Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2012

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tony Noonan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tony Noonan

  • Postcode verified

    LE2 7LW

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestronghigh-qualitywarmsuccessfulenthusiasticskilfulrigorousthoughtful
Criticisminconsistency

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings383w+81
  • What needs to improve93w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
466
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms M Galliers Principal Leicester College Freemen’s Park Campus Aylestone Road, Leicester LE2 7LW

p.1

progress and achieve

Thank you for your warm welcome and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 23 and 24 February 2012 to look at your work in supporting students to progress and achieve.

p.1

progress and achieve

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in supporting college students. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your college is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress and achieve

The evidence used to inform the judgements included scrutiny of documentation and meetings with senior managers, curriculum managers, tutors and students.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Senior managers have a reflective and thoughtful approach and have adapted the college’s curriculum to ensure students receive good support despite the cuts to entitlement funding.  A strong ethos prevails throughout the college that helps students to progress and achieve success. The fully committed staff work very hard and are successful in raising the aspirations of students, helping them to reach their full potential.  Students find the broad range of enrichment activities interesting and relevant. Extra-curricular activities, including many trips, are tailored and meet the needs and interests of students.  Enthusiastic and skilful staff deliver group tutorials. Topical themes are introduced at regular sessions which are adapted to meet the level and previous experience of students.  The wealth of high-quality learning materials covers contemporary topics relevant to the ‘Every Child Matters’ themes. These materials are freely

p.1

Features of good practice observed

available to staff and students on the college’s virtual learning environment.  Individual learning plans (ILPs) contain specific and measurable targets that help to keep students motivated and focused on their progress.  Tutors liaise closely with teaching staff and regularly monitor the progress of students. ILPs are held electronically and tutors have up-to-date information about the performance of their students in all aspects of their course.  Rigorous quality assurance procedures, including graded observations of group work and individual review meetings, are used to inform managers and improve the quality of student support work.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 tackling the inconsistency arising in 2011/12 in some curriculum areas where not all students receive their full entitlement of enrichment activities and the overall decrease in participation by students in sporting activities  introducing further staff training to ensure that all tutors make the most of their opportunities to promote spiritual, moral, social and cultural issues with students.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your approaches to providing support for your students. As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion