Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Central Foundation Boys' School

Inspected 18 Nov 2010 · published 9 Dec 2010 · URN 100458

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Nov 2010

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carmen Rodney

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    EC2A 4SH

  • Name on report verified

    Central Foundation Boys' School

  • URN verified

    100458

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery welloutstandingexceptionallystronghighly effectiveexceptionaleffectiveconsistently
Criticismunacceptableinadequatenot alwaysconcernsinconsistenciesharmpersistent absenceerrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2431w+62
  • Leadership582w+92
  • What needs to improve135w+79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
3,137
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Central Foundation Boys' School Inspection report

p.1

Unique Reference Number 100458 Local Authority Islington Inspection number 335546 Inspection dates 17–18 November 2010 Reporting inspector Carmen Rodney

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Boys Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 880 Of which, number on roll in the sixth form 171 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Graham Forbes Headteacher Jamie Brownhill Date of previous school inspection 21 September 2006 School address Cowper Street London EC2A 4SH Telephone number 020 72533741 Fax number 020 73367295 Email address brownhillj@cfbs.islington.sch.uk

p.1

Age group 11–18 Inspection dates 17–18 November 2010 Inspection number 335546 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 1234 234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors and four additional inspectors. The inspectors observed 42 lessons taught by 40 teachers. They held meetings with senior and middle leaders, three groups of students and the Chair of the Governing Body. They observed the school's work, and looked at a range of documents such as the school improvement plan, attendance data and policies for risk assessment, equality and behaviour. In addition, the questionnaire responses of 44 parents and carers and 131 students were analysed and their views taken into account. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the school's work. It looked in detail at a number of key areas.  The progress of students during Key Stage 4 and the extent to which the school meets the needs of all groups.  The use of monitoring and evaluation in planning for improvement and the accuracy of assessment information.

p.3

Introduction

 The impact of strategies to ensure that students behave well and attend regularly.  The effectiveness of leaders and managers at all levels to secure improvement in provision and the capacity to sustain these improvements.The effectiveness of leaders and managers at all levels to secure improvement in provision and the capacity to sustain these improvements.

p.3

Information about the school

Central Foundation Boys' School is an ethnically diverse school that is smaller than the average-sized secondary school. While a small minority of students are of White British heritage, the majority are from minority ethnic heritages but very few are in the early stages of learning English as an additional language. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is high. The school has identified that almost a quarter of all students have special educational needs and/or disabilities but the proportion with a formal statement of special educational needs is high. The most common additional needs are behavioural, emotional and social difficulties and speech, language and communication difficulties. The number of students on roll has increased since the last inspection. The sixth form includes a few girls and is one of four schools in the Islington Sixth Form Consortium. The school has specialist status in business and enterprise. It has achieved the Healthy

p.3

Information about the school

School award and the British Council International School status. The new headteacher, previously a senior deputy headteacher at the school, was appointed to the permanent post at the start of September 2010.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Central Foundation Boys' School is a good school and is rapidly improving. The headteacher has successfully sustained a number of improvements, of which the boys are very proud. In particular, the students are making good progress in their learning with a majority exceeding their targets. As a result, attainment is above average at the end of Year 11 and in the sixth form. This is an impressive achievement given the high proportion of students with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The unvalidated GCSE and A-level results in 2010 rose substantially confirming the year-on-year trend of improvement. This is a significant improvement since the previous inspection. There are a number of key factors contributing to the school's success. First, the headteacher is committed to making big improvements. His strong leadership skills have enabled him to take staff with him. He has, therefore, clearly communicated his ambitions

p.4

Main findings

for the school and is ably supported by a strong team of senior and middle leaders. Together, they demonstrate commitment and there is effective team work to select and deliver the right strategic plans that will improve outcomes. Second, staff know the students exceptionally well and the exemplary care and guidance ensure they are given highly effective and personalised support. Third, the school's work with external partners is outstanding. This is leading to better outcomes for students and is contributing strongly to their personal development. Additionally, productive links with the vast majority of parents and community groups are used effectively to support students' learning and personal development. Fourth, the specialist status is central to the school's inclusive and far-reaching approach to driving curriculum development and academic attainment. The specialism reaches into the local, legal and business communities as well as higher

p.4

Main findings

educational establishments. It is also used very well to promote community cohesion. The quality of teaching and learning is good overall. While the school has done much to improve teaching, senior leaders and the governing body recognise that there is still more to do. There is increasing awareness that although all students make good progress, there are inconsistencies in teaching and the quality of marking. In addition, in the sixth form, there is little evaluation of teaching and learning to identify the impact on students' performance. Since the last inspection, the school has made good progress in tackling the areas for improvement. Leaders and managers at all levels, including the governing body, know the strengths and areas for improvement very well. Clear lines of accountability, beginning with the governing body and headteacher through to senior and middle leaders and all staff, ensure continuous and rigorous monitoring. A culture of high expectations underpins

p.4

Main findings

the school's work. The school has achieved much in a short time by successfully closing the achievement gap for all ethnic groups when results are compared to similar groups

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

nationally. This sustained improvement confirms that the school has good capacity to improve further.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Further develop teaching to ensure that a higher proportion is consistently good or better, so that all students can make exceptional progress, by: making better use of short-term plans to prepare well-structured lessons that will accelerate learning. consistently sharing and developing the best practice . ensuring that day-to-day marking in Years 7 to 9 is consistently thorough in relation to developing skills across the curriculum, helping students to understand how they can improve their work and presentation skills. ensuring that teaching challenges all students. In the sixth form  Further develop clear systems for evaluating teaching and learning by: making effective and efficient use of assessment data to identify the performance of individuals and groups of students. linking progress to the quality of provision in lessons.linking progress to the quality of provision in lessons.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

Students enter the school with broadly average attainment and their achievement is good by the end of Year 11. Attainment, previously in line with the national average, was significantly above average in 2010 for all students in English and mathematics. This trend of improvement from 2009 to the current academic year has been sustained well and the unvalidated results indicate that students made outstanding progress. Standards in the specialist subject are also well above average. All students, irrespective of their ethnicity or ability, made similar progress. In particular, students with special educational needs and/or disabilities, the gifted and talented and those who do not speak English as their first language made even better progress than in previous years. The achievement of students at both key stages is consistently good or outstanding and includes those whose circumstances have made them vulnerable. Early examination entry is used very well to

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 2

raise aspirations and develop positive attitudes to learning. During the inspection, observation of lessons and analysis of early entry results indicate that students are mostly making good or better progress. Relationships throughout the school community are strong and contribute to students aspiring to do well because staff know the students very well. Mutual respect between them is very good, as is the use of humour in and out of the classroom. The school fosters respect for different cultural heritages and there is good cooperation between students. As a result, there are very few racist or bullying incidents among students. They are confident that if unacceptable behaviour occurs, staff will deal with it quickly and confidentially. This awareness of others extends to students having a strong sense of right and wrong and

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

reinforces all aspects of their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Students feel extremely safe and are clear that the school has effective systems in place to protect them from any potential harm. Students are assured of this because the curriculum covers a wide range of topics on safety. Additionally, senior leaders maintain a visible presence in the locality and well-developed links with external services confirm that the well-being of students is at the forefront of the school's provision. Students make an outstanding contribution to the school and wider community and are very proud to act as ambassadors. Attendance is above average because measures to improve persistent absence are working. While students' academic progress makes a good contribution to their economic well-being, preparation for the next stage of their life is very well supported through their involvement in enterprise-related activities in school and the local

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 2

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 2

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

2

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.6

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.6

How effective is the provision?

Most teachers use their good subject knowledge to plan thoroughly and meet students' learning needs. In the most effective lessons, relationships are relaxed, resources are carefully selected, there is good pace and teachers use a range of strategies including whole-class teaching, paired, group or independent work to engage students and build on their skills. Talk is used well to develop thinking and communication skills. For example, there is effective questioning and modelling using the interactive whiteboard to explain

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

and consolidate learning. This is highly effective particularly when learning is broken down into small blocks and questions are used to probe and assess students' understanding. Students are keen to learn but there are variations in the quality of teaching and learning across the school. For example, questioning is not always used effectively to broaden and extend learning and the potential of the interactive whiteboard to stimulate learning is not always explored. Furthermore, in a few lessons, work is not well matched to individual needs and leads to students being disengaged. The school has robust systems for tracking the progress of students and using early intervention to adjust and set targets that are far more challenging or to provide additional help. While regular analyses and evaluation of examination and test results are contributing to outstanding care, guidance and support, books are not always carefully

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

marked to identify errors with enough detailed comments to help students understand how they can improve their targets. Students benefit from an outstanding curriculum that is imaginative and flexible. It meets their interests and individual needs very well. Different pathways, including the more traditional academic subjects, provide students with a wide range of offers from which to choose. The specialism enhances the curriculum and enrichment activities very well and outcomes are improving in other subjects across the curriculum. This is because the exposure to business and enterprise opportunity is transforming students' lives and contributing to them developing a mature approach to their studies. The specialism is also used to develop exceptionally good transitional links with primary schools. For example, the transition process is well structured, beginning in Year 5 and extending through to the

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

sixth form. All students, and in particular those who are gifted and talented, those with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those whose circumstances have made them vulnerable, receive highly specialised care that is tailored to their needs. Students feel very well supported and value highly the careers guidance and support given when they move on to the next phase of their learning.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching 2

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The headteacher has skilfully prioritised and targeted actions to improve academic outcomes. He has made things happen and delivered tough messages about raising aspirations. His has enabled leaders and managers at all levels to take ownership of the actions to make further improvements. Increased accountability and regular line

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

management, linked to performance management, ensure that students' progress is kept under scrutiny and reported regularly to senior leaders, parents and carers. Further work to improve teaching and learning has started. The school's vision of raising aspirations is linked to its close work with external services, organisations and parents and carers. The governing body is knowledgeable about the school. It provides good support, holds the school to account and challenges its work. The school upholds all aspects of equality very well by working hard to ensure that all groups have equal access to services and opportunities to achieve well. Additionally, the school ensures that barriers, if any, can be dismantled. For example, there has been clear and incisive use of data to identify and improve the achievement of underperforming groups, notably White British students and those of Caribbean heritage. Community

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

cohesion is promoted well through local, national and international links. In particular, strong links with a wide range of community groups foster a good understanding of different cultures. Safeguarding requirements are robust and there is good attention to reviewing and updating a wide range of policies regularly. The school uses its resources very well to achieve good and improving value for money.

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

2

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Sixth form

Students' achievement is outstanding. They enter the sixth form with attainment that historically is below average, but by the end of Year 13 results in the A-level, BTEC and other courses are above average. The good results have been sustained and are improving year on year. Students enjoy supportive relationships in school with their teachers and with each other. Monitoring is thorough and students' progress is kept under review. The quality of teaching is good, with emphasis on developing independent learning. Nevertheless, there is not a systematic approach to evaluating and analysing the

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

information on teaching and learning to identify and compare the performance of different groups, in particular when assessments take place. The curriculum across the consortium is outstanding and covers a range of courses across schools. A flexible timetable provides opportunities for movement between schools. Enrichment outcomes are very strong and the exceptional links within the community, for example local lawyers and other businesses, provide students with high quality support and advice when preparing for university or seeking work experience. This partnership, par excellence, is contributing to raising aspirations. Exceptionally good care and guidance, provided through regular assessments and target setting, support students' study very well. In particular, attendance is high as is the retention rate. The sixth form is very well led. The leaders, including the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, head of the sixth form and head of the consortium, are highly respected.

p.9

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Like the main school, there is a clear vision for developing the sixth form and students have a voice in decision making. The excellent engagement with external partners and sharing of information across the key stages and within the consortium ensure that provision is tailored well to students' needs.

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 1

Taking into account: Outcomes for students in the sixth form

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 1

The quality of provision in the sixth form 2

p.9

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 1

Leadership and management of the sixth form 1

p.9

Views of parents and carers

Most parents and carers who responded to the parental questionnaire are very positive about almost all aspects of the school's work. They are particularly pleased about their children's safety and experience as well as the good or better progress they make. The very few concerns around communication, unacceptable behaviour, meeting students' needs and encouraging healthy lifestyles were explored during the inspection. The inspection evidence confirmed that the school has developed and implemented plans to deal with each issue raised.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Central Foundation Boys' School to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The inspection team received 44 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 880 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 17 39 24 55 2 5 0 0 The school keeps my child safe 10 23 33 75 1 2 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My school informs me about my child's progress 16 36 27 61 1 2 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child is making enough progress at this school 15 34 27 61 1 2 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The teaching is good at this school 15 34 26 59 2 5 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps me to support my child's learning 10 23 30 68 2 5 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 8 18 29 66 6 14 1 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 12 27 23 52 3 7 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 11 25 22 50 6 14 1 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 11 25 25 57 6 14 1 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 4 9 28 64 4 9 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 10 23 30 68 1 2 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 13 30 30 68 1 2 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 March 2010 and are the most recently published data available (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). Please note that the sample of schools inspected during the autumn and spring terms 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Secondary school figures in clude those that have sixth forms, and sixth form figures include only the data specifically for sixth form inspection judgements.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of Central Foundation Boys' School, London EC2A 4SH

On behalf of the inspectors who inspected your school recently, I would like to thank you all for helping us to gather the evidence. We enjoyed meeting a number of you to find out your views about the school. A special thanks to the students who completed the questionnaire. Central Foundation Boys' is indeed a good and improving school and you are rightly very proud and supportive of all of its work. The school is helping you to achieve well and results are improving each year. In 2010, the GCSE results in English and mathematics were well above average and students made outstanding progress. Well done! This has been possible because the headteacher, staff and the governing body are very ambitious for you. They are determined to transform your lives and so they are doing everything possible to support you in your learning and prepare you well for your future. In fact, the quality of care, guidance and support is outstanding as is the curriculum. The school takes

p.13

Inspection of Central Foundation Boys' School, London EC2A 4SH

every precaution necessary to keep you safe. You were very positive about this as well as the way in which you are given exceptional opportunities to extend your understanding of business enterprise. You are also learning well because your behaviour and attendance are good. The few who are often absent are responding well to the actions for them to attend regularly. You enjoy very good relationships with each other and your teachers. Although you are all doing very well, the school is not yet satisfied with its achievement and is determined to make sure that all of you receive 'a first class education'. We have therefore asked the school to do two things to reach this goal. First, not all teaching and learning are yet consistently good or outstanding and your books are not always carefully marked to help you improve further. Second, in the sixth form, we have asked the leaders and managers to evaluate

p.13

Inspection of Central Foundation Boys' School, London EC2A 4SH

the quality of teaching when looking at your performance, in particular when assessments take place. You have a school to be proud of and I am sure that you will continue to work with the staff as they seek to make it a better place. We wish you and the school every success.

p.13

www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please

telephone 0300 1234 234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion