Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Keys Nhcc Ltd in Shropshire

Inspected 21 Feb 2012 · published 29 Mar 2012 · URN SC020602

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Morgan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    David Morgan

  • URN verified

    SC020602

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressimprovedeffectivepositivestrongindependentclearlyimproving
Criticisminadequatefailednot metcompromiseddeclinednot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings672w+8
  • What needs to improve100w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
768
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC020602 Inspection date 21/02/2012 Inspector David Morgan Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 17/11/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This children’s home provides care and accommodation for up to five young people of either gender aged between eight and 17 years who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The home is owned by a private company.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.

p.3

Progress

The judgement at the last full inspection was good. The quality of service provided to young people since then has been maintained and improved in several areas. In particular, there is closer attention to the use of measures of control. This means that young people benefit from more effective steps to help them learn appropriate behaviour. Also, young people benefit from decisions and risk assessments that are more age appropriate, which prepare them better for independence. Independence is also facilitated by the forthcoming installation of a computer with internet access in the communal areas. Young people remain largely positive about their home and are helped to pursue independent lifestyles. They continue to have good relationships with the staff team.

p.3

Progress

The last inspection made one requirement and seven recommendations. These have all been addressed, along with additional matters that were discussed during the inspection. Decisions and progress have been carefully recorded by the manager to clearly demonstrate the improvements that have occurred. For example, the understanding of young people and staff has been improved by using fire drills as training exercises that simulate a variety of emergency situations. Practical improvements have also been made to the security of external doors so that exiting the property in an emergency is unhindered. Overall effectiveness is compromised slightly, however, by a small proportion of staff not undertaking evacuation training for extended periods. Training provision in other regards is improving steadily with staff obtaining relevant qualifications and improvements being made by the organisation to training provision generally. Staff are positive about the service they

p.3

Progress

offer to each young person and feel there is a strong team spirit.

p.4

Progress

Young people benefit from closer management of rewards and measures of control. This includes, for example, more direct input to young people's meetings by the manager and deputy manager so that young people are engaged more fully in deciding on the most effective methods. Individual behaviour management plans have also been adapted to ensure they actually move young people forward. Young people also benefit from less use of door alarms, which makes the communal areas in particular more homely. The negative impact on young people of record keeping is now reduced by more accessible information encouraging young people to see their files.

p.4

Progress

Significant incidents are recorded well and notified promptly to relevant agencies so that attention is paid quickly to young people's changing needs. However, the monitoring of some records is inaccurate and does not always show that suitable action has taken place. This slightly reduces the ability of staff to adapt their practices to minimise negative incidents. Overall, however, good progress is being made in implementing improvements arising from the last inspection and the home's development plan.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 apply the emergency escape plan so that all staff and children are familiar with it and have practised this so they know what to do in an emergency, with regard to all members of staff undertaking fire evacuations at regular intervals (NMS 10.9)  ensure there is a system in place to monitor the quality and adequacy of record keeping and take action when needed, with regard to the monitoring of incidents being accurate and follow-up action being clear. (NMS 22.1)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion