Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
William Ellis School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Nov 2010
- Postcode verified
NW5 1RN
- Name on report verified
William Ellis School
- URN verified
100056
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.11
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.11
- Students who speak English as an additional language are well supported by the coordinator, who liaises with parents and carers effectively to induct the students into the new systems and the school's high expectations. p.7
- Year 11 modern foreign language students used assessment criteria and mark schemes effectively to assess their own work in a German lesson and made good progress as a result. p.5
- Students say they feel safe and measures are taken consistently to ensure that any bullying, if it were to occur, is reported and dealt with swiftly. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- a result, the previously inadequate achievement of these groups is now satisfactory. p.4
- During the inspection, the school was mostly calm and orderly, though there was lack of focus and attention in some lessons as a result of lack of pace and challenge. p.5
- Inspectors found that the progress of some groups was previously inadequate. p.9
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.11
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.11
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Build on the improved curriculum provision already present at Key Stage 4, ensuring that better opportunities are provided for all students to develop the basic skills of literacy, numeracy and information and communication p.5
- Improve the leadership and management of middle leaders by sharpening the systems used to hold them to account. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 14
- Words of findings
- 3,058
- about usual (typical 3042)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique Reference Number 100056 Local Authority Camden Inspection number 354797 Inspection dates 4–5 November 2010 Reporting inspector Nasim Butt
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 899 Of which, number on roll in the sixth form 280 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Fiona Millar Headteacher Jill Hislop Date of previous school inspection 26 March 2008 School address Highgate Road London NW5 1RN Telephone number 020 72679346 Fax number 020 72841274 Email address hislop@williamellis.camden.sch.uk
p.1
Age group 11–18 Inspection dates 4–5 November 2010 Inspection number 354797 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.1
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 1234 234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by five additional inspectors. The inspectors observed 42 part lessons, each taught by a different teacher, undertaking three joint observations with school staff. They held meetings with staff, students and governors. Inspectors observed the school's work and looked at a range of documentation including the school's self- evaluation form, its monitoring records of students' progress towards their targets, governing body minutes, and the school improvement plan. They also considered responses to questionnaires completed by 21 parents and carers, 155 students and 34 staff. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at the following. The effectiveness of school leaders at all levels in raising attainment and accelerating the progress of students eligible for free school meals and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities.
p.3
Introduction
How well teachers use assessment information to support the learning of students of different abilities, set personal targets and track their progress. The impact of the school's language specialism in promoting the future economic well-being of students. Sixth form achievement and how effectively the consistency of provision has been improved.
p.3
Information about the school
This is a slightly smaller than average non-denominational school drawing boys from North London. About one third of the student population is made up of a mixed sixth form which is part of a consortium comprising four local schools. The school works in close partnership with the neighbouring Parliament Hill Girls School. It has been a specialist language college since 1997 and was last re-designated in March 2008. The proportion of students eligible for free school meals and those who speak English as an additional language is above average. The proportion of students with special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average, and the proportion with a statement of special educational needs is well above average. At the time of the inspection, the school was led by an interim headteacher who assumed post in September 2010.
p.3
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Main findings
William Ellis provides a satisfactory education and shows early signs of sustained improvement. Outcomes in the sixth form are good because of good teaching and a strong curriculum. The school is a caring and inclusive community in which students and staff from diverse backgrounds get on well with each other. Students enter the school with attainment that is broadly average and make satisfactory progress. Students' attainment in English and mathematics by the end of Year 11 has been close to the national average for several years and the latest data show that it is steadily rising. Although teaching has improved, too much is still consistently satisfactory rather than good with the result that many students do not make the maximum progress. Teaching is satisfactory overall, but there is much that is good and occasionally outstanding. However, there are missed opportunities for teachers to share good practice
p.4
Main findings
more widely across departments and subjects. In the best lessons, which comprise almost half of all lessons seen, teachers planned work well to meet students' individual needs, and skilfully asked questions that engage and challenge the learners. However, assessment information is not used consistently to plan work that meets the needs of individual students. In addition, teachers do not always share with students what they need to do to make good improvements in the lesson. As a result, students' progress is often no more than satisfactory. Partnerships are strong. For example, the language college status of the school is used effectively to train and update local primary school teachers in teaching modern foreign languages. Adult language provision is also good and those who partake, and this includes some parents and carers, benefit from gaining accredited qualifications. Although the curriculum has clear strengths, the school agrees with inspectors that key skills such as
p.4
Main findings
literacy and numeracy are not yet fully embedded. The school is showing signs of emerging well from a period of turbulence. The new headteacher's energy and vision are apparent and she is providing clear strategic direction. She is supported well by a competent and energetic group of senior leaders. As a result, the drive for improvement is gaining momentum, with both governors and staff sharing this vision. Increasingly, middle leaders are taking responsibility for performance in their curriculum area, though the systems used to hold them to account are insufficiently robust. The accuracy of the school's self- evaluation is shown by its clear analysis of performance data and identification of underachieving groups. The outcome of this process has been targeted interventions for specific groups, for example those eligible for free school meals and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. As
p.4
Main findings
a result, the previously inadequate achievement of these groups is now satisfactory. The positive impact of the work of school leaders in a relatively short span of time indicates the school's satisfactory, and rapidly improving, capacity for sustained improvement.
p.4
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching so that the large majority is regularly good or better by: ? ensuring all teachers consistently use assessment information to ensure high expectations in lessons and good challenge for all students in their learning ? providing students with good quality written and oral feedback, linked to learning targets, to support them in making further improvements ? systematically sharing with students what they need to do to make good progress in the lesson. ? Build on the improved curriculum provision already present at Key Stage 4, ensuring that better opportunities are provided for all students to develop the basic skills of literacy, numeracy and information and communication Improve the leadership and management of middle leaders by sharpening the systems used to hold them to account.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Students' learning and progress are satisfactory and improving as a result of improvements in teaching. The school's own assessment information shows that students eligible for free school meals and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities are, in the main, meeting their challenging targets and achieving in line with expectations. In about half the lessons seen during the inspection, students were making good progress. Year 7 students enjoyed working in groups to investigate whether the height of drop affected the size of the blood splatter, using red ink in a science lesson. Students who speak English as an additional language developed their experimental skills well and took full part in evaluating their findings. Year 11 modern foreign language students used assessment criteria and mark schemes effectively to assess their own work in a German lesson and made good progress as a result. In many cases, however, students are not
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
given sufficient opportunity to extend their learning in lessons and develop further their speaking, listening and thinking skills. In these lessons, students' learning is no more than satisfactory. The attendance of the vast majority is good and students say they enjoy coming to school. New behaviour systems have clarified expectations and most students are responding well to this. During the inspection, the school was mostly calm and orderly, though there was lack of focus and attention in some lessons as a result of lack of pace and challenge. Students say they feel safe and measures are taken consistently to ensure that any bullying, if it were to occur, is reported and dealt with swiftly. Students have a good understanding of personal safety. The school council has been recently reinstated but, although there are some early signs of success, this has not had sufficient time to make a significant impact. Students have a clear understanding of what good health involves and
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
what they need to do to maintain a healthy lifestyle. However, due to constraints imposed by the school building, opportunities to put this into practice at lunchtime are too limited. The school actively and successfully promotes students' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. For example, the annual international evening celebrates the diversity of cultures represented through national costumes, food, poetry and music.
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for pupils' outcomes
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3
Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3
The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3
The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress
p.6
3
Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹
p.6
The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4
p.6
How effective is the provision?
Teaching and learning have improved steadily since the last inspection. In most lessons seen, students show a desire to learn. Teachers who use the school's assessment data effectively show good knowledge and understanding of students' needs. This was the case in over half of the lessons seen. These lessons provide all groups of students with appropriately challenging and stimulating work and result in equally good progress. In other lessons, teachers' planning lacks sufficient detail and focuses more on what the teacher will do, rather than what the students will learn. In these lessons, teachers do not use the assessment data available effectively to plan for the needs of different groups, resulting in lessons that lack sufficient challenge or pace. As a consequence, students are less motivated to learn. The quality of teachers' marking of students' work is varied and does not always provide students with clear advice on how to improve.
p.6
How effective is the provision?
The curriculum is broad and balanced and has recently been extended to meet the wider range of needs and interests of Key Stage 4 students. Language college status has enabled the school to both enhance and extend its curriculum so that most Key Stage 3 students study two modern foreign languages and many across the school study Mandarin during extra-curricular time. This aspect of provision has a good impact on students' future economic well-being. However, basic skills of literacy, numeracy, and information and communication technology are not well embedded through the curriculum and school
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
leaders have begun work to address this. Students who speak English as an additional language are well supported by the coordinator, who liaises with parents and carers effectively to induct the students into the new systems and the school's high expectations. Care systems are well organised and staff carry out their roles diligently and effectively. Students receive good quality information, advice and guidance about future courses and career opportunities. The needs of the most vulnerable students are effectively met which ensures that these students participate well in a wide range of activities.
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for the quality of provision
p.7
The quality of teaching 3
Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The impact of leadership and management is satisfactory and improving. After a period of turbulence, the new headteacher has been successful in galvanising the school community so that leaders and managers at all levels have a shared vision and a good understanding of the key priorities for the school. The senior team is providing the capacity to focus more effectively on improving teaching and learning across the school. The impact of the work of the teaching and learning communities, coupled with the productive partnership work with the neighbouring girls' school, is beginning to pay dividends. The school's systems for monitoring and evaluating its work are not always sufficiently robust to ensure accountability at all levels for the outcomes achieved by students. There is more work to be done at middle leadership level to ensure that improvements in achievement and teaching extend to all subjects.
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The governing body has been instrumental in setting the right strategic direction and taking tough decisions to secure the future of the school. The good work of the school improvement committee has ensured that there is a relentless focus on raising students' achievement. Safeguarding procedures meet all statutory requirements and the school site is secure. New technology is now being used to undertake risk assessments for educational visits that were previously not sufficiently robust. All forms of discrimination and barriers to learning are effectively tackled. However, the school's promotion of equality of opportunity is no more than satisfactory because its work with students of differing ability levels has not yet led them to achieving the best they can. Community cohesion is effectively encouraged within the school and internationally through the link with two schools in China. Sixth form students in their gap year, learning
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
to speak Mandarin, have worked as teaching assistants in these schools. The school acknowledges there is work yet to be done in completing an analysis of needs and fully evaluating the effectiveness with which it promotes community cohesion.
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for leadership and management
p.8
3
Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning
p.8
Sixth form
The provision for sixth form education at William Ellis is provided within the La Swap consortium of schools. The consortium is effectively managed and there are good procedures for monitoring the quality of the provision across all the schools. Students enter the sixth form with average to below average levels of attainment and most make good progress by the time they leave. Attendance and punctuality have improved as a result of better systems and closer monitoring, and are satisfactory. Pass rates and retention rates are close to the national average. Students say they enjoy their lessons in the sixth form and the wider opportunities available to them. Teaching is mostly good, supported by good tracking systems to monitor students' progress. This enables effective intervention to take place where there is any underachievement. The curriculum is broad and offers both academic and vocational opportunities, and is well matched at different
p.8
Sixth form
levels to the needs of the students. Students benefit from the wider curriculum provision offered within the consortium of schools. The guidance programme raises students' aspirations and ensures that they are well informed about opportunities at university and in the world of work. Leaders and managers of the sixth form are focused on raising levels of students' achievement. A key priority now is to raise attainment in the weaker subjects to the level of the best by working closely with individual departments, and this is already recognised by staff.
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.9
Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 2
Taking into account: Outcomes for students in the sixth form
p.9
Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 2
The quality of provision in the sixth form 2
p.9
Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 2
Leadership and management of the sixth form 2
p.9
Views of parents and carers
The few parents and carers who responded to the questionnaire expressed a range of views about their children's experience at the school. Most say that their children enjoys school and this is reflected in good attendance. A small minority do not agree that the school promotes healthy lifestyles or deals effectively with poor behaviour. These aspects are covered in the report. A few respondents raised concerns about the frequent change in leadership and their children not making enough progress at the school. Inspectors found that the progress of some groups was previously inadequate. However, as a result of the strategies put in place by current school leaders, most students are now making satisfactory progress.
p.9
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at William Ellis School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.
p.10
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire
The inspection team received 21 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 931 pupils registered at the school.
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child enjoys school 6 29 12 57 1 5 2 10 The school keeps my child safe 4 19 16 76 1 5 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My school informs me about my child's progress 8 38 10 48 2 10 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child is making enough progress at this school 9 43 7 33 4 19 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The teaching is good at this school 4 19 14 67 0 0 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school helps me to support my child's learning 5 24 12 57 3 14 1 5
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 4 19 8 38 7 33 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 3 15 9 43 1 5 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school meets my child's particular needs 5 24 12 57 2 10 2 10
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 4 19 9 43 6 29 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 8 38 12 57 1 5 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school is led and managed effectively 5 24 11 52 2 10 1 5
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 6 26 12 57 3 14 0 0
p.10
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.
p.11
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.11
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 March 2010 and are the most recently published data available (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). Please note that the sample of schools inspected during the autumn and spring terms 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Secondary school figures in clude those that have sixth forms, and sixth form figures include only the data specifically for sixth form inspection judgements.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
The school's capacity for sustained improvement. Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils. The quality of teaching. The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
p.12
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.12
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.13
Inspection of William Ellis School, London NW5 1RN
On behalf of the inspection team, I would like to thank you all for your help during our visit to your school. We found what you had to say very helpful in informing our judgements about your school. We were pleased to see so many of you willingly take part in the wide range of extra-curricular activities, especially those linked with your school's language college specialism, in particular the study of Mandarin. We judged that your school provides you with a satisfactory education. It has some good features. For example, you have a good understanding of personal safety, and the care, guidance and support you receive is a strength of the school. Your governors have also worked hard and successfully in keeping the school community focused on matters of strategic importance. You told us that you found teaching to be of variable quality, although it was apparent that many lessons were interesting because they involved you
p.13
Inspection of William Ellis School, London NW5 1RN
actively in learning. We judged the quality of teaching to be satisfactory with some improvements since the last inspection. Although there are strengths to your curriculum, we considered that the school could help you more in developing your literacy, numeracy, and information and communication technology skills. We also noted that your behaviour has improved because of clearer expectations and better systems in place to monitor it. However, there is still a lack of focus and attention in some lessons. Your headteacher and her senior team have done well in a short span of time. We worked closely with her and she agrees with our conclusions on what the school should do to make it better. We have asked the school to: improve the quality of teaching so that most is consistently good or better, resulting in students making consistently good progress. provide more opportunities in the curriculum for you to develop your literacy,
p.13
Inspection of William Ellis School, London NW5 1RN
numeracy, and information and communication technology skills develop sharper systems to hold middle leaders to account. All of you can help by behaving consistently well and working hard to achieve your targets, and perhaps even exceeding them.
p.13
www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please
telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.14
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion