Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)
Humphrey Perkins School
Summary
David Anstead (lead), Jacqueline Pentlow, John Burridge, Suha Ahmad
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Feb 2012
- Inspectors verified
David Anstead, Jacqueline Pentlow, John Burridge, Suha Ahmad
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Behaviour and safety verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Inadequate
- Quality of teaching verified
Satisfactory
- Name on report verified
Humphrey Perkins School
- URN verified
137799
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Behaviour and safetyInadequate
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Quality of teachingSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. p.9
- An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.9
- An excellent tracking system shows these two groups of pupils are now making the same good progress in English and mathematics as other pupils. p.5
- In an outstanding history lesson, for example, pupils were very well engaged by an interesting task in which they had to review original source material including photographs, newspapers of the time and extracts from a contemporary novel to identify the features of racial segregation in America during that era. p.6
- Pupils worked in small groups to share their views about what the source material showed and their excellent behaviour, together with skilful prompting and use of questioning by the teacher, ensured the lesson proceeded at a fast pace. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Nevertheless, there are instances of unacceptable behaviour and a small number of pupils express unacceptable attitudes to others. p.7
- The progress of all pupils in other subjects is variable because there are inconsistencies in the quality of teaching, which sometimes lead to a lack of engagement and disruption to learning. p.5
- Behaviour and safety are inadequate because learning in some classes is regularly disrupted. p.4
- The rate of improvement is slowed by weaknesses in the effectiveness of some senior and Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms p.4
- High proportions of parents, carers, pupils and staff responding to a questionnaire (around one third in each case) expressed concerns about frequent disruption to lessons by a minority of pupils. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise achievement by: tracking the impact of phonics teaching to ensure pupils who need help with their reading catch up more quickly increasing to at least good the progress pupils make in subjects other than English and mathematics. p.5
- Improve the quality of teaching by: ensuring pupils’ work is marked frequently and that marking shows pupils how to improve helping teachers to use assessment information to plan work of an appropriate challenge for the range of needs in each class. p.5
- Minimise disruption to learning in lessons by: ensuring staff consistently implement the behaviour management policy providing engaging activities for pupils with plentiful opportunities for them to learn actively. p.5
- Improve the quality of leadership and management at all levels by spreading the good practice that exists among some senior and middle leaders. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,654
- about usual (typical 3042)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 20%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Age group 11–14 Inspection date(s) 8–9 February 2012 Inspection number 388567 Humphrey Perkins School Inspection report
p.1
Unique reference number 137799 Local authority Not applicable Inspection number 388567 Inspection dates 8–9 February 2012 Lead inspector David Anstead HMI
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Type of school Academy School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 11–14 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 900 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Brian Tetley Headteacher Peter Nutkins Date of previous school inspection Not applicable School address Cotes Road Barrow-upon-Soar Loughborough LE12 8JU Telephone number 01509 412385 Fax number 01509 620902 Email address p.nutkins@humphreyperkins.leics.sch.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked
p.1
after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.2
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.
p.2
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out with two days' notice. The inspection team observed 36 lessons taught by 34 teachers, including three mentoring sessions, and an assembly taken by the headmaster. Meetings were held with staff, pupils and the Chair of the Governing Body. Inspectors took account of the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection, observed the school’s work, and looked at a range of documentation including the school’s self-evaluation, its strategic plan and its analysis of performance data. The quality and challenge of pupils’ written work and the quality of teachers’ marking were checked during the lessons visited. The views of 334 parents and carers, a sample of 102 pupils and 27 staff expressed in questionnaires were taken into consideration. The lead inspector spoke to three parents by telephone.
p.3
Information about the school
Humphrey Perkins School is larger than the average middle school. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is below average. The vast majority of pupils are from White British backgrounds and around 5% of pupils are from several minority ethnic groups. There is a lower-than-average proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language, and the proportions of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are average.
p.3
Information about the school
The school very recently converted to an academy and is now consulting parents, carers and the community on becoming an 11–16 school. The school has specialist status in the arts. The floor standards (set by the government for minimum levels of progress and attainment) do not apply to the age ranges currently provided for by the school. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.3
Key findings
In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a notice to improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to behaviour and safety.
p.4
Key findings
Although pupils make good progress in English and mathematics, progress is variable in other subjects, meaning achievement is satisfactory. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs who need help with their reading are catching up, but slowly, because the impact of their phonics sessions (lessons where they are taught the correspondence between the sounds in words and how they are written) is not well evaluated.
p.4
Key findings
Some teaching is outstanding and some is inadequate but most is in between and so, on balance and over time, the quality of teaching is satisfactory. Teaching is not good because generally pupils’ work is not marked frequently enough and pupils have insufficient written guidance about how they might improve their work. Some teachers do not have the assessment information they need to be able to plan work of appropriate challenge for the differing needs of individuals within their classes.
p.4
Key findings
Behaviour and safety are inadequate because learning in some classes is regularly disrupted. This tends to occur in lessons where the tasks are uninteresting or where the teacher fails to operate the school’s behaviour management policy properly.
p.4
Key findings
The headmaster is bringing about rapid change and taking the school in new directions. Aspects of achievement, and of behaviour and safety, are improving as a consequence of satisfactory leadership and management. The rate of improvement is slowed by weaknesses in the effectiveness of some senior and Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.4
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise achievement by: tracking the impact of phonics teaching to ensure pupils who need help with their reading catch up more quickly increasing to at least good the progress pupils make in subjects other than English and mathematics.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching by: ensuring pupils’ work is marked frequently and that marking shows pupils how to improve helping teachers to use assessment information to plan work of an appropriate challenge for the range of needs in each class.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Minimise disruption to learning in lessons by: ensuring staff consistently implement the behaviour management policy providing engaging activities for pupils with plentiful opportunities for them to learn actively.
p.5
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of leadership and management at all levels by spreading the good practice that exists among some senior and middle leaders.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
Attainment on entry varies between broadly average and above average. Pupils make good progress in English and mathematics so that their attainment by the end of Year 9 in these subjects is above average. In 2011, although progress overall was good in English and mathematics, this masked the fact that pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and disabled pupils and those with special educational needs only made satisfactory progress that year. An excellent tracking system shows these two groups of pupils are now making the same good progress in English and mathematics as other pupils. The progress of all pupils in other subjects is variable because there are inconsistencies in the quality of teaching, which sometimes lead to a lack of engagement and disruption to learning. Achievement overall is satisfactory.
p.5
Achievement of pupils
The quality of learning for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is variable but generally satisfactory. In art and music lessons, pupils with special educational needs were seen to be making better progress than other pupils because either their needs were well catered for or they were particularly talented in the subject. A small number of lower-attaining pupils, who require additional help to improve their level of reading, receive individual coaching in the use of phonics. Assessments show that these interventions are helping this group of pupils to catch Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.5
Achievement of pupils
up, albeit rather slowly. This is partly because the gains made through the phonics interventions are not shared with class teachers, and there is insufficient oversight of how well the interventions are working.
p.6
Achievement of pupils
Learning is best where there is variety and pupils can actively participate in tasks or work creatively. For instance, in a music technology lesson, different groups of pupils were spread about the school but were so engrossed in their learning that all stayed on task. The pupils thoroughly enjoyed the opportunity to use professional-quality equipment and learnt a great deal about how to ‘mic up’ a drum kit and guitar amplifiers. In contrast, though, learning is weaker and less enjoyable where teachers do not actively engage pupils, or where all pupils are given the same work to do. The pace is slower in such lessons, pupils become uninterested and sometimes misbehave. Almost all parents and carers feel their children are making good progress at the school. This is true for English and mathematics but not for some of the other subjects.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Teaching in English and mathematics is consistently good resulting in pupils making good progress in these subjects. The quality of teaching is more mixed in other subjects with examples of both outstanding and inadequate teaching seen. In an outstanding history lesson, for example, pupils were very well engaged by an interesting task in which they had to review original source material including photographs, newspapers of the time and extracts from a contemporary novel to identify the features of racial segregation in America during that era. Pupils worked in small groups to share their views about what the source material showed and their excellent behaviour, together with skilful prompting and use of questioning by the teacher, ensured the lesson proceeded at a fast pace. As well as learning about the importance of citing the sources of evidence in history, the lesson made an important contribution to pupils’ understanding of the injustice caused by prejudice and
p.6
Quality of teaching
inequality when a whole nation chooses to behave in this way.
p.6
Quality of teaching
Most teaching, however, is more mundane. Often pupils are given the same work to do despite the range of differing needs in the class, meaning that the work is too easy for some and too difficult for others. In part this is because teachers do not assess work frequently enough and also because there is not one consistent approach to planning learning to meet the needs of all in the class. Scrutiny of pupils’ written work showed some good examples of marking but many books are not marked often enough. Consequently, pupils know their targets for at least one subject but almost all do not for most subjects. Pupils are often unclear about what they need to do to improve their work. Some teachers plan the development of pupils’ literacy skills in subjects other than English with, for example, mathematics teachers insisting on pupils using the correct terminology like ‘linear’ in place of ‘straight line graph’. There is little planned development of pupils’ numeracy skills in
p.6
Quality of teaching
Most parents and carers feel their children are well taught but some have concerns Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.6
Quality of teaching
about the inconsistent quality of teaching. Inspection evidence supports these comments.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Attendance is above average overall, but last year it was very low for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals. The school has made strenuous efforts this year to raise the attendance of this group of pupils. Any absences are rigorously followed up and the school has explained to parents and carers the importance of good attendance for achievement. This approach has had considerable success. The attendance of this group has risen markedly, although it is still low in comparison with all pupils nationally.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Logs recording incidents of bullying and racist behaviour show occurrences are relatively high, but this is partly owing to the importance the school attaches to ensuring all incidences are properly recorded and followed up. Nevertheless, there are instances of unacceptable behaviour and a small number of pupils express unacceptable attitudes to others. A few parents, carers and pupils complained about bullying and prejudice-based behaviour, including racist and homophobic remarks. However, most pupils who spoke with inspectors said that incidences of such behaviour were uncommon and that when they did occur, they felt the school dealt with them well.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
Over the last few years, the number of pupils excluded from school has been about twice as high as that seen nationally. The exclusion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals has been disproportionately high. Last year the exclusion figure was halved through new approaches to managing behaviour and this improvement is being sustained this year.
p.7
Behaviour and safety of pupils
High proportions of parents, carers, pupils and staff responding to a questionnaire (around one third in each case) expressed concerns about frequent disruption to lessons by a minority of pupils. Inspectors saw some incidents of low-level disruption in lessons but not at the level suggested by the questionnaires. It is clear, however, that behaviour over time is inadequate. Pupils understand the new behaviour management policy and are clear about how the system of ‘red warnings’ should be operated by teachers. They say that learning is most often disrupted in uninteresting lessons or where their teachers do not implement the behaviour management policy properly. This limits learning in subjects other than English and mathematics. Older pupils spoken to were adamant that behaviour over time has improved in lessons since the introduction of the new policy, and that disruptions to lessons are becoming less frequent.
p.7
Leadership and management
The headmaster has been in post some 18 months and has had a testing start to his time at the school. A serious budget deficit has been resolved and spending aligned with income in just one year. He has built partnerships with local schools, converted Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms
p.7
Leadership and management
the school to an academy and is leading preparations for its transition from middle school to secondary school in September 2013. His outstanding leadership and resilience in swiftly and effectively tackling this range of concurrent problems is impressive. The headmaster has embedded the systems and processes necessary to bring about rapid school improvement but recognises that there are inconsistencies in the effectiveness of senior and middle leadership. Most senior and middle leaders are positive about the headmaster’s vision and ambition for the school, feel empowered to carry out their roles, and support the changes he is making. A questionnaire to all staff shows that they strongly believe the school is well led and managed. Members of the governing body have an accurate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school and provide astute support and challenge to its leaders. The arrangements for safeguarding meet statutory requirements.
p.8
Leadership and management
A thorough review of the quality of teaching and learning has been conducted as part of performance management arrangements and informs the training provided to staff. Some teachers have the opportunity to visit other institutions to see good practice. The headmaster is running a leadership development course which some teachers attend and others are receiving training to improve their behaviour management skills.
p.8
Leadership and management
The curriculum is broad and balanced and generally meets pupils’ needs but there is insufficient development of pupils’ literacy and numeracy skills when working in subjects other than English and mathematics. The curriculum gives a high priority to promoting pupils’ social, moral, spiritual and cultural development and to combating discrimination and inequality. Values are developed in assemblies and in daily 25 minute sessions through discussions which develop pupils’ understanding of moral choices and awareness of other cultures.
p.8
Leadership and management
Self-evaluation is detailed, accurate and informs strategic planning. The school knows itself well and is aware, for example, that the quality and timeliness of communication with parents and carers have not always been good enough. The impact of planned actions is carefully monitored and trends in data and comparisons with benchmark figures are regularly reported to the governing body. Attendance has improved and is now above average overall. The achievement of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals has improved to be good as has the achievement of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs. There are indications that a new behaviour management policy is reducing the disruption to learning some pupils have experienced and a budget deficit has been eliminated. All these factors show that the school has the capacity to improve.
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Nursery schools 46 46 8 0 Primary schools 8 47 40 5 Secondary schools 14 38 40 8 Special schools 28 48 20 4 Pupil referral units 15 50 29 5 All schools 11 46 38 6
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.
p.9
Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate
Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.
p.9
Common terminology used by inspectors
Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Attendance the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Behaviour how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.
p.10
Common terminology used by inspectors
Safety how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.
p.10
carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s
main findings from the inspection of their school.
p.11
Loughborough, LE12 8JU
Thank you for your friendly welcome when we inspected your school. We found your school to be inadequate because of the disruption to learning by some of you during lessons. This is limiting the progress you could make. We have given the school a notice to improve your behaviour, which means an inspector will be coming to check on this. Over one third of you who responded to our questionnaire said that behaviour in lessons was only sometimes good or was not good very often. Your test results in English and mathematics show that you make good progress in these subjects but the progress you make in other subjects is mixed. The subjects where the teaching is consistently the best are English and mathematics. Although there is some good teaching in other subjects too, generally the quality of teaching you receive is satisfactory. Your attendance has improved to be better than is usually seen. The headmaster and senior staff are doing a satisfactory job of making your
p.11
Loughborough, LE12 8JU
I have asked the headmaster to continue to improve the school by: ensuring you make better progress in reading and subjects other than English and mathematics making sure lessons are not disrupted and all teachers use ‘red warnings’ properly giving you more interesting work to do which is not too hard for some and too easy for others making sure teachers mark your books more often and give you guidance on how to improve your work helping other teachers to be as successful at improving the school as he is.
p.11
Loughborough, LE12 8JU
You can help by maintaining your good attendance record and by always trying your best in lessons.
p.11
Loughborough, LE12 8JU
David Anstead Her Majesty's Inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion