Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Andrews' Endowed Church of England Primary School
Summary
Janet Sinclair (lead), Andrew Saunders
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Mar 2012
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Saunders, Janet Sinclair
- Achievement verified
Good
- Behaviour and safety verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Quality of teaching verified
Good
- Name on report verified
Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School
- URN verified
116360
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.
- OverallGood
- AchievementGood
- Behaviour and safetyGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- Quality of teachingGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- Teachers plan very well for guided reading to ensure that older pupils make good progress in developing skills of inference and deduction, and that younger pupils use their knowledge of phonics to confidently sound out unknown words. p.6
- It has a caring and supportive ethos within a framework of high expectations that ensures pupils achieve well, both academically and personally. p.4
- Monitoring has improved teaching but at times feedback is not specific enough in identifying the precise improvements needed to make good teaching outstanding. p.8
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It is not outstanding because teaching and learning are not above a consistently good quality, and monitoring of them has not yet raised the quality still further. p.4
- Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. p.9
- An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. p.9
- Progress across Key Stage 2, although good overall, is at times a little uneven due to inconsistencies in practice such as match of work to pupils’ needs and the use of numeracy targets to enhance learning. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve teaching and learning so that practice is always good or better by ensuring: a more consistent match of work to the differing needs of pupils clear numeracy targets for all pupils more involvement of pupils in responding to marking and in deciding how they can improve their work. p.5
- Ensure monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning are sharply focused in identifying more precisely what needs to be improved and in enabling good practice to be disseminated so that teaching quality is raised even further. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,538
- about usual (typical 2920)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 4−11 Inspection date(s) 1−2 March 2012 Inspection number 379239 Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 116360 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 379239 Inspection dates 1−2 March 2012 Lead inspector Janet Sinclair
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4−11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 197 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Kandy Maddock Headteacher Maria Lloyd Date of previous school inspection 23 June 2009 School address 92 London Road Alton Hampshire GU34 4EL Telephone number 01420 83094 Fax number 01420 87549 Email address adminoffice@andrewsendowed.hants.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspectors spent seven hours observing teaching and learning in 18 lessons or part-lessons. They observed seven teachers and several teaching assistants. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, listened to a sample of pupils read and looked at examples of pupils’ work. They considered a wide range of documentation, including: school policies, particularly for safeguarding, the school development plan and records of pupils’ progress. The inspectors also held meetings with members of the governing body, senior staff and four groups of pupils. Inspectors considered the responses from questionnaires returned by 127 parents and carers as well as those from pupils and staff.
p.3
Information about the school
Andrews’ Endowed is smaller than the average-sized primary school. Most pupils are White British with a below-average proportion having minority ethnic heritage. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is below average; these are mainly speech and language difficulties. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is below average. The children in the Early Years Foundation Stage are in one class. The school meets current government floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.
p.3
Information about the school
There is an after-school club run by the school. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key findings
This is a good school. It is not outstanding because teaching and learning are not above a consistently good quality, and monitoring of them has not yet raised the quality still further. It has a caring and supportive ethos within a framework of high expectations that ensures pupils achieve well, both academically and personally. Attainment is above average by the end of Year 6 and reflects the good progress pupils make, given their starting points. A strong focus on improving writing and raising the attainment and rates of progress of higher-attaining pupils has been successful. Teaching is well organised within a good curricular framework that promotes effective learning. Learning support assistants make a strong contribution through their effective work with small groups and individuals. Occasionally, work is not well enough matched to pupils’ needs and this slows learning. Effective targets for literacy, good use of marking and clear ‘next steps’ in
p.4
Key findings
learning ensure pupils are clear about what they need to do to improve. However, t eachers do not always enable pupils to respond to feedback or set their own learning goals and this limits opportunities for pupils to take responsibility for their own learning. Additionally, the use of targets for numeracy is inconsistent, so not all pupils benefit. Behaviour is good, both in lessons and around the school. Pupils feel safe and say that any form of bullying is infrequent, and most know what the procedures are if it happens. Strong, purposeful leadership from the headteacher and senior leaders ensures good teamwork and a successful focus on managing performance and driving up standards. Although monitoring of teaching is undertaken regularly to bring about better practice, the identified areas for improvement sometimes lack specificity to improve and share good practice still further. Performance management is well established and a key target of improvement in writing has
p.4
Key findings
been successful. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching and learning so that practice is always good or better by ensuring: a more consistent match of work to the differing needs of pupils clear numeracy targets for all pupils more involvement of pupils in responding to marking and in deciding how they can improve their work. Ensure monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning are sharply focused in identifying more precisely what needs to be improved and in enabling good practice to be disseminated so that teaching quality is raised even further.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Children start in the Early Years Foundation Stage with some skills and abilities that exceed those expected for their age, but key aspects of communication – sounds and letters knowledge – and calculating are broadly those expected. Children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage, and mainly exceed the expected learning goals on entry to Year 1.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Attainment is above average over Key Stages 1 and 2, including in reading by the end of Year 2 and Year 6. Pupils’ attainment overall is approximately two terms ahead of expected attainment when they leave the school and is evidence of the good overall progress given their starting points. Progress in reading is good across the school due to guided reading sessions that are well organised and focused on the development of key skills. Pupils enjoy the opportunity for regular reading and this was seen when one pupil in Year 5 read expressively to the rest of his group who followed the text avidly. Regular letters and sounds (phonics) work in Key Stage 1 ensures that pupils learn to use these techniques when tackling unknown words. The good focus on improving writing through ‘Sentence of the Week’ work and half- termly assessments of progress have been effective in raising attainment in writing.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Progress across Key Stage 2, although good overall, is at times a little uneven due to inconsistencies in practice such as match of work to pupils’ needs and the use of numeracy targets to enhance learning. These shortcomings are being ironed out effectively. The school provides well for its more- and very-able pupils. For example, some pupils in Year 6 are working at the level of 15-year-olds in English and mathematics. Pupils develop their mathematical and communication skills well through opportunities for paired and small-group work. For example, in Year 6, when working out a method for finding prime numbers, pupils led the discussion and provided great support for each other; in Year 4, they responded enthusiastically to a problem-solving task. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress due to effective interventions, well focused on their specific needs. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Achievement of pupils
They are confident that these sessions help them to improve and say, ‘We are happier with our writing and can do it now.’ Inspection findings endorsed their views. The small number of pupils from diverse ethnic backgrounds make equally good progress. The after-school club provides well for a small number of pupils, who thoroughly enjoy the activities on offer. The vast majority of parents and carers who responded to the inspection questionnaire consider that their children achieve well, and this is supported by inspection evidence.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Effective teacher-led group work and well-judged teacher questioning ensure that children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make good progress. A good focus on early reading and sounds and letters work ensures children develop their literacy skills well. Additionally, staff provide a good range of activities to engage children across the areas of learning. Just occasionally, though, they do not use questioning effectively to extend children’s ideas and this prevents learning being even better.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teachers plan lessons well, and in many instances work is challenging and engaging, and keeps the pupils on their toes. The more- and most-able pupils are catered for well and rise to the challenges set. On occasions, teachers do not ensure that work matches the full ability range of pupils present in the class and this sometimes slows progress. Teachers plan very well for guided reading to ensure that older pupils make good progress in developing skills of inference and deduction, and that younger pupils use their knowledge of phonics to confidently sound out unknown words. Teachers have good subject knowledge and use subject-specific vocabulary well. For example, in a mathematics lesson in Year 3, the teacher encouraged pupils to look for ‘lines of symmetry and perpendicular and parallel lines as well as obtuse angles’ in a selection of flags.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Pupils with speech and language difficulties receive effective support to develop their phonic skills, writing and punctuation. There is a high level of consistency in setting targets for literacy and the next steps for pupils’ learning through marking, but this is not yet fully consistent practice in mathematics. Additionally, teachers do not always involve pupils enough in responding to marking or in setting their own goals for their learning and this limits their involvement in, and responsibility for, improving their own work.
p.6
Quality of teaching
The curriculum is broad and balanced, and topics are used well to support learning. Teachers make good use of them to combine subjects in interesting ways, for example writing about their homes and the village of Alton as part of a geography topic. Teaching supports pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Lessons offer occasions for pupils to reflect on the work of artists, such as Romero Britto, and to develop their social skills by writing their own newspaper. Homework is challenging and includes opportunities for writing as well as more open-ended tasks.
p.6
Quality of teaching
The vast majority of parents and carers consider that their children are taught well, and this view is supported by inspection evidence and the pupils themselves. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Almost all pupils are excited by learning and are keen to do their best. These qualities make a strong contribution to a calm, purposeful and safe learning environment. The curriculum makes a good contribution to pupils’ understanding of risk; they show a good awareness of how to stay safe in their daily lives, such as when using the internet and as junior road-safety officers.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Behaviour in lessons and around the school is good and has been over time. Pupils are kind and courteous to each other and work well together. They say that behaviour is mainly good and the appointment of peer mentors and a new play leader at break times has also helped to ensure good behaviour at playtimes and made them more fun. There is a consistent approach to managing behaviour and good relationships ensure that pupils respond well to the school’s expectations. Attendance is above average and pupils enjoy coming to school.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Most parents and carers who responded to the inspection questionnaire consider that there is a good standard of behaviour in the school and that their children are safe. A very small minority of parents and carers raised some concerns over bullying and behaviour disrupting lessons. The school is inclusive and there are a very small number of pupils with identified behaviour difficulties who do not always manage to control their behaviour successfully. Very occasionally, this causes some disruption to lessons that is managed very sensitively, successfully and swiftly by the school.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Pupils say that they feel safe and secure in school. They have a good awareness of different forms of bullying but are keen to point out that there is very little bullying of any description and any issues tend mainly to take the form of name calling as a result of minor disagreements. These are quickly dealt with by adults. They say that they are taught to use the internet safely and have an anti-bullying fortnight to raise their awareness.
p.7
Leadership and management
Senior leaders and the governing body have high expectations for pupils and provide an effective and vibrant learning environment. The governing body is fully committed to the school and provides a good level of challenge and support. Governors and school leaders ensure that safeguarding procedures fully meet all statutory requirements. The school’s strategic plan is the key driver for monitoring and evaluation, and is used effectively by staff and governors to monitor progress towards key improvement targets. Leaders monitor pupils’ progress carefully, particularly looking at the achievement of different groups. This practice has ensured that higher-attaining pupils now make good progress and that all groups and individuals get the support they need should they fall behind. This vigilance demonstrates a positive commitment from school leaders at all levels to promoting equality of opportunity and tackling discrimination.
p.7
Leadership and management
Regular monitoring of teaching and learning takes place by senior leaders, and the Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Leadership and management
headteacher has an accurate view of quality. Monitoring has improved teaching but at times feedback is not specific enough in identifying the precise improvements needed to make good teaching outstanding. In addition, the best classroom practice is not consistently shared across the staff. Self-evaluation is accurate, and the school has improved pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching well from previously satisfactory performance, showing a good capacity for further improvement.
p.8
Leadership and management
The curriculum is good. It provides good opportunities for pupils to participate in art, drama and singing as well as multi-sports. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is developed well through the school’s positive ethos, opportunities for reflection in assembly and consideration of moral dilemmas, for example, when discussing the protagonists in the war between England and Spain and the Spanish Armada of 1588.
p.8
Leadership and management
There are good links with parents and carers who are very positive about the school’s overall provision. They support it well and there is regular communication by email to ensure that they are well informed. The school works well with other schools and its membership of the East Hants Improvement Partnership provides additional sports and leadership training.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Inspection of Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School, Alton GU34 4EL
I am writing to tell you how much we enjoyed our visit to your school. We enjoyed talking to you, and were pleased to see how much you enjoy school and the many responsibilities you willingly undertake, particularly acting as ‘buddies’ to the youngest children.
p.11
Inspection of Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School, Alton GU34 4EL
We judged that your school is good and your headteacher and all the staff work hard to ensure you achieve well.
p.11
Inspection of Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School, Alton GU34 4EL
Here are some other things we were impressed with about your school. You make a good start to your education in the Early Years Foundation Stage. You make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics. You behave well and feel safe in school. You work well together, are polite and friendly, and supportive of each other. Your teachers provide you with interesting activities so you find lessons fun.
p.11
Inspection of Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School, Alton GU34 4EL
These are the things we have asked your school to do to make it even better. Help you all achieve even better by making sure work is always well matched to your needs, and that you are more involved in responding to teachers’ marking and in checking how well you are doing. Ensure you all have targets for your mathematics so you are clear about your next steps. Ensure senior leaders improve teaching even further by being clear about how to make it even better.
p.11
Inspection of Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School, Alton GU34 4EL
All of you can help by getting involved in setting your own learning goals.
p.11
Inspection of Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School, Alton GU34 4EL
We wish you every success for the future.
p.11
Inspection of Andrews’ Endowed C of E Primary School, Alton GU34 4EL
Janet Sinclair Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion