerns. The inspection team found that the school provides suitable opportunities to respond to the views of parents and carers and the headteacher is always available before school to meet parents. The inspection team found that behaviour is managed well.
p.9
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Giffard Park Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 129 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 362 pupils registered at the school.
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child enjoys school 93 72 35 27 1 1 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 103 80 26 20 0 0 0 0 The school informs me about my child’s progress 66 51 50 39 3 2 1 1 My child is making enough progress at this school 58 45 55 43 3 2 2 2 The teaching is good at this school 80 62 41 32 1 1 0 0 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 76 59 41 32 3 2 2 2 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 72 56 48 37 3 2 0 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 61 47 52 40 2 2 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school meets my child’s particular needs 67 52 50 39 4 3 1 1 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 59 46 48 37 7 5 1 1 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 55 43 50 39 6 5 1 1
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school is led and managed effectively 79 61 43 33 2 2 0 0 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 90 70 35 27 2 2 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be. The school’s capacity for sustained improvement. Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils. The quality of teaching. The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.12
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.13
Inspection of Giffard Park Primary School, Milton Keynes MK14 5PY
We enjoyed coming to see your friendly school. Thank you for being so helpful during our visit. Your school provides you with a satisfactory education.
p.13
Inspection of Giffard Park Primary School, Milton Keynes MK14 5PY
These are the best things about your school.
p.13
Inspection of Giffard Park Primary School, Milton Keynes MK14 5PY
You make best progress in writing and in the Reception classes . You behave well and enjoy coming to school. You are good at helping around the school and in the local area. We agree with you when you say that teachers look after you well. The headteacher and other leaders know what needs to be done to make the school better.
p.13
These are the things we have asked your school to do next to help it
Help you to learn more quickly in Years 3 and 4 by always giving you work that is just right for you, involving you all in whole class discussions and giving you sufficient opportunity to work on your own. Help you learn more quickly in mathematics by showing you what you need to learn next and giving you plenty of chances to use your numeracy skills when you are learning in other subjects. Make sure that all leaders at your school know when you have made good progress and can check that they set challenging targets that they can measure for success.
p.13
These are the things we have asked your school to do next to help it
Thank you once again for telling us about your school and letting us see your work. You could help your teachers by always doing your best work.
p.13
from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy
of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.14
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion