Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Excelsior Academy

Inspected 13 Jan 2011 · published 3 Feb 2011 · URN 135423

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tom Grieveson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Jan 2011

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tom Grieveson

  • Postcode verified

    NE15 6AF

  • Name on report verified

    Excelsior Academy

  • URN verified

    135423

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 27% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveoutstandingexceptionallysuccessfullyimprovingexemplarypositive
Criticisminadequatepersistent absenceunacceptablelowlimitedweakweaknessesdeclining

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1887w+32
  • Leadership506w+88
  • What needs to improve70w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
2,459
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Unique Reference Number 135423 Local Authority Newcastle Upon Tyne Inspection number 361302 Inspection dates 12–13 January 2011 Reporting inspector Tom Grieveson HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Academy School category Community Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1200 Of which, number on roll in the sixth form 140 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mr Peter Fair Principal Mrs Philomena Marshall Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected School address Denton Road Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE15 6AF Telephone number 0191 2288400 Fax number 0191 2747466 Email address philomena.marshall@excelsiornewcastle.org.uk

p.1

Age group 11–18 Inspection dates 12–13 January 2011 Inspection number 361302 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.1

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.2

You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the documentation in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'. Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty's Inspectors and three Additional Inspectors. In total, 45 lessons were observed involving 43 teachers. Meetings were held with senior leaders, the chair of the governing body, students, staff and by telephone with the School Improvement Partner. Inspectors observed the academy's work and considered a range of documentation including students' workbooks. Inspectors analysed 111 parental inspection questionnaires, 129 completed by students and 19 submitted by staff. The inspection team reviewed many aspects of the academy's work. Inspectors looked in detail at a number of key areas.  The progress made by students given their capabilities and starting points.  The academy's work in tackling high absence rates.  Teachers' use of assessment and tracking information when planning learning.  Whether the curriculum is meeting the needs and interests of the students and its

p.3

Introduction

contribution to raising achievement.  How effectively academy leaders are holding staff to account for their performance and the degree to which this is leading to sustained improvements in teaching and learning, standards and achievement.

p.3

Information about the school

Excelsior Academy opened in September 2008 in new purpose-built accommodation. It is larger in size than most secondary schools. It operates a 'schools within a school' framework, with four autonomous 11 to 16 schools and a sixth form college. Each has its own management structure, school principal, staff, students, curriculum and timetable. They are directly accountable to the executive principal who leads the academy. The academy's specialism is business enterprise, although each school leads an academy-wide specialist area: Armstrong School – Business and Economics; Hadrian School – Environment, Technology and Design; Jefferson School – Creative and Performing Arts; Milburn School – Health Related Studies. The academy is sponsored by Irvine Laidlaw (Lord Laidlaw). The academy serves communities in the west end of Newcastle. The proportion of students across the Academy known to be eligible for free school meals is

p.3

Information about the school

significantly in excess of the national average. A high proportion of students enter the academy during term time and many in this group are from overseas. Increasing numbers, currently 35%, come from minority ethnic communities with a third speaking English as an additional language. The proportion of students with special educational needs and/or disabilities is significantly above average and in some year groups represents over half of the cohort.

p.3

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Main findings

Excelsior provides its students with a satisfactory and rapidly improving education. It has clear strengths, most notably in its leadership, curriculum and the care, guidance and support it provides. The manner in which the academy promotes community cohesion is exemplary. Much has been achieved since the academy opened. Although low, attainment is rising quickly and the proportion of students making satisfactory or better progress is increasing well. Self-evaluation is rigorous, providing a secure basis from which carefully crafted improvement planning occurs. There is good capacity for further improvement and the academy's specialism makes a positive contribution to students' development. The majority of teaching seen during the inspection was satisfactory; about 40% was good. Senior leaders have established an effective professional development programme for staff and a rigorous monitoring framework, both of which are successfully contributing to

p.4

Main findings

improving teaching and learning. In the best lessons this is evident in teachers' planning and lesson delivery, reflecting a keen awareness of students' capabilities. Activities engage students' interest, address their learning needs and promote learning well. In these lessons, teachers' good questioning skills are used consistently to challenge students' thinking and deepen their understanding. These factors are not yet commonplace, however. In too many lessons students of differing abilities undertake the same tasks. This hinders the progress of the most able. Those of lower ability and students at the early stages of learning English find the work too hard. Furthermore, opportunities for students to work independently and express their ideas and opinions in these lessons are limited. Academy leaders and staff have worked assiduously to improve the curriculum. Their detailed understanding of students' needs and interests has shaped the curriculum so that

p.4

Main findings

its impact on outcomes is increasingly apparent. It is constantly added to as new opportunities are identified. Students' personal and learning needs are well catered for. Students say they feel safe, expressing confidence in staff support. Students demonstrate a strong commitment to the academy and their behaviour is good. They take responsibility for their actions while recognising the safety of others. Although improving well, absence and persistent absence rates remain high. There are good procedures in place for the safeguarding of students. The academy provides satisfactory value for money. Up to 40% of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 In order to raise attainment and accelerate students' learning and progress, the academy should:

p.4

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

 build upon and extend current strategies to improve teaching and learning by: developing teachers' questioning skills promoting students' capacity to learn independently broadening opportunities for classroom talk  deploy and extend existing strategies to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence.

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

The large majority of students demonstrate positive attitudes to learning and engage productively in lessons. The calm and orderly climate within the academy provides a secure platform from which students can learn. Their commitment to adopting healthy lifestyles is noteworthy and students commit in good numbers to the extensive health and sports programme. Attendance rates have increased sharply since the academy opened but remain low. Relatively high persistent absence rates are declining well. There have been no permanent exclusions. All aspects of students' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development are strong. Students' attainment on entry to the academy is exceptionally low. Their literacy and numeracy skills are particularly weak. Few enter with higher than average results at Key Stage 2. Key Stage 4 outcomes remain low but improved markedly in 2010 compared to the previous year with attainment now much higher than in the predecessor school. It is

p.5

Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils 3

rising more quickly at Key Stage 3 and particularly amongst the youngest age groups. Robust and incisive assessment of students' progress is demonstrating that increasing numbers, at both key stages, are now making satisfactory or better progress. This equally applies to those with special educational needs and/or disabilities because well timed and effective intervention is supporting their learning increasingly well.

p.5

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for pupils' outcomes

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

Taking into account: Pupils' attainment¹

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of pupils' learning and their progress 3

p.6

Pupils' achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning 3

The quality of learning for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and their progress

p.6

3

Taking into account: Pupils' attendance¹

p.6

The extent of pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2

1 The grades for attainment and attendance are: 1 is high; 2 is above average; 3 is broadly average; and 4

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The most effective teachers have good knowledge and an enthusiasm for their subject. Planning is incisive, reflecting a thorough understanding of students' prior learning and their capabilities. Expectations are high, the pace of lessons is brisk and challenging questioning ensures that students are kept interested and engaged. They have ample opportunities to work independently. Too often though, while teachers strive to make learning relevant, activities do not cater sufficiently well for the needs of all. Progress tends to be satisfactory rather than good. Learning in these lessons lacks pace, students become passive, often because teacher-talk dominates proceedings and opportunities to collaborate or work independently are missing. In some lessons, teachers' questioning skills are limited and tend to confine rather than extend students' opportunities to be challenged, share their ideas or express opinions.

p.6

How effective is the provision?

The good curriculum is increasingly finely tuned to students' requirements and interests. Pathways at Key Stage 4 build successfully on Key Stage 3 strategies which are effectively tackling long-standing weaknesses in students' basic skills. Students are offered a well- defined mix of academic and vocational options which are proving relevant and motivational in promoting learning and sustaining engagement. Their impact is evident in the increasing numbers staying on into post-16 provision. Enrichment activities are well attended and are highly valued including recent ventures to Poland and South Africa.

p.6

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

The quality of care, guidance and support is a strength. It contributes substantially to students' confidence in the academy and in the staff to support them. It effectively underpins the academy's intensive drive to improve students' academic achievement.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for the quality of provision

p.7

The quality of teaching 3

Taking into account: The use of assessment to support learning

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

The strength of purpose in tackling historic levels of under-achievement and raising students' aspirations is fully reflected in the work of senior leaders, governors and all those who work at the academy. The resolute focus on raising attainment lies at the heart of the academy's vision and is reflected fully in its core priorities. The work which underpins this strategy is evident in rising levels of attainment and improving rates of student progress. The executive principal and chair of governors demonstrate a sharp and incisive understanding of the academy's performance and offer a clear perspective on areas which require most improvement. Governance is good and while supportive of academy leaders, governors are highly expectant about individual and collective performance. Partnership arrangements are effective and wide ranging, including with Merchiston School in Edinburgh. Students' learning benefits greatly from broad ranging initiatives such

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

as the enterprise day. A community police officer, based in the academy, works effectively to support individual students, and engagement with parents and carers is good. The large majority of parents and carers who replied to the inspection questionnaire were unequivocal in their support of the academy and its work. Innovative strategies to connect with harder to reach families are effective. Strident efforts to develop all aspects of community cohesion ensure that this aspect of the academy's work is outstanding. Staff demonstrate an incisive understanding of the academy community, its make-up and its needs. Substantial progress has been made since the academy opened in shaping a cohesive community and in reaching out in numerous ways into the area it serves. Effective quality assurance and risk assessment systems ensure that safeguarding arrangements are good. The sponsor provides extensive financial support for students to directly promote their

p.7

How effective are leadership and management?

personal and academic progress. These monies are used prudently by the leadership to extend students' experiences in a significant number of areas.

p.7

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

These are the grades for leadership and management

p.8

2

Taking into account: The leadership and management of teaching and learning

p.8

Sixth form

Post-16 provision is satisfactory and quickly improving. Almost all students are making satisfactory and often good progress. The proportion of students out-performing their targets has increased significantly in the last year. Teaching is at least satisfactory and an increasing proportion is good. Teachers know students well, have good subject knowledge and successfully engage students in learning. The college works closely with students to make sure they accept responsibility for their own progress and show independence in learning. Individual needs and interests are particularly well met and the curriculum meets students' aspirations successfully by providing a suitable range of academic and vocational subjects. Students highly value the individual care, guidance and support they receive. The college provides a wide range of successful strategies to overcome any barriers to learning. High ambition is firmly embedded in all aspects of post-16 provision. Growth and

p.8

Sixth form

development are central to the work of the college and is reflected in improving student outcomes. As a result, leadership and management are good.

p.8

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 3

Taking into account: Outcomes for students in the sixth form

p.8

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 3

The quality of provision in the sixth form 3

p.8

Overall effectiveness of the sixth form 3

Leadership and management of the sixth form 2

p.8

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

Views of parents and carers

The large majority of parents and carers who responded to the inspection questionnaire expressed their appreciation and support for the work of the academy.

p.9

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

Ofsted invited all the registered parents and carers of pupils registered at Excelsior Academy to complete a questionnaire about their views of the school. In the questionnaire, parents and carers were asked to record how strongly they agreed with 13 statements about the school.

p.10

Responses from parents and carers to Ofsted's questionnaire

The inspection team received 111 completed questionnaires by the end of the on-site inspection. In total, there are 1200 pupils registered at the school.

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child enjoys school 28 25 70 63 9 8 3 3 The school keeps my child safe 33 30 72 65 5 5 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My school informs me about my child's progress 45 41 62 56 2 2 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

My child is making enough progress at this school 33 30 69 62 6 5 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The teaching is good at this school 38 34 66 59 4 4 2 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps me to support my child's learning 34 31 69 62 6 5 1 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school helps my child to have a healthy lifestyle 36 32 64 58 8 7 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school makes sure that my child is well prepared for the future (for example changing year group, changing school, and for children who are finishing school, entering further or higher education, or entering employment) 31 28 72 65 4 4 1 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school meets my child's particular needs 30 27 71 64 7 6 0 0

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school deals effectively with unacceptable behaviour 34 31 62 56 8 7 6 5

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school takes account of my suggestions and concerns 26 23 73 66 9 8 2 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The school is led and managed effectively 25 23 75 68 8 7 2 2

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

Overall, I am happy with my child's experience at this school 39 35 65 59 5 5 1 1

p.10

Total % Total % Total % Total %

The table above summarises the responses that parents and carers made to each statement. The percentages indicate the proportion of parents and carers giving that response out of the total number of completed questionnaires. Where one or more parents and carers chose not to answer a particular question, the percentages will not add up to 100%.

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils' needs.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils.

p.11

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements were introduced on 1 September 2009. This means that inspectors now make some additional judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2009 to 31 August 2010 and are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2009/10 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Sixth form figures reflect the judgements made for the overall effectiveness of the sixth form in secondary schools, special schools and pupil referral units.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning, development or training.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils' work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving. Inspectors base this judgement on what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school's overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school. The following judgements, in particular, influence what the overall effectiveness judgement will be.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

 The school's capacity for sustained improvement.  Outcomes for individuals and groups of pupils.  The quality of teaching.  The extent to which the curriculum meets pupils' needs, including, where relevant, through partnerships.  The effectiveness of care, guidance and support.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils' attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted's

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of Excelsior Academy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE15 6AF

Thank you for your participation during the recent inspection of your academy. Particular thanks go to those groups of students who met with us: you represented the academy extremely well and you should be justly proud. We have judged the academy to be providing you with a satisfactory and rapidly improving education. It has a number of strengths, notably the quality of its leadership, curriculum and the care, guidance and support which it offers. The academy's work in promoting community cohesion is excellent. Although attainment remains low, we were pleased to see that standards are rising and that many more of you are making good progress. The details of our findings are contained in the report which I am sure you would like to read in full. We have asked the governing body, the academy leaders and the staff to build on work which is already underway so that you can all make better progress in your learning and

p.13

Inspection of Excelsior Academy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE15 6AF

attain more highly. We have asked them to concentrate on the following two areas in particular.  To continue with current strategies to improve teaching and learning by: - developing teachers' questioning skills - promoting students' capacity to learn independently - broadening opportunities for classroom talk.  To continue to deploy and extend existing strategies to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence We were particularly pleased to observe your good behaviour and your positive attitudes towards learning. Well done! You can support the staff to make these improvements by continuing to work hard and attend regularly. Please accept the very best wishes of the inspection team for your future success.

p.13

www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion