Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Merton Junior School

Inspected 7 Mar 2012 · published 28 Mar 2012 · URN 116001

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Mar 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Michael Pye

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Merton Junior School

  • URN verified

    116001

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingpositiveexceptionallyhigh qualityeffectivehighly effectivestrengthenjoy
Criticisminadequateinconsistenciesweaknessesnot outstandinginsufficientlylimitedgapslower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1714w+56
  • Leadership577w+23
  • What needs to improve200w−50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,479
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group 7–11 Inspection date(s) 6–7 March 2012 Inspection number 379185 Merton Junior School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 116001 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 379185 Inspection dates 6–7 March 2012 Lead inspector Michael Pye

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Junior School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 128 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair George Hood Headteacher Helen Palmer Date of previous school inspection 22–23 October 2008 School address Romsey Close Popley Way Basingstoke RG24 9HB Telephone number 01256 326573 Fax number 01256 462491 Email address adminoffice@merton-jun.hants.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspector observed eight lessons including those involving linking sounds and letters. Of these, three were joint observations with the headteacher. A total of six teachers were seen. The inspector looked at pupils’ work and also heard pupils read. He spoke to parents and carers and held meetings with members of the governing body, pupils and staff. The inspector took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work and looked at data relating to pupils’ attainment and progress. The school’s development plan, lesson and curriculum plans, governing body documentation and school policies and procedures, particularly those relating to the health and safety and safeguarding of pupils, were scrutinised. He also looked at 31 questionnaires completed by parents and carers as

p.3

Introduction

well as those returned by staff and pupils.

p.3

Information about the school

Pupils in this smaller-than-average-sized junior school come from a predominantly White British background. The largest minority ethnic group consists of pupils from Any Other White background. The proportion of pupils who are disabled or have special educational needs is currently well above average. The main groups consist of pupils with moderate learning difficulties or behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. Currently, the proportion of pupils with a statement of special educational needs is well above average. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is above average . The school exceeds current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The school has been nationally recognised through gaining the enhanced Healthy Schools award . Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate

p.3

Information about the school

Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

 This is a good school. Pupils achieve well. It is not an outstanding school because teaching and pupils’ achievement are good rather than outstanding. Although overall leadership and management are good, some aspects of middle management are in need of improvement.  Pupils make good progress and attain average standards in writing, reading and mathematics. A whole school focus has brought gains in the quality of writing. Pupils have opportunities for writing at length but the use of an extended writing session for assessment and detailed feedback to pupils is not maximised.  The quality of teaching is good and improving. A strength is the high quality of relationships which ensures that pupils, including the high number of pupils who find concentrating in school more difficult, engage in lessons. There exist some inconsistencies in teachers’ use of data to plan lessons and in how pupils’ understanding is checked during lessons.

p.4

Key findings

 Pupils’ behaviour is good. Pastoral support for pupils is outstanding and undoubtedly contributes to pupils feeling safe and respected.  Leadership and management are good. The headteacher has overseen a good, effective drive for improvement. Leadership and management responsibilities have been well distributed. All are involved in monitoring and evaluation. Inconsistencies exist between subject leaders in the degree to which they use criteria against which progress can be measured in their development plans. Also, their action plans do not clearly show how their area of responsibility supports the whole school development plan. Not all curriculum plans contain sufficiently detailed guidance about how skills and knowledge are progressed in that subject, or where the basic skills, especially mathematics, are supported. Governors act as critical friends to the school because through regular visits they monitor the work of the school well. They receive reports from all subject

p.4

Key findings

leaders. However, their knowledge of levels of work across the school in subjects other than literacy and numeracy is limited by the fact that attainment and progress are not reported on in these reports. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attainment in reading, writing and mathematics building on pupils’ already good achievement, ensuring that all teachers: - use regular consolidation periods during lessons to identify any gaps in learning and use that information to change the direction of the lesson to support pupils’ learning - use assessment data to plan work that challenges pupils of different abilities.  Maximise the impact of leaders and managers, making the most of current good practice, by: - ensuring that all curriculum plans show in detail where and when a particular subject’s skills and knowledge are progressed across the school, and how the subject supports the basic skills, especially in mathematics - making sure subject leaders use criteria in their development plans against which success can be measured, and how the subject supports the priorities of the whole school improvement plan - ensuring that when reporting to governors all subject leaders provide

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

information about pupils’ progress and their levels of work.  Improve pupils’ achievement through providing regular opportunities for all pupils to complete extended pieces of writing, leading to in-depth assessment of strengths and weaknesses which staff can use to provide detailed feedback to pupils about how to improve their work.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Attainment on entry varies from year to year, from broadly to well below average depending on the cohort. Pupils achieve well because they have positive attitudes to school. Their determination was well illustrated in one lower set mathematics lesson where pupils were working to solve problems using decimal points. After clear explanations by the teacher, one pupil said excitedly, ‘I think we’ve got it!’

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Younger pupils’ work shows middle attainers confidently using multiplication skills to solve basic word problems. By the end of Year 6 pupils’ work reflects good progress and pupils use, for example, different methodologies to convert percentages to fractions and decimals. Pupils respond particularly well when mathematics is applied to real situations. For example, older pupils used a summer fayre scenario to calculate, using their knowledge of money, the exact total takings for three different stalls. Not all younger pupils find writing easy and some experience difficulty in spelling. The majority write clearly and are able to write simple sentences. Older pupils increasingly use adjectives, similes and metaphors to write complex sentences. One pupil wrote of a wizard type character as ‘wearing a blue jacket with stars on it and a black mask as dark as the darkest sky’. Reading levels are average by the end

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Achievement of pupils

of Year 6. Year 4 readers choose books independently, like reading to adults and talk about their favourite authors. They use their linking sounds to letters knowledge (phonics) to identify accurately individual sounds in words. The school has recently introduced regular phonics sessions so not all pupils naturally use this approach; one girl initially said she could not spell ‘potato’, but after being encouraged to sound out the word she successfully completed the sentence.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Overall, attainment when pupils leave the school is average, which represents good achievement. In 2011 the various minority pupil groups, including those pupils with English as an additional language, attained above average levels. Detailed pupil tracking results in a high proportion of those pupils known to be eligible for free school meals achieving well, as do pupils with disabilities or special educational needs.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Parents praise the positive impact of recent changes, writing comments such as ‘standards have greatly improved’ and ‘very impressed with the way the school is going’. Pupils support these positive comments.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching is typically good. In an outstanding mathematics lesson the use of individual whiteboards allowed pupils to show their work on fractions. This was exceptionally well used by the teacher to illustrate and explain misconceptions. A Year 3 English lesson saw pupils very appropriately challenged. The teacher identified the different learning expected of three ability groups, involving references to the use of metaphors and similes by some pupils, whilst lower attainers were expected to show their knowledge of the three-part story – beginning, middle and end. In all lessons the high quality of relationships ensures that pupils are highly motivated and engaged in their learning. Lessons have good pace and interactive whiteboards are well used. Pupils’ social development is well enhanced by the consistent use of talk partners and self-evaluation opportunities. Some inconsistencies exist between teachers regarding their use of assessment data to set

p.6

Quality of teaching

challenging work for pupils of different abilities and in their use of on-going assessment. All parents and carers and the great majority of pupils who completed the Ofsted questionnaire agree that teaching is good. Secure subject knowledge leads to some effective questioning by teachers which very appropriately encourages pupils to reflect on their learning. Pupils enjoy the creative curriculum opportunities for learning and spoke excitedly about the possible break in to the school and the painting of a ‘Banksie’ style graffiti image as part of the Catwalk Creations topic. There are good opportunities for the spiritual, moral and cultural development of pupils during assemblies and circle time. Pupils obviously enjoy singing.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The majority of pupils say that they feel safe. Parents and carers who expressed an opinion agree and believe that behaviour is good. Attendance is above average and improving. The school analysis of behaviour illustrates the very positive impact of its Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

work; lunchtime incidents of poorer behaviour fell by 90% in one year. Behaviour over time is good. Occasional off-task behaviour is seen in lessons, usually when adults move to another group. Pupils are adamant that any incidents are acted upon effectively and promptly by the school, including the few incidents of bullying. They show their understanding of bullying when commenting that there are ‘arguments rather than bullying’. With regard to cyber-bullying and internet safety an example recounted by one pupil was, ‘If you are on a chat site you don’t know if the other person is an adult.’ A girl said, ‘Whilst one person sees it as funny, the other may see it as homophobic.’ Personal and social development is actively encouraged when pupils act as school councillors and buddies.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

One parent wrote and echoed the view of many about the quality of pastoral care, ‘My child is going through a very tough time, not only have the staff been very sensitive to her and my own needs, they have also been able to work with my child so that schooling has not been affected at all.’ This reflects the genuine nurturing approach to the pupils’ pastoral care and helps ensure pupils are able to concentrate on their learning.

p.7

Leadership and management

Improvement since the last inspection has been good, with a trend of improving attainment as a consequence of effective monitoring and better quality teaching. More accountability exists, a consequence of the wider distribution of leadership responsibilities and regular, highly focused pupil progress meetings. The school acknowledges the need for a regular assessment opportunity of extended writing where detailed feedback can be given to pupils. The headteacher’s ambition, based on constant improvement, is evident and shared by all adults. This shared vision, along with the improvements to achievement and teaching, shows a good capacity to sustain improvement.

p.7

Leadership and management

An example of improvement is the successful introduction of ‘directed play’ at the start of the school day. This resulted from a consideration by the school of how to better settle pupils into the school day, particularly those facing specific social and emotional difficulties. Monitoring is embedded, accurate and results in highly relevant development priorities being identified which are systematically monitored by the governors. Some leaders, relatively new to management, still display inconsistencies in aspects of action planning. The curriculum provides a broad and balanced experience for pupils. In subjects other than English and mathematics, curriculum plans insufficiently identify the range of skills and knowledge to be progressed across the school or where, particularly, numeracy can be supported. Consequently, levels of attainment and progress are generalised and subject leaders do not report such

p.7

Leadership and management

The curriculum promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well with opportunities presented for pupils to reinforce their good understanding of healthy living issues and the need to challenge stereotyping. Pupils’ high respect for, and tolerance of, others are the result of the established ethos within the school Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

based on the good promotion of equality.

p.8

Leadership and management

Governors gain a good knowledge of the school through their visits and reports. It enables them to raise questions over aspects such as reading schemes. During such visits they miss opportunities to talk more formally to pupils to identify their views about school life. Checks on adults are rigorously carried out, annual child protection training takes place and staff who join the school later have an interview to ensure their understanding. Safeguarding is good.

p.8

Leadership and management

Communication and partnership with parents are a strength. The use of a social networking site complements the more traditional methods of communication. It has had the positive impact of helping to establish contact with some ‘hard to reach’ parents. The great majority of those responding to the questionnaire agreed that they are kept well informed. Pupils also benefit from some well-established partnerships with the local schools. This has resulted in pupils benefiting in sport, from science and mathematics workshops for pupils with gifts and talents and coaching about money skills by a national bank.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Merton Junior School, Basingstoke RG24 9HB

You may remember my recent visit. You were eager to tell me about your school and I listened carefully to what you told me. I believe yours is a good school.

p.11

Inspection of Merton Junior School, Basingstoke RG24 9HB

You are taught well and make good progress. You also told me that lessons are ‘fun’, that you really enjoy the projects that you are set, and that you enjoy school. Your above average attendance shows this!

p.11

Inspection of Merton Junior School, Basingstoke RG24 9HB

Whilst most of you are challenged by the work set, I have asked that all of your teachers plan work that ensures you all make good progress in lessons. You could help by telling them when you are finding the work too hard or too easy. I have also asked that their questioning ensures that you have to think hard when answering. I have asked that the school organises a writing opportunity where you can get back detailed information from teachers about how to improve.

p.11

Inspection of Merton Junior School, Basingstoke RG24 9HB

I was very pleased to see that you behave well. You told me you feel safe and that if there are any incidents then you know the school will act to help you. The way the school cares for you is excellent and this helps you concentrate on your work.

p.11

Inspection of Merton Junior School, Basingstoke RG24 9HB

Your headteacher leads the school well and, like the other adults, wants things to improve even more. The school makes good plans for the future but I have asked that all leaders make sure they can accurately see the improvements made by any changes they introduce. I have also asked that all subjects show how they support your mathematics and English skills. Also, that your knowledge and skills in, for example, history, progress well.

p.11

Inspection of Merton Junior School, Basingstoke RG24 9HB

Thank you again and I wish you all the best for the future.

p.11

Inspection of Merton Junior School, Basingstoke RG24 9HB

Michael Pye Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion