Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Praxis Care in Leicestershire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
22 Feb 2012
- Inspectors verified
Sharon Treadwell
- URN verified
SC032069
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff receive excellent training input from health professionals to equip them to manage children and young people's complex health care needs. p.5
- At the last full inspection in October 2011, the overall quality rating for the service was outstanding. p.3
- The home continues to work co-operatively with children and young people's families, and with associated health and learning disability professionals, to provide children and young people with a holistic service, which promotes the achievement of very positive outcomes in all areas, supports them to develop to their optimum potential, and encourages a real enjoyment of life experiences. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making inadequate progress. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,200
- about usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC032069 Inspection date 22/02/2012 Inspector Sharon Treadwell Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 12/10/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This children's home is operated by an independent provider. The provider organisation is a registered charity and is a major provider of services for adults and children with learning disabilities and mental health issues.
p.3
Brief description of the service
This home provides respite care for more than 40 children and young people with learning and physical difficulties, and often complex health care needs, accommodating a maximum of four at any one time. The children and young people are aged between six and 19 years.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making inadequate progress.
p.3
Progress
At the last full inspection in October 2011, the overall quality rating for the service was outstanding. However the home has been without a Registered Manager since June 2008. The current manager has been in post since November 2008, initially in an acting capacity. He was confirmed in post in June 2010, when he had completed leadership and management training. The manager submitted an application for registration with Ofsted, in response to a requirement made during inspection, in August 2011. At the time of the key inspection, in October 2011, Ofsted was in receipt of this application and no shortfall was highlighted. However, the application was incomplete and was returned to the applicant. The completion of the registration process has not subsequently been actively pursued by the manager. This leaves the home in contravention of the regulatory requirement to have a Registered Manager, and this has been the position for almost four years. This is the reason for the
p.3
Progress
Two recommendations were made at the full inspection. One has been fully implemented and work is ongoing on implementing the other. The provider organisation has amended the application form, utilised for staff recruitment. The form now requires applicants to provide the day, month and year when detailing the dates of their previous employment, which highlights any potential gaps in employment so these can be properly followed up at interview. This will better ensure that all staff employed are safe to work with young people.
p.4
Progress
At the time of the key inspection the recording pro-forma, utilised for independent visits to the home under Regulation 33, focused too highly on gathering statistical data. There was insufficient reflection, in the reports, of the views of staff, children, young people and their families being utilised to enable the independent visitor to form an opinion of the standard of care provided in the home. Reports submitted since the key inspection, although using the same pro-forma, have incorporated better reflection of service user views and observation of their care experiences at the home. The manager has been involved, with his Assistant Director, in reviewing the pro-forma utilised for recording these visits and a more appropriate record has been developed and is ready for implementation. Although the new pro-forma is not yet in use, a copy was available for inspection. The new pro-forma better highlights
p.4
Progress
the requirement for the visitor to speak with children, young people, their families and the staff to form an opinion of the quality of service provision.
p.4
Progress
The manager completes monthly management reports, in line with regulatory requirement, to demonstrate appropriate monitoring of the service. Currently, although discussion with the manager highlights that he is using this monitoring to identify concerns about specific incidents, monitor patterns and trends and develop staff practice, his reports do not demonstrate this. The manager is regularly observing staff practice to promote consistency of approach and to identify improvements in practice, which will ensure progressive improvements in delivery of service to children, young people and their families. The written, monthly reports, however, very much constitute an audit of records rather than evidencing this quality assurance practice.
p.4
Progress
The home continues to work co-operatively with children and young people's families, and with associated health and learning disability professionals, to provide children and young people with a holistic service, which promotes the achievement of very positive outcomes in all areas, supports them to develop to their optimum potential, and encourages a real enjoyment of life experiences. Additional work, undertaken by the staff as part of the home's outreach service, is supporting and extending children and young people's positive experiences within the respite scheme. The manager and staff feel that the provision of care is more consistent for children and young people because they strive to ensure that the staff providing outreach care to the children and young people are on duty when those children and young people stay at the home for respite. This promotes the development of positive relationships between staff, children and young people. In arranging respite
p.4
Progress
care, the manager has good awareness of friendship groups and great efforts are made to ensure that the grouping of children and young people reflects this. This enables children and young people to make and sustain friendships with others who enjoy similar activities.
p.5
Progress
Staff say that the organisation and provision of training has improved significantly since October. Partnership working arrangements with a local college, and the implementation of learning sessions facilitated by team leaders, have promoted more timely completion of the Children's Workforce Development Council's induction programme. Earlier registration is also supporting more timely completion of the Children and Young People's Workforce Diploma. Staff receive excellent training input from health professionals to equip them to manage children and young people's complex health care needs. This ensures that all staff are receiving timely and appropriate training to fully equip them to meet the very individual and specialist needs of children and young people in placement.
p.5
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.5
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure that the person appointed to manage the home is presented for registration with Ofsted. (Regulation 7(1(a)) 01/03/2012
p.5
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.5
Recommendations
review the recording of the manager's monitoring of the home to reflect the identification of concerns regarding practice, to identify any patterns or trends and to reflect an overview of the quality of service provided within the home. (NMS 21.2)
p.5
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion