Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Sir John Nelthorpe School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Sept 2011
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing
- URN verified
118112
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.
- OverallSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.11
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.11
- The majority of positive comments made by parents and carers were in support of the school’s pastoral system, which helps students feel safe and secure. p.9
- The school has recently improved the subject choices for Year 10 and 11 to make sure it suits all abilities of students and we found that this is improving results and how much you enjoy school, which is reflected in your high attendance. p.13
- Some departments have been more successful in establishing consistently high quality teaching than others and it is this inconsistency across the school that is preventing the overall quality of teaching from rising to good. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching ranges from good to inadequate, although the school is working hard to eliminate the rare instances of inadequate teaching. p.6
- A minority of parents expressed concerns about how the school informs them of their children’s progress, how well the school helps parents and carers to support their children, how well students are helped to have a healthy lifestyle, how well the school deals with unacceptable behaviour and how the school takes account of parents’ and carers’ concerns. p.9
- However, the limited development of literacy across the curriculum is a relative weakness of the curriculum. p.7
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.11
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.11
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ■ Raise the achievement of lower-ability students by: ensuring no opportunities are missed to develop their literacy skills across the curriculum increasing the rigour with which the progress of lower-ability students is tracked and monitored by school leaders and classroom teachers to ensure that additional support is targeted effectively. p.5
- ■ Improve the leadership and management of teaching and learning by: increasing the opportunities for staff to share the good practice that currently exists in the school ensuring that the results from classroom monitoring of teaching are used to systematically improve the quality of teaching across the school. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 14
- Words of findings
- 4,284
- longer than usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing Inspection report
p.1
Age group 11–19 Inspection date(s) 12–13 September 2011 Inspection number 379545 Unique Reference Number 118112 Local authority North Lincolnshire Inspection number 379545 Inspection dates 12–13 September 2011 Reporting inspector Robert Jones
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 11–19 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 645 Of which number on roll in the sixth form 64 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Peter Gray Headteacher L Hewlett Parker Date of previous school inspection 17 June 2009 School address Grammar School Road Brigg DN20 8AA Telephone number 01652 656551 Fax number 01652 658229 Email address admin.sjn@northlincs.gov.uk Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 2 of 14
p.1
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It rates council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.
p.2
To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 3 of 14
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by four additional inspectors. The inspectors observed teaching and learning in 34 lessons, taught by 34 teachers, and held meetings with members of the governing body, staff and students. They observed the school's work, and looked at a range of documentation, including policies, the school improvement plan, records of students' progress and child protection records. The inspection team received and analysed 329 questionnaires from parents and carers, as well as a number of questionnaires completed by students and from staff.
p.3
Introduction
The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.
p.3
Introduction
■ The progress made by lower-ability students. ■ How well the curriculum is customised to meet the diverse needs of students in Key Stage 4 and for those in the sixth form. ■ How effective are the school’s middle leaders in monitoring and evaluating provision in the school?
p.3
Information about the school
This is a smaller-than-average secondary school. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is below the national average. The majority of students are of White British heritage and very few speak English as an additional language. There are fewer students than average with special educational needs and/or disabilities but the number of students who have a statement of special educational needs is above average. The school has a sixth form that is federated with The Vale of Ancholme Technology and Music College, and together they form the Brigg Sixth Form.
p.3
Information about the school
The school gained specialist status for science, mathematics and computing in September 2005 and holds various awards, including Healthy Schools status and the Gold standard in information, advice and guidance. Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 4 of 14
p.3
Information about the school
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Main findings
This is a satisfactory school. It is improving steadily and there are good aspects of its work, notably in the care, guidance and support afforded to students. Students agree, making comments such as, ‘The school takes really good care of us’. A feature of the school is students’ positive behaviour, exemplified by students’ good manners. Consequently, the school is a calm, ordered environment where trust and mutual respect are very much the order of the day. Students are well motivated as demonstrated by their high attendance.
p.4
Main findings
Attainment over the past three years has been rising, as has the rate of progress students make. Progress is satisfactory overall. However, the rate of progress is accelerating more consistently for the higher- and middle-ability students than that of lower-ability students.
p.4
Main findings
The quality of teaching varies across the school and therefore lacks the consistency needed to improve its overall quality to good. While there are examples of teaching that fully engages, motivates and challenges all abilities, too much teaching falls short of these essential qualities needed to get the best from students.
p.4
Main findings
The school benefits greatly from its good sixth form provision. The articulate, well- mannered students provide very positive role models for younger students. Although small numbers of students join the sixth-form federation, students make good progress, with many securing university places on completion of A level studies.
p.4
Main findings
The school has concentrated its efforts on developing the role of middle leaders. This has had success in improving the way leaders at all levels use data, resulting in increased numbers of students leaving in Year 11 with grades A* to C in five or more GCSEs, including both English and mathematics. Leaders and managers have been less successful in systematically improving the quality of teaching and learning across the school. Middle leaders increasingly undertake self-evaluation activities, although this varies in sharpness between departments. The curriculum has recently been overhauled at Key Stage 4 to more adequately accommodate different abilities of students and there are clear early signs of this initiative being successful. The school’s specialism has contributed to developing the school’s curriculum; it has also had an impact in the wider community. These factors illustrate well the school’s
p.4
Main findings
satisfactory capacity to sustain its improvement. Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 5 of 14
p.4
Main findings
Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
■ Improve the consistency and quality of teaching so it becomes at least good by: using data more effectively in the classroom so that work that is planned matches the range of students’ abilities increasing the challenge for students through more effective questioning giving students increased opportunities to work in groups, solving problems and being actively involved in their own learning ensuring students are fully involved in assessing their own and each other’s work so they know what they should do to improve.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
■ Raise the achievement of lower-ability students by: ensuring no opportunities are missed to develop their literacy skills across the curriculum increasing the rigour with which the progress of lower-ability students is tracked and monitored by school leaders and classroom teachers to ensure that additional support is targeted effectively.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
■ Improve the leadership and management of teaching and learning by: increasing the opportunities for staff to share the good practice that currently exists in the school ensuring that the results from classroom monitoring of teaching are used to systematically improve the quality of teaching across the school.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
The quality of learning is satisfactory overall but inconsistent across the school. In the best lessons, students’ good behaviour and well-developed social skills are put to good use in activities that require them to work closely in groups and learn independently. This results in rapid rates of progress. In one English lesson, for example, students made good progress by working in pairs to analyse various websites to understand how persuasive language was used. In other lessons, however, students are not well challenged due to over-long teacher explanations and insufficient opportunities for students to work in groups, solve problems and be actively involved in their own learning. Furthermore, there are often missed opportunities for students to develop their literacy skills across all areas of the curriculum. This shortcoming particularly slows the progress made by lower-ability students. While their progress is broadly satisfactory, there is a smaller proportion of
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
students who make good progress than for other ability groupings. This includes students with special educational needs and/or disabilities and others of low ability who do not receive timely support. Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 6 of 14
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Students enter the school with attainment that is average. By the time they reach the end of Year 11, their achievement is satisfactory. Students enjoy school, which is reflected in their high attendance. They comment on how safe they feel from any threats of bullying, with a caring ear always available should the need arise. Many students grasp the plentiful opportunities to make valuable contributions to the school and community, notably through participation in the ‘Lifestyle’ scheme in helping senior members of the community. A good range of activities help students learn about the world of business and enterprise with careers guidance being of a high quality. This, coupled with students’ high attendance and rising attainment in the school, results in them being well prepared for the next stage in their education. Students’ well-developed social skills, alongside good opportunities to engage with
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
students of other cultures, for example, through foreign exchanges, ensures their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good.
p.6
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
These are the grades for pupils' outcomes Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning Taking into account: Pupils' attainment 1 3 The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3 The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress The extent to which pupils feel safe 2 Pupils' behaviour 2 The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 2 The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being Taking into account: Pupils' attendance 1 1 The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2
p.6
How effective is the provision?
The quality of teaching ranges from good to inadequate, although the school is working hard to eliminate the rare instances of inadequate teaching. Some departments have been more successful in establishing consistently high quality teaching than others and it is this inconsistency across the school that is preventing the overall quality of teaching from rising to good. Where teaching is most successful, planning takes account of the full range of abilities and teachers use a variety of questioning techniques to challenge students fully. This enables teachers to target specific students who need additional support while also stretching others. Too often though, planning does not take into account the data on students’ abilities to ensure high quality learning takes place. In these less effective lessons, questioning provides limited challenge through only asking the motivated students who have their hands up, or only requiring very brief answers, and the additional
p.6
How effective is the provision?
support is not as effective or is not deployed to greatest effect. Similarly, assessment to support learning varies in quality. Where it is most effective, students are acutely
p.6
How effective is the provision?
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4 is low Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 7 of 14
p.6
How effective is the provision?
aware of their abilities through assessing their own and each other’s work. Consequently, they can comment, using subject specific vocabulary, on what they should do to improve. This was particularly evident in an art lesson where students gave each other advice on how to improve their work. In some lessons, however, students were unsure of what they needed to do to improve due to insufficient opportunities to assess their own and each other’s work.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
The satisfactory curriculum is broad and balanced, meeting statutory requirements. A new ‘pathways’ curriculum in Key Stage 4 now more adequately meets the needs of students. This has resulted in improved outcomes for all students. However, the limited development of literacy across the curriculum is a relative weakness of the curriculum. A good range of sporting and other extra-curricular enhancements add to students’ enjoyment of school.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
Care, guidance and pastoral support are strengths in the school. Non-attendance is pursued rigorously, resulting in very few persistent absences and high attendance overall. Pastoral support is first class. This has ensured students receive high quality guidance on the next stage of their education and that Year 7 students settle quickly into their new surroundings. Students whose circumstances make them vulnerable receive good support for their needs, which results in their high attendance and them feeling safe and secure. The school works well with a range of outside agencies to support those students who need the most care.
p.7
How effective is the provision?
These are the grades for the quality of provision The quality of teaching Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning 3 The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 2
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
Leaders and managers embed ambition and drive improvement to a satisfactory level. The tracking of students’ progress has ensured that more students are now attaining five GCSEs at grade C or above including English and mathematics. However, the progress of lower-ability students has not been tracked with the same rigour, which has been a contributory factor in these students not making as much progress as their peers. Leaders are aware that the next stage in development for the school is to increase the pace with which the quality of teaching and learning improves in consistency and quality. There are, at present, too few opportunities for the good practice that currently exists in the school to be shared, so that teachers learn from the best. The quality of teaching and learning is monitored. However, the middle and senior leaders have not always systematically used the results of this monitoring to improve the quality of teaching and learning. The governing body
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
provides adequate challenge and support to the school, discharging its statutory duties effectively. The school’s specialist status has had a positive impact in projects such as an over 60s computer club, provision of computer courses for the local Traveller community and in hosting a science week involving local primary schools. Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 8 of 14
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The school meets statutory requirements for safeguarding. Discrimination is robustly tackled whenever and wherever it occurs. While students make different rates of progress, the gaps with similar groups nationally are narrowing, and therefore the school promotes equal opportunities to a satisfactory level. The school satisfactorily promotes community cohesion. The school has undertaken an audit in relation to community cohesion that has had some success in helping students to engage with communities other than their own, such as engaging in a project to develop a school in Malawi.
p.8
How effective are leadership and management?
These are the grades for the leadership and management The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning 3 The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and support ing the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met The effectiveness of the school's engagement with parents and carers 3 The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 2 The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 3 The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 3 The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money
p.8
Sixth form
Students in the sixth form play an important part in the school, such as acting as ambassadors for the school in community events and organising fund-raising initiatives through ‘TWAG’, the world awareness group. They act as good role models for younger members of the school. The quality of teaching in the sixth form is good, which ensures academic outcomes for students are good, with many securing places at their first choice university. However, group sizes are very small, often consisting of fewer than five students. Inevitably, this limits opportunities for collaboration and discussion. In other respects, the curriculum for the sixth form meets the needs of students well, with a range of A level and vocational courses on offer across the federated sixth form. Care, guidance and support are strong, with tutors being the first port of call for students. Students speak positively about the additional support
p.8
Sixth form
teachers offer them. A range of external speakers and events organised by the federation prepares students well for their university applications. A range of enhancements are on offer to students, but these are not taken up by all students, since they are not always viewed with equal importance as formal academic studies.
p.8
Sixth form
These are the grades for the sixth form Overall effectiveness of the sixth Form Taking into account: Outcomes for students in the sixth form 2 The quality of provision in the sixth form 2 Leadership and management of the sixth form 2 Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 9 of 14
p.8
Views of parents and carers
The majority of positive comments made by parents and carers were in support of the school’s pastoral system, which helps students feel safe and secure. The inspection findings endorse these positive comments.
p.9
Views of parents and carers
A minority of parents expressed concerns about how the school informs them of their children’s progress, how well the school helps parents and carers to support their children, how well students are helped to have a healthy lifestyle, how well the school deals with unacceptable behaviour and how the school takes account of parents’ and carers’ concerns.
p.9
Views of parents and carers
The inspection team investigated all these issues. The school’s engagement with parents and carers was judged to be satisfactory. Parents and carers receive regular updates on the progress of their children through, an open evening for parents and carers, an annual report and a termly report on attainment and effort made in lessons. The team found that students’ planners were sometimes used to pass messages to parents and carers, but this was inconsistent across the school. The team found that behaviour was good across the school, particularly during break times and lunch times. However, where lessons did not fully engage students, they were passive observers rather than active participants. They found that students receive plentiful advice on how to lead active, healthy lifestyles, but not all students choose to act on this advice. For example, while smoking is not common, it is in evidence in corners of the school.
p.9
Views of parents and carers
Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 10 of 14
p.10
questionnaire
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 329 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 645 pupils registered at the school.
p.10
questionnaire
Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 104 32 208 63 5 2 3 1 The school keeps my child safe 99 30 203 62 10 3 1 0 The school informs me about my child's progress 81 25 194 59 22 7 3 1 My child is making enough progress at this school 79 24 209 64 11 3 1 0 The teaching is good at this school 94 29 202 61 9 3 1 0 The school helps me to support my child's learning 54 16 197 60 43 13 3 1 The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 50 15 218 66 29 9 1 0 The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 91 28 185 56 12 4 2 1
p.10
questionnaire
The school meets my child's particular needs 87 26 207 63 14 4 2 1 The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 61 19 187 57 37 11 9 3
p.10
questionnaire
The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 48 15 197 60 24 7 4 1
p.10
questionnaire
The school is led and managed effectively 71 22 198 60 18 5 3 1 Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 108 33 194 59 11 3 1 0
p.10
questionnaire
The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%. Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 11 of 14
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.11
Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 43 47 10 0 Primary schools 6 46 42 6 Secondary schools 14 36 41 9 Sixth forms 15 42 41 3 Special schools 30 48 19 3 Pupil referral units 14 50 31 5 All schools 10 44 39 6
p.11
Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously.
p.11
Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The data in the table above is for the period 1 September 2010 to 08 April 2011 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ).
p.11
Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools.
p.11
Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units. Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 12 of 14
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
The school's capacity for sustained improvement. Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils. The quality of teaching. The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started. Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 13 of 14
p.12
for Science, Mathematics and Computing, Brigg, DN20 8AA
Thank you for the welcome you gave us recently. I am pleased to report that you go to a satisfactory school that is improving. You told us how much you enjoyed school, how safe you felt from the threats of bullying and how well the school ensures you are well looked after.
p.13
for Science, Mathematics and Computing, Brigg, DN20 8AA
We found that you make satisfactory progress. The school has recently improved the subject choices for Year 10 and 11 to make sure it suits all abilities of students and we found that this is improving results and how much you enjoy school, which is reflected in your high attendance. We found that the sixth form is good, and provides a good choice of courses. To improve further, we have asked your headteacher and staff to do the following.
p.13
for Science, Mathematics and Computing, Brigg, DN20 8AA
■ Improve teaching so it is all at least good, by making sure teachers plan work that is suitable for all abilities, question you more thoroughly in lessons, give you more opportunities to learn by being actively involved rather than listening to long explanations, and having more opportunities to assess your own and each others’ work. ■ Help lower-ability students to make good progress by making sure you develop literacy skills in all subjects, not only in English lessons ■ Improve how school leaders monitor the quality of teaching by making sure all teachers learn from the best teachers in the school.
p.13
for Science, Mathematics and Computing, Brigg, DN20 8AA
You can help by continuing to be the well-behaved, confident young people you are today. I wish you the very best for the future.
p.13
for Science, Mathematics and Computing, Brigg, DN20 8AA
Robert Jones Lead inspector Inspection report: Sir John Nelthorpe School - A Specialist Technology College for Science, Mathematics and Computing, 12–13 September 2011 14 of 14
p.13
for Science, Mathematics and Computing, Brigg, DN20 8AA
procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.14
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion