Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

City of London Academy Islington

Inspected 2 Dec 2010 · published 20 Dec 2010 · URN 135587

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Dec 2010

  • Postcode verified

    N1 8PQ

  • Name on report verified

    City of London Academy - Islington

  • URN verified

    135587

Page 1 of 15
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 22% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovingmake good progresseffectivelystrongenjoyeffectiveexcellent
Criticisminadequateconcernsweaklimitedunacceptablenot consistentlynot metdisruption

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2510w+30
  • Leadership421w+86
  • What needs to improve121w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
15
Words of findings
3,047
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

City of London Academy - Islington Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 135587 Local Authority None Inspection number 361464 Inspection dates 1–2 December 2010 Reporting inspector Sue Frater HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Academy School category Community Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 769 Of which, number on roll in the sixth form 60 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr Richard Regan Principal Ms Ann Palmer Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected School address Prebend Street Islington, London N1 8PQ Telephone number 020 72268611 Fax number 020 72269363 Email address info@cityacademyislington.org.uk

p.1

Age group 11–18 Inspection dates 1–2 December 2010 Inspection number 361464 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 1234 234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty's Inspectors and two additional inspectors. They observed 41 lessons, gave feedback on the lessons to the 41 teachers seen, and held meetings with parents, groups of students, governors and staff. They observed the academy's work, and looked at a range of documentation including the academy's monitoring and evaluation of lessons and students' attendance and progress, improvement and curriculum plans, minutes of meetings held by the governing body, and key policies and procedures including safeguarding, equality and diversity. In addition, they looked at the questionnaires completed by 150 students and 33 parents and carers. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.  The achievement of more-able students, boys in English, and students eligible for free school meals, to determine whether teaching, especially teachers' use of targets

p.3

Introduction

and assessment, is sufficiently challenging.  Progress in developing students' literacy skills.  Behaviour in lessons and around the academy.  The quality of monitoring and evaluating students' learning and progress.

p.3

Information about the school

The academy is sponsored by the City of London Corporation and City University London. Its specialist subjects are business and enterprise. The academy opened in September 2008 in the premises previously occupied by its predecessor school. It moved into its new building, on the same site, and extended to post-16 provision, in September 2010. A special school for students with physical disability is due to open on the shared site in 2011. The principal took up the posts of principal designate in February 2008 and of principal in September of the same year. The academy is smaller than most secondary schools and there are more than twice as many boys than girls. The proportions of students known to be eligible for free school meals, from minority ethnic groups and with home languages other than English, are high. A high proportion of students have special educational needs and/or disabilities, covering a wide range of needs but mainly

p.3

Information about the school

behavioural, emotional and social difficulty or specific learning difficulty. An above-average number of students join or leave the academy other than at the usual times. There were significant changes in staffing during the past two years, but staffing is now stable. The academy recently gained an award from the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust for Parental Engagement and was awarded International School status.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

The academy is satisfactory and improving rapidly. In the two years since the academy opened, the principal, ably supported by senior leaders and managers, has embedded ambition and driven improvement effectively in all areas of its work. As a result, much of the academy's work is good and some is outstanding. This is driving improvements in teaching and students' achievement, which are satisfactory. Through robust self- evaluation, challenging targets and appropriate priorities in improvement plans, the principal and leadership team have raised teachers' expectations of students' academic and personal development. As a result, students' attendance is improving rapidly, significant progress has been made in English and mathematics, and good improvements are evident in other outcomes. While attainment is low due to variable performance across subjects and students' weak literacy skills, it is improving strongly and promoting students'

p.4

Main findings

satisfactory achievement. There is no significant variation in the achievement of different groups. The governing body is highly challenging and supportive of the academy's work and holds subject leaders to account for public examination results. It provides strong links to higher education through City University London and to companies in the City of London, which enhance the academy's specialist status and raise students' aspirations. The rapid progress has been sustained whilst the principal and senior staff manag ed the building of the new academy on the same site as the existing school, and managed the successful transfer into the new building. Given the rate and extent of progress, especially during these conditions, the academy has good capacity for sustained improvement. Procedures for safeguarding students, and their care, guidance and support are outstanding, particularly in the engagement of external agencies to support students and

p.4

Main findings

their families. The academy knows each individual student very well and monitors their personal development rigorously. As a result, attendance is good and behaviour is satisfactory and improving. The academy makes an outstanding contribution to promoting community cohesion through its international links. Students value diversity within and outside the academy. Consequently, they work and play together well. The curriculum is good and improving rapidly. It is broad, balanced and flexible to meet the differing needs of the students, for example in the provision of study support or early public examination entry. It leads to most students continuing their education or training. While at the time of the inspection the sixth form had been in existence for only three months, evidence shows that it is good. It is supported well by high quality links with City of London University. Due to significant staffing changes in the past two years, the quality of teaching is

p.4

Main findings

satisfactory overall, but with an increasing proportion of good teaching. It promotes students' satisfactory learning and progress in lessons. In the majority of lessons, teachers do not use targets or assessment to set tasks at different levels to support and challenge

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

all students, particularly the more able and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, to make good progress. In addition, students are given limited opportunities to develop their literacy and independent learning skills, for instance in researching, investigating or problem solving. Relationships between staff and students are positive in all lessons, although there is some low level disruption in lessons that do not engage all students. In these lessons, behaviour management strategies are not applied consistently.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attainment across all subjects to ensure it more closely matches the national average by improving the quality of learning and accelerating progress in lessons.  Improve the quality of learning and accelerate progress in lessons by: improving teachers' use of targets and assessment to support and challenge all students, particularly more-able students and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities increasing the opportunities for students to develop their literacy skills and to apply independent learning skills, for example in researching, investigating and problem solving ensuring a consistent approach to behaviour management  Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Students' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning are satisfactory. GCSE results over the past two years at five or more A*-G grades are in line with the national average and at five or more A*-C grades including English and mathematics are well below average but above the government's target. The quality of students' learning and their progress are satisfactory in the majority of lessons and improving rapidly in English and mathematics. Students say they make good progress in their mathematics and science lessons because they know their target levels or grades and how to improve their work to reach the targets. This is not the case in all subjects. Students enjoy the practical tasks in mathematics and science, such as problem solving, using computers for data handling, and investigations. They say music and humanities lessons also 'are fun' because they involve performing, debating and presentations, but they do not find all

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

subjects so engaging. Boys in particular would welcome a more varied approach to support their writing in English. Students with special educational needs and/or disabilities progress as well as other students in lessons where they are supported by teaching assistants. Their needs are not met consistently in all lessons because teachers have received limited guidance on how to support those students in their lessons with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Students say they feel safe in the academy and that any bullying is addressed robustly. They are confident to talk to staff if they have any concerns. They say that behaviour is improving and that everyone is friendly. Behaviour was seen to be satisfactory in lessons, and around the academy students of all age groups were getting on well together.

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Through the curriculum, and good participation in sport and healthy lunch options, students develop a good understanding of healthy lifestyles. They make a good contribution to the academy and the community, for example as members of the academy council, in fund raising for charity, performing for local elderly residents and, in particular, as ambassadors who help to ensure the academy is an orderly community. While students have many opportunities to develop workplace skills, their skills in literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology result in this area being satisfactory. Students' attendance is improving rapidly and is now good. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Students are encouraged to reflect on religious and moral issues, as in assemblies. Their social and cultural experiences are especially strong, for example through the performing arts in the academy and in visits to venues in London, and also

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

through international links with other cultures.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

3

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.6

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.6

How effective is the provision?

While the majority of teaching is satisfactory, a minority is good. Good and outstanding teaching is characterised by effective planning that leads students from their prior knowledge to new learning objectives through a variety of suitable tasks. For example, in an English lesson, good use was made of the interactive whiteboard to ascertain students' understanding and to model expectations of the required new skills. This enabled students to work independently on identifying writing techniques. Similarly, the pace of learning

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

was brisk in a mathematics lesson where the teacher engaged groups of students in solving problems at different levels of challenge, and extended their explanations through probing questions. Satisfactory and inadequate lessons are characterised by all students being led by the teacher through the same tasks regardless of their abilities, with limited opportunities to respond or to develop their skills independently. The good curriculum includes discrete business and enterprise lessons that make an effective contribution to developing students' understanding of financial management. Students have extensive opportunities to apply these strategies, for instance in running the academy shop, bank and juice bar. They also apply good organisational and leadership skills, for example as junior sports leaders in local primary schools. The curriculum is extended by a good range of well attended extra-curricular clubs and visits. While targeted

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

support for some students is helping to address their weak literacy and numeracy skills, there are limited opportunities in lessons to develop the skills of all students in these areas. A feature of the academy's outstanding care, guidance and support is the excellent use it makes of an extensive range of external agencies to support the health, safety and welfare of vulnerable students and their families. Its wide range of intervention programmes result in improved behaviour, attendance, attitudes to learning and achievement. Students say their learning mentors know and support them well and they feel well informed to make choices about future courses of study.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching 3

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

Subject leaders are developing appropriate skills in monitoring and evaluating the quality of teaching and learning. Together with senior leaders, they promote improvements. While the rate of progress has been affected by staffing changes, which are now stable, good procedures are in place to ensure it accelerates. A new system for monitoring the progress of students across all subjects has been introduced recently. It enables students' performance to be evaluated each term and, consequently, underachievement to be addressed more promptly. The system is not being used consistently by all teachers to ensure lessons support and challenge all students to make good progress towards their targets. The academy engages parents and carers successfully in its work, as confirmed by its recently attained award. An extensive range of partnerships contribute effectively to students' improving learning and well-being. Due to the academy's effective policies and

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

procedures for promoting equality of opportunity and tackling discrimination, there is no

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

significant difference in students' attainment by gender, ethnicity or ability. Given that students' outcomes are satisfactory at this point in time, the academy provides satisfactory value for money.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

2

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Sixth form

In the majority of the six lessons observed in the sixth form it is clear that students enjoy their learning and are making good progress from starting points that are lower than is usual for access to AS level courses. Good progress is confirmed by the academy's monitoring of students' progress towards their targets. Students are aware of their target grades and know what is required to achieve them. Their attendance and punctuality are good. They make a good contribution to the academy, for example as mentors to younger students and in leading various extra-curricular activities. The quality of provision is good. Teachers' good subject knowledge engages students in well focused discussions to develop their ideas and concepts. The curriculum is broad and balanced. Students say they value the provision of good information, advice and guidance about university and other training and employment opportunities. In the short time that the sixth form has

p.8

Sixth form

been open, it has been well led and managed. Students' views are taken into account and there is a good match of courses to their needs. Self-evaluation of the sixth form is rigorous and informs its future development well.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 2

Taking into account: Outcomes for students in the sixth form

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 2

The quality of provision in the sixth form 2

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 2

Leadership and management of the sixth form 2

p.9

Views of parents and carers

Overall, parents and carers are happy with the work of the academy. The lead inspector met with a group of parents and carers who confirmed a comment written in a questionnaire that communication with staff was outstanding. They praised the 'very helpful teachers'. A few parents and carers expressed concern in the questionnaires that the academy is not meeting their children's particular needs. The inspectors found that the academy is improving its procedures for the identification of students with special educational needs and/or disabilities and for monitoring their progress. Some information has been given to teachers to support students' learning in lessons, but this remains work in progress. A few parents and carers do not feel that the academy helps them to support their children's learning. The parents and carers who met with the inspector commented that they do not know what their children are learning because few teachers set

p.9

Views of parents and carers

homework. Inspectors found that the setting of homework is inconsistent across subjects. In addition, students are not informed how they can improve their work in all subjects. The academy is aware of these concerns, and concerns about lunch arrangements, and is addressing the issues.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at City of London Academy - Islington to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. The inspection team received 33 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 769 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 11 33 20 61 2 6 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 7 21 26 79 0 0 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My school informs me about my child's progress 14 42 16 48 3 9 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child is making enough progress at this school 10 30 20 61 2 6 1 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The teaching is good at this school 6 18 24 73 2 6 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps me to support my child's learning 6 18 21 64 5 15 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 5 15 23 70 3 9 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 9 27 19 58 2 6 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 5 15 20 61 5 15 1 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 12 36 19 58 2 6 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 5 15 20 61 4 12 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 8 24 19 58 1 3 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 12 36 18 55 2 6 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 March 2010 and are the most recently published data available (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). Please note that the sample of schools inspected during the autumn and spring terms 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Secondary school figures include those that have sixth forms, and sixth form figures include only the data specifically for sixth form inspection judgements.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of City of London Academy - Islington, London N1 8PQ

Thank you for the support you gave to the inspectors when we visited the academy recently. We enjoyed seeing, and talking to you, in lessons and meeting with some of you. The following is what we found out. The academy's GCSE results are improving. We have asked the academy to bring them closer in line with most schools. Your achievement is satisfactory because your learning and progress in lessons are satisfactory. We have asked the academy to improve the quality of your learning and to accelerate your progress to ensure it is good in all lessons. You feel safe in school and your behaviour overall is satisfactory. We have asked teachers to ensure everyone's behaviour is good in all lessons. Most of you adopt healthy lifestyles and make a good contribution to the academy and your community, for example as members of the academy council and ambassadors. Your attendance is improving rapidly and you are prepared appropriately for the

p.13

Inspection of City of London Academy - Islington, London N1 8PQ

workplace. Your spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good and you enjoy a growing number of links with schools in different parts of the world. The quality of teaching is satisfactory overall. We have asked your teachers to make better use of targets and assessment to support and challenge all of you to make good progress, and to enable more of you to reach higher grades. While you have good opportunities to learn different things within and outside of lessons, we have asked your teachers to develop your literacy and independent learning skills, for example in doing more research, investigations and problem solving. The staff provide outstanding care, guidance and support for you. The academy's leaders and managers do a good job. The new sixth form is good. We hope you continue to enjoy and take pride in your excellent new building and facilities. We hope also that you make the most of the many opportunities you have to continue to

p.13

Inspection of City of London Academy - Islington, London N1 8PQ

learn and gain good skills for your future education and employment.

p.13

www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please

telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.15

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion