Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nigel Evans

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nigel Evans

  • Postcode verified

    B69 3DE

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyvery wellpositivehigh expectationswell-designedmake good progresseffectivesuccessfully
Criticismnot alwaystoo few

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings491w+57
  • What needs to improve121w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
605
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 24, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Wells Principal Advisor, Extended & Lifelong Services Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council Sandwell Adult Education Service PO Box 2374 Oldbury B69 3DE

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visit on 2 and 3 February to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, participants, employers and other partners; visits to three learning centres, and one Jobcentre Plus jobcentre; scrutiny of relevant documents; and observation of one learning session.

p.1

Key findings

 Since September 2011, Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council’s Adult Learning Service has developed good strategies to improve the employment prospects of local residents by improving partnership arrangements with local employers and in particular with Jobcentre Plus. It has also made good use of the resources and skills provided by the council’s training organisation, Future Skills.  The service uses local labour market information very well to plan provision and respond effectively to local needs. The co-location of schools, Children’s Centres and adult learning centres supports the activities well and helps ensure that the provision reaches a high proportion of Sandwell residents. The good range of work-related learning opportunities effectively supports the council’s implementation of its anti- poverty strategy.  The well-designed ‘Step Into’ courses support local employment needs effectively by providing participants with a good understanding of the

p.1

Key findings

industry requirements and by developing appropriate vocational and employability skills. The programmes for participants with criminal records or those involved in gang culture are particularly effective in giving participants a very positive learning experience, developing their practical skills and providing potential routes into employment.  Staff are suitably qualified and have good relevant occupational experience. Many tutors have a particularly good understanding of the barriers to employment experienced by the local community. Tutors receive relevant professional development to support them in this work. All staff, and particularly those working in the construction trades, have high expectations and successfully demand high standards from participants. However, participants do not always receive sufficiently detailed feedback on their progress or priority areas for improvement.  Participants make good progress and they receive appropriate information,

p.2

Key findings

advice and guidance to help them identify realistic employment goals. Local employers are committed to creating employment opportunities for Sandwell residents and many of the participants interviewed are now more optimistic about their changes of employment. However, participants have too few opportunities to develop their employability and vocational skills in real work-related settings.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing a more evaluative way of giving feedback to participants that builds on the positive aspects of their progress, but also makes clear what individuals need to do to improve their performance and increase their employment opportunities  extending the range of work trials or work experience to help participants develop a work routine and demonstrate suitability for particular job roles.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Sandwell Adult Education Service.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion