Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School

Inspected 29 Jun 2011 · published 20 Jul 2011 · URN 119531

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Jun 2011

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PR4 0TT

  • Name on report verified

    Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School

  • URN verified

    119531

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentenjoyextremelyhighly effectivemake good progressexemplaryeffective
Criticisminadequatelacknot alwaysweaknessesunacceptablenot outstandinginsufficientweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1919w+61
  • Leadership1580w+34
  • What needs to improve162w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
3,656
longer than usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 40%Leadership 33%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 119531 Local Authority Lancashire Inspection number 358575 Inspection dates 28–29 June 2011 Reporting inspector Susan Clipson-Boyles

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 32 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mrs Julie Eccleston Headteacher Mrs Jan Porter Date of previous school inspection 16 June 2008 School address Preston Road Inskip, Preston Lancashire PR4 0TT Telephone number 01772 690438 Fax number 01772 690438 Email address burser@inskip.lancs.sch.uk

p.1

Age group 4–11 Inspection dates 28–29 June 2011 Inspection number 358575 Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 2 of 14

p.1

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 3 of 14

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by one additional inspector. Three teachers were observed during four lessons and informal visits to classrooms. Meetings were held with staff and members of the governing body; a formal discussion took place with the local authority senior adviser on the telephone; informal discussions were held with parents, carers and pupils in the playground; and a more formal meeting was held with Years 5 and 6 pupils. The inspector observed the school's work, and scrutinised books from various curriculum areas and assessment data for pupils from all year groups. She scrutinised other documentation including teachers' planning; school improvement documents; minutes from meetings; information for parents and carers; and relevant policies, procedures and audits, including those relating to health and safety issues. She analysed 22 questionnaires from parents and carers, 15 from pupils and five from staff.

p.3

Introduction

The inspector reviewed many aspects of the school's work. She looked in detail at a number of key areas.  Is teaching in Key Stage 2 consistently planned and delivered to secure good progress for all pupils?  Is the teaching throughout the school sufficiently challenging for pupils who are capable of achieving the higher levels in mathematics?  How do staff take responsibility for monitoring standards across the curriculum and is their approach effective?  Is there sufficient evidence to support the school's judgement that capacity for improvement is outstanding?

p.3

Information about the school

Inskip St Peter's Church of England (Aided) School is much smaller than the average- sized primary school. The pupils, almost all of whom are White British, are taught in two mixed-age classes: Reception, Year 1 and Year 2 in the lower-school class; Years 3-6 in the upper-school class. The headteacher teaches for half the week in Key Stage 2. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is extremely low compared to the national average. The school supports an average percentage of pupils with special educational needs; there are currently no pupils with a disability. The proportion of those with a statement of special educational needs is above the national average. The school has won a number of awards since its last inspection including the gold level Green Flag Eco award and the Lancashire Physical Education Gold Mark. It recently won the Church Schools' Distinctiveness Award from the Diocese of Blackburn.

p.3

Information about the school

A private pre-school is provided on the school site. This is subject to a separate inspection, and the report is available on the Ofsted website. Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 4 of 14

p.3

Information about the school

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Inskip St Peter's is a good school. It provides a very caring and supportive environment where pupils feel extremely safe, happy and secure. They enjoy coming to school and attendance is high. The school's creative approach to teaching the curriculum results in particularly high levels of knowledge and awareness of safety and healthy lifestyles. Pupils make an outstanding contribution to the school and wider community, ranging from a well-informed determination when writing to the local council about recycling, to their relentless efforts when raising funds to buy hens for a village in Rwanda. The church plays a significant role in the work of the school, and this is linked closely to the highly effective promotion of community cohesion which extends and enriches learning further. The impact of both is reflected in the pupils' excellent spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. As a result of the school's good provision, almost all pupils make good progress. Cohorts

p.4

Main findings

are very small and children's starting points vary considerably from year to year. Generally, they are around national expectations for their age. Attainment is average overall: above average for English, but for mathematics slightly below because there is insufficient challenge for those who are capable of reaching the higher levels. The school is aware of this and it has implemented some changes for Years 5 and 6 but attainment remains average across the rest of the school. The headteacher and two part-time teachers share the teaching of Key Stage 2 pupils. They understand the pupils' learning needs well and often individualise lessons from units of work. Lesson planning is collaborative but does not build on assessments sharply enough to target different levels of learning. This means that not all pupils are able to talk about and demonstrate their progress within a lesson. Marking is variable; it is nearly always supportive, but next steps

p.4

Main findings

for improvement are not provided consistently. Parents and carers speak very highly of the school and its staff; communication between school and home is outstanding. Likewise, other partnerships add excellent value to secure good and outstanding outcomes for the pupils. The staff and headteacher work closely together on a daily basis in classrooms. They evaluate and review their teaching and the wider work of the school constantly. Similarly, members of the governing body participate in evaluative activities. However, there is a lack of more formal monitoring which limits the precision of any strategic planning to improve teaching and learning. Similarly, quality assurance of systems and procedures, including those for safeguarding, take place informally rather than in a planned and proactive way. Nevertheless, aspects of the school's work, such as attainment in writing, have improved since the last inspection.

p.4

Main findings

Subject leadership has also developed well and the school's capacity to improve is good. Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 5 of 14

p.4

Main findings

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attainment in mathematics so that in July 2012 more pupils have reached Level 3 in Year 2 and Level 5 in Year 6 by: ensuring that all teachers plan more challenging targets for pupils who are capable of reaching the higher levels using step-by-step pupil progress assessments, a system already used successfully to improve writing, to help identify next steps for learning.  Increase the effectiveness of assessment to support learning by: linking data directly to more focused learning targets for different abilities when planning lessons including next steps for learning when marking pupils' work and providing time to practise corrections involving pupils more often in evaluating and discussing their own progress in lessons.  Develop regular proactive approaches to monitoring and quality assurance so that: there is a clearer picture of strengths and weaknesses in teaching to assist with ongoing improvement and professional development

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

actions in improvement plans have measurable success criteria to evaluate the impact on pupils' outcomes.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Pupils are very enthusiastic about school and enjoy learning. They achieve well and in some areas their progress and development are outstanding. Academic progress is good across the school for all groups of learners, apart from higher-ability pupils in mathematics. In Years 5 and 6, this is improving as a result of accelerated progress this year. In the classrooms, the inspector observed pupils enjoying taking part in the 'hands- on' lessons that teachers provide. Years 3 and 4 pupils were totally absorbed in practical science during the inspection, while testing substances for solubility. Other pupils were seen participating maturely during a short drama sequence about an earthquake, prior to writing news reports. Pupils with special educational needs learn and develop very positively as a result of the good support the school provides; they too make good progress. Behaviour is good. Physical education staff at a local college wrote that, during

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

recent dance and gymnastic events, the pupils from Inskip St Peter's 'demonstrated their confidence, competence, drive and motivation as well as their level of skill'. Pupils' behaviour makes a strong contribution to learning, particularly as they are confident to express their ideas and take ownership of decision-making. However, some of the younger children are less able to work independently, and sometimes need help in re- focusing their attention to stay on task. In the lower-school, personal and social skills for some pupils do not develop as rapidly as other aspects of their development. Older pupils help the younger ones very responsibly at playtimes and enjoy taking responsibility for improving the school, particularly the Eco Committee. The many awards conferred upon the school reflect the breadth of their achievements. Pupils' outstanding spiritual, moral, Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 6 of 14

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

social and cultural development is very evident in the reflective ways that pupils discuss issues. They are highly responsible individuals and enjoy making decisions about the school, such as the gradual expansion of the garden from flowers to vegetables for the kitchen, and eventually into an orchard for future generations of pupils to enjoy!

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 2

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 1

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 1

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Teaching is good overall because it leads to high levels of engagement, productivity and good achievement. Teachers have strong subject knowledge, and are particularly skilled at making lessons interesting and practical for the pupils. For example, Year 1 pupils were absorbed in a lesson on measuring, where they had to design a packet for a large book. Pupils' thinking is extended frequently through skilful questioning. A significant contributing factor to the improvements in writing has been the use by teachers of step- by-step pupil progress assessments, but this is not yet used to raise attainment in mathematics. Additional support for pupils with special educational needs is of high quality and promotes good learning and behaviour. The weaker aspects of teaching are the planning and the marking. Lesson plans tend to be based on standard units of work, so targets for learning by different ability groups are not always sufficiently focused, although

p.6

How effective is the provision?

teachers do fine-tune lessons regularly to adapt tasks according to individual pupils' progress. Books are marked regularly, but too little attention is paid to providing clear next Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 7 of 14

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

How effective is the provision?

steps for learning and corrections are not necessarily followed up. Pupils have too few opportunities to evaluate their own work. The creative curriculum is varied with many examples of enrichment and extension. During the inspection, there was much excitement about the visit to a local recycling plant. Despite its small size, the school provides a good range of after-school clubs across the year. Care, guidance and support are good. Adults build trusting and supportive relationships with all pupils to encourage and support their learning. The staff are constantly striving to seek new ways to support better learning and personal development, and they are responsive to the needs of all groups. The excellent engagement with parents and carers plays a significant part in this, and learning is extended into the home through workshops for parents and carers and resources on the school website. The school works hard to promote pupils' attendance; the effectiveness of this is evidenced by

p.7

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 2

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The school is an extremely warm and welcoming community. The headteacher leads with an ambitious determination that all pupils will receive the best possible education and care. Her high expectations and continuous drive for improvement are echoed throughout the school. Staff, the governing body and pupils are constantly seeking to develop new initiatives. They are vigilant against discrimination to ensure that all pupils have equal opportunities to succeed. Action is already being taken to ensure the higher-ability pupils reach the standards they are capable of in mathematics. Self-evaluation is second nature, and reflective practice leads to a continuous refining of what the school does. The good and outstanding outcomes pay tribute to this. However, the lack of precision in strategic planning and more focused analysis means that sometimes the priorities for improvement are not as precise as they might be. Outcomes are not always measured against success

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

criteria and so some evaluations are over-generous. Capacity to improve is good, though not outstanding as the school has judged it to be. The teachers are familiar with each other's practice, but the lack of more focused lesson observations means that some aspects for improvement have not been identified. The way that subjects are coordinated and monitored has been developed since the last inspection and this now promotes good learning across the curriculum. Safeguarding procedures are effective and all requirements are in place so that pupils are extremely safe. Many protocols follow good practice, but the lack of systematic quality assurance means that these are not necessarily checked in order to monitor the impact Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 8 of 14

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

and identify further adjustments that may be necessary over time. The school's promotion of community cohesion is exemplary. It is, in itself a highly cohesive and mature community. This provides a secure and inspiring springboard for pupils to reach out to other communities in the United Kingdom and globally. During a recent business enterprise day, one of the school's partners wrote to say that, ' the pupils from Inskip St Peter's mixed extremely well with those from other schools'. Similarly, pupils responded as exemplary diplomats and thoughtful friends to a visiting children's choir from Romania. The work of the governing body is effective. Meetings are well organised and quarterly reviews are carried out to check the work of the school. Members are not afraid to ask challenging questions when required.

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the school's engagement with parents and carers 1

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 1

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 3

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 1

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money 2

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

Provision is effective for the Reception age children within the lower-school class of Key Stage 1 pupils. Good partnership with the pre-school means that learning opportunities outdoors are maximised through the shared area and resources. This enables children to move freely between activities inside and outdoors during continuous provision time. Children clearly enjoy their learning and make good progress during their time in Reception. During the inspection, some children were organising a pretend barbeque and talked sensibly about the dangers of the 'heat' on which they were cooking. The children make choices in their learning, and there is a good balance between adult-led and independently selected activities. However, the lesson planning does not always make clear the specific learning to be targeted across different areas of learning. As a result, children are sometimes at a loss for something to choose that has a more structured

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

purpose. In the classroom, the teacher maximises learning opportunities skilfully for different levels of ability by integrating some Reception age children with the older Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 9 of 14

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

children, for example, when teaching phonics. This results in high levels of challenge and progress is good for all children across the year. All statutory welfare requirements are in place and the environment is well organised, safe and child-friendly. Good information is provided for parents and carers, and induction arrangements reflect good partnerships with home. Staff evaluate the provision continuously, and have a clear understanding of what needs to improve based on their daily observations and the analysis of achievement data for the different areas of learning. However, there is currently no strategic action plan for the Early Years Foundation Stage, which means that improvements are not as focused as they otherwise might be.

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Views of parents and carers

The percentage of questionnaires returned by parents and carers was above the national average return for primary schools. They were all overwhelmingly positive. Parents and carers particularly appreciate the wide range of activities and high quality teaching. They say that the school has a welcoming family atmosphere and children are well cared for, including those with special educational needs. Similarly, this inspection found that teaching, curriculum, care, guidance and support are all good and that the school is well led. Pupils with special educational needs make good progress as a result of good support. A comment about the lack of parking was discussed with the headteacher and the governing body. The cost of building a car park adjacent to the school, £76,000, is considerably beyond the school budget. Alternative parking is provided at the church nearby. Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 10 of 14

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The inspector received 22 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 32 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 13 59 9 41 0 0 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 18 82 4 18 0 0 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

My school informs me about my child's progress 11 50 10 45 1 5 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

My child is making enough progress at this school 12 55 8 36 0 0 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The teaching is good at this school 14 64 7 32 0 0 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school helps me to support my child's learning 12 55 9 41 1 5 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 15 68 6 27 0 0 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 11 50 9 41 1 5 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school meets my child's particular needs 11 50 11 50 0 0 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 8 36 12 55 0 0 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 13 59 7 32 1 5 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school is led and managed effectively 11 50 11 50 0 0 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 11 50 10 45 0 0 1 5

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%. Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 11 of 14

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 December 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units. Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 12 of 14

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started. Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 13 of 14

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Preston, PR4 0TT

Thank you very much for making me welcome when I came to inspect your school. You were very helpful when I asked you questions, and I was impressed with the way you worked so hard in lessons. I also saw good work in your books, and was impressed with your good behaviour. I have judged that Inskip St Peter's is a good school. You feel extremely safe there and enjoy your learning so your attendance is excellent. Your understanding of how to live a healthy lifestyle and how to be safe are outstanding. So are the ways that you take responsibility around the school, and do things for other people in other communities. The amount of money you raised to buy hens for the village in Rwanda was a credit to your efforts. Well done! Mrs Porter and the staff and the governing body work hard to ensure that you have enjoyable lessons and an interesting curriculum. They also take good care of you and guide you in your work so that you learn well. They link up with other

p.13

Preston, PR4 0TT

organisations to provide you with even more learning opportunities. The ways that the staff communicate with and help your parents and carers is also excellent because this helps you feel more secure at school and in your learning. There are some things that the school needs to do to be an even better school. I have asked the teachers to:  help those of you who can to reach the higher levels in mathematics  use assessments and marking more to help you understand the next steps in your learning  check the work of the school more often so they know what is working well and can plan what needs to improve more accurately. I ask you to play your part by continuing to attend well and always doing your best work. I wish every one of you a very happy and successful future.

p.13

Preston, PR4 0TT

Susan Clipson-Boyles Lead Inspector Inspection report: Inskip St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Aided School, 28–29 June 2011 14 of 14

p.13

Preston, PR4 0TT

out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion