Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Grimmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Grimmer

  • Postcode verified

    S65 1EG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyknowledgeableimproving
Criticismlimitedlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings459w+21
  • What needs to improve116w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
569
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs G Alton Principal Rotherham College of Arts and Technology Town Centre Campus Eastwood Lane Rotherham S65 1EG

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visits on 3 November 2011 and 14 March 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, participants, Jobcentre Plus staff and employers; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of participants’ work; and observation of three learning sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 Rotherham College has a good strategic focus on the development of employment provision to assist unemployed people in improving their employment prospects. Since August 2011, it has recruited additional staff experienced in employability work and developed courses to meet local employment opportunities. A section of the college is being refurbished to become a dedicated site for its employability provision.  The college has promoted apprenticeship funding grants to employers effectively to encourage them to employ apprentices within their businesses. The business development team has managed to find employment for 416 apprentices and of these 226 were previously benefit claimants. However, other opportunities for unemployed participants to gain work experience with local employers are limited and overall job entry rates are low.  Unemployed participants receive good individual support. Those interviewed said that staff were very friendly and helpful, and provided

p.1

Key findings

good support to help improve their job prospects. The college has recently created a post for a project coordinator and adviser. This post enables a very knowledgeable member of staff to support and advise participants for up to two years. This includes support for people who gain a job to review their progress and help them to sustain their employment.  The targeting of disadvantaged groups to help develop their skills and employment prospects is good. The college works with the local probation service well and provides courses to help ex-offenders address barriers to finding and sustaining work. This includes vocational taster courses to help persistent offenders develop relevant work skills. The college’s employability provision also helps people with drug and alcohol misuse problems. A pilot programme for young single mothers teaches them parenting skills and leads to a qualification for teaching assistants as

p.2

Key findings

employment in this area will fit in with their childcare responsibilities.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing more opportunities for unemployed participants to access work-experience opportunities to allow them to update their skills in the workplace, increase their confidence and update their CV  developing further initiatives to expand the job opportunities available to participants to improve the overall success rates for people finding sustainable work as a direct result of the college’s interventions.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Rotherham College.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion