Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Wyvern School

Inspected 24 Feb 2012 · published 16 Mar 2012 · URN 110257

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Feb 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Adam Hewitt, Liz Kissane, Paul Edwards

  • Achievement verified

    Good

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Wyvern School

  • URN verified

    110257

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • AchievementGood
  • Behaviour and safetyGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of teachingGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+68Positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandinggood progresseffectivelyeffectivemake good progressvery wellpositiverigorous
Criticisminadequateweaknessestoo fewnot alwaysconcernnot yetgapsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1842w+76
  • Leadership450w+41
  • What needs to improve78w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,363
about usual (typical 2920)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 13%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Age group 3–7 Inspection date(s) 23–24 February 2012 Inspection number 378070 Wyvern School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 110257 Local authority Milton Keynes Inspection number 378070 Inspection dates 23–24 February 2012 Lead inspector Paul Edwards

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Type of school Infant School category Community Age range of pupils 3–7 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 320 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jackie Buckingham-Shum Headteacher Helen Hann Date of previous school inspection 24 November 2008 School address Aylesbury Street Wolverton Milton Keynes MK12 5HU Telephone number 01908 312275 Fax number 01908 222149 Email address wyvern@miltonkeynes.gov.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked

p.1

after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers thi nk about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. Inspectors observed 23 lessons taught by 11 teachers, visited two assemblies and listened to pupils reading. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders, teaching staff, members of the governing body and groups of pupils. Formal meetings were not held with parents and carers although inspectors took the opportunity to talk to them before school. Inspectors took account of the responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, and looked at governing body minutes, the systems for assessing and monitoring pupils’ progress, safeguarding procedures, pupils’ work, and teachers’ planning and marking. Inspectors took note of the questionnaires completed by 146 parents and carers and those completed by staff.

p.3

Information about the school

Wyvern is a larger than average-sized infant school. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups, who come from a wide range of backgrounds, is well above that seen nationally. The largest groups are from White British and Pakistani heritage. A higher-than-average proportion of pupils speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is similar to that seen nationally. The percentage of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is broadly average. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage are taught in two Nursery classes, the large majority staying for a whole day, once a week. There are also three separate Reception classes.

p.3

Information about the school

There is an on-site nursery that provides wrap-around care for children. This is privately managed and subject to a separate inspection. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 This is a good school. However it is not yet better than this as there needs to be more outstanding teaching. Occasionally, teachers miss the opportunity to accelerate the progress of the more-able pupils soon enough in lessons and spend too long in explaining the activities to pupils. This limits opportunities for them to find things out for themselves and to move on quickly to more challenging work.  Pupils’ achievement is good. A dip in national assessments in 2010 was tackled effectively through rigorous monitoring of teaching and learning. Consequently, attainment rose in 2011 and pupils’ attainment is rising in reading, writing and mathematics. The gaps in attainment between boys and girls identified in the Nursery are closing by the end of Year 2, the result of effective intervention strategies.  Effective teaching across the school results in most pupils making good progress. Well-targeted support and effective interventions are ensuring those

p.4

Key findings

at an early stage of learning English make rapid progress in their acquisition of language skills. There are too few opportunities for pupils to develop their improving writing skills through planned activities across subjects.  Pupils’ good behaviour ensures that disruptions to lessons are a very rare occurrence. They feel safe in school and have a good understanding of safety issues. Pupils of all backgrounds cooperate very well in lessons and play together happily. They understand and value each other’s cultures, ensuring the development of a harmonious working environment.  The school is improving as a result of the senior leaders’ high expectations, drive and determination. Effective monitoring of teaching, with clearly targeted professional development is improving the pace of pupils’ learning. Rigorous challenge by the governing body, coupled with its strong support, is aiding school leaders to accurately evaluate the school’s work and implement well-

p.4

Key findings

planned actions to tackle key priorities.

p.4

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 By September 2012, improve the proportion of outstanding teaching by:  ensuring that teachers achieve an appropriate balance of the time they spend on explanation and that given to pupils to complete their work  allowing the more-able pupils to move on to more challenging activities sooner in lessons  eliminate the reliance on worksheets for writing activities.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Prepare a plan that ensures teachers use opportunities for pupils to practise their writing skills in other subjects.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Almost all parents and carers responding to the questionnaire commented that their children were making good progress and their views are accurate. By the end of Year 2, pupils’ attainment is average in reading, writing and mathematics, demonstrating good progress from their starting points. Children enter the Nursery classes with skills and abilities that are well below those expected for their age and with particular weaknesses in their communication, language and literacy skills. They make good progress throughout the Early Years Foundation Stage in all areas of learning, entering Year 1 with attainment that is below average. Children’s understanding of the links between sounds and letters (phonics) develops well. For example, children in a Reception class were seen to spell and use complex words accurately and in context.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

Good progress in reading continues across the school, the result of the consistent approach in teaching daily phonics sessions, and older pupils demonstrate increasingly accurate spelling skills when writing sentences. For those pupils who find reading particularly challenging, daily, individual support sessions, taught by specialists, are closing the gap between them and other pupils. Specialist support is utilised effectively to provide in-class support for those pupils who speak English as an additional language, particularly those from Pakistani backgrounds, narrowing the gap between them and other pupils in their reading and writing.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

The introduction of a commercial writing programme that is implemented systematically is ensuring all pupils are developing a structured approach to their writing. Their skills are progressing well, particularly those of the boys so that the gender gap is narrowing quickly. A sharper focus on boys’ writing from Reception onwards, providing more interesting books and writing activities that engage their interest are having a positive impact. Most boys express a positive enjoyment in reading matching that of the girls. Number and calculating skills develop well from simple counting activities in the Nursery classes to more complex calculations in Year 2. They use their skills well when solving problems, as was seen in a typically good Year 2 lesson where pupil estimated accurately the volumes of different liquids in various containers.

p.5

Achievement of pupils

While the overall picture shows all groups of pupils to be making good progress, some more-able pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. This is more evident in writing where challenging activities are not provided soon enough in lessons. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress overall. A good balance of in-class support and well-targeted, one-to-one interventions is providing them with a secure foundation for reading. In writing, they make good progress through being taught in smaller groups.

p.6

Quality of teaching

The inspectors confirm the views of parents and carers that teaching is good. Teaching is typically lively, engages the pupils’ interest and motivates them effectively. For example, in the Early Years Foundation Stage, children in a Nursery class improved their speaking and counting skills as they joined with the teacher in singing ‘we climbed aboard the pirate ship’. Challenging questioning by the teachers is evident throughout the school and encourages pupils to respond at length, developing their speaking skills well. Teachers adapt the questioning skills effectively according to the ability and varying needs of pupils. For example, with a group of lower attaining Year 2 boys, the teacher was careful to phrase questions that engaged and motivated them well, improving their use of verbs and adjectives in their writing.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teachers plan carefully for pupils of different abilities. Occasionally, the translation into practice is not always secure and more-able pupils are not encouraged to move on to the more challenging work soon enough in lessons. This impinges on the opportunity for them to make better progress in lessons, particularly when the teachers spend too long explaining tasks. Pupils have a good understanding of their targets and what they are expected to achieve, reflecting the good dialogue that takes place with their teachers. There is a good balance of oral and written feedback so that pupils have a clear understanding of what they need to do to improve their work. In the Early Years Foundation Stage, teachers regularly assess children’s achievements and they form part of the useful ‘Learning Journey’. However, the school rightly recognises the need for these to be more easily accessible for parents and carers.

p.6

Quality of teaching

There is good variety of effective methods to teach reading. Pupils are taught in ability groups for daily phonic sessions and these stimulate children’s enthusiasm for early reading skills in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Guided reading sessions stimulate older pupils’ enjoyment of reading, Small group work and the opportunity for individuals to read to an adult help those who are not reading at the level expected for their age to improve their skills. Teaching assistants contribute well to lessons, supporting pupils learning English as an additional language. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are also supported effectively by skilled support assistants.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well through teachers’ planning and curriculum planning which encourage partner work, working in groups, role play and reflection on their work through discussions at the end of sessions. For example, as part of Year 2 mathematics activities, pupils worked well in small groups improving their understanding of liquid measurements.

p.6

Behaviour and safety of pupils

During the inspection, pupils behaved well in lessons, during lunchtime and at play times. Pupils say that this is normal, and that behaviour is usually good. Almost all parents and carers responding to the questionnaire were very happy with the general behaviour and very few believed that lessons were disrupted by behaviour. Pupils know about bullying and say that there is a ‘little name calling’ but cannot recall any specific issues. The school has talked to pupils about different types of bullying and issues are addressed effectively through its personal and social development programme. Movement around the larger Edwardian building, upstairs and downstairs, is well ordered and pupils are extremely good at following rules to avoid mishaps.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils spoken to feel they are well looked after and said that they feel extremely safe in school. Their parents and carers, almost without exception, agreed with this and many commented very favourably on the high quality of care provided by the staff. Pupils from a wide range of backgrounds get on very well with one another and the school is a very cohesive setting. For their age, pupils demonstrate a clear understanding of racism and do not believe there is any racist behaviour. The curriculum ensures pupils develop tolerance and a good understanding of the different cultures and backgrounds represented in the school. The school works hard to encourage the very small number whose attendance and punctuality is a concern. As a result of improvements, attendance is now average with most pupils being punctual, enabling lessons to start promptly.

p.7

Leadership and management

Senior leaders and members of the governing body have high aspirations for the school. Priorities for school improvement have been well chosen and focus clearly on accelerating learning and improving teaching. There is clear evidence that opportunities for teachers to participate in mentoring programmes and individual coaching programmes have improved the quality of teaching and learning. The development of detailed tracking and assessment information provides a comprehensive picture of the progress of all groups of pupils. Governors and the headteacher are astute in their use of this information, determining the impact of additional staffing resources on pupils’ learning. This clarity has ensured resources to improve reading and writing skills have been effective and demonstrates the school’s good capacity for further improvement.

p.7

Leadership and management

The curriculum contributes well to the pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, for example opportunities to learn about different cultures. Their participation in the ‘Wolverton Lantern Festival’ and construction of their own impressive lanterns enabled them to develop a greater understanding of how ‘light’ is a common theme in different religions. There are missed opportunities, however, for pupils to improve their writing skills in subjects such as history and geography. Leaders have a clear commitment to ensuring all pupils have equality of opportunity and the school does not tolerate discrimination of any kind. For example, they correctly identified the need to ensure boys made better progress in both reading and writing and the impact of strategies has resulted in a narrowing of the gap between boys and girls. School leaders, including governors, ensure the safety of all pupils and staff through stringent checks. Staff training ensures all are kept up to

p.7

Leadership and management

date with the latest child protection procedures. Staff are vigilant in meeting the needs of those pupils whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. The governing body is rigorous in ensuring the safety of the site and that risk assessments for all activities meet requirements. Parents and carers are very positive about the quality of leadership and the links between home and school. They are particularly appreciative of the sessions where they can learn about how reading and writing are taught in school.

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nati onally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.9

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.9

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.10

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.10

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.11

Inspection of Wyvern School, Wolverton MK12 5HU

Thank you for making us all so welcome when we visited your school recently. We really enjoyed talking to you, watching you work and listening to some of you read

p.11

Inspection of Wyvern School, Wolverton MK12 5HU

These are some of the strengths of the school.

p.11

Inspection of Wyvern School, Wolverton MK12 5HU

 You school provides you with a good education.  You behave well in lessons and at break times. You are polite and friendly and you enjoy school. You say you feel very safe and that the adults at school look after you very well. We are pleased the attendance has improved and it is now similar to that seen in most schools.  Teachers work hard to help you improve your reading, writing and mathematics.  Those in charge of the school look after you well, so you feel safe and happy.

p.11

Inspection of Wyvern School, Wolverton MK12 5HU

We have asked those in charge of the school to make it better by:

p.11

Inspection of Wyvern School, Wolverton MK12 5HU

 making sure teaching improves further through:  giving you sufficient time in lessons to complete more work  allowing those of you who find work a little easy to move on to more challenging activities sooner in lessons  giving you fewer worksheets for writing activities.  providing you with more opportunities to practise writing skills in other subjects.

p.11

Inspection of Wyvern School, Wolverton MK12 5HU

Thank you once again for talking to us and particularly to those of you who came to speak to us. We hope you really continue to enjoy your reading. You can help to make the school better by letting your teacher know if you find the work too easy.

p.11

Inspection of Wyvern School, Wolverton MK12 5HU

Paul Edwards Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion