Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Apr 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marina Gaze

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marina Gaze

  • Postcode verified

    NE4 9LU

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivepositivelysuccessfulclear
Criticismnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings484w+39
  • What needs to improve103w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
580
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 25, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Miller Head of Newcastle City Learning Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council Westgate Community College West Road Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 9LU

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visit on 12 and 13 March 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, participants, partners, subcontractors and employers; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of participants’ work; and observation of two learning sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 Newcastle City Learning (NCL) has a very clear and effective strategy for helping participants find employment including those with multiple barriers and those furthest away from the job market. Since August 2011, the service has responded very positively to the increase in participants who are mandated to the provision. It is using the funding flexibilities well to meet their needs, especially those with multiple barriers to learning and employment.  NCL works very effectively with partners and subcontractors to provide a wide range of provision and progression routes. Close working with Jobcentre Plus and Newcastle College helps to ensure that the high number of participants needing provision in English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) to improve their employability can access learning at a level and location to suit them. Effective working with agencies and other local providers enables participants to access a one-stop-shop of services

p.1

Key findings

including initial assessment, jobsearch skills and specialist help with homelessness. Partners work closely together to share information about participants to avoid unnecessary duplication. Successful work with subcontractors and partner agencies to increase the range of participants supported into employment has included good links with a local training provider that resulted in many participants finding employment in care homes.  NCL works well with employers, helping large national retail employers with their recruitment and equipping participants with the necessary skills to apply for these new jobs. Work with smaller employers results in some good work-placement opportunities which develop participants’ confidence and skills. However, participants do not always receive sufficiently detailed feedback on their work when on a placement.  Programmes effectively develop participants’ employability skills such as

p.2

Key findings

teamworking, time management and problem solving skills which they recognise in themselves and others. Staff use participants’ experiences of work and applying for jobs effectively to develop individual learning plans and the provision. Employability skills, such as using a computer, jobsearch, language used in job interviews and numeracy for work, are an integral part of the ESOL provision. However, the pre-apprenticeship programme does not always develop participants’ sector-specific skills sufficiently.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 coaching work-placement providers to give more constructive and detailed feedback to participants  ensuring that participants on the pre-apprenticeship programme develop sector-specific skills  ensuring that the new employability programme develops the literacy, numeracy and IT skills that participants need to increase their employability.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Newcastle City Learning.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion