Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
18 May 2011
- Postcode verified
GL55 6DB
- Name on report verified
St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary Schools
- URN verified
115713
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.11
- These children make excellent progress because of teaching that is focused extremely well on p.4
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.11
- The new leadership team has communicated its ambition and plans to be an outstanding school very well. p.4
- They are independent and articulate, concentrate well and their imagination is developed extremely well because of the skilled questioning techniques of the adults. p.8
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.11
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.11
- A thorough audit of the promotion of community cohesion has been carried out and an action plan developed to address the relative weakness of the pupils' awareness of the diversity of British culture. p.8
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 14
- Words of findings
- 3,239
- about usual (typical 3042)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary Schools Inspection report
p.1
Unique Reference Number 115713 Local Authority Gloucestershire Inspection number 363835 Inspection dates 17–18 May 2011 Reporting inspector John Eadie
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 186 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Kim Binder Headteacher Joanna Jonson Date of previous school inspection 14 May 2008 School address Pear Tree Close Chipping Campden GL55 6DB Telephone number 01386840634 Fax number 01386841877 Email address admin@st-james-ebrington.gloucs.sch.uk
p.1
Age group 4–11 Inspection dates 17–18 May 2011 Inspection number 363835 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.1
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. They observed 19 lessons or part lessons and observed seven teachers. Inspectors held meetings with leaders and managers, the Chair and vice-chair of the Governing Body, staff and pupils. They observed the school's work and looked at a variety of documentation, including the school's improvement plan, policies and procedures, particularly those concerning safeguarding, data showing the progress that pupils are making and evidence from the school's own monitoring as well as that of the local authority. Questionnaires returned by 80 parents and carers were analysed, as were those completed by 104 pupils in Years 3 to 6 and 22 staff. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas. The progress of pupils through the school, as the school suggests it is good, although nationally-published data might indicate that it is satisfactory.
p.3
Introduction
The effectiveness of initiatives to raise standards in reading, and particularly writing, especially in Years 1 and 2. The effectiveness of the development of pupils' basic skills, particularly in information and communication technology. The effectiveness of the new headteacher and senior leadership team in communicating their ambition so that it is shared by all staff and governors.
p.3
Information about the school
The school is a little smaller than average and is on two sites. About two thirds of the pupils attend the site in the Cotswold market town of Chipping Camden, the remainder are sited in the village of Ebrington, some three miles away. The vast majority of pupils are White British. Very few of the remaining pupils of other ethnic heritages speak English as an additional language, and none is at an early stage of learning English. The proportion of pupils identified as having special educational needs and/or disabilities is broadly average and most of these have moderate learning difficulties. The headteacher took up her post at the start of November 2010 and the deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher were appointed for January 2011. All of these were internal appointments.
p.3
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Main findings
The new headteacher and leadership team have rapidly created their own vision for the school, which is shared well by all staff and governors, and the school has maintained its status as a good school. It has a number of strong features, the most significant of which is the outstanding quality of care, guidance and support. As a parent put it: 'The school places great value on the both the children's and staff members' social and emotional well-being.' This results in pupils feeling outstandingly safe. They are extremely well aware of what constitutes an unsafe situation and say that there is always an adult to whom they can turn if they have a problem. Pupils on both sites were adamant that bullying just does not happen. There have been a number of good improvements since the last inspection. In particular, the provision for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage is now outstanding. These children make excellent progress because of teaching that is focused extremely well on
p.4
Main findings
their particular needs. More recently, leaders have initiated improvements to raise attainment in reading and writing in the rest of the school. These have already begun to have an impact and pupils' progress in these two areas is now as good as it is in mathematics. Pupils are now making good progress throughout the school in reading, writing and mathematics, and their attainment is above average by the time they leave. There have also been improvements in systems of assessment. Teachers are accurate when assessing pupils' progress and use this information very well to identify any who are in danger of falling behind. Effective strategies are then put in place to help pupils catch up, and the effectiveness of these strategies is evaluated closely. However, these clear assessments are not used as well as they might be to enable pupils to know the next steps in their learning. Although pupils have targets for these next steps, they are not
p.4
Main findings
precisely matched to their abilities or needs. The school has recognised that pupils' basic skills in information and communication technology, although satisfactory, are not as good as they should be. Work has started on forming a plan of action to develop pupils' skills further and to encourage their use in a range of other subjects. In their responses to the questionnaire, all staff were very positive that they know what the school is trying to achieve and that they are involved in the process of heading in that direction. The new leadership team has communicated its ambition and plans to be an outstanding school very well. There is a clear sense of teamwork among all staff and governors to achieve this aim. Monitoring has improved recently. For example, teachers now have regular meetings with leaders and managers to discuss the progress of the pupils in their class, and this is beginning to have an impact on giving teachers more
p.4
Main findings
accountability for ensuring this progress. Almost all staff and governors are involved in processes of self-evaluation and a very accurate picture of the school's strengths and
p.4
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
areas for development has been created. Bearing all this in mind, despite the newness of the leadership team, the school has a good capacity for sustained improvement.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve pupils' attainment, and accelerate their progress still further in English and mathematics, by: using the current systems of assessment to set precise targets for pupils' next steps in learning that accurately match each pupil's abilities and needs ensuring that teachers use these next steps when they are feeding back to pupils on the success of their learning and give time for pupils to respond to this feedback sharing these next steps consistently with pupils and their parents and carers. Raise standards in information and communication technology by: assessing what skills pupils have already gained and using this information to put in place a structured programme to develop skills further providing more opportunities for pupils to use and practise information and communication technology skills in other subjects.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
In most lessons, pupils thoroughly enjoy their learning. They make good progress and achieve well. Their enthusiasm for learning was seen in a mathematics lesson when they were solving problems; here, a purposeful buzz was evident as pupils were completing their tasks keenly and successfully. This was also seen in a lesson where pupils were writing about volcanoes. Using a poem as a stimulus, pupils were eagerly using good picturesque language. There are sometimes occasions when pupils are less engaged, as when they spend too long on the carpet listening without being actively involved. The individual needs of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are understood very well by all staff, enabling these pupils to make good progress relative to their abilities. Pupils are developing well into responsible and sensitive young people. As a parent said: 'In addition to the school's good academic achievements, we are impressed by its
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2
emphasis on personal development.' Pupils are keenly aware of their place in, and their responsibilities as members of, society. Behaviour is good, with pupils almost always very aware of the needs of others although, just occasionally, play is a little boisterous. Pupils make a good contribution to the smooth running of the school by taking on responsibilities willingly and they are involved well in the local community, taking part in the local music and literary festivals, for instance. They raise good sums of money for those less fortunate around the world, particularly as staff have links in Kenya and Sri Lanka. However, pupils' awareness of the multicultural nature of the British community is insufficiently developed. Although pupils take lots of activity and have very good knowledge of how to lead a healthy lifestyle, they do not always carry this through into making healthy dietary choices, for example.
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for pupils' outcomes
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2
Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2
The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 2
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2
The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress
p.6
2
Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹
p.6
The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4
p.6
How effective is the provision?
There is good consistency in the quality of teaching. Lessons are planned to be interesting and engaging, and pupils are provided with a good variety of extra opportunities. For example, during the inspection, a Japanese visitor worked with one class, teaching them something of her culture, while instructing them in the art of origami. Teaching assistants are particularly skilful and provide very good support, particularly for those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The basic skills in literacy and numeracy are taught thoroughly, so preparing pupils well for their future. Their progress in mastering these skills is checked very carefully, although this is not the case in information and communication technology. This means that, as teachers are unsure of the skills that have been mastered, they are not sufficiently aware of what pupils need to learn next in this subject. In English and mathematics, although
p.6
How effective is the provision?
assessment is thorough, this has not been carried on to the next stage of giving pupils precise information about what they need to learn next in order to make faster progress. Teachers are therefore unable to give pupils accurate feedback on the success of their learning and pupils and their parents or carers are not always sure of how well they are doing. Opportunities are also missed for giving time for pupils to read and respond to the teacher's marking in their books. There are many opportunities provided for pupils to practise their literacy skills in other subjects, for example when writing in history or religious education. These opportunities
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
are more limited when practising numeracy skills and, particularly, skills in information and communication technology. There is a good range of extra-curricular activities and these are supported well, especially the sporting opportunities. Visits, such as those to a mosque and a synagogue, which contribute well to pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness, are an important part of the curriculum. Visitors, too, play their part in broadening experiences; for example the visit by a brass specialist enthused pupils and encouraged a good number to take up playing a brass instrument. Expertise from partner schools is used well, providing specialist teaching in French and science and giving opportunities to challenge more-able pupils. The care and support provided for each individual are of high quality. Each child and their circumstances are known exceptionally well by all staff and careful plans are put in place
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
to support any in need. External agencies are used extremely well when necessary. This care also extends to families and the school goes out of its way to ensure that all are supported.
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for the quality of provision
p.7
The quality of teaching 2
Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The headteacher and leadership team have made a robust start at heading the school in the direction towards the accolade of outstanding. Their clear ambition is evident in the common sense of purpose among all staff and governors. The governing body is very supportive. The governors challenge well and, as a number of members are new, they recognise the need for training in their role of monitoring and evaluating the school's effectiveness. Middle managers are empowered well and are capably taking responsibility for their areas of accountability. All staff and governors are aware of their responsibilities for keeping pupils safe, and procedures and policies for safeguarding are in good order. However, there are some minor actions needed on aspects of health and safety. The school is extremely inclusive. All pupils are valued and their talents and gifts are recognised and celebrated. The performance of different groups is evaluated carefully. For
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
instance, comparison with national data suggested that pupils known to be eligible for free school meals did not perform as well as they should in the tests for pupils in Year 6 last year. Careful analysis was carried out of the progress of all pupils in this category in the school and the blip was found to be specific to the particular pupils in that cohort. As the school is almost entirely mono-cultural, there are difficulties in preparing pupils to challenge stereotypical views and to live and work in a culturally diverse country. However, the school has recognised this difficulty and is working to link with a school with a much greater ethnic mix.
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
The school is an impressively cohesive community. All within it get on well and good opportunities are provided for pupils from the two schools to link up for projects for example. There is good involvement in the local community. A thorough audit of the promotion of community cohesion has been carried out and an action plan developed to address the relative weakness of the pupils' awareness of the diversity of British culture.
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for leadership and management
p.8
2
Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning
p.8
Early Years Foundation Stage
Children make excellent progress during their time in the Reception classes and develop very good communication, number and personal skills. They are independent and articulate, concentrate well and their imagination is developed extremely well because of the skilled questioning techniques of the adults. For example, a group was observed using the equipment in the outside area very creatively to invent a game, based on 'baddies' and 'goodies' all sorts of traps were set for the 'baddies'! Relationships are very strong and so behaviour is outstanding. Children are developing excellent attitudes to learning and have a very keen desire to participate. They are observant and enthusiastic about all around them, for instance showing real excitement about the wormery in one class and that their tadpoles were growing legs in the other. The environment on both sites is highly stimulating. Staff make best use of the space
p.8
Early Years Foundation Stage
available, especially the more restricted area at Ebrington, and this is an excellent improvement since the last inspection. Educational programmes are rich and varied and match children's needs very well. Assessment through observations is rigorous and is used very effectively to plan the next steps for children's learning. Children are highly motivated through inspirational teaching. All records, policies and procedures for safe and efficient management of the Early Years Foundation Stage are fully in place. Links with parents, including notes of children's
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.9
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
achievements at home, give valuable insights into children's development. Leadership is outstanding and all staff are very clear about strengths of provision and what they wish to improve. There is an unmistakable shared commitment to high aspirations and to equality. Leaders have overcome the difficulties of working on two sites extremely well and staff have regular opportunities to meet and share planning and expertise.
p.9
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage
p.9
Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 1
Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage
p.9
Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 1
The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 1
p.9
Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 1
The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage
p.9
Views of parents and carers
The response rate to the questionnaires for parents and carers was higher than average and the response was overwhelmingly positive. Many affirmative comments were made, such as, 'I feel the school is nurturing my child and preparing her for a bright well- balanced future,' and, 'My child loves this school and we always find the staff approachable, friendly and caring.' Very few concerns were expressed, although a very small minority felt that the school does not always listen to their concerns or suggestions. However, other parents and carers took the opposite view, supporting this from their own experience. Inspection report: St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary Schools, 17–18 May 2011 10 of 14
p.9
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.
p.10
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire
The inspection team received 80 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 186 pupils registered at the school.
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child enjoys school 51 64 28 35 0 0 1 1 The school keeps my child safe 54 68 24 30 2 3 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My school informs me about my child's progress 35 44 40 50 2 3 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child is making enough progress at this school 36 45 37 46 3 4 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The teaching is good at this school 45 56 30 38 0 0 1 1
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school helps me to support my child's learning 39 49 38 48 2 3 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 38 48 37 46 2 3 1 1
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 41 51 33 41 2 3 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school meets my child's particular needs 40 50 36 45 2 3 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 39 49 32 40 2 3 1 1
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 29 36 45 56 4 5 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school is led and managed effectively 40 50 32 40 3 4 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 47 59 31 39 1 1 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%. Inspection report: St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary Schools, 17–18 May 2011 11 of 14
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 December 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units. Inspection report: St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary Schools, 17–18 May 2011 12 of 14
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
The school's capacity for sustained improvement. Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils. The quality of teaching. The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started. Inspection report: St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary Schools, 17–18 May 2011 13 of 14
p.12
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.13
Chipping Camden, GL55 6DB
Thank you so much for welcoming us to your school recently. We thoroughly enjoyed our time with you and listening to all you told us about your school. We are not surprised that you enjoy it as it is a good school. These are some of the best things we found. All adults look after you extremely well, so you feel exceptionally safe and secure. The progress you make in reading and writing has improved and you are now making good progress in reading, writing and mathematics. The children in the Reception classes have a particularly good start to their schooling and they make outstanding progress during their first year. Your teachers plan interesting tasks for you to do and almost all of you told us that you learn a lot in lessons. You are developing well into sensible and responsible young people and you behave well. Your headteacher, the other staff and governors have really good plans to make
p.13
Chipping Camden, GL55 6DB
your school even better. They want it to be outstanding! These are the things we think need to be improved. Although teachers are keeping a careful check on how well you are doing, they do not always give you clear guidance on how you can make faster progress in reaching the targets they set for you or when they mark your work. It would be good if you shared these targets regularly with your parents and carers. You are not doing as well in information and communication technology as in English and mathematics because you are not learning the skills well enough. You also do not have enough opportunities to use the computers in other subjects. I know you will want to help your teachers by continuing to work hard and perhaps you can ask them more frequently how you can improve your work.
p.13
Chipping Camden, GL55 6DB
John Eadie Lead inspector Inspection report: St James and Ebrington Church of England Primary Schools, 17–18 May 2011 14 of 14
p.13
www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.14
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion