Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Woodmancote School

Inspected 6 Oct 2010 · published 3 Nov 2010 · URN 115576

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Oct 2010

  • Postcode verified

    GL52 9HN

  • Name on report verified

    Woodmancote School

  • URN verified

    115576

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 16% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveoutstandingenjoymentsuccessfullyeffectivelypositivehighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticismnot yetinadequatenot alwaysconcernsinconsistencyunacceptableweaknessesinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2255w+24
  • Leadership522w+37
  • What needs to improve114w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
2,888
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Unique Reference Number 115576 Local Authority Gloucestershire Inspection number 357783 Inspection dates 5–6 October 2010 Reporting inspector David Carrington

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 306 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair John Musgrave Headteacher Gary Tucker Date of previous school inspection 20 March 2008 School address Station Road Cheltenham GL52 9HN Telephone number 01242 674312 Fax number 01242 677651 Email address admin@woodmancote.gloucs.sch.uk

p.1

Age group 4–11 Inspection dates 5–6 October 2010 Inspection number 357783 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 1234 234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by three additional inspectors. They observed 19 lessons led by 15 teachers. Meetings were held with the headteacher, deputy headteacher, senior leaders and the governors. The inspectors observed the school's work, and looked at school planning, assessment data, samples of pupils' work, the school's monitoring of the quality of teaching and a number of policy documents. The team received 138 questionnaires from parents and carers and also evaluated those from school staff and the pupils. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at the following.  The degree to which improvements have been made in achievement in mathematics and writing, especially for boys.  How far school leaders and members of the governing body probe the school's performance and drive improvement.  The success of the school's promotion of community cohesion, including the

p.3

Introduction

development of pupils' understanding of different cultures.The effectiveness of the use of information and communication technology (ICT) across the curriculum, particularly in mathematics.

p.3

Information about the school

Woodmancote School is larger than most primary schools. Most of the pupils come from White British backgrounds. Very few speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is below average. The percentage of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities is about half the national average. Several of these pupils have behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage are taught in two Reception classes. Some of these children attend the school-managed before and after school provision. This was inspected by the team. Other year groups work in mixed-age classes or are set by ability for much of their English and mathematics work. There has been considerable reorganisation of staffing recently, including among the senior leadership team. There are several new members of the governing body. The

p.3

Information about the school

headteacher was absent for a period before the inspection.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Woodmancote School provides a satisfactory education for its pupils. After a period when the achievement of pupils slowed, their progress is now improving because of a more effective focus on their needs in lessons. Whilst teaching quality is satisfactory, it too is improving. Some outstanding teaching was observed in music, which is a notable curriculum strength. Good teaching and learning was observed across the school. Pupils' behaviour, the relationships they form with others, their enjoyment of school and their attendance are all good. School leaders and members of the governing body recognise that pupils' attainment is not yet high enough. Until recently, the tracking of progress was not sharp enough to detect underachievement quickly enough and so pupils' attainment, whilst above average, did not reach its peak. Observations in lessons and the examination of pupils' books show that this is being addressed successfully. Boys, for example, are now targeted more

p.4

Main findings

accurately and their progress is being monitored more regularly. They achieve as well as girls in most lessons. There are still some groups who are not challenged sufficiently, especially the more able. Sometimes, the teaching approach does not build on their good learning habits and their enthusiasm for, and enjoyment of, their work. School monitoring and evaluation of the quality of lessons and the degree of challenging work provided is being strengthened and is becoming a useful tool for school improvement. However, several of the senior leaders have had little opportunity to monitor and evaluate the school's successes and weaknesses, which has meant most evaluation of the school's work is based on a limited range of evidence. The curriculum provides appropriate opportunities for pupils to learn the necessary skills and knowledge in all subjects. Its greatest shortcoming is provision in information and

p.4

Main findings

communication technology (ICT) which is not yet extended across all subjects sufficiently. In part, this is due to past problems with hardware, and school leaders have well- expressed priorities for the improvement of the subject. In contrast, curriculum provision for pupils' personal, social and health education is good. The governing body has ensured the school maintains up-to-date policies which are regularly reviewed and renewed. Procedures to ensure these policies are followed are satisfactory, although sometimes records to show the actions taken do not always cover all the responses made. Thus, whilst supportive and useful, care, guidance and support are satisfactory rather than good. The school is making appropriate improvements and senior leaders recognise that this can be accelerated by improved self-evaluation. The school has made satisfactory improvement since the previous inspection, even during the period of staff reorganisation

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

and change. It has the capacity to maintain its improvement because priorities are shared and agreed by all staff.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase pupils' attainment, particularly in writing and mathematics by making their targets more challenging, especially for the more able using the information from assessment more rigorously to evaluate how well pupils are progressing.  Strengthen the quality of monitoring and evaluation by giving all senior leaders regular opportunities to make formal observations of learning ensuring members of the governing body make use of key data in making rigorous checks of how well the school is performing ensuring the strengths in teaching and learning are shared across the school.  Improve provision in ICT so that it effectively assists pupils to develop the necessary skills and knowledge in all subjects, especially mathematics and writing.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

Children start Reception with very well formed skills and knowledge that will assist their early learning. By the end of Reception, they reach well above average scores in all six areas. This sets a marker for their potential as high achievers in Years 1 to 6. Observation in lessons, allied to the investigation of data about pupils' progress, suggests that the slower progress shown during the last two years is being tackled successfully. This is not yet consistent, however. In the best lessons, such as a Year 1/2 mathematics session observed, pupils are set challenging targets repeatedly, urged to work at a very brisk pace and have ample opportunities to evaluate their own learning and what they need to do next to improve. This spurs them to make good progress and to reach even higher attainment levels. Their enjoyment of learning is doubled because they are not fazed by the challenge and are keen to show their prowess as learners. In a Year 6 mathematics

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

lesson, pupils' mental agility with complicated mathematical sums such as 360 divided by 0.8 was very impressive. Such good features are not yet seen in every lesson. There has been an improvement recently in the progress of boys. The Forest School initiative in Reception has been particularly effective in helping the younger boys adopt a purposeful, enquiring approach to their learning. This is being continued more successfully in Years 1 to 6 than in the past. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are given the necessary support, including the accurate planning of their next steps, which enables them to make satisfactory progress as well. Although some parents, carers and their children are concerned about safety in school, behaviour in lessons, at break and at other times is good. There is some fidgeting sometimes in lessons because pupils' learning is not challenging enough. The

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

management of behaviour, including the anti-bullying strategy, is effective in establishing a settled, harmonious community of pupils. The good enjoyment of school is reflected in pupils' regular and punctual attendance. Their spiritual, moral, social and cultural

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

development is good because pupils relate well to others, know right from wrong and have useful opportunities to reflect on the special nature of things around them. Because attainment is above average and also because pupils are capable of effective team work and independent learning, they develop good skills to assist them in the next stage of their education.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

2

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.6

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The use of assessment to support learning is based on sound procedures and a secure system to track pupils' progress. There is some inconsistency in practice in the classrooms to enable pupils to self-evaluate their work and to discuss with other pupils and their teacher the progress they are making and necessary next steps in learning. The degree of rigour in investigating trends in progress amongst different ability groups and according to age is rising but it is not yet robust enough. This is recognised by senior leaders who are determined to make better use of such evidence. Provision in the classroom is sometimes affected by this inconsistency in the use of assessment information and so the work is not always challenging enough. There is, however, good practice to share. It is not very often, for example, that in inspectors' observations of music lessons, the work is adjusted for each ability group so that the

p.6

How effective is the provision?

pupils maximise their achievement. This happens at Woodmancote, where a Year 5/6

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

class worked to improve their own singing and notation skills with very good levels of musical creativity. They achieved highly in this lesson. Guidance to enable all pupils to benefit from their learning is successful. The support of vulnerable pupils and those with barriers to learning is effective in helping them settle to school and work hard. The school has formed good partnerships with outside agencies to support this work. The written records of actions taken to support and encourage pupils' better learning do not always include full details of the actions and their outcomes.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching 3

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The procedures, systems and teams necessary for the effective embedding of ambition and driving improvement have been put in place. In some cases, this has been a recent development and there has been insufficient time for the full impact of improvement to emerge. Senior leaders and members of the governing body show the necessary vision and aspiration to make crucial improvements. In doing this, they are led capably by the headteacher, and the deputy headteacher who has led the school during the absence of the headteacher. There is a renewed urgency in tackling weaker areas and ensuring that school strengths in provision are available to all pupils at all times. The school has moved ahead successfully to ensure there is appropriate promotion of community cohesion. Senior leaders are currently and decisively working to extend the pupils' links with people in other communities and cultures which will lead to good

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

practices and outcomes. The necessary procedures, policies and training are in place to support secure safeguarding of children. Actions to support the safeguarding of pupils are robust and the school maintains adequate records of its checks. Training of staff and members of the governing body is up to date and policies and procedures are subject to the necessary review and renewal. The effectiveness with which the school promotes equality of opportunity is satisfactory at present. Improvements to all pupils' progress and levels of attainment are the key to increased quality of opportunity. Any inappropriate behaviour among the pupils is stemmed quickly and effectively.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

3

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

Many children enter school with the skills and knowledge well above those expected for their age. They make satisfactory progress and most join Year 1 with well above average attainment. The children are very assured, confident and quick learners when they start school, which gives them a head start. They were observed to share well, cooperate willingly and listen attentively during a lesson focused on their mathematical development. The children could sort into sets and talk about why an item fitted a particular group. Provision in Reception is satisfactory. There are some good features, such as the effective use made of the Forest School to develop children's personal, social and emotional development and their knowledge of the world around them. The curriculum covers all six areas of learning appropriately. Assessment of children's learning is much improved compared with the past and involves children in self-assessment as well as regular

p.8

Early Years Foundation Stage

comprehensive adult-led evaluations of progress. The Early Years Foundation Stage is led and managed satisfactorily by a part-time Reception teacher. Partnership between staff is good, which is enabling the necessary improvements to be made. The school recognises that the outside area close to the Reception classrooms is not yet used to maximum benefit for the children and therefore is forming promising plans for improvement.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 3

Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 3

The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage 3

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage 3

The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage

p.9

Views of parents and carers

The rate of return for the questionnaire was above average. Most parents and carers hold very positive views of the school, although a few raised written concerns. Chief among these worries are the system of mixed-age classes and the way in which pupils are selected for the different ability sets. There were also concerns about how behaviour is managed and how the school helps pupils prepare for the next stage in their education. However, many parents and carers praised the school for its welcoming ethos, the positive reception they received from staff and how it encouraged their children's enjoyment of school. Inspectors' judgements are similar to those of parents and carers. The school is reviewing its ability setting system, and improvements to teaching are helping pupils of different ages in the same class to increase their progress. Behaviour is good and pupils are prepared well for the next step in their education because they reach above average

p.9

Views of parents and carers

attainment and show good maturity in their learning.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Woodmancote School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school. Inspection team received 138 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 306 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 80 58 55 40 3 2 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 72 52 60 43 3 2 1 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My school informs me about my child's progress 53 38 74 54 8 6 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child is making enough progress at this school 53 38 66 48 13 9 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The teaching is good at this school 51 37 76 55 4 3 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps me to support my child's learning 54 39 69 50 9 7 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 49 36 86 62 2 1 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 49 36 58 42 19 14 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 48 35 70 51 14 10 1 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 36 26 76 55 18 13 2 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 33 24 80 58 9 7 4 3

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 40 29 48 57 5 4 6 4

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 65 47 65 47 6 4 1 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 March 2010 and are the most recently published data available (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). Please note that the sample of schools inspected during the autumn and spring terms 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Secondary school figures include those that have sixth forms, and sixth form figures include only the data specifically for sixth form inspection judgements.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of Woodmancote School, Cheltenham GL52 9HN

Thank you for the warm welcome you gave us when we visited your school recently. Your friendliness, good behaviour and politeness were something we will remember for a long time. You helped us to find out more about your school. We judge that it gives you a satisfactory education. To help your teachers improve this, we have suggested three areas to work on.  Make sure that the information your teachers gather about how well you are working is used to set you more challenging tasks.  Make more checks on how successfully your lessons help you to improve your progress.  Give you more opportunities to use ICT to develop skills and knowledge in all subjects. We know you will help your teachers make these improvements. They will help you make good, rather than satisfactory, progress and go beyond the above average attainment you show now. To start, you can tell your teachers, and your parents and carers, about what

p.13

Inspection of Woodmancote School, Cheltenham GL52 9HN

you find easy and what you find difficult at school. Perhaps some of you would like to write about this. Your school already does some good things. It helps you become sensible learners who work well with other pupils and your teachers. It also makes sure you are prepared well for secondary education. The way your teachers work with your parents and carers to help you learn is a strength. There have already been some noticeable improvements, including the quality of teaching, which is getting better. Best wishes for your future education.

p.13

www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please

telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion