Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
St Edmund's Catholic Primary School
Summary
Michael Sutherland-Harper (lead), Ann Taylor, Gay Tattersall
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Ann Taylor, Gay Tattersall, Michael Sutherland-Harper
- Achievement verified
Good
- Behaviour and safety verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Quality of teaching verified
Good
- Name on report verified
St Edmund's Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
124764
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Behaviour and safetyGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Quality of teachingGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- Strong professional development ensures that staff deliver highly effective support programmes so any gaps in achievement are now minimal. p.7
- Well-planned lessons ensure that all pupils, including the more able, disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs or English as an additional language, make similar good progress. p.6
- Strong support processes effectively meet the learning needs of pupils facing challenges of any sort. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.9
- Teaching is good but the school is not yet outstanding because some satisfactory teaching occurs where lessons are teacher dominated. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,385
- about usual (typical 2920)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 4–9 Inspection date(s) 21–22 March 2012 Inspection number 380977 St Edmund's Catholic Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 124764 Local authority Suffolk Inspection number 380977 Inspection dates 21–22 March 2012 Lead inspector Michael Sutherland-Harper
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–9 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 304 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Nichole Barber Headteacher Maria Kemble Date of previous school inspection 30 April 2007 School address Westgate Street Bury St Edmunds IP33 1QG Telephone number 01284 755141 Fax number 01284 762425 Email address office@st-edmunds.suffolk.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
Michael Sutherland-Harper Additional inspector
p.3
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspection team observed 17 lessons across the school taught by 12 teachers and held meetings with members of the governing body, staff and groups of pupils. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. They observed the school’s work, and looked at pupils’ books, the school’s improvement plan, assessment data, monitoring and self-evaluation records, arrangements for safeguarding and a range of policies and procedures. Inspectors listened to pupils read. In addition to replies from pupil and staff questionnaires, questionnaires from 159 parents and carers were received and analysed.
p.3
Information about the school
St Edmund’s Catholic Primary School is a larger than average-sized primary school. It takes pupils from a wide area. The large majority of pupils are from White British backgrounds. The proportions of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, and of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, including those with a statement of special educational needs, are below the national average. The proportions of pupils speaking English as an additional language and from minority ethnic backgrounds are increasing but are below the national average. The school has achieved the Basic Skills and Sports Mark awards. Following the reorganisation of schools in the western area of Suffolk, the school is in the process of exploring possibilities for reorganisation. Pre-school onsite childcare is not managed by the governing body and was inspected separately. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
p.3
Information about the school
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Key findings
St Edmund’s Catholic Primary School is a good school. Progress rates are good. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and curriculum enrichment are strengths. The headteacher, staff and governing body are ambitious for the school. Teaching is good but the school is not yet outstanding because some satisfactory teaching occurs where lessons are teacher dominated. In these lessons, pupil input is more limited and expectations are lower. Sharing of best practice is at an early stage.
p.4
Key findings
All groups of pupils achieve well across all subjects. Children make a good start in the Early Years Foundation Stage. This progress continues through the school. Pupils take an active part in lessons where they are engaged by the resources and approaches used. Strong support processes effectively meet the learning needs of pupils facing challenges of any sort.
p.4
Key findings
Behaviour is good. Expectations are clear. Pupils get on well with each other and with adults. Pupils feel safe and parents and carers agree.
p.4
Key findings
Teaching is good overall. Teaching meets the needs of all groups of pupils, including the more able, the rising number of those who speak English as an additional language, disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs. The school has focused on improving provision in reading, writing and mathematics for all groups. Books are regularly marked but marking is inconsistent in indicating next steps in learning.
p.4
Key findings
The headteacher, senior team, staff and governing body work together to ensure continued improvement. Middle managers have refined roles in leading teaching and managing performance. The strong, varied curriculum engages pupils effectively with learning. Tracking and monitoring procedures are rigorous and effective. The governing body offers good support and challenge and has an accurate picture of the school’s strengths and areas requiring improvement. Communication with parents and carers is good. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that all teaching is consistently good or better, with at least a third outstanding, by July 2013 by: encouraging an appropriate blend of teacher and pupil input in lessons emphasising consistency of expectations sharing of best practice across the school making sure that marking always indicates the way forward.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Pupils’ attainment is above average. Children enter the school with knowledge and skills slightly above those expected for their age and make good progress through the Early Years Foundation Stage so that all reach age related expectations with a good number exceeding them. This progress continues through Key Stages 1 and 2. Carefully chosen approaches, such as work on the language of mathematics and on letter formation in handwriting, and boy-friendly reading materials, advance pupils’ skills in reading, writing and mathematics. In addition, effective support programmes quickly address any underachievement. They ensure an inclusive learning environment for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs as well as for the growing number of pupils who speak English as an additional language. Any remaining gaps between the performance of different groups are rapidly closing.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
An engaging programme of enrichment weeks is helping to develop cross-curricular skills, for example, through linking literacy and history with new technologies. Open- ended topics and creative seminars allow the more able to extend their learning. Pupils are fluent, confident readers who reach above average standards by the end of Key Stage 1 and when they finish in Year 4. They can talk about the context of their chosen book, reasons for their choices and how characters or situations have been brought to life.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Learning in lessons is good. Pupils work well together and respond enthusiastically in independent work, especially when activities are closely timed or provide additional challenge. Pupils have good access to information and communication technology which they use confidently to enhance team and individual work. They are proud of the centrally located board which displays their ‘Work of the week’ and of the collages of St Edmund made to connect the school with its local history. Pupils enjoy school because there is always something going on. The wide range of lunchtime and after-school clubs reinforces learning. Most pupils know their academic targets or where to find them. The very large majority of parents and carers feel that their children are making good progress and that the school helps them to support their children’s learning. A similar proportion of children say they learn a lot in lessons.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Achievement of pupils
The vast majority feel that the school helps them to make progress.
p.6
Quality of teaching
The vast majority of parents and carers believe their children are well taught. Pupils agree in similar numbers. Inspectors found that these views are justified. Teachers have good subject knowledge and make good use of questioning to assess and develop pupils’ skills. Teachers use a range of engaging resources and effectively link subjects to deliver the planned curriculum and relate it to pupils’ own experiences. For example, in a Year 1 lesson on making an animated film during technology week, teaching was outstanding, and pupils were held spellbound when the teacher showed them the first cartoon ever made in the silent era. In Year 4 lesson to discuss and plan an invention, teaching was good, and the teacher carefully checked pupils’ understanding so that initial enthusiasm resulted in positive outcomes. Use of support staff, including a native Polish speaker to give step-by-step guidance to pupils speaking English as an additional language, is a strength and indicative of the
p.6
Quality of teaching
prompt integration of potentially vulnerable pupils into the classroom setting. Well- developed spiritual, moral, social and cultural skills are reinforced by shared residential visits with a partner school and links that teachers made on a recent visit to a Cambodian school.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Well-planned lessons ensure that all pupils, including the more able, disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs or English as an additional language, make similar good progress. In the majority of lessons, pace, challenge and time are well used to ensure that expectations are high and that teaching leads to high quality outcomes. Occasionally, teachers talk for too long and pupils become restless when they are not able to get on with independent work quickly enough or opportunities for them to contribute are limited. The school is beginning to share best practice to make all teachers fully aware about how to advance learning.
p.6
Quality of teaching
The school has concentrated on developing teachers’ assessment skills as part of its emphasis on thorough tracking and monitoring. Books are regularly marked, with some evidence of peer and self-assessment, but teachers’ comments often focus on praising good efforts without indicating the way forward to the next level.
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Behaviour in lessons and around the school is good. Pupils have a keen sense of responsibility, such as when they help to tidy up at lunchtimes or ensure the safety of younger pupils in the playground and around the school. Expectations for behaviour are clear. Incidents are carefully monitored in order to address any inappropriate behaviour quickly. Individual class behaviour logs show successful management of minor incidents in class settings with a central log for more serious incidents and follow-up. Pupils are respectful of each other and of adults. The vast majority of parents and carers believe that behaviour is good at the school and the large majority feel that lessons are not disrupted by bad behaviour. Pupils are very clear about the high expectations for behaviour as demonstrated in the large Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
majority of lessons, but where lessons are less engaging, behaviour is occasionally less secure. The school has worked steadily to ensure that behaviour reaches high standards and to provide additional support wherever necessary. The large majority of parents and carers believe that the school deals effectively with any rare incidents of bullying. The very large majority of pupils agree and affirm that any incidents of bullying are quickly and securely sorted out. Positive behaviour is a focus of whole school assemblies.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Attendance is above average. All pupils are punctual to school and at lessons. Pupils move around the school with care for each other and the building. The vast majority feel safe. Their parents and carers agree in similar numbers. Pupils are happy to help each other resolve issues but are equally clear that there is always an adult who will provide any support needed. Pupils know how to stay safe, fit and healthy. The school helps parents and carers ensure these aspects; over-subscribed e-safety sessions for parents and carers were held on two consecutive evenings during the inspection. Effective transition arrangements into and out of the school are carefully planned to take individual needs into account. Very good arrangements meet the needs of pupils whose circumstances might make them vulnerable.
p.7
Leadership and management
The headteacher, senior leaders, staff and governing body work effectively together to improve the school and deliver the vision exemplified by its mosaic – a place where everyone learns together but, like each tile, is valued for their individual gifts and talents. This approach ensures that equality of opportunity is at the heart of the school’s work and that there is no discrimination of any kind. Staff work well as a team and are clear about their accountability for pupils’ progress. Half-termly key stage meetings led by middle managers are an example of thorough monitoring and evaluation procedures. Middle managers also review the work of the teams they lead. Strong professional development ensures that staff deliver highly effective support programmes so any gaps in achievement are now minimal. The governing body is well organised. Visits to the school and regular contact with parents and carers ensure its members have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and
p.7
Leadership and management
the challenges it still faces. The school believes that the growing number of pupils who speak English as an additional language brings a rich cultural mix into the school. Their families are represented on the governing body by a native Polish speaking governor. The headteacher is also executive headteacher of a neighbouring primary school; this partnership, along with a range of other strong links to the local community, has helped to enhance learning through shared initiatives. The school has good capacity to improve because its continuous improvement is not dependent on one or two leaders, self-evaluation is accurate and progress rates are rising.
p.7
Leadership and management
Safeguarding is effective and meets all current requirements with thorough, regularly refreshed training in safety and safer recruitment for the governing body and staff. The broad, balanced curriculum is well planned; cross-curricular provision through events like enrichment weeks is a growing strength of the school and serves to engage learners with the subjects on offer. Provision is enhanced by a variety of Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Leadership and management
visits and visitors. The careful emphasis on, and development of, pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding is a strength of the school.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
1QG
Thank you for welcoming us to your school during our recent visit and for the help you gave us by talking to us and completing questionnaires.
p.11
1QG
St. Edmund’s Catholic Primary School is a good school. Here are some of the things that your school does well.
p.11
1QG
You are making good progress because the school works hard to make sure you have good skills in reading, writing and mathematics. You do exciting work during your enrichment weeks. You value the opportunity to look after each other during lunchtime and breaks.
p.11
1QG
The headteacher, staff and governing body want to make your school even better. To help them, we have asked them to do the following things:
p.11
1QG
to make sure that all teaching is good or better by getting teachers to share what they do best to check that marking always lets you know how to improve your work to provide plenty of opportunities for you to contribute as much in lessons as your teachers do to have high expectations of how well you should be doing in all lessons.
p.11
1QG
The inspectors believe that your pride in your school and care for each other can help the school to improve. You can help by letting your teachers know whenever you have a question or have finished an activity so that your work moves forward quickly.
p.11
1QG
Michael Sutherland-Harper Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion