Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

St Hilda's Church of England Primary School

Inspected 30 Mar 2011 · published 20 Apr 2011 · URN 105351

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pat Kime

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Mar 2011

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pat Kime

  • Postcode verified

    M25 1HA

  • Name on report verified

    St Hilda's Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    105351

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedeffectivelyoutstandingmake good progresspositivehighly effectiveexceptionallyrapid progress
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysconcernsunacceptableshortcomingsbelowgapsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2052w+34
  • Leadership672w+86
  • What needs to improve109w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
2,827
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

St Hilda's Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 105351 Local Authority Bury Inspection number 355763 Inspection dates 29–30 March 2011 Reporting inspector Pat Kime HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 92 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr Alan Armitage Headteacher Mrs Adele Gaunt Date of previous school inspection 11 January 2007 School address Whittaker Lane Prestwich Manchester M25 1HA Telephone number 0161 798 6227 Fax number 0161 773 5320 Email address sthildas@bury.gov.uk

p.1

Age group 4–11 Inspection dates 29–30 March 2011 Inspection number 355763 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and one additional inspector. The inspectors observed seven lessons and made short visits to a further four lessons, including sessions of one-to-one support. They observed all seven teachers. The inspectors held meetings with staff, pupils, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority, and they spoke informally with many parents and carers. They observed the school's work, and looked at a range of documentation provided by the school, including curricular planning, records of pupils' progress and planning for school improvement. The inspectors took account of responses to the inspection questionnaires that were received from pupils and 39 parents and carers. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.  Has pupils' progress improved sufficiently to overcome underachievement?

p.3

Introduction

 Has the quality of teaching improved sufficiently?  Have the school's senior staff and governing body shown the capacity to drive school improvement?

p.3

Information about the school

St Hilda's Church of England Primary School is much smaller than the average primary school. It is an ethnically mixed school with around one in every seven pupils being from a minority-ethnic background. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage are taught in a class with some of the Year 1 pupils. There are three other classes, each catering for two school years. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is above average. The number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average. A higher than average proportion of these pupils has significant learning difficulties, including several with emotional, behavioural or social difficulties. The proportion of pupils joining and leaving the school part way through their primary education is much higher than in most schools. There have been changes to the school's staffing since the inspection in February 2010, including two new class teachers and a

p.3

Information about the school

part-time support teacher. The school has Healthy School status and an Activemark. An after-school club is run on the school premises. This is inspected separately from the school. The latest report on this provision is available on Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

In accordance with section 13 (5) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires significant improvement. St Hilda's has improved a lot in the last year. It now provides a satisfactory standard of education and good pastoral care. Children get off to a good start in the Early Years Foundation Stage (Reception). Pupils' progress in learning in Key Stages 1 and 2 has improved. For most, it is at least satisfactory progress. Some pupils have made rapid progress since September. For some others, a legacy of underachievement remains and a few have aspects of their learning in which they are not making the progress they should. Test results for last year's leavers were well below the national average but, nonetheless, much higher than the previous year. Year groups are small and attainment varies from one to another but the underlying trend in attainment across the school is upward.

p.4

Main findings

The quality of teaching has improved and is now satisfactory overall. There is good teaching, but not enough to enable all pupils to catch up lost ground. At times, work is not tailored closely enough to pupils' different stages in learning. Occasionally, pupils have to sit listening to the teacher for too long before getting down to work. Much of the extra teaching for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is of a good quality. Topics have been introduced in which study of several subjects is linked to a theme. Pupils enjoy this 'linked learning' but work remains to be done to ensure it is planned with sufficient rigour. The staff and the governing body are clearly committed to improving the school further. Their evaluation of its performance is accurate and, importantly, they have much better ways of keeping track of how well pupils are doing. These factors, along with what has

p.4

Main findings

been achieved in the last year show satisfactory capacity for improvement. Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Further accelerate pupils' progress in order to overcome the legacy of previous underachievement and raise attainment.  Improve the quality of teaching further so that most is of a consistently good quality by: ensuring that, in all subjects, work is always well-matched to the pupils' range of learning needs and is sufficiently challenging for all ensuring an appropriate balance between teachers' talk and pupils' work.

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

 Strengthen curricular planning in subjects other than English and mathematics to ensure that pupils tackle progressively more demanding work in all subjects as they move up the school.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

When children start in Reception what they can do varies from year-to-year but is usually a lot less than is typical for children of their age. They make good progress but, by the end of the Reception Year, their attainment has not caught up to average. In Key Stages 1 and 2, most pupils are now making satisfactory progress and this was seen in most of the lessons observed. The school's records show that the proportion of pupils making good progress has increased. Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 improved last year, with a dramatic improvement in mathematics. There is also a rising trend in attainment in Key Stage 1. Across the school, however, there are some pupils who are not making the progress they should. A legacy remains from previous underachievement, particularly in Key Stage 2, with the gaps in pupils' learning varying between year groups. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities receive a considerable amount of extra help

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

and, often, one-to-one teaching. As a result most of these pupils make satisfactory progress. Pupils' personal development is satisfactory in most respects. Pupils develop personal attributes necessary for future success. For instance: they take on responsibilities which contribute to community life in school and the local area; they establish the habit of regular, punctual attendance; and their key skills are improving. The attendance rate has improved considerably this school year. Pupils who have emotional, behavioural or social difficulties gain in confidence and self-control and develop positive attitudes to learning. Pupils have a sound understanding of healthy lifestyles and they know that the school helps them to be healthy. They feel very safe in school and are confident to turn to the adults for any help or support they might need.

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

3

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.6

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Teaching has improved and is now satisfactory. There is good teaching but not enough that is consistently of a good quality. This is a key reason why pupils are not yet making the accelerated progress needed to reach the standard expected for their age by the time they leave the school. Typically, teachers have good relationships with pupils and, for the most part, they manage behaviour well. They apply the school's positive behaviour policy consistently. Lessons are orderly and planned. The more effective lessons are lively and fun for pupils. For example, younger pupils concentrated intently and tackled counting in tens and fives with gusto. They enjoyed joining in familiar songs about numbers and were captivated by an appealing computer program which was used to reinforce their learning. Such lessons move along at a good pace so pupils sustain involvement in learning and tackle progressively more demanding tasks. Various shortcomings in teaching reduce the

p.6

How effective is the provision?

effectiveness of some lessons. Most significantly, work is not always matched sufficiently closely to the range of pupils' learning needs. In some of the lessons observed this meant that some pupils were unable to complete the work set while others found their work easy, soon finished, and had nothing more demanding to move on to. When too much time is spent reiterating instructions and explanations, pupils' attention drifts, behaviour slips and too little is achieved, because pupils do not have enough time for their work.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

The curriculum covers all that is required and it is enriched by a good range of clubs and an increasing number of visits and visitors. Much of the work in non-core subjects is taught through 'topics' which link learning in several subjects. This approach was introduced this school year and work remains to be done to sharpen up the planning to ensure that pupils build up skills progressively in all these subjects. There is a good range of additional provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. The school takes good care of pupils. Staff know the pupils well and understand the circumstances of their lives, which are not always easy. They go to great lengths to secure support from outside agencies to meet pupils' pastoral needs. Pupils are confident that the staff care about them and will help them.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching 3

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The senior staff and the governing body have a clear picture of how well the school is doing and where improvements are still needed. They have concentrated on improving pupils' achievement in the key skills of literacy and numeracy, their attendance, and their behaviour. They have had success on all these fronts. In the last year staff have had considerable support to develop their teaching skills and this has generally proved effective. Policies and procedure have been introduced to establish greater consistency, for example, in the marking of pupils' work and setting of targets for them and in the management of behaviour. The assessment of pupils' attainment and tracking of their progress has improved. Detailed termly plans are produced showing exactly what will be done to raise pupils' achievement. The effectiveness of what the school's leaders and managers have done over the last year shows they have the capacity to continue to take

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

the school forward. Governance is good and has made a significant contribution to the school's improvement. The governing body was augmented with experienced governors around the time of the previous inspection. These governors have brought a high level of relevant skills and experience to their roles and have provided good support, balanced by challenge, for the school, especially the senior staff. The governing body is well-informed about the school's performance and knows well what still needs to be done. Recently-appointed governors have embarked on training in order to strengthen the capacity of the governing body as a whole. Pupils' have equality of opportunity. The improved arrangements for assessment mean that staff at all levels have a better picture of how individuals and groups of pupils are progressing. This information is used effectively to determine how to deploy staff to

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

provide extra help. However, underachievement has not been entirely eradicated. The school itself is a cohesive, diverse community and pupils contribute to the immediate local community. Wider national and global links are under-developed. The school fully meets requirements for safeguarding pupils and staff are well-trained in these matters. Staff are alert to day-to-day safety issues and the school is a safe environment for pupils. The school is proactive in work with a range of external agencies to promote pupils' safety, particularly in relation to child-protection matters. Staffing levels are generous but staff are deployed effectively to promote pupils' achievement, for instance, through high levels of additional support for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who have fallen behind in their learning. Since pupils' achievement is now satisfactory, the school provides satisfactory

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

3

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

Provision in this stage has improved. Children now get a good start in the Reception Year. They settle to school life quickly and enjoy the good range of appealing activities on offer. They make good progress in all areas of their learning, from a low starting point. By the end of the year they have gained ground but not caught up to average attainment. Reception children are taught in a class with some of the Year 1 pupils but the work is organised effectively to ensure that they get the right provision. The classroom provides a well-organised and attractive learning environment with good attention to promoting early reading and writing, children's personal, social and emotional development and their creative development. Improvements have been made this year to the provision for

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

learning out of doors with a wider range of resources which enable children to play and learn purposefully. The staff's skill in observing children at work and play, assessing their attainment and measuring their progress has improved. Consequently, their judgements are accurate but the systems used could be sharpened up to support the planning of work more efficiently.

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Views of parents and carers

The table below shows that most parents and carers who returned the inspection questionnaire are happy with the school. A few are dissatisfied with some aspects of the school's work. The lead inspector discussed the significance and implications of their concerns with the headteacher.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at St Hilda's Church of England Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The inspection team received 39 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 92 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 20 51 16 41 2 5 1 3 The school keeps my child safe 24 62 14 36 1 3 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My school informs me about my child's progress 18 46 17 44 2 5 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child is making enough progress at this school 15 38 17 44 3 8 1 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The teaching is good at this school 20 51 14 36 2 5 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps me to support my child's learning 17 44 16 41 5 13 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 16 41 22 56 1 3 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 15 38 19 49 3 8 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 16 41 15 38 3 8 1 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 11 28 20 51 5 13 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 15 38 18 46 2 5 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 16 41 14 36 1 3 5 13

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 21 54 14 36 3 8 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 August 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

1HA

Thank you for welcoming Mr Yates and me when we inspected your school recently. I am writing on behalf of us both. We enjoyed our time at your school and we learned a lot about how well you are doing at school from talking to you and observing your lessons. This letter is to report our judgements to you. St Hilda's has improved a lot in the last year. The school now gives you a satisfactory education and the staff look after you well. We were pleased to hear that you feel safe at school and know you can turn to the adults there for any help you might need. Children get a good start in the Reception Year. After that, progress in learning is satisfactory overall. Some of you have made great strides forward but others still have some catching up to do. There is a lot of extra help for pupils who find learning difficult or who have fallen behind. You might not know much about the governors but they had

p.13

1HA

done a great deal, behind the scenes, to help your school improve. We talked with Mrs Gaunt about how the school could get better still. We agreed that you could reach higher standards if more lessons were taught well, so that is the top priority for the future. We know you enjoy 'linked learning' but we think the teachers could tighten up the planning for subjects taught in these lessons. I wish you all well for the future. I know that, through the school council, you will be able to make suggestions for improving the school. I am sure you will have good ideas.

p.13

www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion