Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Karen Adriaanse

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Karen Adriaanse

  • Postcode verified

    M24 1RU

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+91Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthighly effectiveoutstandingvery wellwell designedmake good progresseffectivelyaccurately

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings541w+91
  • What needs to improve98w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
632
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Currie Chief Executive Mantra Learning Greengate Middleton Manchester M24 1RU

p.1

employment

This survey evaluates providers’ response to initiatives launched on 1 August 2011 to use Skills Funding Agency funds flexibly to support people on benefits.

p.1

employment

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and participants, during my visits on 1 and 2 November 2011 and 23 February 2012 to look at your work in employability provision.

p.1

employment

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

employment

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff, participants and employers; scrutiny of relevant documents; and observation of one learning session and one guidance interview.

p.1

Key findings

 Mantra Learning (Mantra) uses the flexibility in government funding for learning and skills well to design employability provision that has a very good focus on meeting the needs of people on benefits and those of employers in the logistics industry. The provider has developed a brand known as ‘Job Gym’ that helps to give this provision status and make it easily recognisable by its users. This work links in well with the development of two new sites based in community locations to attract more people to careers in logistics and to make the programmes more accessible.  Mantra uses its own facilities as an employer to enable participants to practise their skills in a real work environment. The specialist resources are outstanding and the participants interviewed said that using such up- to-date equipment prepared them well for a good range of jobs in the industry. The vocational courses are well designed and they include good

p.1

Key findings

opportunities to develop participants’ employability skills. However, participants do not receive sufficient feedback on their progress in developing these skills, such as team building and problem solving.  The specialist advice and guidance on retuning to work is highly effective and focuses well on ensuring that participants’ CVs summarise accurately all their relevant experience and expertise. However, the individual learning plans do not include sufficient information on participants’ personal barriers to employment and the training and support needed to overcome them.  Mantra’s managers and staff understand the job market and the different recruitment procedures in this industry very well. They use their excellent links with employers effectively to promote purposeful work experience for people who have completed the employability programmes. Mantra has recently introduced a comprehensive computerised system to monitor

p.2

Key findings

participants’ progress from the time they are referred from Jobcentre Plus. It has an excellent facility that disseminates job vacancies to participants by carefully matching the jobs to their previous experience, their achievements on the programmes and their personal circumstances.  Participants make good progress in improving their chances of employment. Their achievement of job-focused qualifications is good and they develop specialist vocational skills to a high standard. Learndirect and group sessions support participants’ development of generic literacy and numeracy skills, but these are not linked enough to the English and mathematics needed to work in the industry.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 recording in more detail participants’ barriers to employment and their progress in developing employability skills  ensuring that participants develop the ability to apply literacy and numeracy skills in the contexts of the types of jobs they hope to gain.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop employability provision at Mantra Learning.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Skills Funding Agency.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion