Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Hordle CofE (VA) Primary School

Inspected 30 Sept 2010 · published 26 Oct 2010 · URN 116486

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Sept 2010

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SO41 0FB

  • Name on report verified

    Hordle CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    116486

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentgood progresseffectivelyhappysuccessfulwell ledhighly effective
Criticisminadequatelackconcernsunacceptableweakweaknessestoo slowdeclining

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2057w+53
  • Leadership460w+91
  • What needs to improve97w+62

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
2,610
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 58%Leadership 13%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Hordle CofE Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 116486 Local Authority Hampshire Inspection number 357983 Inspection dates 29–30 September 2010 Reporting inspector Michael Burghart

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 308 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Karen Richards Headteacher Fiona Adams Date of previous school inspection 30 September 2010 School address Hordle Lane Lymington SO41 0FB Telephone number 01425 611657 Fax number 01425 616935 Email address admin@hordle.hants.sch.uk

p.1

Age group 4–11 Inspection dates 29–30 September 2010 Inspection number 357983 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 1234 234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. Inspectors observed 21 lessons featuring 12 teachers. They held meetings with staff, pupils and members of the governing body and observed the school's work. They looked at pupils' work, school documentation and considered questionnaire responses from 135 parents and carers, as well as 18 staff and 177 pupils from Years 3 to 6. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at the following:  The success of initiatives to bring about improvements to teaching and pupils' performance.  The effectiveness of the use of assessment to ensure all pupils are well challenged.  The progress of those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities.  The impact of developments in the leadership and management of staff and governors on pupils' attainment and achievement.

p.3

Information about the school

This is a larger-than-average-sized primary school serving a wide rural area. The overwhelming majority of pupils are of White British heritage. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is below the national average. Although the overall proportion of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is about average, the proportion with statements of special educational needs is above average. Such needs mainly feature extra help for language and literacy. Nearly three quarters of the teaching staff have been appointed since the last inspection. Three teachers, two of whom are newly qualified, have been in post for less than a month. The school holds an enhanced Healthy School award and the Activemark.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

This is a good school. It has some outstanding features in the way pupils are cared for and how the very strong teamwork of staff and governors ensures that the outstanding vision of the headteacher is turned into practice. The school's capacity to sustain further improvement is judged good rather than outstanding due more to the impact of initiatives not yet being fully proven rather than a lack of confidence in leadership and management. Given the quality of planning, procedures and staffing and its excellent learning environment, the school is well set for the future. Pupils are happy and work with a will. Their behaviour is excellent and they have a very clear appreciation of right and wrong. Consideration and respect, deep rooted in the school's Christian ideals, are encouraged from children's first day in Reception, where care and provision are good, and built on throughout the school. The profile of pupils' attainment over the last three years has been average overall. This is

p.4

Main findings

mainly due to weak outcomes in 2009 where some more-able pupils underachieved. Since then, attainment has been improved and in mathematics is above average, very much the result of being a central focus of the school's improvement plan. Attainment in English is currently average, but this profile is the result of success in reading. Writing is below national expectations, most notably for boys. The school is already working hard to address this with signs of marked improvement, particularly in Years 5 and 6. Pupils are achieving well, making good progress, and their learning is good across the school. Those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, although working at lower levels than the majority of other pupils, are well supported and make similarly good progress. There is clear evidence that rates of improvement are accelerating as enhanced planning and initiatives begin to bite and new staff settle into their roles. Teaching is good, underpinned

p.4

Main findings

by some outstanding examples set by senior staff and good monitoring of quality. In the minority of lessons where teaching is satisfactory rather than good, this is because some pupils are not challenged enough and the pace of learning is too slow. A key factor in the good progress pupils make is the way assessment information is collated and used to set objectives for lessons. Targets are created effectively for the school and individual pupils. Pupils are embracing the opportunity to share evaluations of their work with other pupils as well as staff. In a culture which encourages pupils to take risks in their learning, pupils' understanding is enhanced as much from their mistakes as their successes.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise pupils' attainment in writing by:

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

building on the system, already well established in Years 5 and 6, which involves pupils in evaluating their own success in response to academic guidance targeting the performance of boys.  Use the excellent examples of teaching which are already on offer in the school as models to raise the quality of teaching in lessons which are satisfactory, ensuring that: pupils are always fully challenged by what they have to do learning moves with good pace.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

When children first start the school, their experience and attainment are broadly consistent with national expectations. This varies year on year and data and school records indicate that there is a declining trend. For example, the profile of children who have just entered in Reception is below what is expected for this age group. In the large majority of lessons observed, pupils of all abilities, regardless of special educational needs and/or disabilities, achieved well and made good progress. It is clear that this is what usually happens, with pupils well behaved in all lessons contributing to the good quality of their learning through positive attitudes. Pupils respond very well to opportunities to work independently and in groups, and are used to sharing ideas and solving problems together. An outstanding example was in a Years 5 and 6 mathematics lesson on capacity where pupils came to an advanced understanding of how to change

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

litres into pints in order to find fuel consumption in a Formula 1 race. Such skills represent good preparation not only for future study but for life in general. Pupils' attainment in reading is a strength of the school, with attainment consistently above average. Considerable improvement in the use of calculation strategies and how to apply basic skills in investigations is a fundamental reason for mathematics being above average by the time pupils leave. Writing has already been identified by the school as the main aspect needing development and this is proving successful. Pupils obviously enjoy learning. They have an excellent understanding of how to stay safe and healthy, and many are eager to contribute to the school as a community. Particularly noteworthy are those pupils on the health and safety council. They not only monitor site safety but took the initiative to organise a much appreciated week of activities involving

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

police, fire and ambulance services to raise awareness.

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 2

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

2

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.6

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Much of the successful progress pupils are making is the direct result of how effectively staff use assessment information to plan for the future and set targets. Joint moderation of pupils' work ensures that gaps in learning are identified and successful practice is capitalised upon. Good teaching is common to the large majority of lessons. This is particularly, but not exclusively, prevalent in Years 3 to 6 and features teachers using probing questioning to get pupils to explain their methods and express their opinions. For example, in an English session in Years 1 and 2, the teacher effectively challenged pupils. She drew all ability levels into discussions which resulted in very imaginative opening sentences. The school is committed to helping pupils to learn through experience. The introduction of a new curriculum, which includes French and builds in enrichment opportunities for art and music, responds to the interests as well as the needs of pupils and promises much. It

p.6

How effective is the provision?

has already added breadth to pupils' understanding of different cultures and lifestyles, as well as contributing very positively to pupils' enjoyment of learning. Outstanding consideration for pupils' support and welfare is recognised by parents and carers, and pupils, as a strength of the school. Staff know pupils well and very effectively set pupils personal, as well as academic, targets to aspire to. The school works well with parents, carers and families and, where appropriate, with outside agencies to promote learning and well-being. Improved attendance rates are a testimony to success in this direction. Specific

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

support for more vulnerable pupils is unobtrusive but rigorous. No wonder that pupils feel safe.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching 2

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

Staff, governors, parents, carers and pupils appreciate what progress the school has made since the last inspection and especially since the disappointing national test results achieved in 2009. Staff change and newly devised planning, both in terms of the curriculum and school improvement, have been well managed reflecting the headteacher's outstanding ambition for the school. There is excellent team spirit, a culture of 'we can succeed' and a growing effectiveness of leaders and managers at all levels. Self-evaluation is effective in identifying strengths and weaknesses and is well led in ways which allow and encourage everyone to contribute. Very careful attention is paid to what pupils think. The governing body has strengthened its involvement in monitoring and evaluating the impact of decisions made on pupils' learning since the last inspection. It makes a good contribution in supporting the school's development and its good capacity to improve.

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

There are valuable educational links with the church and local schools. These are being extended to other areas, for example in London, in effective support for aspects of community cohesion. Pupils' understanding of faiths, customs and lifestyles is further enriched by links with other countries, such as Rwanda, and regular visitors. Outstanding safeguarding procedures are robustly followed, protecting the welfare of everyone on site. The school is very good at providing equality of opportunity in terms of activities, trips and chances for pupils to tackle responsibility. The good judgement for this aspect of its work, as opposed to an outstanding one, reflects the lack of challenge and opportunity for more-able pupils that was evident in past results. This is a situation which is fast being overcome.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

1

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

Good care and support help children to become familiar with school routines and expectations very quickly. Even in the fourth week of part-time attendance, children enter eagerly and go immediately to choose from the wide range of play activities on offer. They are happy to learn through a good mixture of self-selected and staff-directed activities, well planned and based on recognised, good early years practice. Behaviour is outstanding and relationships are already well established. Sharing, turn-taking and considering others are very successfully encouraged. Children make good progress and, by the end of Reception, are emerging as readers and writers because they are well taught and provision is well led, managed and organised. A point for further development, which staff are keen to take on, is increasing opportunities for children to extend their speaking and listening skills in conversation with adults when in play learning activities.

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

p.8

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 2

The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Views of parents and carers

Parents and carers expressed overwhelming support for the school. The vast majority are appreciative of changes since the last inspection, particularly in terms of leadership and management, teaching and the learning environment. A very small minority of parents and carers have concerns, but there is no consensus of negative view. Individual comments, for example about their child's progress, the lack of effective communication and bullying, were noted by inspectors, who found no evidence during the inspection to indicate that these are school-wide problems.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Hordle CofE Primary School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The inspection team received 135 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 308 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 68 50 61 45 5 4 1 1 The school keeps my child safe 82 61 50 37 1 1 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My school informs me about my child's progress 52 39 73 54 5 4 1 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child is making enough progress at this school 63 47 56 41 7 5 4 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The teaching is good at this school 64 47 66 49 1 1 1 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps me to support my child's learning 66 49 63 47 3 2 2 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 72 53 58 43 2 1 2 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 53 39 67 50 4 3 2 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 58 43 68 50 3 2 4 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 51 38 70 52 3 2 2 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 53 39 69 51 3 2 5 4

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 75 56 50 37 5 4 2 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 79 59 48 36 3 2 3 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 March 2010 and are the most recently published data available (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). Please note that the sample of schools inspected during the autumn and spring terms 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Secondary school figures include those that have sixth forms, and sixth form figures include only the data specifically for sixth form inspection judgements.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

This letter is provided for the school, parents and carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's main findings from the inspection of their school. 1 October 2010

p.13

Inspection of Hordle CofE Primary School, Hordle SO41 0FB

Thank you for the kind and sensible way you helped us during the inspection. We were particularly impressed by the way you are prepared to take responsibility. Congratulations to the health and safety councillors for a splendid effort in arranging the interesting visitors throughout this week. It is good to see how safe you feel at school and that you are so knowledgeable about what keeps you fit and healthy. Yours is a good school. Here are some of the highlights.  The headteacher, staff and governors run the school well.  They take excellent care of you and make sure you have interesting things to do. The building and grounds are a really good place to learn.  You are making good progress, especially in mathematics, and are growing up as caring, sensible young people.  Good planning sets work at the right level for you. It is good to see that you know your targets and keep measuring how well you are doing against them.

p.13

Inspection of Hordle CofE Primary School, Hordle SO41 0FB

 The links you have with schools in London and in Rwanda are helping you to understand what life is like outside Hordle. In order to be an even better school, we have asked staff and governors to concentrate on the following.  Improving standards in writing to bring them up to the same level as those in mathematics.  Finding ways to improve those few lessons where teaching is satisfactory rather than good to the good level. As you know, lots of lessons are already good and some are outstanding (that means extremely good!) so there are plenty of examples to work with. All of you can play your part by continuing to work hard. I am sure you will. Best wishes for the future.

p.13

www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please

telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion