Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Red Hill CofE Primary School

Inspected 17 Jun 2011 · published 4 Jul 2011 · URN 116859

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Jun 2011

  • Postcode verified

    WR5 2HX

  • Name on report verified

    Red Hill CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    116859

Page 1 of 15
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 13% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresspositiveoutstandinggood progresshighly effectiveexceptionallyeffectiveenthusiasm
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysconcernconcernsunacceptablepoordecliningfalling behind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2468w+15
  • Leadership727w+50
  • What needs to improve228w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
15
Words of findings
3,422
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Red Hill CofE Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 116859 Local Authority Worcestershire Inspection number 367408 Inspection dates 16–17 June 2011 Reporting inspector Selwyn Ward

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 241 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Kevin Ruff Headteacher Spencer Morris Date of previous school inspection 14 March 2008 School address Midhurst Close Worcester WR5 2HX Telephone number 01905 352524 Fax number 01905 352524 Email address office@redhill.worcs.sch.uk

p.1

Age group 3–11 Inspection dates 16–17 June 2011 Inspection number 367408 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors, who visited 18 lessons taught by 10 teachers. Inspectors spoke with staff, parents and carers, members of the governing body and groups of pupils. Inspectors looked at samples of pupils' work, the analysis of the tracking of pupils' progress, attendance records, school policies and procedures, school leaders' monitoring records, school planning and risk assessments. They also analysed the questionnaires received from 124 pupils, 24 staff and from 96 parents and carers. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.  How well does the school cater for its more-able pupils and those boys and girls who have additional learning needs?  What have been the barriers to learning that have prevented pupils from making faster progress, especially in Key Stage 2?  To what extent do leaders and the governing body have an accurate view of how

p.3

Introduction

well the school is doing and where improvements are needed?

p.3

Information about the school

This is an average-sized school which has been in a process of transition from 1.5 to one form of entry. With the exception of the current Year 6, there is a single separate class for each year group. The large majority of pupils are White British, with the largest minority coming from Pakistani backgrounds. The percentage of pupils learning English as an additional language has been rising and it is now average. The percentage of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is below average, as is the proportion with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The headteacher was appointed in January 2010. Red Hill has ActiveMark, ArtsMark and Eco-Schools Green Flag awards and Healthy Schools status.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Red Hill provides a satisfactory education for its pupils. It has emerged from a period where pupils made less progress than they should. In only one of the last five years has attainment at the end of Year 6 been above average. This means that pupils underachieved in relation to their above average starting points following the good start they get off to in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Changes over the past year have arrested what has been a declining trend in standards. The headteacher identified that assessment was previously inadequate and introduced a more rigorous system for monitoring pupils' progress. Leaders now have half-termly updates to check on each pupil's progress and to target support for any pupil identified as falling behind. This improvement has been effective in eliminating underachievement, so that pupils are now making at least satisfactory progress. An increasing proportion are making accelerated

p.4

Main findings

progress and meeting or exceeding the challenging targets set for them. Although evidence available at the time of the inspection shows attainment still to be in the average range, it is rising. Assessment is satisfactory rather than good because there remain inconsistencies in marking and in the use teachers make of assessment information to match work to pupils' different capabilities. There are still too many lessons where more- able pupils are insufficiently challenged, and this is also a concern raised by some parents and carers. Sometimes, pupils are expected to sit listening for too long when they are keen to get on with activities. On these occasions, attention drifts. Teaching assistants are deployed well, particularly when those pupils who need extra help with their learning are working individually or in small groups, but they are not always used to best effect during whole-class teaching.

p.4

Main findings

Although still in the early stages of development, revisions made this year to the curriculum have given an increased stimulus to learning. Pupils are increasingly using and applying in other subjects what they learn in English and mathematics. Pupils are proud of their school and take an equal pride in their work. They produce artwork of high quality and many are involved in the choir and school orchestra. Pupils' great enjoyment of school is evident in their above-average attendance and in the enthusiasm seen in many lessons. They get on well with each other and treat each other with consideration. Behaviour is satisfactory rather than good, however, because pupils do not all listen well in lessons. Even when pupils are attentively listening to the teacher, they fidget and pay less attention to each other's contributions. Almost all parents and carers say they are pleased with the good care, guidance and

p.4

Main findings

support provided to pupils. They are supportive of the school and of their children's education, and they express confidence in the headteacher and the leadership of the school. Red Hill is demonstrating a satisfactory capacity for improvement. Leaders have moved this school forward a long way over the past year, but they have further to go in order to ensure that all pupils make consistently good progress. School self-evaluation has

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

been overly positive. Although it is sharper now than it was earlier in the year, leaders' monitoring of teaching and learning has contributed to this by focusing more on the features of teaching and not so much on the progress made in lessons by pupils of all abilities. Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 By the start of the spring term 2012, further accelerate pupils' learning and progress in lessons by ensuring that: the work in lessons is always matched to pupils' different capabilities, particularly to extend the more able teachers routinely reinforce good listening skills so that pupils listen to each other's contributions as well as to the teacher lengthy periods of passive listening are not allowed to limit the opportunities for pupils to get on with practical activities teachers direct questions rather than always taking answers from volunteers teaching assistants are given an active role during whole-class teaching pupils' writing and mathematics is always appropriately recorded leaders' lesson observations focus on the progress made by all groups of pupils.  By the end of the autumn term 2011, improve assessment and the impact of marking by: consistently giving all pupils clear guidance through marking in all subjects that

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

shows them what they need to do to improve their work giving pupils time to read and respond to the comments teachers make in their marking ensuring that all pupils know and make routine use of their individual targets making consistent use throughout the school of the recent initiative to encourage pupils to check and mark their own and each other's work making full use of assessment information to plan and deliver work that is appropriately matched to pupils' different capabilities.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Attainment has mostly been average at the end of Key Stage 2. This means that it has been lower than it should be in relation to pupils' above average starting points and most Key Stage 1 assessments. A sharp rise in national tests results in 2009 was not sustained, and attainment fell even more sharply in both key stages in 2010. This represented significant underachievement, especially for pupils learning English as an additional language, those known to be eligible for free school meals, and for more-able pupils. The school has responded well to this over the past year, overhauling the curriculum and systems for tracking pupils' progress. As a result, pupils are now making satisfactory

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

progress in lessons. Though attainment remains in the average range, it is rising as pupils catch up on previously lost ground. Pupils are especially motivated by the imaginative links made between subjects. In a particularly successful English lesson in Year 4, for example, pupils drew on what they had learnt in history as the teacher encouraged them to think themselves into the character of a Second World War evacuee, parent or host family member as a prelude to a piece of empathetic writing. Because 'thought tracking' to share ideas was so well established in the class, pupils were unselfconscious, threw themselves into role, and came up with some thoughtful and moving responses. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make similar progress to their peers. They benefit from often well-targeted support in lessons, although provision is better for these pupils in Key Stage 2 than Key Stage 1 because the targets in older pupils' individual education

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

plans are more sharply focused. Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep safe, for example when cycling. They appreciate the importance of a healthy diet and regular exercise. The good relationships throughout the school mean that boys and girls from different backgrounds get on well together and treat each other with respect. They take an interest in each other's faiths and beliefs. Pupils confirm that incidents of poor behaviour are rare: this is an improvement over the past year. Pupils are keen to take on responsibilities, including as school councillors and peer mediators, and they have taken part with enthusiasm in local community and inter-school events, including several involving musical talents. Attendance is above average. Pupils' basic skills in literacy and numeracy prepare them satisfactorily for the next stage of their education.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.7

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.7

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3

p.7

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.7

3

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.7

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.7

How effective is the provision?

Pupils are well motivated because they like their teachers and are keen to please them. They respond well to the encouragement they are given, although a parent expressed concern that their Key Stage 1 child had 'lost interest in doing homework because it isn't marked.' Marking varies in quality. Some gives clear guidance to pupils on the steps they need to take to improve their work but this is not a consistent feature of marking throughout the school. Often teachers' advice goes unheeded because pupils are not routinely given the time to read and respond to teachers' comments. There are examples of pupils using the success criteria given to them by teachers to evaluate their own and each other's work, but pupils' books show this has tapered off. Pupils have individual targets, for example in writing, but they do not all know what their targets are and they do not routinely refer to them when they are working. Questioning is often used well in

p.7

How effective is the provision?

lessons to extend pupils' thinking, for example in explaining how they have arrived at the solution to a mathematical problem, but teachers mostly take responses from those who volunteer to answer. This leaves some more passive members of the class less actively involved. In some classes, too much of the pupils' work is done on individual whiteboards rather than in drafting books. This means that pupils' work is simply erased and lost at the end of the lesson. The improving curriculum has helped to better engage the interest of boys and girls of different abilities. At the start of a new topic, pupils are invited to record what they

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

already know about it and what they would like to find out. This helps to make the topic relevant to the pupils and gives them 'ownership' of their learning. They enjoy the good range of clubs and extra-curricular activities on offer, and many learn musical instruments and take part in choral or orchestral performances. Although cross-curricular links are making a positive contribution to improved attainment in literacy and numeracy, some of the impact is dulled when teachers demand less rigour of pupils' punctuation and spelling when writing in subjects other than in English. Red Hill is a caring school where pupils are helped to feel secure and where they grow in confidence. There are good arrangements for supporting pupils whose circumstances may make them vulnerable, with the school drawing well on partnerships with other agencies. Systems for ensuring good attendance have proven effective.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.8

The quality of teaching 3

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The 2010 results came as a shock to the governing body, which had previously had an overly rosy view of the school's effectiveness. They realise now that there has been a degree of complacency within the school and that the governing body has not done enough to challenge leaders over pupils' attainment and progress. This is already changing, with governors having taken on training so that they are more confident in interpreting performance data and are not dependent on staff for information about how well the school is doing. The governing body has provided challenge this year, for example over the need to ensure continued financial stability as the school completes its transition to having one class for each year group. The governing body ensures that legal requirements are met, including those relating to pupils' safeguarding. Equal opportunities are promoted satisfactorily. The school has been successful over the past year in tackling

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

underachievement among specific groups, including those known to be eligible for free school meals, but it is still the case that more-able pupils do less well than they should. Much of the drive for improvement over the past year has been the result of the headteacher's analysis and identification of areas where the school had been failing to meet pupils' needs. Staff have appreciated the need for change, although not all of those with subject and other leadership roles have a complete enough overview of their areas of responsibility. This means that there is not always a consistent whole-school approach, for example to the teaching of letters and the sounds they make (phonics), which differs between Reception and Year 1. The school is a harmonious community. Interfaith links are promoted well and the school plays an active role within the local community. There are links with a school in Tanzania,

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

which has been the focus of a topic of study for pupils in Years 3 and 4. There are productive ties with other local schools catering for pupils with a more diverse intake.

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.9

3

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Children make good progress in both the Nursery and Reception Years in all areas of learning. This is because they are taught in a stimulating environment and the adults plan for them to have a wide range of activities to choose from. These are well planned to cover all areas of learning and they take account of children's interests from home. There is a good balance between child-initiated and adult-led activities. The outdoor area is used well and the 'cover' enables it to be in use whatever the weather. The range of activities is good but the adults are not always as focused in their teaching as they are indoors. A particular strength in the teaching is the friendly, supportive and encouraging manner in which teachers talk to the children. They make each child feel special. This raises the children's self-esteem and significantly contributes to their good progress in personal skills, their good behaviour and their confidence to select activities and follow classroom

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

routines. The teaching of number is good. Progress in learning letters and the sounds they make is slowed because children at different levels of development are all taught together. Children with special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress and there are good partnerships with external providers to support their learning and to meet their specific learning needs. The children who join the Early Years Foundation Stage speaking a language other than English make good progress in learning English and also in all other areas of the curriculum. Their good pace of learning is due to the adults providing a constant good level of spoken language at all times and identifying English words for the children as they play and take part in activities.

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.10

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Observations of children's learning are used well to identify their next steps in learning and individual records of progress are well maintained. However, the Early Years Foundation Stage leader has a clearer picture of the progress of children in the Reception Year than of those in the Nursery.

p.10

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.10

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Views of parents and carers

More than a third of the parents and carers returned questionnaires. Their views are mostly positive but a number express concerns over the behaviour of a small minority of children and several feel that more-able pupils are not stretched enough. Behaviour seen during the inspection was never less than satisfactory, and lapses were in attentiveness rather than examples of ill-discipline. Inspectors found that work in lessons does not always extend more-able pupils.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Red Hill CofE Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 96 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 241 pupils registered at the school.

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 54 56 39 41 2 2 1 1 The school keeps my child safe 49 51 43 45 3 3 1 1

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My school informs me about my child's progress 39 41 49 51 1 1 0 0

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child is making enough progress at this school 36 38 47 49 11 11 1 1

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The teaching is good at this school 42 44 50 52 0 0 0 0

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps me to support my child's learning 24 25 62 65 3 3 1 1

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 37 39 55 57 3 3 0 0

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 34 35 54 56 1 1 0 0

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 28 29 56 58 4 4 1 1

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 23 24 54 56 10 10 2 2

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 32 33 50 52 3 3 1 1

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 40 42 44 46 2 2 1 1

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 42 44 46 48 5 5 0 0

p.11

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.12

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.12

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.12

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 December 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.13

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.14

Inspection of Red Hill CofE Primary School, Worcester WR5 2HX

Thank you for making us so welcome when we came to visit your school. Children have not always done as well as they should at your school, especially after the good start you have in the Early Years Foundation Stage. However, we were pleased to see that things are improving this year. You are benefiting from a satisfactory education and standards are beginning to rise as you make faster progress in lessons. We have suggested some ways in which teachers can help you to make even better progress in lessons and we have asked them to further improve assessment arrangements. You can help to do better too, by trying hard to listen carefully in class, not just to your teachers but also to each other. You can also help by taking care always to read the comments your teachers make when they mark your work and by doing your best to follow their advice. You enjoy your lessons, and especially the topics. I hope those of you in Years 3 and 4

p.14

Inspection of Red Hill CofE Primary School, Worcester WR5 2HX

had a good day at the Three Counties Show as part of your Market Garden project. We were pleased to see how well you all get on together, and that you know a lot about how to keep safe and healthy. One of the reasons you feel safe at school is that staff take good care of you. You also look out for each other, and treat each other with kindness. This all helps to make your school such a happy place. Best wishes for the future.

p.14

www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.15

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion