Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Springwell Community College

Inspected 16 Mar 2012 · published 18 Apr 2012 · URN 112966

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Mar 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Elizabeth Needham, Gwendoline Onyon, Sean Thornton, Trevor Riddiough

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Springwell Community College

  • URN verified

    112966

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Quality of teachingSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivepositivevery welleffectivelyhigh expectationsimprovedmake good progress
Criticisminadequateat riskgapsnot yetslowweaknessestoo lownot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1869w+47
  • Leadership506w+10
  • What needs to improve98w+78

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,466
about usual (typical 3005)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 44
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 3
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Age group 11–16 Inspection date(s) 15–16 March 2012 Inspection number 378622 Springwell Community College Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 112966 Local authority Derbyshire Inspection number 378622 Inspection dates 15–16 March 2012 Lead inspector Trevor Riddiough HMI

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 862 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Kay Bonnett Headteacher Tracey Burnside (Acting Head) Date of previous school inspection 8 December 2008 School address Middlecroft Road Chesterfield S43 3NQ Telephone number 01246 473873 Fax number 01246 281899 Email address headteacher@springwell-online.co.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

Trevor Riddiough Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.3

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. Inspectors observed 36 lessons taught by 35 teachers, of which four were joint observations with members of the senior leadership team. They also sat in on 10 tutor groups and two assemblies. Inspectors carried out brief visits to a series of other lessons and held meetings with senior leaders and other staff, groups of students, and members of the governing body. They observed the college’s work and looked at the tracking of students’ progress, performance data, students' work, whole-college and subject development plans, numerous policies, college documents, incident logs, and case studies. Completed questionnaires from 289 parents and carers, 150 students and 58 staff were received and analysed.

p.3

Information about the school

This college is an average-sized comprehensive school serving the village of Brimington and Staveley town, and its surrounding communities. The proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is above average. Most students are from White British backgrounds, and the proportion of students who speak English as an additional language is very low. The proportion of students with special educational needs is above average. The college is a designated specialist arts college and it holds the Healthy Schools award. The college also provides educational and recreational opportunities for adult learners and other members of the community. In November 2010 the school moved into its new college premises adjacent to the old site. At the time of the inspection, the college was led by the acting headteacher who is covering for the headteacher while on extended sick leave. The college is above current government floor standards, which set the

p.3

Information about the school

minimum expectations for attainment and progress. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 Springwell Community College is a satisfactory school. The achievement of students is satisfactory and improving rapidly as a result of rigorous monitoring and tracking procedures, very well focused intervention strategies and effective support for students’ personal and academic development. The college is not yet good because a small minority of students do not achieve the levels expected, particularly in mathematics.

p.4

Key findings

 The college has emerged from a period in which the school’s improvement was slow and students’ attainment was too low, particularly in mathematics. Standards in the college, including in mathematics, are now rising and students are making better progress. Where there are gaps in the performance of some groups of students, for example boys, those entitled to free school meals and those of higher ability, these gaps are closing.

p.4

Key findings

 The quality of teaching is improving but is not yet consistently good enough to ensure that students are always challenged enough to make good progress in all their subjects. Sometimes students are not sure how to improve their work.

p.4

Key findings

 The college is an inclusive and welcoming community and the vast majority of pupils feel safe. Students’ good behaviour contributes positively to their learning and the orderly college environment. Students enjoy taking responsibility and develop good team working and most work hard.

p.4

Key findings

 The acting headteacher leads the school effectively, with good support from a newly formed senior leadership team. Her commitment and determination to raise standards are evident in all her work. Self-evaluation is precise and accurate, and monitoring is used effectively to generate improvements, particularly in teaching. The governing body has a satisfactory but increasingly effective grasp of how to probe and challenge school performance.

p.4

Key findings

Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attainment further by accelerating rates of progress especially in mathematics, by:  setting consistently high expectations for students of all abilities  reviewing targets more systematically with students so that they clearly understand what to do to improve their work.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of high-quality teaching across the school by:  making more effective use of assessment information to match tasks to pupils’ needs and capabilities more accurately  promoting students’ independent learning skills  sharing the good practice in teaching and learning that exists in some areas across all departments through a planned approach.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Provisional results from GCSE examinations in 2011 indicate that students did not always achieve the results predicted, most often in mathematics, where results were well below average. Although inspection evidence of current students’ work in class and in books indicates that achievement is rising sharply, overall results were below national averages last year. However, the proportion of students gaining five or more good GCSE passes at 74% was the highest in the college’s history.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Although students’ attainment at the end of Year 11 is low, attainment on entry is well below average, indicating progress is broadly in line with expectations overall. The college is undergoing rapid improvement and progress levels in most subjects are now good or better, including in mathematics. This is evident in the number of students currently in Year 11 who have attained their targets and who have already gained a grade C or above in English or mathematics in their GCSE module results. Even higher numbers in Year 10 are set to follow.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

This improved progress is also evident for disabled students and those who have special educational needs. Here the improvements are due to the introduction of a more appropriate curriculum, coupled with improved identification of all students’ needs and more targeted support to meet them throughout the school.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In humanities, results are significantly above the national average. Students in all years, including disabled students and those who have special educational needs, expressed their enjoyment of subjects that offer practical, collaborative activities and Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

teaching that inspires. For example, in an outstanding applied physical education lesson, the teacher encouraged the acquisition of high level skills in basketball, through challenging practical activities. Students worked hard together to practise, develop and evaluate the skills that they had learned.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

The gaps in attainment between different groups are narrowing, for example, for students known to be eligible for free school meals. Disabled students and those who have special educational needs now make progress in line with their peers, and the attainment of boys is catching up with that of girls. However, there is still some unevenness in the performance of all students across the curriculum, which is closely aligned with the quality of teaching. Parents’ views suggest that most parents and carers are happy with the progress that their child is making.

p.6

Quality of teaching

College records show that teaching and learning are improving and most lessons are good with some that are outstanding. Responses from parents and carers were extremely positive, with the majority saying that their children are taught well. Inspectors agree this is increasingly the case. However this improvement is only relatively recently established in some subjects, for example in mathematics. In good lessons, assessments are used well to ensure that there is the right level of challenge for all learners in the class. Activities are lively and interesting, and students benefit from verbal feedback during the lesson as well as from the written comments in their books on how to improve. Students are encouraged to work independently and, as a result, make good progress. For example, in a Year 11 mathematics lesson, students worked steadily through linear, quadratic and cubic graphs. The teacher modelled

p.6

Quality of teaching

the expected responses using a writing frame and good attention was paid to the examination requirements. Targeted questioning developed students’ deeper understanding of problem solving and then students were left to plot their own graphs and work out for themselves what happens.

p.6

Quality of teaching

However, in some lessons assessment information is not used precisely enough to plan work which matches different students’ needs and capabilities, especially those of higher ability. Some marking is too erratic or general to ensure all students are clear about how they are progressing and how to improve their work.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Opportunities for students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development are often well developed. For example, in a Year 8 science lesson, the teacher capitalised on the joy and wonder of finding living organisms in leaf litter. As a result, students appreciated the importance of living things in recycling and the circle of life and death. In tutor time, a discussion on smoking and pregnancy drew out social and moral issues well.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Many students enter the college with low levels of literacy. The increasingly successful use of early intervention and good reinforcement of literacy across the curriculum in all lessons are enabling most to make rapid progress, especially in reading. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

The planned curriculum makes a positive impact on learning. In Year 7, a combined curriculum through ‘project management’ includes literacy, numeracy and personal development taught through a range of topics which give students the opportunity to learn and practise their basic skills. ‘Super Learning’ days, which are jointly planned by staff and students, enable a deeper understanding of selected topics. The college arts specialism has done much to promote students’ interest in music, art and design, and the performing arts.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students overwhelmingly say that they feel safe and that behaviour is good. Parents and carers agree. Comments such as ‘First class learning environment’; ‘My daughter really enjoys going to school’; ‘Any problems me or my child has had have been dealt with quickly and effectively’ illustrate these positive viewpoints. This long established good behaviour results from well focused strategies and teachers’ firm and positive management of students. The design of the new building, with its separate ‘pods’ aptly named ‘Perform’, ‘Energise’, ‘Create’, ‘Discover’ and ‘Inspire’, is highly conducive to the promotion of good behaviour and high expectations. As a result, students demonstrate tolerance and respect and make strong contributions to the establishment of a harmonious college community. The ‘Behaviour Inclusion Centre’ is well managed and provides a safe and supportive learning environment allowing

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

students time for reflection, a well-formed understanding of restorative justice and mediation. This enables students who are at risk of exclusion to modify their behaviours and play a full part in college life.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Students are given responsibilities which they welcome and embrace. There is an effective student mentor system, and ambassadors promote the college to visitors. The good curriculum and tutorial system help ensure students’ understanding of all safety issues relating to their own health and well-being is good. College records show that incidents of bullying, including cyber-bullying are rare and students expressed confidence that where it occurs it is dealt with effectively. Students are punctual to college and lessons. Attendance levels have risen and are now average. Well considered and robust strategies are helping to improve attendance further.

p.7

Leadership and management

The senior leadership and governing body recognised that achievement at the college had been low in the past and slow to improve. With help from the local authority, an accurate analysis was made of the key weaknesses and swift action taken to remove any barriers to progress. These have included additions to the leadership team, changes in subject leadership and staffing, improved tracking of progress and support for those at risk of missing their targets, improved professional development opportunities, a wider curriculum and more secure examination entry policies. The unevenness in the progress of different groups of students is reducing and the school's effectiveness in promoting equal opportunities growing. Better training has ensured that middle leaders now evaluate the work of their departments Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

accurately and take responsibility for making necessary improvements. Thorough arrangements are in place for the management of performance and teachers are accountable for their students’ results. Inadequate teaching has been virtually eliminated. Common goals have been established and an action plan is in place that reflects the correct priorities and clear success criteria. Though the impact of these measures on achievement is only recently evident, the commonly shared sense of urgency among all who work at the college, including governors, to drive the improvements forward demonstrates a satisfactory capacity for improvement. Governors undertake their statutory responsibilities well; procedures for the safeguarding of students are secure and the college's approach meets statutory requirements.

p.8

Leadership and management

The planned curriculum is effective in meeting students’ needs and aspirations and supports their social, moral, cultural and spiritual development well. Astute adjustments to the curriculum have maximised students’ opportunities to gain relevant qualifications and increased their enjoyment and motivation. The recent change in the organisation of the key stages, with two years at Key Stage 3 and three years at Key Stage 4, has allowed greater choices. Students of higher ability can follow the English Baccalaureate or triple sciences, while others can follow new foundation learning and a range of vocational courses. The common core at Key Stage 4 is enhanced by a good careers and guidance curriculum which includes work experience for all. The mixed year groups of Years 9 and 10 in the different options choices are working very well with staff making any allowances for lack of skills from any Year 9 student.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Springwell Community College, Chesterfield, S43 3NQ

As you know, inspectors visited your school recently. I am writing this letter to tell you what we found out. As we walked through the front entrance we could feel the positive atmosphere. We enjoyed meeting you. We welcomed your friendliness, politeness and honesty when answering our questions. We particularly enjoyed seeing you in your new building and making the most of your time in college.

p.11

Inspection of Springwell Community College, Chesterfield, S43 3NQ

Inspectors judge that you go to a satisfactory school. Your school is improving at a steady pace. Previously, your progress has been slow and standards have been below average in some subjects. Now, we can see that you are making good progress in most of your subjects. This is because you are effectively taught and the curriculum is well designed to meet your personal and academic needs. Your behaviour is good and you have very positive attitudes to learning. It was good to see that many of you get involved in the opportunities to help others in school through mentoring or by being college ambassadors. We were pleased to see that the vast majority of you are attending regularly.

p.11

Inspection of Springwell Community College, Chesterfield, S43 3NQ

Your college is led effectively by your acting headteacher and her team of leaders and managers, who are determined to ensure that it provides the best for every one of you. To help improve your college further, we have asked your acting headteacher, the staff and the governing body to raise your achievement in all subjects by:  improving some aspects of teaching so that you are all challenged to produce your best in all your subjects  providing greater opportunities for you to work more independently of your teachers  giving you good advice on how to improve your work and reach your targets during your lessons and through the day-to-day marking of your work.

p.11

Inspection of Springwell Community College, Chesterfield, S43 3NQ

You have a part to play and you can really help your college by ensuring that you do not settle for anything other than your best and that you follow up the comments and suggestions that your teachers make to help you to improve your work. I wish you all success in the future and hope that you continue to enjoy your time at Springwell Community College.

p.11

Inspection of Springwell Community College, Chesterfield, S43 3NQ

Trevor Riddiough Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion