Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited in Kent

Inspected 21 Feb 2012 · published 28 Mar 2012 · URN SC023746

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Hunnam

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Janet Hunnam

  • URN verified

    SC023746

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresseffectivepositivetrusting relationshipshigh qualityrobustfeel safeimproved
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinedabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
689
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC023746 Inspection date 21/02/2012 Inspector Janet Hunnam Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 10/08/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This is a children's home for three young people. It is operated by a private organisation. The home provides a service to children with a wide range of behavioural or educational needs, clearly explained in its Statement of Purpose.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.

p.3

Progress

At the previous inspection, which was carried out in August 2011, the home’s overall effectiveness was judged to be good, and one requirement and one recommendation were made. These have both been appropriately addressed. The home’s physical intervention records now include details of a young person’s behaviour leading to the restraint and what actions the staff have taken to avoid the need for the measure. The records also show discussion with the young person after the event. The home has clear records recording a young person’s educational progress and school attendance record.

p.3

Progress

The home is maintaining and improving on the good standards of care. Each young person has a comprehensive health plan and the home is effective in meeting the individual health needs of young people with the support of the organisation’s qualified nurse and healthcare advisor. The system for the administration of medication is robust. Additional resources are in place to provide further support for young people’s health needs when necessary.

p.3

Progress

Young people have a positive experience living at the home. They feel safe and benefit from constructive interactions with staff. These enable them to develop beneficial relationships which impact on improvements in their behaviour. They are encouraged to make choices and their views are actively sought. Staff fully support young people who are going through difficult times, helping them to address their difficulties and to move forward. The stable, committed staff team, led by an effective manager, provide consistency of care and good behaviour management, enabling young people to make gradual but significant progress.

p.3

Progress

Liaison between the home and school has improved significantly. Staff provide detailed information for the school each morning and the school inform the home daily of the young person’s time at school. This ensures that young people are fully and sensitively supported to engage in their education. Alternative education provision is accessed when young people refuse to attend school.

p.4

Progress

The home is effective in managing young people’s challenging behaviour. Physical intervention is rare and staff are skilled in de-escalating situations. This helps young people develop trusting relationships and positive engagement with staff resulting in improvements in their behaviour. Young people with a history of unauthorised absence from the home are showing gradual improvements in this area as a result of the impact of staff engagement with them. Staff are proactive in managing any unauthorised absence, demonstrating to young people that they are valued and their safety is important.

p.4

Progress

Training for staff is continuously monitored, well managed and is provided to meet the individual needs of young people as required. Supervision of staff has a high priority and plans are in place to improve the quality of this supervision. The Registered Manager has thorough and regular monitoring systems in place, ensuring that a high quality of care is maintained.

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion