Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Sheffield City Council in Sheffield
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
5 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Russell Shackford
- URN verified
SC356868
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 109
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC356868 Inspection date 05/03/2012 Inspector Russell Shackford Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 15/12/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.3
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Brief description of the service
This children's home, run by a local authority, provides up to five long-term placements for young people, aged from 12 up to 17 years of age on admission.
p.4
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress.
p.4
Progress
At the last full inspection in December 2011, this home was judged as good. The home is judged to have made satisfactory progress at this interim inspection. The home has maintained the quality of care and outcomes for children and has begun to address the recommendation raised at the previous inspection by developing the format and content of young people's case files. However, the results of this are not yet fully embedded in all young people's records.
p.4
Progress
The manager described how he and his staff team are working collaboratively to produce an improved filing system and recording format for placement plans. Pathway plans, designed to show young people's progress towards independent living, have been similarly developed. Sound progress has been made and examples of improved recordings were evident in some young people's files. However, the new records have not yet been fully implemented at the home. It remains the case that young people's daily records and one-to-one records do not always reflect the content of the plans used or show the full extent of the action taken by the staff to meet the identified needs of the young person. Therefore, the recommendation to improve case records about young people is carried over.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that the requirements of the placement plan are implemented in the day- to-day care of the child. For example, that action taken by the staff is clear in daily records and one-to-one records. (NMS 25.2)
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion