Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Corpus Christi Catholic High School

Inspected 31 Mar 2011 · published 4 May 2011 · URN 119780

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Joan Davis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    31 Mar 2011

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Davis

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    PR2 8QY

  • Name on report verified

    Corpus Christi Catholic Sports College

  • URN verified

    119780

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+34Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellenteffectivelyimprovingimprovedenjoystronglyhighly effective
Criticisminadequatedisruptionpoorweaknessesinconsistentnot sufficientlyconcernsunacceptable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2167w+35
  • Leadership1141w+21
  • What needs to improve137w+78

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
3,442
about usual (typical 3005)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 44
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 3
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Corpus Christi Catholic Sports College Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 119780 Local Authority Lancashire Inspection number 358624 Inspection dates 30–31 March 2011 Reporting inspector Joan Davis HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 745 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr Steve Gray Headteacher Mr Martin Callagher Date of previous school inspection 1 April 2008 School address St Vincent's Road Fulwood, Preston Lancashire PR2 8QY Telephone number 01772 716912 Fax number 01772 718779 Email address martin.callagher@talk21.com

p.1

Age group 11–16 Inspection dates 30–31 March 2011 Inspection number 358624 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and three additional inspectors. Thirty three lessons were observed and thirty two teachers seen. Meetings were held with groups of students, the Chair of the Governing Body, the School Improvement Partner and staff. Inspectors observed the school's work, and looked at the school's self-evaluation documentation, the school's development plan, policies and students' work. The team also considered an analysis of 118 parents and carer questionnaires as well as those from staff and students. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.  Whether all students in the school make at least satisfactory progress in all subjects, but particularly in English and mathematics.  The extent to which teaching challenges students and meets their needs and interests.  Whether the drive for improvement is sufficiently embedded at all levels to provide

p.3

Introduction

satisfactory capacity to continue to improve.

p.3

Information about the school

Corpus Christi is a smaller than average secondary school near Preston. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is above the national average. The percentage of students from minority ethnic groups is slightly below the national average, while the number of students who speak English as an additional language is slightly above the national average. The percentage of students with special educational needs and/or disabilities is below the national average. The school has specialist status for sport and technology. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Main findings

Corpus Christi is a satisfactory school. Satisfactory progress has been made in tackling the areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection and there is now a tangible and concerted ambition at all levels to secure improved outcomes for students. The attainment of students is now broadly average and learning and progress are satisfactory. Therefore, their achievement is satisfactory overall and improving. The school has a number of good features. Its chief strength lies in the contribution that the sports' specialism has made in improving outcomes for students, such as the wide range of sporting activities on offer, which help students adopt healthy lifestyles. The specialism has also been a factor in driving improvements in attainment and leads developments in sports' education at both local and national levels. Excellent leadership in this area is now being harnessed to drive improvements in other areas of the school's

p.4

Main findings

work, such as in the management of behaviour. Students feel safe in the school and their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good, reflecting the school's inclusive ethos. Behaviour is satisfactory overall and movement around the school is orderly. Students are friendly, cooperative and polite. They say that there is very little bullying and when it occurs it is dealt with effectively. The school provides a caring environment where all students are valued. The quality of teaching is satisfactory overall. Teaching is of good quality in lessons for older students, when they are preparing for examinations. The school does not, as yet, provide sufficient opportunities to share existing good practice in order to improve the overall quality of provision. As a result, some lessons are dull and low-level disruption on the part of some students impairs their learning and that of others. The use of assessment to support learning is inconsistent. In some lessons, questioning is

p.4

Main findings

used effectively, for example, to establish whether students have understood the work or to encourage debate. However, procedures for monitoring the marking of students' work are not rigorous enough and opportunities are missed to give students information on how to improve. The curriculum is satisfactory. Good links with primary schools have been established and the school works effectively in partnership with a number of institutions through the sports' specialism and its links with industry. Leadership, management and governance are satisfactory but improving. The headteacher has a clear vision for the further development of the school and has made improvements to leadership at all levels. The school has embraced challenge and support from a number of agencies, and leaders are developing a much sharper focus on improving students' achievement. Robust action has been taken to eradicate underperformance. Development

p.4

Main findings

planning has been an area of weakness. Planning is not being used effectively to ensure Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

that all members of the school community know exactly what they need to do to improve outcomes for students. Nonetheless, given the satisfactory level of self-evaluation, the shared ambition to improve students' achievement, a greater degree of accountability and steady improvement in some key measures, the school has a satisfactory capacity for sustained improvement. The school provides adequate value for money because outcomes for students are satisfactory. Procedures for safeguarding are satisfactory. Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attainment by:  - building on improvements in English and mathematics and thereby accelerating the rate of progress in improving outcomes for students  - improving development planning so that plans are specific and focused with clear information as to how the impact of plans will be monitored and evaluated.  Increase the proportion of good teaching, particularly in Key Stage 3, by:  - providing regular training on the key elements of good and outstanding teaching for all staff  - improving the engagement of students with their learning by matching the work to students' different learning styles and abilities  - making better use of existing good and outstanding practice in teaching within the school by providing more opportunities for dissemination  - making assessment and marking procedures consistently good across the school.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Students enter the school with prior attainment that is broadly in line with the national average. They make satisfactory progress overall so their achievement is satisfactory. Attainment of students when they leave the school has been low but it improved in 2010 and this trend has been sustained so that current attainment is now broadly in line with the national average and for some key measures it is above. The learning and progress of students with special educational needs and/or disabilities are also satisfactory. Attainment in English and mathematics has been poor, largely owing to staffing difficulties. The school now benefits from excellent, dynamic leadership and improved teaching in these subjects. As a result, attainment is rising rapidly. In an outstanding Year 10 mathematics lesson seen during the inspection, the teacher's excellent subject knowledge and careful planning ensured that students sustained effort and concentration and made outstanding progress.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

One student was overheard saying to her friend, 'I love it when I understand it – I feel such a sense of achievement!' In other subjects, students make good progress in Years 10 and 11 in lessons, but progress in Key Stage 3 is satisfactory because activities in lessons are often not imaginative enough or do not sufficiently address the interests and abilities of the students. Students feel safe in the school. They trust staff and feel that they can confide in them should problems arise. Students' behaviour between lessons and around the school is Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

generally good. The school benefits from an excellent environment and uses social spaces effectively so that students can mix with their peers. The library is used to good effect at break and at lunchtime, as students can pursue their interests, read and take part in social activities. Older students say that behaviour has improved. The number of students excluded is decreasing. However, on occasion, instances of poor behaviour were observed in some lessons when students were not fully engaged by the activities provided. Students have a good appreciation of the importance of adopting healthy lifestyles which is reinforced in many aspects of the curriculum as well as during form time and assemblies. Students enjoy the many opportunities they have to take part in extra- curricular sport. Students speak highly of the healthy options available in the canteen. There is a much higher than average take-up of school meals and the school has won a

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

national award for its excellent provision in this respect. Students have opportunities to take up positions of responsibility, for example as buddies for Year 7 students. However, younger students are less involved in the life of the school than older students. Students contribute to the community by holding an annual Christmas party for senior citizens, which is much appreciated. They also raise substantial amounts of money for charitable causes. Students develop workplace skills through enterprise and vocation days and links with partners, such as that with Yorkshire Bank. Actions taken by the school to improve numeracy and literacy skills are now improving students' future employment prospects. Attendance is broadly in line with the national average and students are punctual to lessons. Students' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good and is a strength of the school. They respond very positively to the excellent opportunities provided for them to

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

reflect on wider issues. Students cooperate well and show respect for each other. They develop an understanding of other faiths through the curriculum and their cultural development is enhanced through visits to museums, theatres and trips abroad. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils adopt healthy lifestyles 2

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils contribute to the school and wider community 3

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent to which pupils develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

p.7

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The quality of teaching is satisfactory overall but is better in lessons for students in Key Stage 4, where the large majority of lessons are good. Teachers use information and communication technology effectively in order to support students' learning. There are substantial variations in the quality of teaching both within and across subjects. In the better lessons, imaginative learning activities are well matched to students' abilities and interests, enabling students to learn by applying their knowledge in context and then reflecting on their learning. For example, in one outstanding English lesson seen during the inspection, students were studying a poem about slavery and the activities planned by the teacher helped them to imagine the plight of slaves, encouraging empathy and compassion. In weaker lessons, activities are not sufficiently matched to the abilities of learners and therefore students lose interest. On occasion, too much talk from the teacher

p.7

How effective is the provision?

results in a loss of concentration on the part of students leading to low-level disruption and chatter. The use of assessment to support learning is variable. The school now has extremely effective systems for tracking the performance of students and putting intervention and support in place when students are not performing as well as they might. This has contributed to the rising trend in attainment. However, the quality of marking is highly inconsistent. Good practice exists, but varies both within and across departments. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

How effective is the provision?

The curriculum is satisfactory. There is a wide range of traditional, academic subjects on offer and the school is increasing the variety of vocational courses. However, the impact of such provision on outcomes is yet to be seen as some of these courses are in the early stages of development. Effective support is provided for students with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support is satisfactory overall. The guidance students receive when they attend school is good and appreciated by students; however this is not as effective for students who are reluctant to come to school. Arrangements for transition from primary to secondary school are smooth and well managed. The recent appointment of directors of learning who have a much sharper focus on improving achievement is starting to have an impact on outcomes for students. The school has worked effectively to reduce the number of students who were persistently absent.

p.8

How effective is the provision?

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.8

How effective is the provision?

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.8

How effective is the provision?

The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships

p.8

How effective is the provision?

The effectiveness of care, guidance and support 3

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

The headteacher shows ambition for the school and understands what the school needs to do to improve. He has been supported by a knowledgeable and capable governing body in tackling underperformance. Some barriers to improvement have been removed and recent developments have established a culture of accountability and a shared focus at all levels on improving outcomes for students. The school now has robust systems to monitor students' progress and set aspirational targets. Although the school's self-evaluation is accurate, planning for improvement has lacked clarity and clear indications as to how the impact of initiatives is to be monitored and evaluated. The leadership and management of teaching and learning are improving. However, the monitoring of the quality of assessment and teaching lacks rigour and uniformity. The school does not, as yet, provide sufficient opportunities to share the good practice that exists within the school, so that all

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

teaching can become as good as the best. Governors are supportive and hold the school to account. They have a good grasp of the school's strengths and weaknesses and have started to build constructive links with departments to challenge underperformance. The effectiveness of the school's engagement with parents and carers is good. Parents and carers appreciate the efforts that teachers make to support their children. The school has good partnerships with a range of institutions which enrich the lives of students. For example the link with Enterprise and Training 2000 is enabling the school to offer a wider range of courses. The school has good policies in place to promote equal opportunities and tackle discrimination. The school is a cohesive community where students of all cultures are welcomed and Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

How effective are leadership and management?

diversity is valued. The school's contribution to community cohesion is good. The school's student population is increasingly diverse and relationships between students of different cultures are characterised by friendliness and mutual respect. The partnership with a school in Slovakia and participation in the exchange scheme with Zambia through the University of Central Lancashire enables students to meet with their peers from other parts of the world. Arrangements for safeguarding are satisfactory, but could be stronger in some aspects. The school is now addressing some minor issues raised during the inspection regarding safeguarding.

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the governing body in challenging and supporting the school so that weaknesses are tackled decisively and statutory responsibilities met

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of the school's engagement with parents and carers 2

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of partnerships in promoting learning and well-being 2

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity and tackles discrimination

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness of safeguarding procedures 3

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school promotes community cohesion 2

p.9

How effective are leadership and management?

The effectiveness with which the school deploys resources to achieve value for money 3

p.9

Views of parents and carers

There was a lower than average return to the Ofsted questionnaire. Parents and carers are very supportive of the school and a very large majority state that their children enjoy school and that the school informs them about their children's progress. Most parents and carers feel that the school prepares their children well for their future. Some parents and carers raised concerns about behaviour. While inspectors found that behaviour is improving, we also observed that some low-level disruption occurs in lessons when the work is not appropriately pitched at the interests and abilities of students. We have therefore recommended to the school that existing good practice in teaching be shared across the school to improve students' motivation and engagement in lessons. A very large majority of parents and carers feel that their children are safe and that the school is led and managed effectively. Most parents and carers are happy with their

p.9

Views of parents and carers

children's experience at Corpus Christi.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Corpus Christi Catholic Sports College to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The inspection team received 118 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 745 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Statements Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total % Total % Total % Total % My child enjoys school 45 38 63 53 8 7 2 2 The school keeps my child safe 56 47 59 50 1 1 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

My school informs me about my child's progress 75 64 39 33 3 3 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

My child is making enough progress at this school 51 43 58 49 5 4 3 3

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The teaching is good at this school 49 42 60 51 5 4 2 2

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school helps me to support my child's learning 43 36 66 56 6 5 1 1

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 44 37 64 54 4 3 0 0

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 46 39 67 57 2 2 2 2

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school meets my child's particular needs 49 42 62 53 3 3 1 1

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 45 38 53 45 12 10 4 3

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 43 36 62 53 7 6 2 2

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The school is led and managed effectively 52 44 61 52 4 3 1 1

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 67 57 44 37 4 3 2 2

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 August 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Sports College, Preston, PR2 8QY

Thank you very much for the warm welcome we received during our inspection of your school. We were impressed by your friendliness and the good attitudes you show towards one another. We found that your school is improving and provides you with a satisfactory standard of education. Many of you enjoy taking part in activities such as trips abroad and the excellent range of sporting opportunities on offer. You have good links with students from other parts of the world and you have a good understanding of other cultures. Your attainment by the end of Year 11 is average and you make satisfactory progress in most subjects as you move up through the school. Teaching is satisfactory overall, but is better when you are in Years 10 and 11 preparing for examinations. We noticed that sometimes the behaviour of some students is not good, especially when they are not interested in the activities prepared for them by teachers.

p.13

Inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Sports College, Preston, PR2 8QY

Behaviour is better when lessons are more suited to your interests and abilities. The school cares well for you and you trust your teachers. You know you can talk to them if you have a problem. We identified a number of areas where we think the school should make improvements. We have asked the headteacher to make sure good teachers share their ideas with other teachers so that all lessons are as good as the best. We also think that the school should help you to continue to improve your results in examinations, particularly in English and mathematics. We have asked the headteacher to make sure your work is marked more regularly and that teachers give you advice on how to improve. All of you can help in this by attending school regularly, working hard and taking advantage of the many opportunities available to you. We wish you every success for the future.

p.13

Inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Sports College, Preston, PR2 8QY

Joan Davis Her Majesty's Inspector out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion