Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Rosy Belton
- Postcode verified
SE25 4XE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 393
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Marinette Bazin Head of Programme - Skills for Life Adult and community learning service London Borough of Croydon CALAT South Norwood Centre Sandown Road London SE25 4XE
p.1
and communities
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on the 22 January 2009. I am particularly grateful to you, and your staff for all the work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up a great deal of time to meet with me. Please pass on my thanks to those concerned.
p.1
and communities
The visit provided much useful evidence, which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting for the family learning survey. It was particularly interesting to see provision in the Norbury Manor Primary School and to talk to parents at CALAT.
p.1
and communities
The evidence used to inform the judgements made on this one day visit included: discussions with family learning staff and parents, scrutiny of examples of learners work and a visit to a school family learning activity, including a meeting with the school’s business manager. A range of documents was reviewed. Thank you for emailing background information to me in advance of my visit.
p.1
and communities
Overall, the family learning provision I sampled during my one day visit to the Croydon Adult Learning and Training (CALAT) is outstanding. I agreed to provide a summary of the good practice seen and to identify some areas for development, and I outline the main findings as bulleted points below. The main strengths are:
p.1
and communities
Good standard of learners work, both in lessons and in practical work produced Good outcomes for learners, such as the development of skills in adult learners and the improved attendance and behaviour of children Good teaching and learning Innovative externally funded initiatives and activities Very effective partnership working with external agencies Very well managed and organised family learning provision
p.2
and communities
The poor accommodation for learners at some family learning venues I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your family learning provision. If there are any points or aspects of the visit you wish to discuss, please contact me. As we will be evaluating the survey, you may be contacted in the future to find out your views. I hope you will contribute to this evaluation.
p.2
and communities
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted Website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion