Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Maple Grove Primary School
Summary
George Logan (lead), Clementina Ogunsanwo
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Clementina Ogunsanwo, George Logan
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Behaviour and safety verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Quality of teaching verified
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
Maple Grove Primary School
- URN verified
135221
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Behaviour and safetyGood
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Quality of teachingSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- It has significant strengths in being an extremely cohesive, highly-regarded community, which provides extensive and effective support for pupils and their families. p.4
- Good progress in Nursery and Reception, and increasingly rapid progress in Years 1 and 2, underpin average, but rising, standards at the end of Year 2. p.4
- Although improvements in the Early Years Foundation Stage have ensured good progress in that phase, teaching elsewhere has not always provided sufficient challenge to secure consistently good progress. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.9
- Insufficient priority has been given to Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms p.6
- Incidents of poor behaviour are now rare. p.4
- In other lessons, the slow pace inhibited learning, leading to missed opportunities to challenge more-able pupils. p.6
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,457
- about usual (typical 3005)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 44
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 3
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 8–9 March 2012 Inspection number 381843 Maple Grove Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 135221 Local authority Hertfordshire Inspection number 381843 Inspection dates 8–9 March 2012 Lead inspector George Logan
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 218 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair John Parr Headteacher Geoff Allen Date of previous school inspection 24 June 2009 School address St Agnell's Lane Grove Hill Hemel Hempstead HP2 7BG Telephone number 01442 426310 Fax number 01442 426311 Email address admin@maplegrove.herts.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers thi nk about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
Clementina Ogunsanwo Additional inspector
p.3
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors spent seven hours and 35 minutes visiting 15 lessons taught by nine different members of staff. They held meetings with the Chair of the Governing Body and other governors, and with staff and two groups of pupils. The inspector took account of the responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, listened to pupils reading and looked at the school’s documentation, which included records of teaching, the main improvement plan, records relating to safeguarding and extracts from the school’s tracking of pupils’ progress. A scrutiny of pupils’ written work was also undertaken. The inspector analysed 59 questionnaires returned by parents and carers, together with 11 questionnaires from staff and 91 from pupils.
p.3
Information about the school
Maple Grove Primary School is an average-sized primary school. The great majority of pupils are of White British heritage. There are a few pupils from the Traveller community. A small minority of pupils speak English as an additional language, although very few are at an early stage of learning English. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is above average. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is well above average. The school meets the current floor standard. The school provides accommodation for an independently-run pre-school. This is inspected separately. It also offers before- and after-school care clubs and a lunch club for 3 to 4 year olds. The school hosts a local authority service base, providing training for thirty local schools in the support of pupils with specific learning difficulties. The school has gained a number of awards
p.3
Information about the school
since it opened, following school amalgamations, in September 2008. These include the Active Mark and Hertfordshire Quality Mark status. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key findings
This is a satisfactory school. It has significant strengths in being an extremely cohesive, highly-regarded community, which provides extensive and effective support for pupils and their families. It is not good overall because the progress of older pupils in particular is not yet consistent or rapid enough.
p.4
Key findings
Good progress in Nursery and Reception, and increasingly rapid progress in Years 1 and 2, underpin average, but rising, standards at the end of Year 2. Progress in Years 3 to 6 is more erratic, although standards at the end of Year 6 are currently broadly average. Progress in mathematics in 2011 was greater than in reading and writing, reflecting the success of an initiative to boost learning in mathematics. Science has insufficient prominence in some classes.
p.4
Key findings
Teaching is satisfactory and some good teaching was observed. However, teachers’ expectations of pupils, including the quality of pupils’ written work and their handwriting, are not always high enough. Teachers’ marking of writing gives pupils clear guidance for improving their work. However, this approach is not consistently applied elsewhere. Pupils develop worthwhile skills in, for example, music and information and communication technology (ICT).
p.4
Key findings
Behaviour, safety and pupils’ personal development are good. Pupils have very positive attitudes towards their learning. Provision for pupils’ welfare is good and pupils feel very safe. Incidents of poor behaviour are now rare. Attendance has improved and is now securely average.
p.4
Key findings
While many aspects of leadership and management are good, ensuring a clear direction and well-embedded systems, the leadership of teaching is not always sufficiently focused to ensure consistent expectations and higher outcomes. The curriculum, including extra-curricular provision, provides well-developed learning experiences which engage pupils’ interest well.
p.4
Key findings
Schools whose effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
Key findings
Ofsted before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Accelerate the pace and consistency of pupils’ learning across the school and raise their attainment by the end of Year 6, by: more analytical evaluation of the quality of teaching and implementation of strategies to ensure consistently effective classroom practice setting higher expectations for the quality of pupils’ handwriting and the presentation of their written work ensuring that the positive attributes of teachers’ marking in indicating the next steps in learning, currently evident in the marking of writing, are more consistently applied across the other subjects.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that pupils have more frequent and challenging opportunities to extend their knowledge and skills in science.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Parents and carers feel that their children make good progress. Inspection evidence indicates, however, that pupils’ achievement, while satisfactory overall, is inconsistent, particularly in Years 3 to 6. Children’s skills on entry to Nursery are below age-related expectations. Although outcomes at the end of Reception dipped in 2011, in general children make mostly good progress in Nursery and Reception. Increasingly accurate assessment has enabled staff to focus particularly on crucial aspects of personal and social development and communication and literacy skills so that children develop confidence and become more independent in their learning. Outcomes are generally good. There are good opportunities to extend learning through challenging interactions with adults. In consequence, children typically enter Year 1 with literacy and numeracy skills at least at the expected level. While attainment in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 2 is typically
p.5
Achievement of pupils
broadly average there is a trend of improvement in reading and writing, reflecting recent initiatives in these areas. Effective teaching and better embedding of reading skills are helping to accelerate learning. For example, a challenging literacy lesson in Year 2, exploring a character’s thoughts and feelings, was successful because of the good questioning skills of the teacher and the effective use of talk partners which elicited thoughtful responses from pupils.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Progress in Years 3 to 6 is also satisfactory, supporting broadly average attainment by the end of Year 6. Progress and attainment in mathematics improved significantly in 2011, although the impact looks to be less strong currently. On the evidence of pupils’ written work, provision for science is underdeveloped in some year groups. Overall, progress is constrained because of variable expectations of what pupils should be achieving. This was evident, for example, in a science lesson observed, Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Achievement of pupils
where a well-shaped introduction was followed by a written task which only required pupils to complete simple information sentences. However, in another science lesson, in Year 6, pupils were given a wide range of opportunities to investigate forces and responded well to these opportunities, so that their learning was good. Other lessons observed, particularly in mathematics, also had a relatively brisk pace, although introductions are sometimes lengthy. In general, more rigorous tracking, greater accountability of staff and a stronger focus on learning are having a positive impact. Progress in reading is increasingly secure, with focused sessions to promote pupils’ knowledge of phonics (the linking of letters and sounds) and to develop their reading skills. Attainment in reading is broadly average by the end of Year 6.
p.6
Achievement of pupils
Generally good provision to meet the needs of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs ensures that they make at least satisfactory progress, with many making good progress. This is in large part a reflection of the impact of the well- trained support staff. Pupils who speak English as an additional language, and those from minority ethnic groups, also make mostly satisfactory progress. The progress and attainment of Traveller pupils generally reflects the length of time they have been in the school and the frequency of their attendance. In general, those who have been in the school for an extended time, and attend frequently, progress as rapidly as other pupils.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Parents and carers, and pupils, feel that the quality of teaching is good. However, inspectors found that, while much teaching seen was indeed good, the impact of teaching over time has often been erratic, resulting in mostly satisfactory, though improving, progress. Teachers promote pupils’ social, moral, spiritual and cultural development well. They encourage cooperative working and a readiness to share. The teaching of phonics is supported by a good range of activities accurately matched to individual needs. Although improvements in the Early Years Foundation Stage have ensured good progress in that phase, teaching elsewhere has not always provided sufficient challenge to secure consistently good progress. That said, an increased focus on pupils’ learning, and more challenging teaching, are driving more rapid progress in particular classes. For example, in a well-paced Year 6 science lesson, motivating presentation, the teacher’s good subject knowledge and
p.6
Quality of teaching
enthusiasm and engaging practical tasks, ensured that progress was good. In other lessons, the slow pace inhibited learning, leading to missed opportunities to challenge more-able pupils. Support for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is generally effective. Teaching assistants benefit from very good opportunities for training and professional development, are well-prepared and have a positive impact upon pupils’ learning.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Across the school, progress in implementing a range of assessment strategies, including self-assessment by pupils and the use of individual targets, has been good, although their impact on pupils’ learning remains inconsistent. The marking of pupils’ work in literacy mostly identifies the next steps they need to make in their learning. This approach is less evident elsewhere. Insufficient priority has been given to Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Quality of teaching
improving pupils’ handwriting, so that written work and presentation are sometimes untidy. Overall, the curriculum is beginning to support better progress in pupils’ core skills.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Parents, carers and pupils are right to acknowledge the good quality of behaviour and safety in the school. Close, trusting relationships between adults and pupils, and the wide range of extra-curricular activities, engage pupils well and help shape the very positive community spirit. Pupils are enthusiastic about their school and are motivated, engaging learners. Behaviour in lessons and around the school is good, for almost all pupils. Pupils, and most parents and carers, have very few concerns about behaviour. Almost all pupils say that they feel very safe, and virtually all parents and carers feel that their children are safe in school. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage behave well and conduct themselves safely both indoors and in the outdoor area. Pupils have a good understanding of risk, supported by the school’s input on road safety and personal safety. Pupils understand the purpose of
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
the school’s efforts to keep them safe when using the internet. There are clear and effective procedures for managing pupils’ behaviour. As a result, there are few recorded incidents and only isolated pockets of occasionally inappropriate behaviour. School records confirm the good quality of pupils’ behaviour over time. The ethos of the school is highly inclusive, providing for pupils with a wide range of needs. There have been few exclusions since the school opened. There are no reports of bullying of any type. Good procedures are in place to manage any issues that might arise. Attendance has risen and is now securely average. Pupils mostly arrive at school punctually. Good provision in the breakfast club supports the prompt arrival of a few pupils who might otherwise have punctuality issues.
p.7
Leadership and management
The headteacher and other senior leaders have worked tirelessly to ensure that the school meets the needs of the local community. The establishment of the pre-school, extensive care arrangements, well-supported opportunities for family learning and investment in learning mentor and inclusion support have helped the school to gain the trust of its community. The school strongly supports the personal development and well-being of pupils and this is rightly recognised by parents and carers. Senior leaders and the governing body ensure that safeguarding arrangements are effective. The school is active in tackling discrimination and is genuinely committed to promoting equality.
p.7
Leadership and management
The headteacher, well supported by his deputy and by middle managers, recognises that the school is well-placed to drive more rapid progress academically. A robust tracking system and rigorous data analysis facilitate close monitoring of pupils’ progress and careful targeting of input. However, the monitoring of teaching is not always incisive enough to ensure that teachers’ expectations are consistently high. Arrangements for the support of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are effective. Provision for the support of Traveller pupils, and the efforts Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Leadership and management
made to meet their needs, is a significant strength. Attendance is now consistently around the expected average.
p.8
Leadership and management
In many respects, the curriculum is good. Through its extensive extra-curricular programme and its commitment to the individual, the school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Pupils’ awareness of cultural diversity is promoted well through active links with a school in Uganda. The curriculum draws upon the International Primary Curriculum. Though still satisfactory in its enhancement of pupils’ basic skills, this provides a good framework within which to drive standards up.
p.8
Leadership and management
School self-evaluation indicates that school leaders have accurately judged what still needs to be done. Capacity for improvement is securely satisfactory. The governing body has a realistic view of the school’s strengths and actively supports its work, although the full extent of their challenge is not always reflected in meeting minutes. Governors recognise that there is still work to be done to improve pupil outcomes.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of Maple Grove Primary School, Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7BG
Thank you for making us welcome when we visited your school. We enjoyed meeting you, spending time in lessons and hearing your views. Thank you to those who completed our questionnaire. We found that yours is a satisfactory school and it is improving steadily. Our main findings are listed below.
p.11
Inspection of Maple Grove Primary School, Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7BG
Standards are broadly average by the end of Year 6 but your progress is inconsistent across the school. Provision in Reception has improved after a dip last year and progress is now good, so that children have average skills in reading, writing and mathematics when they enter Year 1. Teaching has improved and is often good. While you learn well in many lessons, your handwriting and written work is often untidy. Marking in subjects other than literacy does not always give you enough guidance. You have very positive views about school, have good attitudes to learning and behave well. Attendance has improved and is now average. Senior leaders are really helping the school to move forward. They have made tremendous strides in ensuring that younger children and families are really well supported. They are working hard to ensure that your academic progress is more rapid. The curriculum offers many interesting activities.
p.11
Inspection of Maple Grove Primary School, Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7BG
To help you to do better, we have asked the school to:
p.11
Inspection of Maple Grove Primary School, Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7BG
ensure that the monitoring of teaching is more thorough and that teachers have higher expectations of your handwriting and presentation and mark your work more rigorously ensure that you get more opportunities to explore science and build your scientific skills and knowledge.
p.11
Inspection of Maple Grove Primary School, Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7BG
All of you can help by continuing to work hard and doing your best. We hope that you will have every success in the future.
p.11
Inspection of Maple Grove Primary School, Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7BG
George Logan Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion