Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Battle and Langton Church of England Primary School

Inspected 29 Feb 2012 · published 16 Mar 2012 · URN 114489

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    David Collard, Howard Dodd, Veronica Young

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Battle and Langton Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    114489

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingstrongeffectivegood progresspositiveexcellenthighly effectiveexceptionally
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysnot yetnot outstandingnot high expectationsinconsistenciesweakervariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1859w+41
  • Leadership492w+39
  • What needs to improve101w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,439
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 28–29 February 2012 Inspection number 378865 Battle and Langton Church of England Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 114489 Local authority East Sussex Inspection number 378865 Inspection dates 28–29 February 2012 Lead inspector David Collard

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 430 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Andrew Dyer Headteacher Richard Dyer Date of previous school inspection October 2006 School address Market Road Battle East Sussex TN33 0HQ Telephone number 01424 775987 Fax number 01424 775988 Email address office@battlelangton.e-sussex.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Twenty one lessons or parts of lessons were seen taught by 15 teachers or higher level teaching assistants (HLTAs). Meetings were held with staff, groups of pupils and members of the governing body. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work and various other activities, heard pupils read and looked at a wide range of documentation. Questionnaires returned by 155 parents and carers were analysed as well as those from staff and pupils in Key Stage 2.

p.3

Information about the school

This much larger than the average-sized primary school serves both its local community and families from further afield. Since the present school building opened in 1986, numbers have significantly increased so five mobile classrooms have been added to house more classes, the last being in 2011. This year, an extra Reception class has been added bringing the total intake to three forms of entry. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is lower than the national average. Most pupils are from a White British background. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is also below that found nationally. The school exceeds the current floor standard, whereby the government sets the minimum expectations for attainment and progress. A children’s centre shares the same site but is managed by the local authority and was not part of this inspection.

p.3

Information about the school

Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

 This continues to be a good school. Since the previous inspection, all areas identified for improvement have been addressed. In addition, the school has built upon its strengths and developed teaching, leadership and the environment of the school. It is not yet outstanding because there is still some variability in the quality of teaching and leadership. Nevertheless, the school demonstrates that it has a good capacity to continue to improve.

p.4

Key findings

 Achievement is good and pupils’ attainment is above average when they leave. Younger pupils have good reading skills due to their understanding of how to break down words into the sounds. Good proportions of pupils in Year 6 are already attaining the levels expected of them when they leave and a significant proportion are exceeding that marker. Good progress is continuous through all years although there is some slight variability.

p.4

Key findings

 Pupils are taught well by enthusiastic, knowledgeable and competent teachers. Planning for lessons is detailed although on occasions concentrates on what will be taught rather than what will be learnt by pupils. Marking is particularly strong in literacy although somewhat variable in other subjects. While support staff provide valuable interventions, they are not always deployed as effectively as they might be.

p.4

Key findings

 Pupils behave well and enjoy each other’s and adults’ company. They play and work together well, sharing ideas and helping when there are difficulties. The atmosphere in and around the school is calm and orderly. The school is effective in ensuring pupils are kept safe.

p.4

Key findings

 The experienced headteacher and deputy headteacher along with a supportive governing body provide a strong steer to school improvement. A new leadership structure has begun to have a positive influence on self-evaluation, the professional development of staff and plans for the future. This is helping to improve the quality of the staff’s performance management. Nevertheless, this Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

is still at an early stage of development so it does not yet provide a clear system of accountability.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise the attainment and progress of all pupils to the highest level by:  improving the deployment and use of support staff so that their capabilities are fully exploited  eliminating any inconsistencies in teaching and identifying the learning opportunities in planning.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Further develop the school’s management at all levels to build upon the new leadership structures by:  developing further the role of senior and middle leaders so that all pupils’ individual needs are identified and supported at an early stage  making clear the structure of leadership so that all leaders are accountable for their particular responsibilities.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils, parents and carers rightly feel happy that their children make the progress they should. Pupils benefit from consistency in the quality of teaching through the school and therefore their learning moves on at a good pace. A good start is made in the Reception classes. On entry, children have skills broadly in line with those expected for their ages although increasingly as numbers have grown, there are more children who have additional problems such as in social or learning development. By the time they start Year 1, pupils have above average ability in communication, language, numeracy and social skills. Through Years 1 to 6 this good progress continues. This is confirmed both from the work seen as well as from the school and national data. For example, pupils can articulately respond to questions, some of which are really searching, and can also apply themselves diligently to their written and research work. This is particularly evident when pupils are asked to work

p.5

Achievement of pupils

independently or in pairs. There is usually a working ‘buzz’ of excitement and pupils settle quickly to the task in hand, producing both a significant quantity and quality of work. The slight variability in progress comes about when teaching does not lay out such high expectations and so pupils are not fully challenged. This is linked more to individuals than being endemic to any particular group of pupils. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make similarly good progress to their peers.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Pupils in Key Stage 1 rapidly develop different skills in reading and are able to decode and sound out letters of words that they do not understand. Consequently, reading skills are above average by the end of Year 2 and Year 6. Through the rest of the school, pupils’ attainment across a broad range of subjects, including English Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

Achievement of pupils

and mathematics, increases as they move up each year. For example, pupils increasingly use a more complicated range of information and communication technology equipment well and so can apply this very appropriately to the projects, research and other work they are doing. Pupils develop an interest in a wide range of topics. In a lesson about marine reserves with older pupils, for example, they showed that they were able to talk competently about how conservation methods help in the natural world. Specialist teachers, including for French, music and physical education, broaden pupils’ ability so that they are prepared well for their next stage of education.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching throughout the school has continued to be good since the last inspection, a view endorsed by pupils, parents and carers. There are some examples of excellent teaching and best practice which help inspire others to do as well. A management policy of moving teachers to different classes has meant that every year group has a good range of expertise in different learning styles. Teachers use this flexibility well in lessons by changing activities when pupils lose interest, for example. They also use practical methods to enthuse pupils and are confident to try out new ideas, such as the use of more creative approaches presently being trialled in Year 3. Equally, teachers will alter and adapt their original planning if they feel it is not working. This was seen to good effect in one science lesson where the activity was not clearly understood by the pupils and the teacher set up a different activity to develop their

p.6

Quality of teaching

understanding. In the Reception classes, the much better use of the outside classroom and area, an issue at the last inspection, has helped ensure that children have a broadened and active range of experiences across all areas of their learning.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Key features of the good curriculum planning are the way pupils are provided with good opportunities to see connections between subjects and innovative ideas are used to interest and motivate pupils. On occasions, however, it does not identify the intricacies of the learning that will take place for individuals and concentrates on the delivery of the lesson. This inhibits the highest levels of challenge for all pupils. Where intervention takes place, such as for those who have special educational needs, this is generally effective. In some cases teaching assistants are not deployed as well as they could be. For example, in one lesson, these pupils did not have the opportunity to play all the computer learning games that others had and so lost an opportunity to reinforce their learning. Those with particularly strong talents in any area have opportunities to extend their learning through other activities. Spiritual,

p.6

Quality of teaching

social, moral and cultural development is promoted well. In lessons, teachers build strong relationships with their class and promote social interaction, morality and an understanding of each other’s similarities and differences. A project for older pupils for instance on the Mexican ‘Day of the Dead’ was very sensitively handled with the focus used being about the death of old technology rather than of family members.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils behave well, not always perfectly, but usually with care and consideration Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

towards others. Inspection evidence confirms that this has long been the case. In lessons, in the playground and when moving around the school there is little need for adults to intervene. Nevertheless, in the pupils’ questionnaire a minority indicated that there is some bad behaviour and a very small number of parents’ and carers’ questionnaires also noted this. There is no disruption in lessons or in other activities. Even though all pupils are clearly aware of the effects of bullying, on just a very few occasions this does happen. In a number of discussions with pupils to follow this up, they said that they feel safe and, when there are disturbances or incidents of bullying, these are generally handled well by adults. The school keeps detailed notes and follows up individual cases effectively. However, there is not enough of a strategic lead on inclusion to ensure that all pupils know and understand the

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

consequences of their actions and to provide a well-developed and wide range of support programmes. Conversely, pupils are extremely well aware of the possibilities of ‘stranger danger’, cyber-bullying and when walking out on their own. They are happy to discuss their own fears and worries and to share these with adults.

p.7

Leadership and management

The highly experienced and respected headteacher is ably supported by a strong deputy headteacher. The staff team unanimously agrees that there is a shared vision and strong direction aimed at providing the best for the pupils. This view is also shared by almost all parents and carers. The school promotes equality of opportunity well and does not tolerate discrimination of any kind. There has been a strong emphasis on developing the quality of teaching and the expertise of teachers to raise achievement for all groups of pupils even further. Weaker aspects, though, have been correctly highlighted. For example, the school has rightly identified that the use and deployment of support staff could be more effective. In the Reception classes there are occasions when teachers’ time is stretched while in other classes support staff are underused. The professional development of teachers has evolved well. First

p.7

Leadership and management

through teaming teachers with different levels of expertise in year groups, and then by developing phase leaders to monitor, support and evaluate how effective this has been. While senior and middle leaders have distinct roles these are not always understood by all and so line management systems and accountability are unclear.

p.7

Leadership and management

Effective management changes have resulted in teachers becoming more accountable for the progress their class makes and this is linked well to performance management. The curriculum balances the need for the teaching of basic skills while successfully providing a wide range of opportunities to extend learning across all subjects. Pupils say they enjoy many activities. The good focus on pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development enables them to be tolerant and respectful of others.

p.7

Leadership and management

The competent governing body provides a good level of challenge and questions any forward decisions. Through a training programme, governors have improved their expertise over time and now have a better understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Regular tracking of safeguarding issues is undertaken rigorously and at the time of the inspection all matters pertaining to the vetting of staff were Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Leadership and management

fulfilled. The many positive features, along with recognition of what needs improving and how this may be achieved, indicate a school that is rightly confident in its own good capacity to continue to improve in the future.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100. Inspection report: Battle and Langton Church of England Primary School, 28–29 February 2012 10 of 12

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning. Inspection report: Battle and Langton Church of England Primary School, 28–29 February 2012 11 of 12

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

TN33 0HQ

Thank you for making us so welcome during our recent visit. We very much enjoyed joining you in your lessons and discussing what you do. You will not be surprised to know that we think yours is a good school as so many of you said this was the case. I have included the main points from our report below.

p.11

TN33 0HQ

 Throughout the school you make good progress and attain well by the time you leave in Year 6. This prepares you well for the next stage of your education.  You told us that behaviour is good in the school. We agree and, although not always perfect, you understand the right things to do and get on well with each other most of the time. Perhaps on the few occasions when this does not happen you could make sure that you tell your teachers.  You think you are taught well and we agree with this too. Your teachers plan exciting activities and try hard to make sure you are always challenged by the work that you are given.  Your headteacher and other leaders know how to make the school better and have a clear idea of how to go about this. The changes they make are having a positive effect on moving the school forward.

p.11

TN33 0HQ

Even in good schools there are things that can help to make the school the best. We have suggested a couple of things. Firstly, we have said that to make you all achieve as well as possible, support staff need to be used as effectively as possible. Secondly, we have asked that the jobs of all leaders needs to be made very clear so that everybody understands what is expected of them.

p.11

TN33 0HQ

Finally, we wish you all the best for your future education. Continue trying as hard as you can so that you can take advantage of all the school has to offer.

p.11

TN33 0HQ

David Collard Lead inspector Inspection report: Battle and Langton Church of England Primary School, 28–29 February 2012 12 of 12

p.11

TN33 0HQ

procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion