Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Aspris Children’s Services Limited in Southampton

Inspected 21 Feb 2012 · published 29 Mar 2012 · URN SC407790

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Maureen Hamer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Maureen Hamer

  • URN verified

    SC407790

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivegood progressindependentvery wellhigh qualitycaringsuccessfullyimproved
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinedconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings699w+27
  • What needs to improve106w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
797
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC407790 Inspection date 21/02/2012 Inspector Maureen Hamer Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 21/06/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This is an independent children's home that is part of a national organisation and provides accommodation for an associated residential special school.

p.3

Brief description of the service

The home provides care and accommodation for up to five young people aged nine to 17 years who have emotional, behavioural and educational difficulties. The home aims to offer high quality care to young people within a homely and caring environment. The home promotes individualised care as well as the importance of boundaries and routines for young people. The committed staff team work with young people, parents and relevant partners to provide a stable placement that promotes positive outcomes.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.

p.3

Progress

This home was judged as good at its last inspection in June 2011. The home demonstrates continued improvement in quality of care provided to young people and to supporting improvement in outcomes for young people.

p.3

Progress

Staff work successfully with young people so that they are aware of the reasons why they are living in the home. Young people are engaged in setting their own goals. This includes identifying ways of positive motivation so that they do well in aspects such as in the promotion of positive behaviour. Young people's contributions and successes are recognised and celebrated by staff, and this approach promotes young people's self confidence. Requirements identified at the last inspection have been met, leading to improved staff knowledge and partnership working in relation to promoting young people's welfare. Staff now receive regular supervision and they state that they feel very well supported by the manager and through working as a cohesive team. The Statement of Purpose and children's guide have been updated to outline the services available in the home. However, the guide does not include information about how to access

p.3

Progress

the children's right's officer or the independent reviewing officer on order to enable the young people to gain independent support.

p.4

Progress

Staff state that their focus is on supporting young people to do well. As a team, the staff reflect on their practice to learn and to improve outcomes for young people. Staff gain information from school about young people's educational targets. They work with young people to promote their learning in areas such as improving numeracy and literacy, for example, listening to young people reading at bedtime. Attendance at school is very good.

p.4

Progress

Young people's views about the home are gained through the regular key worker sessions and house meetings. Young people are engaged and involved in the running of the home. Young people help with the shopping, cooking and some decorating in the home; this contributes to their sense of ownership and pride in where they live.

p.4

Progress

Staff keep in regular contact with parents to gain parents’ views and to ensure that there is good communication about young people's progress. Staff also facilitate regular contact between young people and their parents to ensure that good relationships are maintained.

p.4

Progress

The manager ensures that the quality of the service is regularly monitored and evaluated. The views of the young people, their parents and the placing authorities are actively sought and acted upon. The home demonstrates a capacity to improve further.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that the Registered Manager completes a recognised social work or a professional qualification relevant to working with children to at least level 4, and a qualification in management to at least level 4. (NMS 14.2 (a) (b))  ensure that the children's guide sets out how children can find out their rights, how a child can contact their independent reviewing officer and the Children's Rights Director if they wish to raise a concern with inspectors, and how to secure access to an independent advocate. (NMS 13.5)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion