Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Grimmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Grimmer

  • Postcode verified

    LN2 5HQ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfulenjoyimprovedknowledgeablesupportiveeffectivepromptlyclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings424w+77
  • What needs to improve119w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
537
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 22%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Allen Principal Lincoln College Monks Road Lincoln Lincolnshire LN2 5HQ

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visit on the 14 October 2011 and 13 March 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visits provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, participants and employers; scrutiny of relevant documents; analysis of participants’ work; and observation of four learning sessions.

p.1

Key findings

 The college has a good strategic commitment to developing a range of employment programmes to help participants to improve their skills knowledge and job prospects. It has recruited additional staff with specialist knowledge and experience. The college has also set up a training centre in the city centre dedicated to working with unemployed people which is providing a good range of courses to help participants to find employment.  The college has developed good links with Jobcentre Plus and local employers to establish sector-based work academies. Successful courses have been designed in conjunction with employers to prepare unemployed participants for work experience which lead to guaranteed job interviews for those who complete their course.  Participants taking part in employability courses with the college enjoy the training. They value the improvements they make in developing their skills and knowledge. Many of those interviewed said that their confidence

p.1

Key findings

levels had greatly improved as a result of attending these courses. They found the tutors very helpful, knowledgeable and supportive, and they worked well with the other participants. However, the individual learning plans reviewed did not contain sufficient information on the agreed action to help participants overcome any identified barriers to employment.  Effective partnership working has enabled the college to gain good information about local employment opportunities and skills requirements. Senior college managers are represented on key boards and committees that represent business sectors in the area. This enables them to feed back labour market intelligence to allow the college to respond promptly to the needs of existing employers and to those of any new businesses moving into the area.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that the individual participants’ learning plans contain clear details on the agreed planned action to address any identified barriers to work and providing a copy to participants  expanding the role of the job coaches to include ongoing contact and support for people who have managed to gain employment to monitor their progress and help them to sustain the employment.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Lincoln College.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion