Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Bedford Borough Council in Bedford
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
15 Feb 2012
- Inspectors verified
Philip Cass
- URN verified
SC409502
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure that children develop their emotional, intellectual, social and creative skills through the stimulating environment created by the home. p.4
- This relates particularly to children who do not have learning difficulties (NMS 7.1) p.4
- ensure that the children’s guide includes information on how children can find out about their rights, how a child can contact their Independent Reviewing Officer, the Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted if they wish to raise a concern with inspectors, and how to secure access to an independent advocate. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 888
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC409502 Inspection date 15/02/2012 Inspector Philip Cass Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 28/11/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The home is run by a local authority and provides short breaks for five children with physical disabilities, learning disabilities and sensory impairment.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection in November 2011, the overall effectiveness rating for the home was judged to be good. The home has made good progress since the last inspection. The hard work and dedication of staff ensure that young people benefit from a service that has continued to improve.
p.3
Progress
Two requirements were made at the last inspection. These matters have been fully addressed. The registered persons were required to supply a copy of the Regulation 33 quality assurance report to Ofsted at least once a month. The organisation has quickly resolved the administrative oversight that led to the report not being sent. Because of the action taken, care quality and the safety of young people are more effectively monitored.
p.3
Progress
The registered persons were also required to establish and maintain a system for monitoring matters set out in Schedule 6 at appropriate intervals. The home has developed a more rigorous system that enables management to identify areas of weakness and set targets to improve the home. Because the Regulation 34 audit has become more evaluative, it can now be used as a tool to promote improvement. The commitment to continual improvement is further demonstrated by the home’s development plan. This plan identifies specific tasks that will improve the home. Good progress is being made towards meeting the objectives of the development plan. The home has improved the way that it consults with young people and acts on suggestions made. As a result of feedback from young people, some bedrooms are being redecorated. A strength of the home is the way it responds when concerns are raised by young people or their parents. Quality of care is improved because the
p.3
Progress
home makes changes quickly in response to feedback.
p.4
Progress
The home has effective accident and ‘near miss’ reporting systems. This means that potential hazards are identified and removed. Staff meetings are used to discuss strategies to improve monitoring of health and safety in the home. The improved use of body maps means that patterns of accidental injury are identified and action is taken to ensure that unnecessary risk is eliminated. In addition, the improved communication between the home, school, and families reduces incidents of unexplained injury.
p.4
Progress
The home builds and maintains strong relationships with families and schools. Young people are supported because staff and parents attend training together where young people have additional needs. A parent commented that she has benefitted from improved communication and strong working relationships. She said, ‘we do everything together.’
p.4
Progress
The home is brightly decorated and well maintained. The provision of sensory toys, games, books, soft play facilities, and a sensory garden ensure that the home is well resourced to meet the needs of children with learning difficulties. However, the available games, books, and leisure facilities do not generally reflect the tastes and developmental needs of teenagers without learning difficulties. The home does not have sufficient facilities to ensure that teenagers without learning difficulties can fully develop their emotional, intellectual, social or creative skills.
p.4
Progress
The home has a children’s guide that provides useful information to young people who stay at the home. The guide is available in ‘Makaton’. Staff are proactive in ensuring that the contents of the guide are explained in a way that is accessible to all the young people. However, it lacks some key information in relation to how to find out about children’s rights, how to contact Independent Reviewing Officers, how to make a complaint to Ofsted, and how to secure access to an independent advocate.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that children develop their emotional, intellectual, social and creative skills through the stimulating environment created by the home. This relates particularly to children who do not have learning difficulties (NMS 7.1) ensure that the children’s guide includes information on how children can find out about their rights, how a child can contact their Independent Reviewing Officer, the Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted if they wish to raise a concern with inspectors, and how to secure access to an independent advocate. (NMS 13.5)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion