Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council in Sefton
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
12 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Elaine Clare
- URN verified
SC036304
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 57
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC036304 Inspection date 12/03/2012 Inspector Elaine Clare Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 03/11/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
The home accommodates a maximum of five young people in the age range of seven years to 15 years. It is close to local amenities. The home is managed by the local authority.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.4
Progress
This children's home was judged as good at the full inspection with no requirements or recommendations. This interim inspection finds the home has demonstrated continued improvement in the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people. There are no requirements or recommendations from this visit.
p.4
Progress
Young people work closely with staff and hard work has created a vibrant home where young people like to be. The young people's views are consistently gathered and these influence the home's operation and future direction. There is good feedback and consultation with partners who confirm the 'excellent ethos' at the home supports young people to achieve and develop. Relationships are excellent with individual differences being accepted and valued by all living and working at the home. The young people are all happy, safe and relaxed living in their home.
p.4
Progress
Good outcomes are being achieved. All the young people continue to receive a high standard of care from an experienced, competent and fully qualified staff team. Managers stimulate the enthusiasm of staff and channel their efforts effectively. It is a strong, child-focused service that is conducive to young people developing their potential.
p.4
Progress
Placements are stable and young people take responsibility for their behaviour. There are no behaviour management concerns. The promotion of young people's education, health and well-being are good. Young people's educational attainments are good. Young people are prepared well for the time when they leave and transition planning has been effective to enable sustained engagement in education or employment.
p.4
Progress
The home's aims and objectives are being fulfilled. There are good quality assurance systems being used to monitor the operation, management, young peoples welfare and the home's records. Realistic and challenging targets are outlined within the home’s development plan. Monitoring systems to comply with the requirements of Regulation 33 and 34 are in place. A protocol had recently been established to forward Regulation 34 reports to Ofsted. The home's management are committed to systematically improving quality through consultation processes, by better capturing then evaluating expressed views.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion