Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council in Bradford
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
28 Feb 2012
- Inspectors verified
Nicola McEvinney
- URN verified
SC063978
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Young people confirm that they feel safe and are well looked after and enjoy living at the home. p.3
- This home was judged to be outstanding at the last inspection held in December 2011. p.3
- Young people benefit from engaging in a semi-independent learning package that enables them to learn skills to help them make a successful transition to adulthood. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- Staff are proactive in working with other agencies to highlight the plight of those individuals who put themselves at risk of exploitation. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 410
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC063978 Inspection date 28/02/2012 Inspector Nicola McEvinney Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 08/12/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This local authority children's home provides care and accommodation for eight young people who may be experiencing a range of social, emotional and behavioural problems. The home offers a living environment to young people on a medium- to long-term basis. The home prepares young people to live independently.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection.
p.3
progress
The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection.
p.3
progress
The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.3
Progress
This home was judged to be outstanding at the last inspection held in December 2011. There were no requirements or recommendations made.
p.3
Progress
Young people continue to benefit from being cared for by experienced and competent staff who have a clear understanding of safeguarding issues. Staff are proactive in working with other agencies to highlight the plight of those individuals who put themselves at risk of exploitation. This has resulted in a decrease in this activity and means young people are safer.
p.3
Progress
Young people continue to live in a settled home where their education is promoted; the majority of them have good attendance.
p.3
Progress
Young people benefit from engaging in a semi-independent learning package that enables them to learn skills to help them make a successful transition to adulthood. This is tailor made to suit the needs and abilities of each young person and is closely monitored to ensure young people are eating properly. Young people confirm that they feel safe and are well looked after and enjoy living at the home.
p.3
Progress
There were no requirements or recommendations made at this inspection.
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion