Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Bedford Borough Council in Bedford

Inspected 15 Feb 2012 · published 20 Mar 2012 · URN SC409502

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philip Cass

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Philip Cass

  • URN verified

    SC409502

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressimprovedindependentstrong relationshipsstrongeffectivelyrigorousstrength
Criticisminadequatefailednot metweaknessdeclinedconcernslacksconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings790w+23
  • What needs to improve102w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
888
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC409502 Inspection date 15/02/2012 Inspector Philip Cass Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 28/11/2011 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

The home is run by a local authority and provides short breaks for five children with physical disabilities, learning disabilities and sensory impairment.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.

p.3

Progress

At the last inspection in November 2011, the overall effectiveness rating for the home was judged to be good. The home has made good progress since the last inspection. The hard work and dedication of staff ensure that young people benefit from a service that has continued to improve.

p.3

Progress

Two requirements were made at the last inspection. These matters have been fully addressed. The registered persons were required to supply a copy of the Regulation 33 quality assurance report to Ofsted at least once a month. The organisation has quickly resolved the administrative oversight that led to the report not being sent. Because of the action taken, care quality and the safety of young people are more effectively monitored.

p.3

Progress

The registered persons were also required to establish and maintain a system for monitoring matters set out in Schedule 6 at appropriate intervals. The home has developed a more rigorous system that enables management to identify areas of weakness and set targets to improve the home. Because the Regulation 34 audit has become more evaluative, it can now be used as a tool to promote improvement. The commitment to continual improvement is further demonstrated by the home’s development plan. This plan identifies specific tasks that will improve the home. Good progress is being made towards meeting the objectives of the development plan. The home has improved the way that it consults with young people and acts on suggestions made. As a result of feedback from young people, some bedrooms are being redecorated. A strength of the home is the way it responds when concerns are raised by young people or their parents. Quality of care is improved because the

p.3

Progress

home makes changes quickly in response to feedback.

p.4

Progress

The home has effective accident and ‘near miss’ reporting systems. This means that potential hazards are identified and removed. Staff meetings are used to discuss strategies to improve monitoring of health and safety in the home. The improved use of body maps means that patterns of accidental injury are identified and action is taken to ensure that unnecessary risk is eliminated. In addition, the improved communication between the home, school, and families reduces incidents of unexplained injury.

p.4

Progress

The home builds and maintains strong relationships with families and schools. Young people are supported because staff and parents attend training together where young people have additional needs. A parent commented that she has benefitted from improved communication and strong working relationships. She said, ‘we do everything together.’

p.4

Progress

The home is brightly decorated and well maintained. The provision of sensory toys, games, books, soft play facilities, and a sensory garden ensure that the home is well resourced to meet the needs of children with learning difficulties. However, the available games, books, and leisure facilities do not generally reflect the tastes and developmental needs of teenagers without learning difficulties. The home does not have sufficient facilities to ensure that teenagers without learning difficulties can fully develop their emotional, intellectual, social or creative skills.

p.4

Progress

The home has a children’s guide that provides useful information to young people who stay at the home. The guide is available in ‘Makaton’. Staff are proactive in ensuring that the contents of the guide are explained in a way that is accessible to all the young people. However, it lacks some key information in relation to how to find out about children’s rights, how to contact Independent Reviewing Officers, how to make a complaint to Ofsted, and how to secure access to an independent advocate.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that children develop their emotional, intellectual, social and creative skills through the stimulating environment created by the home. This relates particularly to children who do not have learning difficulties (NMS 7.1)  ensure that the children’s guide includes information on how children can find out about their rights, how a child can contact their Independent Reviewing Officer, the Children’s Rights Director, Ofsted if they wish to raise a concern with inspectors, and how to secure access to an independent advocate. (NMS 13.5)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection (March 2011).

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion