Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Whitley Park Primary and Nursery School

Inspected 7 Mar 2012 · published 28 Mar 2012 · URN 136512

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Mar 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Heidi Boreham, Phillip Hibbs, Una Stevens, Wendy Forbes

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Satisfactory

  • Name on report verified

    Whitley Park Primary and Nursery School

  • URN verified

    136512

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Behaviour and safetySatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Quality of teachingSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 23% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progresseffectiveimprovinggood progressstrengthseffectivelyskilful
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysnot consistentlypoornot engagingconcernsinconsistentbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1955w+19
  • Leadership529w+36
  • What needs to improve155w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,629
about usual (typical 3005)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 44
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 3
Hedged sentences
21%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group 3−11 Inspection date(s) 6−7 March 2012 Inspection number 385885 Whitley Park Primary and Nursery School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 136512 Local authority Reading Inspection number 385885 Inspection dates 6−7 March 2012 Lead inspector Wendy Forbes

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary and Nursery School category Community Age range of pupils 3−11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 619 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Ruth Allen Headteacher Ann Tanner Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected School address Brixham Road Reading Berkshire RG27RB Telephone number 0118 937 5566 Fax number 0118 937 5198 Email address admin@whitleypark.reading.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. The inspection team observed teaching and learning in 28 part-lessons, amounting to approximately 14 hours in total. Twenty four teachers were observed. For approximately one-third of the lessons, inspectors were accompanied by the headteacher or deputy headteachers. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders, members of the governing body, staff and pupils. The inspectors observed the school’s work, listened to pupils reading and looked at self-evaluation documentation, monitoring and assessment information, lesson planning and policies. Inspectors took account of the responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. They analysed questionnaires from 88 parents and carers and 97 pupils. The school’s safeguarding procedures were also evaluated.

p.3

Information about the school

Whitley Park Primary and Nursery School is a new school which was recently formed from an amalgamation of an infant and a junior school following a hard federation for one year. It opened in April 2011. This is its first inspection. It is a larger than average primary school. The majority of pupils are from White British backgrounds. The proportion of pupils who are from minority ethnic heritages is below average. There are a few pupils who speak English as an additional language . The proportion of pupils who are disabled or who have special educational needs is above average. The school meets current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. There is a daily Year 6 mathematics booster breakfast club which is managed by the governing body. There is also an on-site afterschool child care facility. This is managed by an external provider and is inspected separately. The new on-site nursery building opened in September 2011.

p.3

Information about the school

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

 Whitley Park is a satisfactory school. The quality of education that the school provides is satisfactory rather than good because in some lessons, teachers do not provide activities that fully extend, challenge or engage pupils particularly in Key Stage 2. Provision for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage is very effective; children make good progress.  Leadership and management are satisfactory. The senior leadership team and members of the governing body have an accurate picture of the school’s effectiveness. They are ambitious for the school, moving swiftly to arrest the significant underachievement identified in the first term of amalgamation when 2011 national assessment results indicated that Year 6 pupils made inadequate progress.  Well-focused actions secured speedy improvements in teaching particularly in reading and writing, helping to ensure that pupils’ achievement overall is now

p.4

Key findings

satisfactory. However, there has been too little focus on improving the teaching of mathematics. As a result pupils’ progress in mathematics is slower than in reading and writing.  Most teaching is satisfactory and some is good, particularly in Year 6. Senior leaders regularly monitor the quality of teaching as part of teachers’ performance management. Areas for improvement are identified and acted upon. As a result, teaching is improving. However, there is not yet enough consistently good or outstanding teaching, particularly at Key Stage 2, to ensure that more pupils make accelerated rather than satisfactory progress.  Behaviour and attendance are improving. As a result of the strategies introduced to manage behaviour, previous incidents of poor behaviour have decreased. Most parents and carers are content with the school. However, some concerns were expressed about the school’s effectiveness in dealing

p.4

Key findings

with behaviour-related issues. Pupils are aware of what is expected of them. Successful initiatives raise pupils’ awareness of tolerance and individual rights.

p.4

Key findings

Schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory may receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Accelerate pupils’ progress in mathematics and improve the achievement of pupils by January 2013 by:  providing more activities and tasks in lessons that challenge pupils and extend their numeracy competencies  strengthening the leadership of mathematics across the whole school  providing targeted staff development in order to strengthen the teaching of mathematics.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of good or better teaching in order to accelerate pupils’ progress, particularly at Key Stage 2, by consistently:  planning well-thought-through tasks matched to the needs of all pupils to promote effective learning  maintaining a good pace of learning so that all pupils are actively engaged and involved in their learning at all times.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the involvement of parents and carers in their children’s learning by ensuring that staff actively, and positively, engage parents and carers to help improve pupils’ behaviour further and help the school to go on reducing the number of exclusions.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Most parents and carers feel their children make good progress. However, inspection evidence indicated that pupils’ achievement, although broadly satisfactory, is inconsistent, particularly at Key Stage 2.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Children start school with skills well-below levels typical for their age, particularly in speech and language. They settle happily into school making good progress throughout the Early Years Foundation Stage . By the time they transfer to Year 1, they have narrowed the gap considerably and attainment is just below national expectations. Strengths in teaching and well-targeted support help Key Stage 1 pupils to consolidate literacy and numeracy skills effectively. Close tracking and careful planning contribute to rising rates of progress in Years 1 and 2. However, progress at Key Stage 2 is slower and more variable. This is because lessons do not typically always ensure pupils are sufficiently well challenged in their learning. The pace of teaching is not always sufficiently brisk enough and work not always well matched to pupils’ differing needs. This means that some pupils do not make as much progress as they could. Where learning is best, pupils are engaged by

p.5

Achievement of pupils

stimulating activities, as seen in a Year 5 literacy lesson where pupils’ literacy Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms competencies were developed well through skilful modelling of how to construct a story. Pupils offered high quality responses, which were well developed, building on exciting and well-written phrases.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

In the first term of amalgamation, national test results in 2011 were significantly below the national average and suggested girls were doing better than boys. Inspection evidence confirmed this gap is closing, particularly for current Year 6 pupils. This is as a result of developments in the English curriculum, the well-tailored programme of teaching letters and sounds which helps pupils to make secure progress in developing early reading skills, the focus given to understanding pupils’ learning styles, particularly those of boys, and strengths in Year 6 teaching which have accelerated the progress of the oldest pupils. All this means that overall, pupils’ achievement in English and mathematics is broadly average. Standards in reading are broadly in line with national averages at the end of both Year 2 and Year 6.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Pupils known to be eligible for free school meals achieve standards similar to their peers . Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make at least satisfactory and some better progress in learning. They benefit from lessons where specific strategies to support them are identified. Pupils who speak English as an additional language make good progress in their learning, achieving well as the result of exceptional support and well-focused learning activities.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The quality of teaching is satisfactory and improving; some is good. A focus on the teaching of writing is securing pupils’ better progress. Teachers are generally well prepared and most plan interesting activities. Teaching is good in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Children are actively engaged in their learning because activities match pupils’ needs well. There is a good balance of teacher-led activities and those initiated by the children themselves. Children enjoy opportunities to develop and extend their language as seen in a Reception class as intrepid explorers discussed what vital equipment they should take on their bear hunt.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The vast majority of parents and carers who returned questionnaires felt their children were taught well. Although there are some good features, this is not completely borne out by inspection findings. Most pupils who completed questionnaires were positive about the quality of teaching. However, a few told inspectors that they did not always find learning challenging. There are examples across the school of skilful teaching where the pace of learning is maintained and well-thought-out activities promote pupils’ interests and skills effectively. However, in some lessons too long is spent sitting and listening. This means that pupils are not always fully engaged in their learning and this slows their progress. Progress in reading and writing is increasingly secure, with well-focused sessions to promote pupils’ knowledge of linking letters and sounds and to develop their reading and writing skills. Teaching and the curriculum support pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and

p.6

Quality of teaching

cultural development effectively. For example, in a Year 6 lesson, pupils were actively involved in planning a discussion about whether animals should be kept in zoos. Skilful questioning and effective use of ‘talk partners’ and ‘magpie techniques’ Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms ensured pupils responded thoughtfully, presenting clear, well-thought-out arguments for and against.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Most teaching enables pupils to make satisfactory progress and some that is better, but there are missed opportunities to increase the challenge for pupils. In some lessons, particularly in mathematics and at Key Stage 2, tasks do not have the potential to allow pupils to move on quickly. Pupils are not always provided with opportunities to use, apply and develop their numeracy competencies in order to consolidate their learning. Consequently their understanding of such concepts as place value and how to problem-solve are not always clear. Teachers do not consistently use assessment effectively in lessons to make adaptations to tasks to provide more challenge. This means that pupils are sometimes involved in work that is neither stretching nor sufficiently engaging to promote good progress.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Behaviour is satisfactory, and often good in lessons and in the mathematics booster breakfast club. Pupils are usually polite and helpful, although some lose interest and are not fully involved with their learning when lessons are not sufficiently engaging. Views from parents and carers are mixed. Some say that their children receive appropriate support. Others are unhappy with the way in which incidents are handled by the school. The large majority feel that the school looks after their children well.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Most pupils feel that behaviour is at least satisfactory but a few do not think it is good enough. In discussion with inspectors, most pupils said staff dealt promptly with any incidents of bullying or racism, which are not tolerated. They say they have received support to overcome instances of bullying when occasional incidents occurred. The school is developing a higher awareness of types of bullying with pupils. At the start of the amalgamation, there were some pupils who exhibited challenging behaviour, particularly at Key Stage 2. As a result the school excluded a higher than average number of pupils. This strategy has had a positive impact, successfully bringing down the incidents of misbehaviour across the school. Pupils are now very aware of the expectations and sanctions if they transgress. ‘Class charters’ help make clear the expectations of behaviour, cooperation and respect. Most pupils say they feel safe within the school, confident that the staff do all they

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

can to ensure their safety. However, a very few pupils felt that their views are not always listened to. The inspectors judge that pupils usually work and play sensibly in an environment which is generally safe for them. The school has implemented successful strategies to improve attendance which has recently moved from below average to average.

p.7

Leadership and management

Leaders and managers have already had an impact on school improvement. The headteacher's purposeful approach encourages others to have the highest aspirations for themselves and the pupils. There is a strong sense of purpose. Pupils’ Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms attendance and behaviour are improving. Strengths in literacy leadership have helped to secure recent improvements in English, particularly in the teaching of writing, accelerating the progress of some pupils, particularly those in Year 6. Daily setting for the teaching of letters and sounds, reading and writing and a planned programme of professional development to strengthen the teaching of writing have improved pupils’ achievement in English successfully halting previous underachievement. These swift improvements since amalgamation demonstrate the

p.7

Leadership and management

school’s satisfactory capacity to improve further.

p.8

Leadership and management

Senior leaders regularly monitor teaching, and information from assessment is scrutinised to check pupils’ progress. Leaders and managers at all levels, including the governing body, ensure that equality is promoted, and discrimination tackled well. Senior leaders and governors have a good understanding of the school’s performance and are working together to ensure self-evaluation is finely tuned. The recent involvement of ‘phase’ leaders in school improvement is adding value to the leadership of the school. However the lack of a dedicated leader to champion improvements in mathematics has meant that the quality of mathematics teaching and pupils’ achievement has been slow to improve. The curriculum is satisfactorily organised to meet pupils’ needs and prepare them for the next stage of their education. It supports pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development through plenty of practical activities and opportunities for reflection. The Early Years

p.8

Leadership and management

Foundation Stage curriculum is focused well on children’s personal learning needs.

p.8

Leadership and management

Senior leaders are alert to any bullying and behaviour issues. Pupils are aware that such behaviour is not tolerated. Incidents have reduced as a result of developing pupils’ greater awareness of their personal responsibility and improving behaviour management. Initiatives, for example ‘learning buddies’ and developments in personal, social and health education, have helped develop pupils’ understanding of respecting rights and taking responsibility for their actions. Safeguarding is a priority for the school; procedures are robust and effective. These meet government guidelines and include effective checks on adults and an organised approach to managing the safety of pupils.

p.8

Leadership and management

Most parents and carers felt that communication with the school was good. However, a very small minority felt it could be more informative and sometimes timelier. The school is working to ensure information received is prompt and helpful.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Whitley Park Primary School, Reading RG2 7RB

Thank you for making us feel so welcome when we visited your school recently. We really enjoyed talking to you in lessons, meeting with you, and when we listened to some of you reading.

p.11

Inspection of Whitley Park Primary School, Reading RG2 7RB

The school is giving you a satisfactory education. It has only just started as a primary school and we could see that there are several ways in which the school is getting better. More of you are coming to school regularly. This is important because it means that you are not missing lessons. This will help you learn better. Behaviour has improved too. As we saw, this means most of your lessons are not interrupted anymore and you can get on with your work. Reading and writing are improving and many of you told us how much you enjoyed writing stories and reading.

p.11

Inspection of Whitley Park Primary School, Reading RG2 7RB

We judged that most of you are making satisfactory progress and we have asked the headteacher to work with the teachers to ensure that you learn even better and make good progress. Your headteacher and all your other teachers know how to make sure that your school continues to get even better. To help them to do this, we have asked everyone to concentrate on three things.

p.11

Inspection of Whitley Park Primary School, Reading RG2 7RB

 Make sure that what you have to do in mathematics challenges you to do your best with more opportunities to practise your number work and problem-solving skills. Appoint a member of staff to lead improvements in mathematics to help other teachers get even better at teaching mathematics.  Ensure more of you benefit from consistently good or better teaching so that more of you make faster progress by ensuring that work is not too easy or too hard and you are actively learning in all lessons.  Make sure that staff work together with pupils, parents and carers so behaviour continues to improve with fewer exclusions.

p.11

Inspection of Whitley Park Primary School, Reading RG2 7RB

You can help your school improve by continuing to go to school as regularly as you can and get on well with and respect each other.

p.11

Inspection of Whitley Park Primary School, Reading RG2 7RB

Keep up the hard work and we are sure that if you do this, you will continue to enjoy learning for a long time to come.

p.11

Inspection of Whitley Park Primary School, Reading RG2 7RB

Wendy Forbes Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion