Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Sir John Thursby Community College
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Jun 2011
- Inspectorssingle source
Sally Kenyon
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Postcode verified
BB10 2AT
- Name on report verified
Sir John Thursby Community College
- URN verified
134996
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.11
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.11
- Improving students' attainment and progress, robust self-evaluation, combined with the strong and highly adaptable leadership team, highly committed staff, supportive parents and carers and a clearly focused school improvement plan, indicate that the school provides good value for money and has good capacity to improve further. p.4
- In a highly effective Year 10 English lesson, students were asked to write about the impression they had gained of a city from a piece of writing they had analysed in pairs. p.6
- The headteacher's ambitious and effective plan to unite staff and students from two distinctly different schools and move into a brand new building while significantly raising standards demonstrates good capacity for further improvement. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The majority of lessons seen were good with none inadequate but there remains some satisfactory teaching. p.4
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.11
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.11
- While the inspectors saw some good examples of literacy across the curriculum, it remains inconsistent and, therefore, the impact on students' progress is limited. p.4
- The inspectors concluded that, while there were some incidents of poor behaviour, swift and decisive action was taken to deal with them. p.9
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 14
- Words of findings
- 2,979
- about usual (typical 2920)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Sir John Thursby Community College Inspection report
p.1
Unique Reference Number 134996 Local Authority Lancashire Inspection number 360670 Inspection dates 8–9 June 2011 Reporting inspector Sally Kenyon HMI
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 956 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr Neil Tranmer Headteacher Mrs Elaine Dawson Date of previous school inspection 13 February 2008 School address Eastern Avenue Burnley Lancashire BB10 2AT Telephone number 01282 682313 Fax number 01282 382314 Email address head@sirjohnthursby.lancs.sch.uk
p.1
Age group 11–16 Inspection dates 8–9 June 2011 Inspection number 360670 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.1
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and four additional inspectors. The inspectors observed teaching and learning in 35 lessons, taught by 35 teachers. Inspectors held meetings with a representative of the governing body, senior school staff, middle leaders, teachers, support staff and groups of students. Inspectors observed the school's work and looked at samples of students' work in lessons across a wide range of subjects and in different year groups. Inspectors looked in detail at documents relating to the school's monitoring of its performance and undertook a detailed analysis of students' attainment and progress. They also scrutinised minutes of meetings, improvement plans and safeguarding procedures. The responses from parents and carers on 124 questionnaires were considered, together with replies from staff and students. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a
p.3
Introduction
number of key areas. The attainment of students currently at the school. How well teaching and oral and written feedback secure good progress. The progress made by different groups of students, particularly those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The quality of leadership and management at all levels across the school.
p.3
Information about the school
Sir John Thursby Community College is an average sized secondary school. It was formed five years ago from an amalgamation of two schools and moved into a new building in 2009. The number of students known to be eligible for free school meals is more than double the national average. The proportion of students with special educational needs and/or disabilities is well above the national average. The number of students who speak English as an additional language is over five times the national average and the percentage of students from minority ethnic groups is over three times the national average. The college has the Leading Parent Partnership Award (2009), the Basic Skills Quality Award (2010), Investors in People Award (2011), Healthy School status (2007) and a Local Authority Excellence Award for Personalised Learning (2009).
p.3
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Main findings
Sir John Thursby Community College is a good school. Many features of the school's work are outstanding. One member of staff aptly commented, 'This is a school where every single child matters.' Since the previous inspection, this school community has moved from temporary accommodation into a state-of-the-art building. Visitors cannot help but be inspired by the many and varied opportunities for learning. Attainment at the end of Key Stage 4 is average, which represents good progress from students' low starting points on entry into the school. This is due to the good teaching and outstanding care, guidance and support that students receive. The school sets ambitious targets and most of the time achieves them. The majority of lessons seen were good with none inadequate but there remains some satisfactory teaching. In the best lessons, teachers' high-quality planning allows students to take control of their own learning and make good or better progress. However, not all
p.4
Main findings
lessons allow for independent learning. In lessons where teaching was less effective, learning was predominantly led by the teacher, allowing students little opportunity to demonstrate better than satisfactory progress. The school offers a good curriculum and takes a very personalised approach to students' needs, resulting in high attendance. For the majority of students, English is an additional language and many have low levels of literacy on entry to the school. While the inspectors saw some good examples of literacy across the curriculum, it remains inconsistent and, therefore, the impact on students' progress is limited. The individual care that students receive is outstanding. The school works in partnership with a multitude of agencies to provide the best support it can for many students who are experiencing difficulties and challenging circumstances. Through good and effective self- evaluation processes, leaders at all levels have a very clear understanding of the school's
p.4
Main findings
strengths and areas for development, and good plans are firmly in place to tackle any areas that need improvement. For example, when the school first opened, leaders focused very much on establishing a positive ethos and a cohesive community. However, once these were established and for the past two years, they have focused with great success on improving the quality of teaching and students' progress. Safeguarding arrangements are outstanding. Policies for many aspects of school life are of a very high quality and this is reflected in the practice. Improving students' attainment and progress, robust self-evaluation, combined with the strong and highly adaptable leadership team, highly committed staff, supportive parents and carers and a clearly focused school improvement plan, indicate that the school provides good value for money and has good capacity to improve further.
p.4
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
What does the school need to do to improve further? Further raise attainment by developing a consistent approach across the curriculum to improving students' literacy skills. Ensure that more teaching is good or better by creating more opportunities for independent learning.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
Inspection evidence, including lesson observations, assessment information and the school's own evaluations of teaching, shows that the majority of students make good progress in lessons. This occurs when teachers allow them to learn independently, and have clearly focused objectives and engaging, challenging tasks. However, such good practice is not evident in all lessons. There are no significant differences in the progress made by different groups of students. The majority, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, make good progress from their individual starting points. School data and inspection evidence show that students with special educational needs and/or disabilities are on track to meet or exceed their targets. Inspectors observed good or better behaviour in the very large majority lessons and around the school. There have been no permanent exclusions for the past four years, a
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
clear indication of the inclusive ethos of the school. Instances of bullying are rare. Most students and almost all parents and carers responding to the questionnaire say that students feel safe in school because there are high levels of supervision at lunch and break times and they are confident that staff will help them if there is a problem. Attendance is high because of the relentless drive of school staff working in partnership with families. 'Learning Leaders' take responsibility for issues, such as punctuality within lessons. The result of this is that the number of persistent absentees has reduced dramatically over the last three years and is now well below the national average. Almost all students leave school and progress onto further education, training or employment. Students feel very empowered by their school council, which is quite formal and models the democratic process from the point of election to decision making. Many students make
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
valuable contributions to the school and wider community. For example, sports leaders organise games of cricket and football at lunch-time. Students recently raised over £300 to sponsor an African girl.
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for pupils' outcomes
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2
Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2
The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 2
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2
The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress
p.6
2
Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹
p.6
The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4
p.6
How effective is the provision?
The quality of teaching has improved since the previous inspection because of a continual focus on developing assessment to support learning. The quality of oral and written feedback has significantly improved. All students have 'learning milestones' in their books giving them detailed feedback about the strengths of their work and areas for development. Students then use these milestones to measure their own progress and remind them of their targets. The majority of teaching is now securing good progress and learning. The best lessons are characterised by lively, engaging, creative teaching which challenges students to push themselves to achieve high standards. In a highly effective Year 10 English lesson, students were asked to write about the impression they had gained of a city from a piece of writing they had analysed in pairs. All students were engrossed in their 'timed challenge,' knowing exactly what was expected of them and having been well supported in
p.6
How effective is the provision?
independently gathering the information they needed. This resulted in some very high- quality written work and outstanding behaviour. In satisfactory lessons, students behave more passively and are not always appropriately challenged to think for themselves or produce extended written responses. Most students know their targets and have a good understanding of their next steps towards achieving them. Inspectors saw some good examples of students assessing their
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
own and others' progress. For example, in a Year 10 performing arts lesson about melodrama, students reviewed their work in pairs to help them further develop their ideas. The good curriculum has made a significant contribution to raising attainment at the end of Key Stage 4. Students begin their GCSE courses in the final term of Year 9. The strong guidance ensures that all students follow a personalised pathway. A member of the senior leadership team works part time at the local sixth form college thus enhancing the already strong partnerships with post-16 providers. Some good examples of cross-curricular numeracy and information and communication technology were seen. There is a good range of extra-curricular activities and many students take part in them. Students agree that the care, guidance and support they receive are a significant strength of the school. They feel that there are a number of adults they could turn to if they had a
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
problem. They are very appreciative of the support they receive at transition points, such as joining from primary school or leaving to start college or enter the world of work. Students whose circumstances may make them vulnerable are well supported and nurtured so that they can enjoy all aspects of school life. The school has many students with very different abilities and a wide variety of needs. It is testament to the dedication of the staff that students are treated as individuals in a very respectful and supportive atmosphere.
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for the quality of provision
p.7
The quality of teaching 2
Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The headteacher's ambitious and effective plan to unite staff and students from two distinctly different schools and move into a brand new building while significantly raising standards demonstrates good capacity for further improvement. The very large majority of staff are proud to be part of the school and feel valued because their views are taken into account when the school sets its strategic goals and improvement plans. Senior leaders have an accurate view of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Some staff take the role of teaching and learning ambassadors, sharing particular areas of expertise with others through a well-established coaching model. Staff report that this has had a very positive impact on the overall quality of teaching. The school has a very well-focused strategic plan for community cohesion and its effectiveness can be seen throughout the school, which functions as a harmonious
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
community. One parent commented: 'My children have grown in confidence since starting at the school. It has a good multicultural ethos.'
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
The school's reputation in the local community has improved dramatically and so the school has full rolls for next year. The school has useful partnerships with schools in contrasting local authorities from which the students benefit, for example, by gaining a new perspective on different faiths. The impact of the school's work with its many partners makes an outstanding contribution to learning and well-being. A combination of shrewd strategic planning and experienced staff ensure that the school makes the most of the support and opportunities available. Local primary schools use the learning and resource areas for some of their lessons during the day, while parents and carers come for after-school classes in the evening. The governing body was restructured in summer 2009 due to the imposition of National Challenge status, even though the school exceeded the National Challenge benchmarks within a matter of months. While the leadership of the governing body remains the same,
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
some members are new and not as experienced. Individual members of the governing body are linked to and work with departments in school. They are also involved in meeting parents and carers and students regarding attendance, health and well-being. They hold highly effective pre-exclusion meetings' to consult with students at risk of exclusion and their parents and carers. However, systems for gathering the views of parents and carers and for becoming fully and systematically involved in school self-evaluation are yet to be embedded. The school is highly successful in tackling discrimination and promoting equal opportunities. There are very few racist incidents and these are thoroughly investigated. School leaders closely monitor the outcomes of different groups of students in the school to ensure that all do equally well. Safeguarding arrangements are outstanding. There are very detailed policies in place with clear and regular systems for monitoring, evaluation
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
and review. Staff receive annual training on aspects of safeguarding, such as child protection and they also provide training for other schools.
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for leadership and management
p.8
2
Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.9
Views of parents and carers
The very large majority of parents and carers feel that the school is led and managed effectively. A few comments were received about behaviour and the way the school handles discipline. However, the large majority of parents and carers feel that behaviour is dealt with effectively. The inspection team followed up the concerns about behaviour with the school. Inspectors scrutinised behaviour records, held discussions with staff and students, and observed students' behaviour in classrooms and around the school. The inspectors concluded that, while there were some incidents of poor behaviour, swift and decisive action was taken to deal with them. A very small minority of parents and carers felt that the school did not help them to support their child's learning. The school is developing its work in this area and a group of 10 parents and carers have just completed an award in supporting their child's learning. A very small minority of parents and carers
p.9
Views of parents and carers
also felt that the school did not take account of their concerns. The inspection team followed up these concerns with the school and, while the large majority of parents and carers feel that their concerns are dealt with effectively, the school is already refining its home-school communication systems.
p.9
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Sir John Thursby Community College to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.
p.10
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire
The inspection team received 124 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 956 pupils registered at the school.
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child enjoys school 30 24 79 64 12 10 3 2 The school keeps my child safe 44 35 74 60 4 3 1 1
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My school informs me about my child's progress 40 32 71 57 10 8 3 2
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child is making enough progress at this school 39 31 69 56 11 9 2 2
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The teaching is good at this school 41 33 68 55 9 7 3 2
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school helps me to support my child's learning 35 28 66 53 13 10 5 4
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 29 23 72 58 16 13 5 4
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 37 30 73 59 8 6 2 2
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school meets my child's particular needs 34 27 70 56 15 12 3 2
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 34 27 62 50 15 12 11 9
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 24 19 71 57 18 15 4 3
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school is led and managed effectively 40 32 64 52 8 6 5 4
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 42 34 63 51 14 11 2 2
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 December 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
The school's capacity for sustained improvement. Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils. The quality of teaching. The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.12
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.13
Inspection of Sir John Thursby Community College, Burnley, BB10 2AT
Thank you for the warm welcome you gave the inspection team when we visited your school recently. Many of you gave up your time to speak to us and to complete questionnaires. We found what you said interesting and thought-provoking and your comments helped us arrive at our judgements. We were particularly impressed with the friendly and caring atmosphere in the school and your good behaviour. We recognised that you play a very important part in making Sir John Thursby Community College a friendly, safe and inclusive place to learn. You achieve good outcomes, make good progress and attain average results in your examinations at the end of Key Stage 4. The outstanding care system supports all of you and is particularly effective in helping those of you who experience difficulties from time to time. Teaching is good and is helping you learn successfully. You are very caring, make a positive contribution to your school and local
p.13
Inspection of Sir John Thursby Community College, Burnley, BB10 2AT
community, and like to help other people by raising money. We have asked the school to improve the quality of teaching and learning by creating more opportunities for you to learn independently. This will help everyone to make the best possible progress. We have also asked the school to improve literacy across the curriculum to help everyone get the best possible results. Very best wishes for the future.
p.13
www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.14
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion