Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Danesgate Community
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Oct 2010
- Postcode verified
YO10 4PB
- Name on report verified
Danesgate Community
- URN verified
121270
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.10
- In lessons, given on a one-to-one basis, work is extremely well matched to the pupils' needs and they make excellent progress. p.5
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs. p.10
- Pupils have a strong voice in lessons and confidently share their ideas and opinions knowing they are well received. p.5
- The recent rapid progress of improvement is linked to clear plans to bring about changes. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.10
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.10
- However, in some lessons, activities lack challenge or involve too many worksheets and work is not matched well enough to the pupils' capabilities. p.6
- However, the process does not yet make enough use of the data on pupils' progress to inform priorities because procedures to collect and analyse information are not yet fully in place. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment16
“The headteacher is highly effective.” p.7
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 13
- Words of findings
- 2,642
- about usual (typical 3042)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique Reference Number 121270 Local Authority York Inspection number 358970 Inspection dates 18–19 October 2010 Reporting inspector Pauline Hilling-Smith
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Pupil referral unit School category Pupil referral unit Age range of pupils 5–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 120 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mrs Shelia Bridge Headteacher Mrs Tricia Head Date of previous school inspection 10 July 2008 School address Danesgate Fulford Cross, York North Yorkshire YO10 4PB Telephone number 01904 642611 Fax number 01904 642613 Email address chris.nicholson@york.gov.uk
p.1
Age group 5–16 Inspection dates 18–19 October 2010 Inspection number 358970 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.1
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.2
You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 1234 234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by two additional inspectors. Eleven lessons were observed and nine teachers seen. Meetings were held with parents and carers, pupils, a representative of the management committee and local authority and staff. Inspectors visited outreach provision, observed the school's work, looked at the school's evaluation of its performance, the current development plan, minutes of meetings of the management committee and documentation to ensure that pupils are safe. The responses to 12 questionnaires from parents and carers were analysed. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a key number of areas. The rate of progress of all groups of pupils towards their targets especially the more- able. How well the curriculum and teaching matches the learning and behaviour needs of the pupils, especially at Key Stage 3. How effectively leaders are bringing about school improvement and how the school
p.3
Information about the school
Danesgate Community is a larger than average size pupil referral unit, which caters for permanently excluded pupils and those at risk of exclusion, on short or long term placements, due to their behavioural social and emotional needs. It operates an outreach service for all the primary and secondary schools in York. It has arrangements for joint teaching of 14-19 courses with all York secondary schools, Applefields Special School, Askham Bryan Further Education College and York College of Further Education. It also operates work-based learning on a number of sites. Danesgate Community has been reorganised and extended since the last inspection and incorporated primary pupils for the first time at the beginning of this school year. The majority of pupils in the centre are boys and most pupils are White British. A few of the pupils are from Travellers families. The number of pupils who have a statement of special educational needs or are undergoing
p.3
Information about the school
assessment is well above average. The number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is well above average. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is well above average. The school has achieved Healthy School status. The current headteacher was appointed April 2010.
p.3
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Main findings
This is a satisfactory and rapidly improving pupil referral unit. Arrangements for care, guidance and support for pupils are good and these enable pupils to feel safe. The way in which partnerships contribute to the curriculum and to achievement and enjoyment is also good. The curriculum, an area for improvement set at the last inspection, is now good. Progress on addressing weaknesses since the last inspection is satisfactory overall, but now improving quickly as clarity about the role and remit of the centre and the appointment of a new headteacher have started to have an impact. The recent rapid progress of improvement is linked to clear plans to bring about changes. Staff now work together closely with the centre's partners, parents and carers so that pupils can make the most of the opportunities available. Leadership has a clear vision for the development of the centre and has established an enthusiastic team with high morale who share these
p.4
Main findings
ambitions. Accurate self-evaluation gives leaders a clear view of strengths and areas for improvement and takes good account of the views of others. However, the process does not yet make enough use of the data on pupils' progress to inform priorities because procedures to collect and analyse information are not yet fully in place. Leaders have a very clear understanding about how teaching can be improved and actions taken have shown good impact so far. Pupils' progress is satisfactory and improving securely as the quality of teaching improves. As a result, attainment, although well below average overall, is rising. All this demonstrates that there is satisfactory and improving capacity to sustain improvement. Everyone involved with Danesgate Community shows a deep understanding and respect for individual differences. Its entire ethos is underpinned by the belief that any obstacles to progress can be removed.
p.4
Main findings
Close partnership with a small but growing number of parents and carers is having a striking impact on pupils' well-being. Teaching is satisfactory and improving. However, staff do not always check frequently enough that all pupils are being challenged throughout a lesson. When this happens progress slows. Behaviour is satisfactory and improving because pupils are well supervised and they respond to additional guidance from individual members of staff about how to modify their behaviour. Although attendance is below average overall, many pupils quickly improve their attendance when they start at Danesgate Community. Pupils say they feel safe in school and are confident in the staff to deal with any issues they may have. This is based on the good attention paid to safeguarding procedures, particularly risk assessment in practical subjects.
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve attendance by at least 10% by :
p.4
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
October 2011 improving the recording of reasons for absence analysing data to inform actions taken. Ensure that data about pupils' attainment and progress consistently informs improvement priorities by : putting systems in place to enable efficient collection about pupil's attainment and progress undertaking a detailed analysis of the data collected. Ensure all pupils are challenged throughout the lesson by adjusting questioning and tasks to match pupils' understanding as the lesson proceeds. Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Pupils make satisfactory progress overall. A few pupils make good progress in lessons because they enjoy learning and rise to the challenges presented to them. In lessons, given on a one-to-one basis, work is extremely well matched to the pupils' needs and they make excellent progress. For example, in one lesson a pupil enjoyed completing a mathematical pattern faster than the teacher. In another lesson, pupils were having a Mad Hatter's Tea Party, which meant that they needed to do things backwards and solve riddles. In this lesson, pupils enjoyed the challenge and discussed answers confidently at the same time as sharing tea and toast. Procedures to establish attainment when pupils start at Danesgate Community are robust and show that most pupils arrive with attainment well below average. This is because their behavioural difficulties have not allowed them to learn as effectively as other pupils.
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
Pupils' progress is improving securely and quickly and, although attainment is still well below average, overall it is rising. A few pupils make better progress and successfully reach the nationally expected level before they leave school. Pupils' targets are reviewed and adjusted frequently, but occasionally pupils are not sufficiently challenged and could make more progress. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities also make satisfactory progress towards the targets set for them. Parents and carers agree with their children when they say they feel safe and secure which helps them to learn. The staff form good relationships with pupils who relate well to each other. Behaviour is satisfactory. Pupils consider moral and social issues, both in classrooms and in a variety of contexts where they come into contact with a wide range of adults. They think carefully about their own and others' experiences and how this affects
p.5
Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3
what they do. Pupils have a strong voice in lessons and confidently share their ideas and opinions knowing they are well received. However, they have not as yet made a strong contribution to the school community because structures are not yet in place to allow this to happen and leadership opportunities are limited. Pupils' attendance is below average but rises considerably as they settle into the expectations and regime at Danesgate Community. Pupils learn to enjoy healthy food by growing fresh food and harvesting it so
p.5
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
that it can be cooked in lessons and in the school kitchens. Pupils show an understanding about what they should do if they begin to feel anxious.
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for pupils' outcomes
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3
Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3
The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3
p.6
Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3
The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress
p.6
3
Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹
p.6
The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3
1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4
p.6
How effective is the provision?
Teaching is satisfactory overall and some good teaching was observed. In good lessons, work is closely matched to pupils' needs, expectations are high and behaviour is good. In these lessons, teachers' knowledge of the subject is good and they make skilled use of questioning to extend learning. Ideas and understanding in these lessons are developed well during discussions, which maintain pupils' progress. However, in some lessons, activities lack challenge or involve too many worksheets and work is not matched well enough to the pupils' capabilities. Understanding is not checked frequently enough and as a result, interest is lost and the pace of learning is too slow. All adults are skilled at ensuring pupils understand how well they have done and what they need to do to improve. The curriculum is good. It has improved at Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4 since the last inspection. At Key Stage 4, the curriculum is broad and well matched to the needs of
p.6
How effective is the provision?
individual pupils. Good vocational opportunities are provided through good partnerships that enrich learning. Personalised programmes and planned activities and experiences are designed to meet the pupils' needs and then accreditation for the course is sought. Courses offer appropriate progression and lead to most pupils securing a placement after
p.6
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
leaving. The curriculum is a key in successfully re-engaging and improving attendance. At Key Stage 3, the curriculum is designed to support reintegration to mainstream school and is enhanced by partnership with the Danesgate Skills Centre. Attendance at alternative provision by a small minority of pupils in order to meet their needs is carefully planned and monitored. However, the use of information and communication technology (ICT) and the curriculum for the youngest and newly arrived pupils is not yet fully developed. Care guidance and support is good because staff gain pupils' trust and confidence, which enables them to make the most of the opportunities available to them. Staff know individual pupils well and are successful in meeting their needs through good relationships and teamwork. Staff are prepared to 'go the extra mile' to support pupils and this includes collecting pupils from home to take an examination or helping a pupil to complete
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
coursework after they have left, so that accreditation can be achieved. Careful attention is given to transition arrangements at all times when a pupil returns to mainstream school. This ensures that when pupils move on to the next stage in their life they make the change successfully and with minimum stress, which is reassuring to parents and carers.
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for the quality of provision
p.7
The quality of teaching 3
Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
The headteacher is highly effective. Over a short period, and against a background of expansion and rapid change, she has raised expectations and put in place clear plans to raise attainment. She is well supported by the leadership team. The management committee plays a part in strategic direction and development of the Community. The composition of the management committee reflects the needs of the centre but has yet to find sufficient parent and carer members. Steps taken to improve teaching have been effective. Training for all staff is seen as a priority and this has impacted positively on pupils' progress. Improved processes for tracking pupils' progress have been put in place but are as yet not fully developed. Pupils' targets, reviewed and adjusted frequently, are communicated to parents and carers. Partnership with parents and carers is satisfactory overall. Procedures for safeguarding and health and safety are good and include rigorous
p.7
How effective are leadership and management?
checks on the safety of the wide range of locations which pupils may attend. The contribution of highly developed partnerships to improve all aspects of learning and well-being both for pupils at the centre, and for the pupils in the mainstream schools and colleges that the school supports, are effective. Community cohesion is promoted satisfactorily through the outreach links which have helped many pupils to remain at their mainstream school. Wider links are as yet not fully developed. The commitment of leaders to ensure equality of opportunity is satisfactory and improving as staff gain more data on
p.7
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
pupils' academic needs. Nevertheless, a harmonious atmosphere is felt throughout the buildings. This includes pupils from a special school accessing courses within the Skills Centre and socialising alongside pupils at lunchtime at Danesgate Community.
p.8
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
These are the grades for leadership and management
p.8
3
Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning
p.8
Views of parents and carers
Ten per cent of parents and carers responded to the questionnaire. The overwhelming majority of these were positive. A very few expressed some concerns and these were followed up by inspectors throughout the inspection and form part of the evidence used to arrive at the judgements.
p.8
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire
Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Danesgate to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.
p.9
Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire
The inspection team received 12 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 120 pupils registered at the school.
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child enjoys school 2 17 10 83 0 0 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 6 50 6 50 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My school informs me about my child's progress 10 83 2 17 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
My child is making enough progress at this school 2 17 10 83 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The teaching is good at this school 6 50 6 50 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school helps me to support my child's learning 8 67 4 33 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 2 17 9 75 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 9 75 3 25 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school meets my child's particular needs 8 67 3 25 1 8 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 9 75 3 25 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 3 25 9 75 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The school is led and managed effectively 6 50 6 50 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 8 67 4 33 0 0 0 0
p.9
Total % Total % Total % Total %
The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.
p.9
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.
p.10
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.10
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 March 2010 and are the most recently published data available (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). Please note that the sample of schools inspected during the autumn and spring terms 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Secondary school figures include those that have sixth forms, and sixth form figures include only the data specifically for sixth form inspection judgements.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
The school's capacity for sustained improvement. Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils. The quality of teaching. The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships. The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.
p.11
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.11
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.12
Inspection of Danesgate Community, York, YO10 4PB
Thank you for being welcoming when we inspected the community a little while ago. We enjoyed talking with you and visiting lessons. We were impressed by how attractive and well cared for the inside of the centres were. Thank you for taking the time to give us your views of the school. It was clear from talking together and the questionnaire replies we received from you, your parents and carers that you feel safe at school and are confident that the staff would help you if needed. We found that Danesgate Community is satisfactory overall, but rapidly getting better, and it is good in the way it cares for you. A few of you are making good or better progress because you enjoy coming and attend well. We have asked the teachers to do the following things to make Danesgate Community even better: to check frequently in lessons how well you understand what you are learning so that tasks are more often at just the right level of difficulty to keep you challenged
p.12
Inspection of Danesgate Community, York, YO10 4PB
by collecting more information about how well everyone is doing so that plans can be made to help you make better progress and reach higher standards to help more pupils to improve their attendance. We know you will do all you can to help your teachers by attending as often as possible and we wish you every success in your future.
p.12
www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please
telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.13
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion