Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Denton Community Primary School and Nursery

Inspected 10 Jun 2011 · published 30 Jun 2011 · URN 114433

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jun 2011

  • Postcode verified

    BN9 0QJ

  • Name on report verified

    Denton Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    114433

Page 1 of 17
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Mostly positivemore positive than 19% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectiveeffectivelygood progressstronglyimprovingclearpositive
Criticisminadequateunacceptablenot alwaysconcernsweaknessestoo fewat risknot sufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2194w+45
  • Leadership1851w+22
  • What needs to improve105w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
17
Words of findings
4,146
longer than usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 36%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Denton Community Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 114433 Local Authority East Sussex Inspection number 357536 Inspection dates 9–10 June 2011 Reporting inspector Clive Dunn

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 177 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Sara Fletcher Headteacher Audrey Jarvis Date of previous school inspection 29 January 2008 School address Acacia Road Newhaven BN9 0QJ Telephone number 01273513377 Fax number 01273512259 Email address ajarvis@denton.e-sussex.sch.uk

p.1

Age group 4–11 Inspection dates 9–10 June 2011 Inspection number 357536 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. They saw parts of 15 lessons taught by eight staff. Inspectors spoke with pupils, parents and carers, staff and representatives of the governing body. They observed the school's work, and looked at planning, monitoring, a range of policy documents and records, the governing body minutes and a range of pupils' work. They also analysed 88 questionnaires returned by parents and carers, 94 from pupils and 30 from staff. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.  To what extent learning and progress are improving securely and quickly.  How well the school uses agreed assessment procedures to match work to the needs of different pupils, particularly in writing and mathematics.  How effectively teachers adapt their teaching and the curriculum to meet the needs and aspirations of pupils, particularly boys, and the impact of additional interventions

p.3

Introduction

for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities.  To what extent leaders and managers at different levels are securing rapid-enough improvements in outcomes for pupils, and the rigour of the systems they use for this.

p.3

Information about the school

The number of pupils on roll at this school has fallen since the previous inspection and it is now smaller than average. Most pupils are of White British heritage and very few speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is above average. The percentage of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and the numbers with a statement of special educational needs are above average and rising. The governing body manages a nursery on-site for children from age three that was part of this inspection. In 2010, the school achieved 'Healthy Schools Plus Enhanced Status' and the 'Green Flag' Eco-school award. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Main findings

Denton Community Primary is an improving school that currently provides a satisfactory standard of education. The determined leadership of the headteacher has secured improvements in the quality of teaching to eradicate previous underachievement. Her firm, clear vision and ambition for the school, supported by the governing body, has ensured consistent application of strategies to accelerate progress. For example, teachers diligently apply the 'Marking to Improve' policy to ensure that pupils know their next steps. Staff understand what the school is trying to achieve, though they do not always feel their views and suggestions are taken into account when decisions about the best ways to achieve improvement are made. Most parents and carers are positive about most aspects of the school. However, a significant minority do not feel that the school listens to their views and suggestions. Leaders and the governing body have an accurate picture of the

p.4

Main findings

school's strengths and weaknesses. Senior leaders monitor individual pupil and group progress rigorously alongside the quality of provision, though they miss opportunities to use this to focus targets precisely enough in the school's plans for improvement. That said, there is a clear trend of improvement and attainment is rising strongly. Taking all of this into account, the school has a satisfactory capacity to secure further improvements. Children get off to a good start in the Early Years Foundation Stage. In the rest of the school, progress is at least satisfactory and accelerating. Actions taken by the school have been particularly effective in certain areas, such as improving reading and writing at Key Stage 2, where progress is now good. Consequently, current attainment in Years 5 and 6 is broadly average. The quality of teaching is satisfactory overall because it has not secured consistently good achievement. For example, pupils make satisfactory progress in

p.4

Main findings

Key Stage 1 and in mathematics across the school. In lessons where progress is slower, this is often because tasks and teaching do not have the right level of challenge to promote good achievement. However, the proportion of good teaching is increasing and much of the teaching seen during the inspection was good or better. Pupils' good attitudes and engagement are an important factor underpinning their improving achievement. They respond well to the consistent encouragement of good 'learning behaviours', such as independently accessing resources or supportive displays, or making links with their own prior learning. Pupils are very clear about different things that make a 'good learner' and teachers seize opportunities to encourage this, celebrating and praising good examples during lessons. Combined with regular opportunities to review and improve their own and each other's work, this has had a particularly good impact in terms

p.4

Main findings

of accelerating progress in writing in Key Stage 2. Teachers sometimes miss opportunities to use this to best effect by spending too long on whole-class introductions, which limits time for pupils to work collaboratively or independently at their own level. Carefully selected topics interest, motivate and engage boys and girls equally. A programme of Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

additional interventions and effective support from teaching assistants enables pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities to make progress in line with their peers. While the focus has rightly been on raising attainment, good-quality care has also resulted in some areas of good personal development for pupils. Leaders prioritise this in their relentless drive for improvement to ensure that promotion of pupils' well-being is always part of their plans. The overwhelming majority of parents and carers feel that the school keeps their children safe. Pupils are confident that adults sort out any problems and appreciate things such as the 'Say no to bullying' week. They develop good habits towards adopting healthy lifestyles, reflected in the 'Healthy Schools Plus Enhanced Status' recently achieved. Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise achievement to good by ensuring pupils make consistently good progress, particularly at Key Stage 1 and in mathematics across the school.  Improve teaching so that it is good overall, by January 2012, by: using assessment information to ensure all tasks are matched carefully to the needs of different groups reducing the proportion of the lesson spent in whole-class introductions.  Secure a better capacity to improve by: fully involving staff at all levels in evaluating the school's effectiveness and planning necessary improvements regularly asking parents and carers for their views and ensuring these are used to inform important decisions about whole-school matters.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Attainment has fluctuated in recent years, with results in 2010 dipping significantly below average in English and mathematics. School tracking data show that the attainment of pupils currently in Years 5 and 6 is average. The quality of work in pupils' books provides convincing confirmation of this. Pupils in Year 5 are already attaining levels comparable to Year 6 in reading and writing, indicating that this is a strongly improving trend. From starting points in Nursery and Reception Year that are below expected levels, rates of progress are at least satisfactory and improving because pupils are effectively engaged in their learning. For example, pupils in Year 1 were able to explain not only what they were doing when learning about the life cycle of a frog, but also why they were doing it, and how this had built on from previous lessons. In an English lesson in Year 5, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities made good progress in line with their peers,

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

motivated and enabled to work with enough independence while benefiting from useful prompts and support from the teaching assistant. Where tasks do not have quite the right level of challenge to sustain good achievement for different groups, this often, though not exclusively, includes extending the more able. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Across the school, pupils make good use of 'learning walls' which provide helpful prompts to support them in their tasks. Pupils know what steps they need to take to improve their work and are often involved in identifying these for themselves or their peers. Consequently, they are supportive of each other, for example bursting into spontaneous applause after a Year 6 pupil read aloud their writing in a lesson exploring Shakespeare's Hamlet. The teacher took the opportunity to deepen pupils' understanding by following up with questions to prompt reflection of why the writing was so effective. In a mathematics lesson in Year 4, pupils were able to select and apply their own methods to solve worded number problems. However, the school has correctly identified through its own monitoring that progress in mathematics is satisfactory because pupils across the school are not able to do use and apply their skills consistently well enough.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Behaviour, both in lessons and around school, is mostly good and sometimes outstanding. Pupils show respect for each other, mix well and demonstrate a clear understanding of right and wrong. They respond positively to a range of cultural opportunities, for example through art and music. Their understanding of other cultures and religions is satisfactory, because there are too few opportunities to engage with groups not represented in the immediate community. Pupils know and understand many of the factors that promote their health and are keen to take action to do so. They take on a range of responsibilities within school, including the school council, and as 'eco-warriors', contributing to the successful achievement of the 'Green Flag' eco-school status. There are some opportunities for pupils to engage in the wider community, for example working with the parish council to develop the local playground. However, the school is aware that this

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

aspect of its work is at an early stage of development, and pupils are unsure about their involvement beyond the school. Though pupils understand the next steps in their learning well, their average attendance and basic skills levels mean they are satisfactorily prepared for the next stage of their education and life beyond. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 2

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 3

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Strong relationships with adults at all levels effectively support pupils' improving achievement and well-being. A good range of effective partnerships with other agencies and professionals help the school to break down possible barriers to engagement for pupils whose contexts may make them potentially vulnerable, including support for pupils with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. The strong focus on 'behaviour for learning' has raised the overall quality of pupils' behaviour from satisfactory to good. The broad, balanced curriculum provides effectively for pupils' personal, social, health and emotional development, including through additional small-group sessions, where necessary. Transition arrangements between the Nursery, Reception Year and Year 1 are good, and the school enjoys good links with local secondary schools, which also enhances the sports curriculum. Though it has much strength, the curriculum is satisfactory overall

p.7

How effective is the provision?

because teachers do not adjust it sufficiently well to meet the needs of different groups. Teachers sometimes try to adapt work for different groups by adjusting the quantity required or providing additional support, rather than making sure the task itself has precisely the right level of challenge. Carefully planned interventions, targeted to address particular areas of need, help ensure pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, or those at risk of underachieving, make at least satisfactory progress. The most effective of these have a sharp focus and a brisk, purposeful pace, resulting in good progress, though this is not consistent. Teachers Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

How effective is the provision?

ensure pupils have a clear understanding of what they are supposed to be learning and identify precisely the different things required to be successful. Pupils use and respond to the teachers' marking effectively, sometimes adding their own comments about their learning. Teaching is more consistently good or better at Key Stage 2. Tasks are not always open ended enough and some present pupils with too few opportunities to make their own choices in their learning to promote better achievement, particularly in Key Stage 1.

p.8

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.8

How effective is the provision?

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.8

How effective is the provision?

The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships

p.8

How effective is the provision?

The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 2

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The senior leadership team provides a purposeful direction for improvement. Clear expectations have secured improvements to the quality of teaching, removing inadequacies identified by the school that were contributing to past underachievement. However, other leaders and staff at different levels are not sufficiently involved in planning improvements and evaluating how effective their actions are to secure further improvements more rapidly. The governing body fulfils its statutory duties. It also has a number of good features that support the improvements seen. For example, regular monitoring visits and careful consideration of reports and information give it a good insight to the performance of the school. Members of the governing body use this to ask challenging questions of school leaders to hold them to account. It recognises the need to explore different mechanisms to improve its ability to seek and respond to the views of

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

parents and carers. The good range of partnerships not only contributes effectively to pupils' well-being, but also to the improving achievement. For example, links with a literacy specialist over an extended period successfully introduced effective teaching of reading through guided groups, resulting in the good progress now seen in this area at Key Stage 2. The school is also proactive in engaging with other schools to support professional development for staff. Clear and effective systems to track pupils' progress enable the school to analyse the performance of different groups and respond to any variations. Leaders have used these well to eradicate underperformance, but do not always use the information to set sharp and precise enough targets to even out inconsistencies in progress between different subjects. The school does not tolerate discrimination of any kind and there have been no recorded incidents of racist behaviour in recent years. The school meets statutory

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

requirements relating to safeguarding. Staff understand the school's policies and procedures, and training relevant to role is provided and logged. Leaders carefully monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of its work relating to pupils whose contexts may make them potentially vulnerable. The school operates as a largely cohesive community. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

However, plans to reach out to groups not represented in the immediate community, a need identified in the school's audit, are at an early stage. Considering outcomes, the school provides satisfactory value for money.

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the school's engagement with parents and carers 3

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 2

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 3

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 3

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money 3

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Recent changes to the leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage have resulted in a more consistent approach across Nursery and Reception, and better links between Nursery and the rest of the school. The early years welfare requirements are met. A combination of separate and shared indoor space, and the shared outdoor area, promotes opportunities for pupils to engage in all six areas of learning and enables the sharing of good practice between adults. However, children do not have continuous access to the outdoor area when selecting their own activities, which limits their choices. Available space outside is used creatively and adults make good use of the adjoining playground to promote children's physical development. Different topics and themes, carefully selected to interest and engage the children, effectively link the various areas. As part of the current 'sea' theme, children were making good use of the outdoor 'Sea-Life

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Centre', promoting development of a range of social, literacy and number skills. Children make good progress in their learning. Adults are responsive to identified areas for improvement in the rest of the school. For example, to support the drive to raise literacy levels, the early years' environment and teaching promote the different aspects of communication, language and literacy particularly well. Children achieved well with their writing during a well-focused teacher-led session in Reception. Procedures for assessment are robust and effective, enabling adults to build a detailed picture of the capabilities and progress of each child in order to be able to plan their next steps. Adults judge well when to observe, and when to interact to extend learning. For example, a small group of boys Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

demonstrated a range of skills and qualities working together to organise materials and equipment to create a pattern on a large roll of paper, solving the problem of how to keep it flat. As it reached the stage that the activity was not developing any further and seemed to be ending, the teaching assistant intervened at precisely the right time. A short while later, the boys proudly shared the treasure maps they had created with the paper, linked to the 'sea' theme. Children mix well and their confidence and willingness to engage reflect their feelings of safety. They conduct themselves well, both inside and out, and are very responsive to adults. Children in Nursery get into good habits and sit, listen and join-in well during sessions all together on the carpet. Later, they confidently selected their own toys to go in the water as they explored which could or could not 'swim' in their own floating

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

experiment. However, some missed opportunities prevent further development of independence across early years, such as using a system that allows children to 'self- register' when they arrive to enable immediate engagement in activities rather than sitting on the carpet, or organising their own snack at a time that suits them.

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Views of parents and carers

The proportion of parents and carers that completed the questionnaire was well above average. The overwhelming majority of parents and carers agree that their children enjoy school and it keeps them safe. Most parents and carers responded positively to the large majority of questions. A small minority do not agree that the school is well led and managed, takes account of their views and suggestions or deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour. However, a small minority of parents and carers were also in strong agreement that the school does these aspects well. A number of questionnaires also contained written comments, mostly to explain areas of concern. The most common area related to parents and carers feeling that the school does not take account of their views and suggestions, and related concerns regarding communication, and leadership and management. During this inspection, the inspection

p.10

Views of parents and carers

team found that the effectiveness of engagement with parents and carers is satisfactory, using typically expected methods including annual reports, individual parent and carer consultation evenings or appointments, and newsletters. We have asked the school to improve their engagement with parents and carers by regularly seeking their views and taking account of those expressed. A number of parents and carers also wrote comments expressing concerns around the school's effectiveness dealing with unacceptable behaviour. Taking the full range of Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.10

Views of parents and carers

evidence into account, the overall quality of behaviour is good, which represents an improvement since the previous inspection. The quality of care, guidance and support, including support for individuals with identified behavioural, emotional or social difficulties, is also good. Positive comments identified a range of different features of the school.

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Denton Community Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The inspection team received 88 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 177 pupils registered at the school.

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 40 45 45 51 3 3 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 44 50 42 48 2 2 0 0

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

My school informs me about my child's progress 40 45 38 43 8 9 0 0

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

My child is making enough progress at this school 39 44 34 39 11 13 4 5

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The teaching is good at this school 43 49 35 40 6 7 3 3

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school helps me to support my child's learning 41 47 38 43 9 10 0 0

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 37 42 44 50 3 3 2 2

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 21 24 47 53 8 9 1 1

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school meets my child's particular needs 26 30 48 55 8 9 4 5

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 21 24 42 48 15 17 8 9

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 22 25 38 43 16 18 7 8

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school is led and managed effectively 20 23 35 40 21 24 6 7

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 35 40 42 48 6 7 4 5

p.12

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.12

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.13

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.13

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.13

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.13

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 December 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.14

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.14

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.14

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.14

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.14

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.14

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.14

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.14

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.15

Inspection of Denton Community Primary School, Denton BN9 0QJ

Thank you for the warm welcome you gave us when we visited your school recently. We really enjoyed talking to you. We are very grateful for how you helped us to find out all about your school and to those of you who answered our questionnaire. We have judged your school to be satisfactory, which means it does some things well, but there are things it can do better. Here are some of the things we found out.  You enjoy school and feel safe when you are here.  The progress that you are making and the quality of teaching are at an acceptable level and getting better.  You make good progress in reading and writing in Key Stage 2.  When you leave Denton, your work is at the right level expected of children across the country.  Your behaviour is good and we were particularly impressed with your 'good learning behaviours' that are really helping you achieve more.  Your understanding of healthy lifestyles is good and you are keen to take action to

p.15

Inspection of Denton Community Primary School, Denton BN9 0QJ

be healthy.  Your school has good links with other schools and professionals.  Children in the Nursery and Reception classes are doing well. Those responsible for running the school have made suitable plans to make it better for you. To help them with this, we have asked them to make sure you make at least as much progress in Key Stage 1 overall and in mathematics across the school as you do in other areas. To do this, we have asked your teachers to make sure that the work they give you is not too easy or too hard, and to give you more time in lessons to work independently or together. We also want your school to make sure it listens to the ideas of all of the adults that work there, and to ask your parents and carers more often for their views and use these to help too. You can all help by continuing to work hard at your good 'learning behaviours' and always trying your very hardest, particularly when set a task to do by yourselves or with a partner

p.15

Inspection of Denton Community Primary School, Denton BN9 0QJ

Clive Dunn Lead inspector out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.15

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion