Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Townsend Primary School

Inspected 31 Mar 2011 · published 3 May 2011 · URN 100814

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    31 Mar 2011

  • Postcode verified

    SE17 1HJ

  • Name on report verified

    Townsend Primary School

  • URN verified

    100814

Page 1 of 15
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 20% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedexcellentstrongenjoymake good progressstrengthseffectively
Criticisminadequateweaknessesnot alwaysweakinconsistencieslimitedunacceptablegaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2030w+30
  • Leadership1519w+46
  • What needs to improve212w−11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
15
Words of findings
3,760
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%Leadership 32%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Townsend Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 100814 Local Authority Southwark Inspection number 354898 Inspection dates 30–31 March 2011 Reporting inspector Kathryn Taylor

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 257 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Debbie Walsh Headteacher Anne Stonell Date of previous school inspection 2 December 2009 School address Townsend Street Old Kent Road London SE17 1HJ Telephone number 020 7703 2672 Fax number 020 7252 5885 Email address office@townsend.southwark.sch.uk

p.1

Age group 3–11 Inspection dates 30–31 March 2011 Inspection number 354898 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. They observed 20 lessons or parts of lessons taught by 12 teachers as well as nursery nurses and other support staff. They held meetings with pupils, members of the governing body and staff and spoke to parents and carers bringing their children to school. Inspectors looked at a number of documents, including those related to pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, attendance data, pupils work, local authority reports on the school, curricular documents and safeguarding information. They analysed questionnaires received from 122 parents and carers as well as those completed by staff and pupils. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the schools work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas. The extent to which the improvements to pupils attainment in 2010 are being maintained and how well the historic weaknesses in writing have been addressed.

p.3

Introduction

How well teaching and improvements to the curriculum enable pupils to learn. How well the Early Years Foundation Stage provision has improved since the last inspection. The contribution that leaders make to school improvement and the extent to which community cohesion, parental links and partnership have been strengthened.

p.3

Information about the school

Pupils in this average-sized school are drawn from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds. A small number are at the very early stages of learning English. The proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is slightly above the national average. The proportion of pupils with a statement of special educational needs is average. Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage in the Nursery in September or January on a part-time basis. They join Reception in September or January of the year in which they have their fifth birthday. The school runs a breakfast club managed by the governing body. After-school provision, managed by an external provider, is available on site but was not part of this inspection. The school has gained a number of awards which include the Active Mark, Healthy Schools and Eco Schools awards. Due to regeneration of the local area and re-housing of families, the school roll has decreased markedly since its last

p.3

Information about the school

inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Main findings

In accordance with section 13(5) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majestys Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires significant improvement. Good leadership, including that provided by the governing body, means the school has improved well since its last inspection. Leaders have a good understanding of what still needs to be improved and a good capacity for continued improvement. Children get off to a good start in Nursery and Reception because of the excellent improvements to accommodation, and because provision has improved greatly since the last inspection and is now good. The school has made good strides in tackling the legacy of underachievement. Consequently, attainment has risen markedly and is in line with the national average by the time pupils leave. The best improvements have been in reading and mathematics, which have been the main school focus areas for the longest time. Attainment in writing,

p.4

Main findings

notably the content of pupils work and their enthusiasm for writing, has started to improve, but remains too low, especially for the oldest pupils. Pupils skills in handwriting, punctuation and spelling remain weak. The school provides a warm welcome to families. Parents and carers are rightly confident that their children are happy in school, enjoy learning and are well cared for. Staff forge good, trusting relationships with pupils. Pupils are polite, friendly and welcoming. They have an increasingly strong voice within the school and a clear sense of pride in their improving school. They note how behaviour has improved and that they have more opportunities for creative expression, through art, physical education, music and drama for example. In Years 1 to 6, there are strengths in much of the teaching, such as the staffs subject knowledge, their expectations of pupils, the quality of questioning and the contribution

p.4

Main findings

that support staff make to the teaching and pupils learning. However, there are still some inconsistencies in marking, the pace of lessons and the clarity of teachers explanations; in addition, some teachers still expect pupils to listen for too long. This is why learning and progress are satisfactory rather than good: the school recognises the need to focus on the provision of additional small group work and interventions to raise attainment, given the success of this work to date. The school has begun to broaden the curriculum, for example by creating topic work, introducing themed events such as science week and increasing the number of visits and visitors. Although the curriculum is still developing, it has improved well. This results in very interesting displays of work that celebrate pupils achievements. Improvements are also helping to increase pupils enjoyment and contribute well to their good spiritual,

p.4

Main findings

moral, social and cultural development. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

About 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspections.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 By July 2012, ensure that at least 75% of pupils throughout the school are reaching age appropriate standards in writing by: placing much more emphasis on teaching pupils how to develop neat, legible handwriting and to apply the basic skills of punctuation and spelling to their writing across all subjects ensuring that all teachers are able to model neat, joined handwriting ensuring marking of writing across all subjects pinpoints pupils mistakes, guides pupils towards improvement and encourages them to take action to address their mistakes providing pupils with time to correct and refine their work.  By July 2012, in order to accelerate pupils progress, strengthen the overall quality of teaching by: sharing more widely the good practice that exists within the school addressing the inconsistencies, especially those linked to marking, pace of lessons, the clarity of teachers explanations and reaching a good balance

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

between teacher talk and pupils having time to work independently ensuring that the learning objectives presented to pupils are easy for them to understand.  Build on the successful curriculum development work already started by: extending enrichment opportunities, for example the number of visits, clubs and links with the wider community developing partnerships with other schools and organisations so as to share and learn from best practice

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Achievement is satisfactory. Throughout their time in the school, pupils of all abilities, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, make at least satisfactory progress. Some make good progress, though progress is not yet consistently good across all classes and for all groups of pupils. Attainment in English, mathematics and science by the end of Year 6 has historically been low. It improved markedly in 2010, slightly exceeding the national average in English and mathematics as a good proportion of pupils reached the higher levels of attainment. Current data and inspection evidence indicate that this picture is likely to be maintained at the end of this academic year. Teaching Year 6 pupils in two smaller English and mathematics sets, along with one-to- one tuition and small group work, is helping to accelerate all pupils progress and challenge the more able. Writing standards, compared to mathematics and reading, are relatively

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

weaker across the school. Although the content of pupils writing and choice of vocabulary have improved, basic skills such as accuracy in punctuation and spelling remain weak. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils make good progress in speaking and listening so that they explain their thinking and articulate their ideas and opinions well. Pupils good attitudes to learning, desire to do well, and their willingness to persevere were evident in almost every lesson observed and contribute well to their learning and progress. Pupils learn well in some lessons. For example, during intervention groups, children listened well and were keen to show what they know, ask questions and to benefit from the additional attention and help. Similarly in an English lesson, pupils in Year 5 made excellent progress in formulating persuasive arguments for and against animal rights. Learning and progress were also good in a mathematics lesson in Year 1, when pupils learned from practical experience how to solve simple money problems involving buying fruits and exchanging coins. Pupils develop a good understanding of, and respect for, British and other cultures. They

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

behave well and are friendly, polite and considerate. They grow in confidence and willingly take on responsibilities around the school. Their involvement in community events and extra-curricular activities is as yet more limited. Pupils say they feel safe in school, noting that staff are kind and take care of them. They develop a good understanding of healthy lifestyles, and enjoy physical activities and healthy school dinners.

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 2

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 3

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

is low Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Strengths in much of the teaching include the staffs good subject knowledge, questioning skills, high expectations and planning for different abilities. Skilled teaching assistants are deployed well and used flexibly. They make a strong contribution to pupils learning by teaching different ability groups or supporting the class while the teacher works with pupils who have special educational needs. In the better lessons, teaching has a brisk pace with a good balance of teacher input and time for pupils to work independently or together. This was the case in mathematics lessons in Year 6. Teachers here are also skilled in plugging the gaps in pupils knowledge, and, are flexible enough to adjust their plans when it becomes clear that pupils need additional teaching or more practise before moving on. In lessons that are satisfactory rather than good, the learning intentions are occasionally not explained simply enough, the pace is too slow, or pupils are expected to listen

p.7

How effective is the provision?

passively for too long and then do not have enough time to learn through practise. Occasionally explanations are muddled so that some pupils become confused, and learning objectives are not always easy for pupils to understand. Teachers are generally aware of shortcomings in pupils handwriting but do not always model neat and well-presented handwriting themselves. Assessments are satisfactory. In most lessons, teachers question pupils well to challenge their thinking and use assessments effectively to match work to different abilities and set targets for pupils. Marking, however, is irregular in some classes and subjects and generally does not do enough to alert teachers to pupils mistakes, challenge pupils or guide them towards improvement. In particularly, marking of pupils writing in all subjects does not always pinpoint mistakes and guide pupils towards making improvements. The curriculum makes a good contribution to pupils personal development, health and

p.7

How effective is the provision?

physical development, as reflected in the school achieving the Healthy Schools and Activemark awards. The improvements currently being made, such as linking subjects together, holding themed weeks and increasing the number of visits and visitors, are adding to pupils engagement and learning. Pupils say how much they enjoyed a topic on liquids and gasses as part of science work, as well as a visit to the Imperial War Museum and making eggless fruit cakes as part of their Word War II project. Similarly in an assembly on science week led by Year 1, pupils had clearly learned a good deal. Lunchtime and after-school activities are popular, but fairly limited. Good care, guidance and support mean pupils settle quickly, are well cared for and feel safe. Pupils whose circumstances may make them vulnerable and their families are well supported. Breakfast club provides a welcoming environment in which pupils can enjoy each others company.

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The schools sterling work to address persistent absence has been very effective in bringing attendance to a satisfactory level. Persistent absence has also declined and is now low. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.8

How effective is the provision?

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.8

How effective is the provision?

The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships

p.8

How effective is the provision?

The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 2

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The headteachers continued strong leadership, with the support of the new deputy headteacher, means that they drive improvements well. They set challenging targets for pupils and staff, while maintaining good staff morale as reflected in the staff questionnaires. The schools action plans identify the right priorities, with clear success criteria and lines of responsibility. The school has invested heavily in training, which has helped to raise staff performance. As the school has travelled on its journey of improvement, the headteacher has begun to delegate responsibilities more widely and to coach others to develop their leadership skills. Although a few middle leaders roles are still developing, they are a good team who are enthusiastic, ambitious to make improvements and have good knowledge of their subjects. Several have also developed good practice in their own teaching that can be shared. The strong governing body are actively involved, fully understand the schools strengths

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

and weaknesses, and are determined to continue to support and challenge it to improve further. They, along with staff, have been proactive in strengthening links with parents, seeking their views, involving them in the school and providing better information about pupils progress and teaching methods. One parent noted that the headteacher is always on hand to talk to parents. Safeguarding, including risk assessment and staff training in child protection procedures, is satisfactory. The school takes effective steps to promote equality of opportunity and tackle discrimination. Pupils get on well together and gaps in performance are now closing. Partnerships with the local authority and external agencies are good, though those with other schools and insitituions to share and learn from best practice, particularly in terms of curricular provision, are as yet fairly limited. The school makes a good contribution to

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

community cohesion at the school level. Its contribution at the local and wider community level is developing. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the school's engagement with parents and carers 2

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 3

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 3

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 3

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money 3

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Excellent improvements have been made to the accommodation and resources since the last inspection so that the learning environment is bright, spacious, stimulating and well resourced. Because of the very warm welcome to children and parents and good standards of care, children quickly settle into school, establish clear routines and good patterns of behaviour. They make good progress from starting points that are generally below typical expectations, partly due to the fact that some children are still at the early stages of learning English. By the time they join Year 1, their attainments are broadly average. Children engage well in a broad range of activities indoors and outside. They play well independently or with others. They develop confidence, good friendships and learn to take care of each other. Children quickly settle to activities at the start of the sessions, for example using computers to paint pictures, listening to stories, and making smoothies.

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

Nursery and Reception staff work very well as a team, have a common vision and understand how young children learn best. They provide a good mix of independent and adult-led activities and interact well with children during play to support learning and move it on. Children in Nursery, for example, were encouraged well to learn early mathematics skills through play when matching numbers on their tabards to the cars they would ride, and when choosing the correct size of wellington boots to put on before going into the garden. Similarly in Reception, children were engaged in various mathematics activities, for example creating simple number stories. The more able were challenged to use number lines or 100 squares when dealing with numbers beyond 20. There is a strong focus on extending childrens speaking skills. Children also develop a good knowledge of letters and sounds, which help them begin to read and enjoy mark

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

making and attempting to write. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Early Years Foundation Stage

When adults work and play alongside children, they make timely assessments of their progress and plan how activities might later be amended to extend their learning and reflect their interests. Strong, visionary leadership has helped to model best practice and move provision on at a rapid pace. Data analysis is beginning to be used effectively to highlight strengths and weaknesses in childrens attainment, identify the impact of provision and plan the next steps. Staff work very well with parents to keep them informed and involve them in their childrens education.

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.10

Early Years Foundation Stage

The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.10

Views of parents and carers

The majority of parents and carers are very satisfied with the school. They feel that their children enjoy attending and that this is a well-led, caring school. The inspection confirms this. A small number of parents and carers are concerned about systems to tackle inappropriate behaviour and their childrens progress. Inspectors found that behaviour has improved and is now good and that the school has good systems to deal with inappropriate behaviour. Inspectors recognise that over time, some of the older pupils have not made the progress they should have made, but can also see that standards are rising and the school has good systems to help pupils at the top of the school to catch up.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Townsend Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The inspection team received 122 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 257 pupils registered at the school.

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 82 67 38 31 2 2 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 67 55 52 43 2 2 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

My school informs me about my child's progress 70 57 47 39 5 4 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

My child is making enough progress at this school 60 49 54 44 3 2 3 2

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The teaching is good at this school 68 56 51 42 1 1 2 2

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school helps me to support my child's learning 60 49 53 43 9 7 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 50 41 59 48 10 8 0 0

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 47 39 53 43 9 7 1 1

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school meets my child's particular needs 52 43 60 49 5 4 2 2

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 48 39 58 48 8 7 3 2

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 49 40 57 47 6 5 2 2

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school is led and managed effectively 54 44 62 51 0 0 2 2

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 70 57 47 39 1 1 3 2

p.11

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.12

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.12

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.12

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.12

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 August 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2009/10 was not representative of all sc hools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.13

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.13

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.14

Inspection of Townsend Primary School, London SE17 1HJ

I am writing to tell you what we found out when we visited your school. Thank you for making us very welcome, talking to us and discussing your work. You told us that your school has improved and we agree. This is what we found. You make satisfactory progress and some of you are making good progress. Standards reached by the end of Year 6 are improving and are now close to average. You behave well and get on well together. You have a good understanding of how to stay safe and healthy. You enjoy school and develop good relationships. The staff are improving the curriculum to ensure you enjoy a wider range of activities. Adults make sure that you are safe, happy and well looked after. Your headteacher and other leaders lead the school well. To help you to do even better, we are asking the school to: improve the standard of your writing, especially your skills in punctuation, spelling and handwriting make sure you all learn well in every lesson and that teachers use marking to show you

p.14

Inspection of Townsend Primary School, London SE17 1HJ

what you need to correct and improve your work continue to improve the learning opportunities that the school offers you, for example by providing more visits and clubs, and more opportunities to be involved in the local community. You can help by continuing to work hard and by improving your writing, for example by checking your work when you have finished, learning spellings, practising your handwriting and ensuring you use the correct punctuation in all of your work.

p.14

Inspection of Townsend Primary School, London SE17 1HJ

Kathy Taylor Lead inspector out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion