Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Scott

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Scott

  • Postcode verified

    KT12 4QY

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedpositiveeffectivehigh expectationsgood progressimprovingsuccessfulenthusiasm
Criticismnot alwaysnot confidently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings776w+66
  • Leadership432w+80

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,205
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 36%

Full report text

Mrs Michelle Blackman Headteacher North East Surrey Secondary Short Stay School 174 Molesey Road Hersham KT12 4QY

p.1

Surrey Secondary Short Stay School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 7 March 2012, for the time you gave to our phone discussion and for the information which you provided during the inspection. Please convey my thanks to the teachers and students whose lessons we jointly visited and who spoke to us about their work. Thank you also to the chair of the management committee who took time to speak to me.

p.1

Surrey Secondary Short Stay School

Since the 2010 inspection there has been a restructuring of the senior team, which now comprises the headteacher and two deputy headteachers. In addition, middle leadership has been strengthened with the appointment of coordinators for information and communication technology (ICT), Key Stage 4, and disabled students and those with special educational needs. A new chair of the management committee was appointed this term. The number of students on roll has risen to 54, with a substantial increase in the proportion of students who are on part-time placements.

p.1

Surrey Secondary Short Stay School

As a result of the inspection on 30 November–1 December 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement, which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Surrey Secondary Short Stay School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made good progress in making improvements.

p.1

Achievement of pupils at the school

The school’s assessment data show that students’ rate of achievement is steadily rising. A number of factors have contributed to students’ better progress and improved levels of attainment. The curriculum has been revised to ensure that as Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115319 Direct F 0117 3150430 Direct email :matthew.parker@tribalgroup.com many students as possible gain externally accredited awards to give them a meaningful currency in life beyond school. The 2011 Year 11 students gained a range of accreditation, including some higher GCSE grades in English, mathematics and science, so that the proportion of students gaining five or more A* to G grades almost doubled. Encouragingly, almost all students now move into education, employment or training. Parents and carers are regularly informed about their

p.1

Achievement of pupils at the school

children’s progress through the publication of the newsletter and phone calls home.

p.2

The quality of teaching

The school has been successful in improving the quality of teaching. The proportion of lessons that are good has risen. Teachers’ planning has improved and now incorporates more challenge and extension activities, and assessment of students’ learning. This was evident in a Year 11 English lesson, where students were enthusiastically discussing Steinbeck’s characterisation of various individuals in Of Mice and Men, in preparation for their controlled assessment later in the week. Nevertheless, in some lessons, learning intentions are not always measurable or specific enough to enable students to know if they have succeeded.

p.2

The quality of teaching

In stronger teaching a variety of learning activities enables students to be active, and where these are well matched to their skills and enthusiasm, students’ progress accelerates and behaviour is good. This is now more consistent across the school. For example, in a Year 11 boys’ physical education lesson on Brazilian football, students were enthusiastically engaged in improving their volley techniques.

p.2

The quality of teaching

Since the previous inspection, the school has established clear assessment systems for collecting and analysing data. As a result, students’ progress is tracked more robustly and teachers are increasingly confident in using this information to plan lessons which cater for students’ learning needs. Nevertheless, although students often knew their targets, they could not regularly or confidently articulate the ‘next steps’ to improve their work.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The lessons observed during the monitoring inspection show that relationships between staff and students are positive. The school’s consistent use of a points system makes a good contribution to the effective management of behaviour so that teachers are able to focus almost exclusively on their learning. Students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted by the high expectations of all staff as role models. This enables students whose circumstances may make them vulnerable to overcome their difficulties and make significant changes in their attitudes and in their lives at home.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The imperative for students to attend regularly has been substantially strengthened by the appointment of an attendance officer. The recording and monitoring and use of attendance data are much improved and challenging targets have been set. Senior staff acknowledge that there is still more to do in analysing data further to unpick trends for groups of students and to make a link between achievement and attendance data. Nevertheless, the rate of attendance has improved markedly in the last year.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management of the school

Good inroads have been made into the areas for improvement from the previous inspection. Members of the newly constructed senior team are working well together and now hold responsibilities that are common across both sites. This has led to a more cohesive and joined-up approach across both sites and, as a result, middle leaders are now more accountable for the performance of their areas of responsibility. For example, as a result of more rigorous monitoring, the quality of teaching is improving. Similarly, the school’s use of data has improved markedly and is being driven by the senior team together with the Key Stage 4 programme manager. The curriculum is now better balanced to meet the needs of the students at the school.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management of the school

Provision for students to prepare for life in the United Kingdom and a global society has improved. Since the previous inspection, an audit has been conducted and leaders now have a much deeper understanding of their own community and the different faiths, ethnicities and cultures within it. For example, students entertained members of the local community by preparing and serving afternoon tea. The school’s international links are expanding and promote positive awareness of global issues, for example, through fund raising to support the work of an orphanage in Mexico.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management of the school

The local authority is providing good monitoring, guidance and training for the school. In addition to this it has supported new senior and middle leaders through a well-considered coaching and induction programme for their roles.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management of the school

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

place on 30 November–1 December 2010

 Ensure that the two sites operate as one short-stay school by:

p.4

place on 30 November–1 December 2010

 increasing the cohesiveness of the leadership and management by developing the roles of middle leaders in particular  strengthening whole-school monitoring  increasing the balance of curriculum and accreditation opportunities across both sites, including contributing more to the community and developing community cohesion.

p.4

place on 30 November–1 December 2010

 Improve attendance at both sites by setting more challenging targets.

p.4

place on 30 November–1 December 2010

 By July 2011, ensure that the quality of teaching is good overall and well supported by effective assessment procedures by:

p.4

place on 30 November–1 December 2010

 accelerating the pace at which lessons proceed  ensuring that the learning activities are challenging and extension activities are provided for those who finish the tasks early  consistently tracking students’ progress  ensuring that staff and parents and carers are fully aware of the progress being made  students knowing exactly what they have to do to improve their learning  providing a variety of activities to meet students’ different learning styles.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion