Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Christ Church CofE Primary School

Inspected 16 Sept 2011 · published 5 Oct 2011 · URN 103997

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Sept 2011

  • Name on report verified

    Christ Church CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    103997

Page 1 of 15
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 15% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingstrongpositivemake good progressstronglycleareffectiveconsistently
Criticisminadequatelackinconsistenciestoo lowunacceptableyet toweaknessweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2272w+19
  • Leadership1337w+35
  • What needs to improve99w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
15
Words of findings
3,701
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 28%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 15–16 September 2011 Inspection number 377005 Christ Church CofE Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 103997 Local Authority Sandwell Inspection number 377005 Inspection dates 15–16 September 2011 Reporting inspector Mike Thompson

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 222 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jane Rogers Headteacher Michaela Long Date of previous school inspection 18 November 2008 School address Albert Street Oldbury B69 4DE Telephone number 0121 552 3625 Fax number 0121 552 0891 Email address Headteacher@christchurch.sandwell.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

Three additional inspectors carried out this inspection. The inspectors observed 16 lessons taught by ten teachers, and held meetings with the headteacher, members of the teaching staff and the governing body, a representative of the local authority, and pupils. They looked at a range of information, including data showing the progress made by pupils and samples of pupils’ work. Inspectors analysed responses to questionnaires returned by 56 parents or carers, 78 pupils in Key Stage 2 and 10 members of staff.

p.3

Introduction

The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school’s work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.

p.3

Introduction

 To what extent is the school able to demonstrate that pupils make at least satisfactory progress, particularly those with special educational needs and/or disabilities?  How effective has the school been in responding to the previous inspection findings by ensuring that teaching and the curriculum meet the needs of pupils with English as an additional language and provide consistently challenging work for more-able pupils?  How effectively has the school responded to the findings of the previous inspection?  How skilled are leaders other than senior leaders in monitoring and evaluating, and what is their impact on pupils’ achievement?

p.3

Information about the school

This is an average-size, one-form entry primary school in which a large majority of pupils are from minority ethnic backgrounds. The proportion of pupils with English as an additional language is about three times the national average and is rising steadily each year. At the time of the inspection, those pupils comprised almost 50% of the number on roll. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is broadly in line with the national average. Most of them have general learning difficulties. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is above average.

p.3

Information about the school

There have been very recent and significant changes in the deployment of staff and in the organisation of some year groups. Pupils in Years 4 to 6 are now taught in three mixed-age classes for most of their lessons. As a result of staff reorganisation and new appointments, almost all teachers are new to the class and year groups that they teach. At the start of the inspection, the pupils had been back at school for five days.

p.3

Information about the school

The school has achieved Healthy Schools status and has an Activemark accreditation for its promotion of physical education and sport. It is a ‘Green Flag’ Eco-school. The school provides a breakfast club during term-time. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Main findings

The school provides a satisfactory education for its pupils. Improvements in provision over the past few years have had a positive impact on pupils’ attainment and progress, but inconsistencies in the quality of teaching mean that pupils make satisfactory rather than good progress overall. The school invests a great deal of time and resources in ensuring that pupils make good progress in developing their personal and social skills, thus providing a climate within which learning can take place. Behaviour is good in lessons and around the school, and discussions with pupils confirm this. Pupils say they are well cared for and feel secure. They have a good awareness of how to be healthy. Parents and carers are greatly appreciative of the welcoming, safe and supportive environment provided for their children.

p.4

Main findings

When children join the Nursery, their starting points are well below those expected for three-year-olds and many have limited comprehension of English and little knowledge and understanding of the world around them. Although children make good progress in the Nursery and Reception classes, their attainment is below average by the time they transfer to Key Stage 1. By the time pupils leave at the end of Year 6, their attainment is broadly average. Since attainment at the beginning of Key Stage 1 is also broadly average, this represents satisfactory progress in Key Stages 1 and 2.

p.4

Main findings

Teaching is satisfactory. There is some good teaching and inspectors observed good features in all lessons. Teachers relate well to their pupils and explain tasks clearly. However, their expectations of what pupils can achieve are not always high enough. In some instances, when all pupils have the same task, teachers miss opportunities to ensure good levels of individual challenge because they do not vary the criteria for completing tasks according to pupils’ different levels of attainment. Generally, teachers make good use of information and communication technology (ICT) to help develop pupils’ understanding of new concepts. That occurs most often through effective use of the interactive white boards available in all classrooms. However, pupils do not use ICT routinely as a day-to-day tool to support their learning.

p.4

Main findings

The curriculum provides pupils with memorable experiences that capture their imaginations. Work to develop the ‘Irresistible Learning’ curriculum is continuing. It does not yet take full account of the way in which pupils’ knowledge and skills in different subjects are to be developed progressively within a cross-curricular framework. In addition, the new organisation of mixed-age teaching groups for Years 4, 5 and 6, together with teachers’ lack of familiarity with their teaching groups, Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

sometimes results in tasks being pitched at too low a level for some pupils. Strengths of the curriculum are the extra help given to pupils who are in the early stages of learning English and the well-constructed programmes used to help pupils who are falling behind in developing their skills in literacy or numeracy. As a result, pupils with English as an additional language and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress during these interventions. In lessons, these groups of pupils progress at the same satisfactory rate as their classmates.

p.5

Main findings

The impact of the school’s leadership on pupils’ achievement is satisfactory. The headteacher is driving much of the strategic improvement currently taking place. Leaders at other levels are yet to develop the full range of skills needed. Governance is satisfactory. The governing body ensures that legal requirements are met and provides adequate challenge. At all levels of leadership, there is a need for sharper and more systematic monitoring and evaluation of the school’s effectiveness. Nonetheless, the impact of actions taken to improve pupils’ achievement, demonstrate that the school has a satisfactory capacity for sustained improvement.

p.5

Main findings

Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good or better by ensuring that teachers:  make clear reference to skills to be developed in lessons and make use of success criteria to set specific, measurable targets matched carefully to the abilities of all pupils  plan for pupils to use ICT as a day-to-day tool for learning.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Review the planning of the new curriculum and the way in which pupils are grouped to ensure seamless continuity and progression in learning.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure more systematic and rigorous monitoring of teaching and learning and curriculum development.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Standards of attainment improved at the end of both key stages between 2008 and 2010, but dipped slightly at the end of Key Stage 2 in 2011. It is clear from the lessons observed and the work in pupils’ books that pupils learn satisfactorily. Barriers to learning are countered successfully through individual support. For example, in an English lesson for Years 4 to 6, pupils were challenged to use a range of adjectives to describe items that a pirate might use. Learning support staff played a key role in ensuring the inclusion of lower-attaining pupils by providing the help Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

needed by discussing the items chosen by the pupils. The standards of writing observed in Years 4 to 6 are too low. Letter formation is insecure; too many pupils print, rather than writing cursively, and standards of presentation are below those expected normally.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

While pupils make satisfactory gains in learning in lessons, those identified as in need of extra help in literacy and numeracy make good and sometimes outstanding progress when withdrawn from lessons. That is because of the quality of the individual attention they receive and the well-structured materials used. For example, a well-established programme of intensive support in reading has resulted in pupils improving their reading age by as much as 18 months within a ten-week period. Although most pupils are technically competent readers, their lack of vocabulary affects their comprehension adversely. That, in turn, limits the progress they are able to make in other subjects, for example when solving problems in mathematics. The school is aware of this issue acutely, particularly in relation to the underperformance of Pakistani boys, and is working to improve the situation. The strategies adopted include a strong focus on developing subject-specific vocabulary through, for

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

example, guided reading and written prompts in lessons.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils’ strong commitment to adopting healthy lifestyles is evident in their enthusiastic participation in physical activities and their very clear understanding of what constitutes a sensible diet. Pupils’ achievements in promoting health and well- being are recognised through the Healthy Schools status and the Activemark accreditation. The school has well-established and consistently applied procedures for promoting good behaviour; these are reflected in the politeness and consideration shown by all pupils. A clear moral code permeates the daily life of the school and clearly pupils know right from wrong. They show great empathy for the wide range of cultural traditions celebrated within the school.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

These are the grades for pupils’ outcomes Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning Taking into account: Pupils’ attainment 1 The quality of pupils’ learning and their progress The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress The extent to which pupils feel safe 2 Pupils’ behaviour 2 The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 3

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being Taking into account: Pupils’ attendance 1 The extent of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Teachers are good at developing pupils’ confidence as learners. They use questions well to develop pupils’ understanding. However, teachers’ practice in using assessment to develop learning is inconsistent. Lessons lose pace and direction when teachers do not set out precisely what they expect of pupils of different levels of ability. Where teaching is most successful, there is a strong focus on ensuring that the pupils know precisely what they have to achieve and how to do it. For example, in a Year 2 English lesson, the teacher’s good use of a poem written by one of the pupils provided clear direction about the criteria that they needed to use when assessing their own work. A scrutiny of pupils’ books showed that generally teachers’ marking is effective in helping improve pupils’ work.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The curriculum contributes satisfactorily to pupils’ academic attainment and provides the required balance between subjects. It is adapted well to meet the needs of pupils with English as an additional language and to capture the interest of boys. Its main strengths are in the promotion of pupils’ personal development and in providing activities to enrich pupils’ learning and life experiences. For example, the local authority music service provides violin and cello tuition for pupils. The newly adopted ‘Irresistible Learning’ curriculum provides good opportunities for pupils to develop their skills in literacy and numeracy within other subjects. The curriculum for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is satisfactory. Individual education plans for pupils at the School Action stage are set out clearly and in accessible language, with clear targets to be achieved. However, the plans for pupils with more

p.7

How effective is the provision?

complex needs are less clear and lack precision.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The needs of individuals are known well and pupils feel valued members of the school family. There are very clear, well-established arrangements for the induction of pupils into school and smooth transition to the next phase of pupils’ education at the end of Year 6. However, transition from the Reception Year to Year 1 is not managed well enough and this results in some inadequate aspects of provision in Year 1. The school provided compelling evidence of the way in which potentially vulnerable pupils and their families benefit from carefully targeted support. The breakfast club provides a caring and safe start to the day for the pupils attending.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision The quality of teaching Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 3

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The positive views expressed by staff, parents and carers, and pupils indicate that they have confidence in the leadership. Leaders embed ambition and drive improvement satisfactorily. Regular tracking of pupils’ progress helps inform the school’s actions. Target-setting is based on secure assessment information, but is only adequately challenging. There are suitable plans in place to improve on areas of weakness and eliminate inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. Senior leaders have a very clear view of what constitutes good teaching, but quality checks are not systematic enough. There is a strong commitment to ensuring that staff update their skills constantly. The governing body takes a keen interest in the work of the school and is well informed. However, it has yet to develop the full range of skills required to help it become even more independent in holding it to account, for example by

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

making links between national data about pupils’ progress and the impact of teaching. A good feature of governance is the way in which the governing body is organising the induction of new governors. Safeguarding procedures are secure, but are not audited thoroughly enough.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

Parents’ and carers’ overwhelmingly positive views about their children’s positive experiences reflect their appreciation that this is an inclusive school in which discrimination has no place and which gives their children a sense of belonging and equality of opportunity. The school is committed strongly to developing partnerships with parents and carers. Good examples of current initiatives are the improved engagement of Pakistani mothers, including a weekly keep-fit session, and the great success of adult education focused on GCSE and NVQ qualifications for parents, carers and family members. Work to improve the promotion of community cohesion is continuing. There is a very good awareness of the needs of the local community and pupils have a satisfactory understanding of other communities within the United Kingdom. The school acknowledges that more needs to be done to broaden pupils’ horizons within a global context.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met The effectiveness of the school’s engagement with parents and carers 2 Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 3 The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 3 The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 3 The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Despite the changes in teaching staff, children in the Nursery and Reception classes continue to make good progress. That is because of the successful, well-established systems in place and the continuity provided by the experienced and effective teams of learning support staff. The children have ready access to a good range of interesting and enjoyable activities that encourage independence and initiative, both indoors and out. Basic skills of number and letter recognition and formation are taught well. The good pace of direct teaching and good opportunities for active, investigative learning mean that children focus their attention well on the tasks in hand. In the Nursery, for example, observation of a hedgehog resulted in good concentration as children made well-proportioned models of the animal. Generally, adults are good at developing learning through constant dialogue with children about the activities being tackled. However, they are less adept at seizing opportunities to

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

develop children’s learning further by modelling grammatically correct responses for them to repeat. Children’s progress is monitored carefully so that provision can be adjusted in response to learning. High priority is placed on ensuring good-quality care. Good links with parents and carers contribute strongly to the good start to children’s education. In the Nursery, for example, they are enhanced through workshops for parents and carers in order to help promote support for children’s learning at home. Leadership is good, despite changes in staffing, because of the strong teamwork and the clear direction provided by following proven practice.

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Views of parents and carers

A very large majority of parents and carers were overwhelmingly positive in their views of the school. There is no common theme within the very few negative responses. Inspection findings support most of the positive views expressed by Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Views of parents and carers

parents and carers, particularly with regard to the good aspects within the care and welfare of pupils. However, teaching and the progress made by pupils are satisfactory rather than good.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Christ Church CofE Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 56 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 222 pupils registered at the school.

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 33 59 20 36 3 5 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 33 59 22 39 1 2 0 0 The school informs me about my child’s progress 19 34 35 63 0 0 2 4 My child is making enough progress at this school 15 27 33 59 4 7 3 5 The teaching is good at this school 13 23 38 68 1 2 3 5 The school helps me to support my child’s learning 20 36 33 59 0 0 3 5 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 18 32 35 63 1 2 1 2 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 16 29 32 57 1 2 3 5

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school meets my child’s particular needs 20 36 30 54 2 4 3 5 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 20 36 26 46 3 5 3 5 The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 18 32 31 55 2 4 3 5

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The school is led and managed effectively 21 38 28 50 0 0 2 4 Overall, I am happy with my child’s experience at this school 20 36 31 55 1 2 3 5

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted’s questionnaire

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.  The school’s capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils’ needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.13

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

Inspection of Christ Church CofE Primary School , Oldbury , B69 4DE

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

I would like to thank all of you for being so welcoming and helpful to the inspectors when we visited your school. The school gives you a satisfactory education; this means that there are a lot of things that the school is doing right and some things that need to be improved. I know that all the adults who help to run your school want it to be a good school. For this to happen, you need to make better progress in your work.

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

Here are some of the good things about your school.

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

 You are making good progress in the Nursery and Reception classes.  We were impressed by your good manners and behaviour.  You know a lot about how to be healthy and you said that you feel safe in school.

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

To help you to make better progress, we want the school to do three things.

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

 Your teachers need to make sure that you understand your targets in each lesson and know how to reach them. Also, we want them to make you use ICT much more often in lessons. I am sure that you will look forward to this!  You enjoy your Irresistible Learning lessons, but some of you told us that you would like to have some harder work in these lessons. We have asked your teachers to look again at their plans so that they give you work that makes you think hard and helps you to learn more quickly.  We would like all of the people who help run your school, including all the teachers and the governing body, to make even closer checks on what is happening in school and how well you are learning.

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

You can play your part in helping the school to become even better. The best way for you to do this is by listening carefully to what your teachers have to say and working hard to reach the targets that your teachers set for you. We are sure that you are ready for these challenges! We wish you every success in the future.

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

Mike Thompson Lead inspector (on behalf of the inspection team) procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion