Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Leicester Partnership School
Summary
Jeffery Plumb (lead), Alan Jones
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Alan Jones, Jeffery Plumb
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Behaviour and safety verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Satisfactory
- Quality of teaching verified
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
Secondary Behaviour Support Service
- URN verified
131535
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Behaviour and safetySatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Quality of teachingSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- In the most successful lessons students are clear about what they are expected to learn and assessment is used effectively to plan well-structured activities for all students to build on their prior understanding in the subject. p.6
- Teachers use questions effectively in these lessons to deepen students’ knowledge and understanding and so students make good progress. p.6
- Students enjoy their vocational curriculum taught through interesting and well-planned practical lessons, such as those in an off-site ‘bike’ shop. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.9
- This is not consistent across the service because some teachers are insufficiently confident in using this tool to best set targets for students. p.8
- Engagement with learning is variable across the service because of inconsistencies in the quality of teaching and use of teaching assistants. p.4
- Achievement in numeracy and literacy is not always as good as it could be because opportunities to develop these important basic skills are missed in the teaching of some subjects. p.6
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve teaching by making sure that: planned activities in lessons are challenging and matched to students’ needs teaching assistants at all times engage students who begin to show a low level of disruption or who lose interest and concentration in learning in lessons teachers in all subjects take every opportunity available to them to develop students’ literacy and numeracy skills. p.5
- Improve students’ attendance so as to accelerate the rate of progress for more students than at present and improve even further the number who access courses at college at the end of Year 11. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance7
“Management systems to ensure students are safe are robust.” p.8
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,060
- about usual (typical 3005)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 44
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 11–16 Inspection date(s) 15–16 March 2012 Inspection number 381358 Secondary Behaviour Support Service Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 131535 Local authority Leicester City Inspection number 381358 Inspection dates 15–16 March 2012 Lead inspector Jeffery Plumb
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Pupil referral unit School category Pupil referral unit Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 140 Appropriate authority The local authority Chair John Broadhead Headteacher Shaun Whittingham Date of previous school inspection 3 June 2009 School address Carisbrooke Gardens Knighton Leicester LE2 3PR Telephone number 0116 2706065 Fax number 0116 2703208 Email address swhittingham@SFPRS.leicester.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed nine teachers and two vocational instructors teaching 11 lessons across the three sites of the provision including two externally provided vocational programmes. Two lessons were joint observations with the headteacher. The lead inspector met formally with two groups of students, and both inspectors spoke with many others on all three sites and in vocational workshops. Meetings were held with three representatives of the management committee, and with service staff including teachers, and middle and senior leaders. Inspectors observed the service’s work and looked at a number of documents, including progress and attainment data, re-integration and attendance figures, the log of behaviour incidents, safeguarding policies and risk assessments, equality and diversity policies, the service improvement partner reports and the service improvement plan. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line
p.3
Introduction
questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. They also took account of three inspection questionnaires returned by parents and carers as well as questionaires completed by staff and pupils.
p.3
Information about the school
The service provides support for students with challenging behaviours. The majority of students are referred by Leicester City schools because they are at risk of exclusion. They remain on the roll of their schools whilst receiving support from the service. Most of these students return to mainstream education. This service receives students at Key Stage 3 on 12 and 24 weekly placements. The proportion of students at Key stage 3 with disabilities and special educational needs is above the national average. Most of these students undergo further assessment whilst with the service so as to identify the best provision for them. There is a mixture of two-day and five- day programmes at Key Stage 3. Those on a two-day programme spend the other three days at their mainstream school. The service also caters for Key Stage 4 students at risk of exclusion. Once settled, these students are placed on vocational
p.3
Information about the school
programmes secured from external providers for four days a week and attend a service site on one day a week. Provision is also made for students permanently excluded from schools. The majority of students are boys from White British backgrounds. There has been an increase in the number of students from minority ethnic backgrounds since the last inspection, but none are at an early stage of learning to speak English as an additional language. An above average proportion of students are known to be eligible for free school meals. There are a few looked after students. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key findings
This is a satisfactory service. The service is not better than this because of the inconsistencies in: the use of assessment to set sufficiently challenging targets in English and mathematics; in the quality of teaching and students’ progress. The attendance of some students is low.
p.4
Key findings
Students’ achievement is satisfactory. Students make satisfactory progress in English and mathematics, but the rate of progress for Key Stage 3 students on the five-day programme lags behind that of their peers on the two-day programme. Key Stage 4 students make good progress on their vocational programmes.
p.4
Key findings
Teaching is satisfactory. There is some good teaching in Years 10 and 11, particularly on the vocational courses. However, in some Key Stage 3 lessons students are not always sufficiently challenged. Opportunities to develop students’ literacy and numeracy skills across the subjects taught are occasionally missed.
p.4
Key findings
Behaviour and safety is satisfactory. The few incidents of racism and bullying, which occur, are dealt with most effectively. Engagement with learning is variable across the service because of inconsistencies in the quality of teaching and use of teaching assistants. Most students are adept at assessing risks and adopting safe practices in work-place environments.
p.4
Key findings
Senior leaders and the management committee, in recent years, have improved a number of aspects of the service such as attainment at the end of Year 11, and the number of students at the end of Year 11 entering college. Attendance, although still low for some students, is significantly better. The management of performance has become more rigorous, especially in its effectiveness in monitoring teaching. Consequently, teaching is better. However, monitoring of students' progress is not as developed. The service has contributed very significantly to reducing the number of permanent exclusions across Leicester Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Key findings
A service whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise attainment and accelerate progress relative to pupils’ starting points in English and mathematics, especially in Key Stage 3, by ensuring that: assessment on entry to the service is used to set challenging targets in English and mathematics for all students teachers use these targets to plan specific learning outcomes for students on a lesson-by-lesson basis so as to enable students to make up for gaps in prior learning the senior leadership team and the management committee rigorously monitor students’ progress over the time the service provides for them so as to trigger immediate interventions to raise achievement where it is most needed.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching by making sure that: planned activities in lessons are challenging and matched to students’ needs teaching assistants at all times engage students who begin to show a low level of disruption or who lose interest and concentration in learning in lessons teachers in all subjects take every opportunity available to them to develop students’ literacy and numeracy skills.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve students’ attendance so as to accelerate the rate of progress for more students than at present and improve even further the number who access courses at college at the end of Year 11.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Students’ progress is satisfactory measured against their different starting points. Students’ learning accelerates through Key Stage 4 because of the rigour of the accredited vocational courses and the effectiveness of the newly implemented curriculum for English and mathematics. This is particularly the case for girls because their attendance is much better than it was in their mainstream schools. The number of Year 11 students successfully securing a place in further education, employment or training has increased significantly year-on-year over the past three years. Similarly, although attainment at the end of Year 11 is below the national average, there has been a steady improvement over the past three years. More students gained higher-level qualifications by the end of Year 11 in 2011 than in the previous Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Students make satisfactory progress during lessons. In most lessons they have a positive attitude to their work and, in their vocational lessons, this is almost always the case. Students’ rate of progress slows when assessments of their prior knowledge and understanding are not used sufficiently well to plan specific learning outcomes to help them to make up the gaps from previous learning. This lack of challenge is most evident in some lessons at Key Stage 3. Achievement in numeracy and literacy is not always as good as it could be because opportunities to develop these important basic skills are missed in the teaching of some subjects. In an information and communication technology lesson, the teacher planned to develop students’ literacy skills, but all students had the same literacy target to work towards despite having varied levels of literacy. In this lesson lower achieving students did not make the progress they needed to make. Students with disabilities and those
p.6
Achievement of pupils
that have special educational needs make satisfactory progress. Their progress is not better than that because in a few lessons they are not sufficiently challenged. Overall, progress is satisfactory in English and mathematics. It is not better than that because targets in these subjects are not always consistently challenging for all students.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Relationships are mostly good in lessons. Consequently, students are not afraid usually to take safe risks and this accelerates their learning. Dignity and a commitment to equality of opportunity pervade all lessons. Failure in a subject in a previous mainstream school is put aside and students are empowered to believe that they can succeed. Parents and carers believe that their children are taught well and, while this is the case in some lessons, it is not consistently the case in all. In the most successful lessons students are clear about what they are expected to learn and assessment is used effectively to plan well-structured activities for all students to build on their prior understanding in the subject. Teachers use questions effectively in these lessons to deepen students’ knowledge and understanding and so students make good progress.
p.6
Quality of teaching
In some satisfactory lessons, teaching lacks sufficient challenge and teaching assistants do not intervene swiftly enough to support students who show signs of waning interest in their learning. For example, in an information and communication technology (ICT) lesson, assessment of prior learning was not used to set specific and challenging learning outcomes for each student. Higher achieving students became bored with the task because they had already mastered the skills they were asked to demonstrate. They began to show signs of low level disruption. Lower achieving students struggled because the task was too difficult for them and some of them sat passively. The teaching assistant did not intervene quickly enough to challenge and support either group of students.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Some pupils think that their teaching is variable, particularly in their core English, mathematics and ICT lessons. Inspection evidence supports their view. Teaching of Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Quality of teaching
important literacy and numeracy skills across subjects is inconsistent. Students enjoy their vocational curriculum taught through interesting and well-planned practical lessons, such as those in an off-site ‘bike’ shop. In an outstanding vocational lesson students gained valuable work-related skills. In such lessons students learn to work in teams and their social skills are enhanced significantly. Overall, teaching often makes a valuable contribution to students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Occasionally, opportunities to promote students’ awareness of the suffering of different groups of people from around the world are missed. For example, in a lesson with a starter activity which focused on flags from countries around the world, an opportunity was missed to encourage students’ to think critically about the suffering of Syrians, many of whom are currently fleeing across the Turkish border to find sanctuary.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Engagement with learning is currently better in Years 10 and 11 compared with previous years. Students in these year groups see the relevance of the recently increased range of accreditation opportunities linked to their vocational subjects. They know that by working hard they will gain qualifications which enable them to secure a place at college. Overall, engagement with learning in lessons is satisfactory, but inconsistencies remain. In lessons where assessment is used to tailor activities to students’ needs, learning behaviour is good. Conversely, where all students in a lesson are asked to complete the same work, there is sometimes low level disruptive behaviour. Occasional instances of aggressive behaviour in lessons are skilfully managed.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
A few incidents of racism and homophobic bullying occur. Such unacceptable incidents are taken extremely seriously. They are tackled swiftly and effectively because there is no tolerance of any form of prejudice or discrimination. One-to-one counselling is provided for the perpetrators and victims. Mostly, this is successful in enabling the perpetrators to reflect on the negative impact of their actions and change their ways. Students have a good understanding of cyber bullying, and know what to do if they fall victim to it. Students feel safe and they have an adult within the service in whom they trust and can talk to about anything that troubles them. The service is effective in keeping permanent exclusions across Leicester City schools extremely low. The majority of students provided for are mostly polite and courteous. Students with challenging behaviours, linked to their emotional needs, are well supported and most have fewer outbursts of anger as a result. Parents and
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
carers consider that their children are safe and that their behaviour has improved since they have been supported by the service. Students also believe that their behaviour has improved. They say, ‘This place has helped us sort ourselves out ….we want to keep out of trouble, work hard and get a good job’.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Students know how to keep safe in the work-place. For example, when working in a garage they understand the importance of putting on gloves to protect their skin when handling oil. They know the risks associated with getting involved in gangs and Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
understand that they must not chat with strangers on the computer. Attendance is improving and significantly so for girls at Key Stage 4, but it remains too low for some students.
p.8
Leadership and management
Senior leaders and the management committee have made a number of improvements in recent years. Attainment by Year 11 has steadily improved, the increased range of vocational placements has engaged more students with learning, and permanent exclusions have fallen in Leicester City schools. Engagement with parents and carers has improved thus enabling them to better support their children’s learning at home. Monitoring of teaching and professional development has resulted in almost all teachers identifying clear learning objectives, so that students can measure the success of their learning in lessons. Some inconsistency in the quality of teaching remains.
p.8
Leadership and management
The service has been tracking the progress of the different groups of students it supports so as to plan to meet all of their needs in accordance with its commitment to equality of opportunity. To improve work in this area a new system to track students’ progress and set challenging academic targets for them has been launched. It is designed to promote equality of opportunity further by enabling every student to realise her or his full potential. Where teachers already use this tool effectively they set challenging targets for all students enabling them to make good progress. This is not consistent across the service because some teachers are insufficiently confident in using this tool to best set targets for students. Professional development to support teachers in how to best use the tracking tool is planned for the near future. Senior leaders are beginning to use the tracking system to monitor students’
p.8
Leadership and management
progress more effectively and to respond more rapidly than before to support those who fall behind with their work. This, however, is at too early a stage of implementation to have had widespread impact in improving achievement. Nonetheless, given the overall improvements since the recent re-structuring of the service, there is sufficient capacity for further improvement.
p.8
Leadership and management
The curriculum is broad, balanced and relevant. It is strongest at Key Stage 4, where individual learning programmes accelerate students’ learning. Students are well- equipped with college readiness skills. Their social development is promoted well through working in teams in a range of work-environments. Equality and diversity issues, including raising students’ awareness of cultural diversity are covered well. Prejudice and discrimination based on religion, sexual preference and disability are actively challenged. Students’ spiritual development is promoted as they reflect deeply on the horror of the Holocaust.
p.8
Leadership and management
Management systems to ensure students are safe are robust. Child protection procedures meet requirements. Vocational placements are thoroughly risk assessed.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of Secondary Behaviour Support Service, Leicester, LE2 3PR
Thank you for welcoming me and my colleague to your service. Your service is satisfactory and this means that another inspector may visit to see if improvements are being made.
p.11
Inspection of Secondary Behaviour Support Service, Leicester, LE2 3PR
By the end of Year 11, most of you achieve qualifications in vocational courses which enable you to go onto college courses. You make satisfactory progress in English and mathematics. Although attendance is improving, particularly amongst girls at Key Stage 4, it is too low for some of you. The few racist and bullying incidents which occur are tackled well and most of you are eager to behave well, work hard and go to college so that you can get a good job. You feel safe and trust your staff. You know how to keep yourselves safe in the work-place and understand that getting involved in a gang would get you into trouble. Teaching is usually satisfactory and sometimes good. We have asked your teachers to give you interesting activities, which challenge you to do your very best in all lessons. We have particularly asked them to set each of you challenging targets in English and mathematics so as to raise your achievement
p.11
Inspection of Secondary Behaviour Support Service, Leicester, LE2 3PR
in these subjects and equip you even better than they do at present to cope with the challenge of being successful in a competitive adult world. The headteacher, staff and management committee have worked successfully to make improvements to the service provided for you. We have asked that they speed up actions to improve your teaching, raise your attendance and by doing so accelerate your learning in English and mathematics. We want them to make sure that each of you achieves your full potential in these subjects.
p.11
Inspection of Secondary Behaviour Support Service, Leicester, LE2 3PR
Please help your service improve by attending regularly, behaving sensibly and doing your very best work in all of your lessons.
p.11
Inspection of Secondary Behaviour Support Service, Leicester, LE2 3PR
Jeffery Plumb Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion